“They’re very passionate about making sure that women stay healthy”: a qualitative examination of women’s experiences participating in a community paramedicine program

Background Community paramedicine programs (i.e., physician-directed preventive care by emergency medical services personnel embedded in communities) offer a novel approach to community-based health care. Project Swaddle, a community paramedicine program for mothers and their infants, seeks to address (directly or through referrals) the physical, mental, social, and economic needs of its participants. The objective of this process evaluation was to describe women’s experiences in Project Swaddle. By understanding their experiences, our work begins to build the foundation for similar programs and future examinations of the efficacy and effectiveness of these approaches. Methods We completed 21 interviews with women living in Indiana (July 2019–February 2020) who were currently participating in or had graduated from Project Swaddle. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a six-phase approach to thematic analysis. Results Program enrollment was influenced by the community paramedics’ experience and connections, as well as information received in the community from related clinics or organizations. Participants viewed the community paramedic as a trusted provider who supplied necessary health information and support and served as their advocate. In their role as physician extenders, the community paramedics enhanced patient care through monitoring critical situations, facilitating communication with other providers, and supporting routine healthcare. Women noted how community paramedics connected them to outside resources (i.e., other experts, tangible goods), which aimed to support their holistic health and wellbeing. Conclusions Results demonstrate Project Swaddle helped women connect with other healthcare providers, including increased access to mental health services. The community paramedics were able to help women establish care with primary care providers and pediatricians, then facilitate communication with these providers. Women were supported through their early motherhood experience, received education on parenting and taking control of their health, and gained access to resources that met their diverse needs.

Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Following One or More Doses of mRNA Vaccine Among Care Team Members at an Academic Health System

Background: Medical University of South Carolina Health began vaccinating care team members December 15, 2020, with the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. We report surveillance data for cases diagnosed following vaccination. Methods: Care team members (CTMs) diagnosed with COVID-19 following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were self-identified during online electronic contact-tracing surveys. Demographic data, symptoms, and dates of symptoms were recorded. CTMs testing positive at MUSC were linked to viral burden data from nasopharyngeal swabs tested on Abbott PCR platforms. Results: As of January 31, 2021, 111 CTMs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 following vaccination: 99 and 12 after 1 and 2 doses, respectively, at medians of 10 days (range, 1–22) and 5 days (range, 1–16), respectively, from vaccination to testing. Of 2 cases that tested positive >14 days from dose 2, CTMs had symptom onset at 4 