scholarly journals Simulating Treating in Place in Long-Term Care: Interprofessional Team Care Video Case for Nurse Practitioners

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 760-760
Author(s):  
Laurie Kennedy-Malone
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Authoring Tool ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Practitioner Education

Abstract As a means of enhancing clinical simulation opportunities for adult-gerontology nurse practitioner students, a series of video simulations were created for use for nurse practitioner education. With funding through the Health Resources and Service Administration (HRSA) Advanced Nursing Education Workforce grant and partnering with nurse practitioner clinical educators from Optum Health Care, a video simulation focused on the concept of treating an older veteran within a long-term care facility rather than transferring to the acute care setting was developed. The case Treating in Place: Nurse Practitioner-Led Team Management of a Long-Term Care Patient Video involved a nurse practitioner collaborating with a physician, a registered nurse, a social worker, and a family member. The interactive simulation video was developed using the eLearning authoring tool H5P to create learning experiences for students that can be used either in face-to-face classroom experiences or embedded in learning management systems. H5P is a web-based authoring tool that helps faculty build interactive course content. H5P activities provide instant feedback to students, allowing them to self-assess their understanding of the dynamic video simulation case. A faculty handbook that describes the case scenario with the interactive questions and suggested discussion questions is available. The adult-gerontology primary care nurse practitioner competencies addressed for this case are identified in the faculty handbook. These videos have been widely disseminated and are being included in nurse practitioner curriculum across the country. A QR code with access to direct viewing of the video will be included in the presentation.

scholarly journals Long-term Care Facility Variation in the Incidence of Pneumonia and Influenza

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliott Bosco ◽  
Andrew R Zullo ◽  
Kevin W McConeghy ◽  
Patience Moyo ◽  
Robertus van Aalst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Short Stay ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Facility Level

Abstract Background Pneumonia and influenza (P&I) increase morbidity and mortality among older adults, especially those residing in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Facility-level characteristics may affect the risk of P&I beyond resident-level risk factors. However, the relationship between facility characteristics and P&I is poorly understood. To address this, we identified potentially modifiable facility-level characteristics that influence the incidence of P&I across LTCFs. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 2013–2015 Medicare claims linked to Minimum Data Set and LTCF-level data. Short-stay (<100 days) and long-stay (100+ days) LTCF residents were followed for the first occurrence of hospitalization, LTCF discharge, Medicare disenrollment, or death. We calculated LTCF risk-standardized incidence rates (RSIRs) per 100 person-years for P&I hospitalizations by adjusting for over 30 resident-level demographic and clinical covariates using hierarchical logistic regression. Results We included 1 767 241 short-stay (13 683 LTCFs) and 922 863 long-stay residents (14 495 LTCFs). LTCFs with lower RSIRs had more licensed independent practitioners (nurse practitioners or physician assistants) among short-stay (44.9% vs 41.6%, P < .001) and long-stay residents (47.4% vs 37.9%, P < .001), higher registered nurse hours/resident/day among short-stay and long-stay residents (mean [SD], 0.5 [0.7] vs 0.4 [0.4], P < .001), and fewer residents for whom antipsychotics were prescribed among short-stay (21.4% [11.6%] vs 23.6% [13.2%], P < .001) and long-stay residents (22.2% [14.3%] vs 25.5% [15.0%], P < .001). Conclusions LTCF characteristics may play an important role in preventing P&I hospitalizations. Hiring more registered nurses and licensed independent practitioners, increasing staffing hours, and higher-quality care practices may be modifiable means of reducing P&I in LTCFs.

scholarly journals LONG-TERM CARE FACILITY VARIATION IN THE INCIDENCE OF PNEUMONIA AND INFLUENZA HOSPITALIZATIONS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S821-S822
Author(s):  
Elliott Bosco ◽  
Andrew Zullo ◽  
Kevin McConeghy ◽  
Patience Moyo ◽  
Robertus van Aalst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Short Stay ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Facility Level ◽  
Physician Extenders

Abstract Pneumonia and influenza (P&I) increase morbidity and mortality among older adults, especially those residing in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Facility-level characteristics may affect P&I risk beyond resident-level determinants. However, the relationship between facility characteristics and P&I is poorly understood. We therefore identified potentially modifiable facility-level characteristics that might influence the incidence of P&I across LTCFs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 100% of 2013-2015 Medicare claims linked to Minimum Data Set 3.0 and LTCF-level data. Short-stay (<100 days) and long-stay (≥100 days) LTCF residents aged ≥65 were followed for the first occurrence of hospitalization, LTCF discharge, Medicare disenrollment, or death. We calculated LTCF risk-standardized incidence rates (RSIRs) per 100 person-years for P&I hospitalizations by adjusting for over 30 resident-level demographic and clinical covariates using hierarchical logistic regression. The final study cohorts included 1,767,241 short-stay (13,683 LTCFs) and 922,863 long-stay residents (14,495 LTCFs). LTCFs with lower RSIRs had more Physician Extenders (Nurse Practitioners or Physician’s Assistants) among short-stay (44.9% vs. 41.6%, p<0.001) and long-stay residents (47.4% vs. 37.9%, p<0.001), higher Registered Nurse hours/resident/day among short-stay and long-stay residents (Mean (SD): 0.5 (0.7) vs. 0.4 (0.4), p<0.001), and fewer residents prescribed antipsychotics among short-stay (21.4% (11.6) vs. 23.6% (13.2), p<0.001) and long-stay residents (22.2% (14.3) vs. 25.5% (15.0), p<0.001). LTCF characteristics may play an important role in preventing P&I hospitalizations. Hiring more Registered Nurses and Physician Extenders, increasing staffing hours, and reducing antipsychotic use may be modifiable means of reducing P&I in LTCFs. Funding provided by Sanofi Pasteur.

scholarly journals Perspectives of Nurse Practitioner–Physician Collaboration among Nurse Practitioners in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes: A National Survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 10-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie McAiney ◽  
Jenny Ploeg ◽  
Abigail Wickson-Griffiths ◽  
Sharon Kaasalainen ◽  
Ruth Martin-Misener ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Term Care

scholarly journals Nurse practitioner interactions in acute and long-term care: an exploration of the role of knotworking in supporting interprofessional collaboration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Hurlock-Chorostecki ◽  
Mary van Soeren ◽  
Kathleen MacMillan ◽  
Souraya Sidani ◽  
Faith Donald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Interprofessional Care

Background Interprofessional care ensures high quality healthcare. Effective interprofessional collaboration is required to enable interprofessional care, although within the acute care hospital setting interprofessional collaboration is considered suboptimal. The integration of nurse practitioner roles into the acute and long-term care settings is influencing enhanced care. What remains unknown is how the nurse practitioner role enacts interprofessional collaboration or enables interprofessional care to promote high quality care. The study aim was to understand how nurse practitioners employed in acute and long-term care settings enable interprofessional collaboration and care. Method Nurse practitioner interactions with other healthcare professionals were observed throughout the work day. These interactions were explored within the context of “knotworking” to create an understanding of their social practices and processes supporting interprofessional collaboration. Healthcare professionals who worked with nurse practitioners were invited to share their perceptions of valued role attributes and impacts. Results Twenty-four nurse practitioners employed at six hospitals participated. 384 hours of observation provided 1,284 observed interactions for analysis. Two types of observed interactions are comparable to knotworking. Rapid interactions resemble the traditional knotworking described in earlier studies, while brief interactions are a new form of knotworking with enhanced qualities that more consistently result in interprofessional care. Nurse practitioners were the most common initiators of brief interactions. Conclusions Brief interactions reveal new qualities of knotworking with more consistent interprofessional care results. A general process used by nurse practitioners, where they practice a combination of both traditional (rapid) knotworking and brief knotworking to enable interprofessional care within acute and long-term care settings, is revealed.

scholarly journals Nurse practitioner interactions in acute and long-term care: an exploration of the role of knotworking in supporting interprofessional collaboration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Hurlock-Chorostecki ◽  
Mary van Soeren ◽  
Kathleen MacMillan ◽  
Souraya Sidani ◽  
Faith Donald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Interprofessional Care

Background Interprofessional care ensures high quality healthcare. Effective interprofessional collaboration is required to enable interprofessional care, although within the acute care hospital setting interprofessional collaboration is considered suboptimal. The integration of nurse practitioner roles into the acute and long-term care settings is influencing enhanced care. What remains unknown is how the nurse practitioner role enacts interprofessional collaboration or enables interprofessional care to promote high quality care. The study aim was to understand how nurse practitioners employed in acute and long-term care settings enable interprofessional collaboration and care. Method Nurse practitioner interactions with other healthcare professionals were observed throughout the work day. These interactions were explored within the context of “knotworking” to create an understanding of their social practices and processes supporting interprofessional collaboration. Healthcare professionals who worked with nurse practitioners were invited to share their perceptions of valued role attributes and impacts. Results Twenty-four nurse practitioners employed at six hospitals participated. 384 hours of observation provided 1,284 observed interactions for analysis. Two types of observed interactions are comparable to knotworking. Rapid interactions resemble the traditional knotworking described in earlier studies, while brief interactions are a new form of knotworking with enhanced qualities that more consistently result in interprofessional care. Nurse practitioners were the most common initiators of brief interactions. Conclusions Brief interactions reveal new qualities of knotworking with more consistent interprofessional care results. A general process used by nurse practitioners, where they practice a combination of both traditional (rapid) knotworking and brief knotworking to enable interprofessional care within acute and long-term care settings, is revealed.

scholarly journals Risk factors for COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalization, and subsequent all-cause mortality in Sweden: a nationwide study

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-298
Author(s):  
Jonathan Bergman ◽  
Marcel Ballin ◽  
Anna Nordström ◽  
Peter Nordström
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Prescription Medication ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Term Care Facility ◽  
Long Term Care Facility ◽  
All Cause Mortality

AbstractWe conducted a nationwide, registry-based study to investigate the importance of 34 potential risk factors for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis, hospitalization (with or without intensive care unit [ICU] admission), and subsequent all-cause mortality. The study population comprised all COVID-19 cases confirmed in Sweden by mid-September 2020 (68,575 non-hospitalized, 2494 ICU hospitalized, and 13,589 non-ICU hospitalized) and 434,081 randomly sampled general-population controls. Older age was the strongest risk factor for hospitalization, although the odds of ICU hospitalization decreased after 60–69 years and, after controlling for other risk factors, the odds of non-ICU hospitalization showed no trend after 40–49 years. Residence in a long-term care facility was associated with non-ICU hospitalization. Male sex and the presence of at least one investigated comorbidity or prescription medication were associated with both ICU and non-ICU hospitalization. Three comorbidities associated with both ICU and non-ICU hospitalization were asthma, hypertension, and Down syndrome. History of cancer was not associated with COVID-19 hospitalization, but cancer in the past year was associated with non-ICU hospitalization, after controlling for other risk factors. Cardiovascular disease was weakly associated with non-ICU hospitalization for COVID-19, but not with ICU hospitalization, after adjustment for other risk factors. Excess mortality was observed in both hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 cases. These results confirm that severe COVID-19 is related to age, sex, and comorbidity in general. The study provides new evidence that hypertension, asthma, Down syndrome, and residence in a long-term care facility are associated with severe COVID-19.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document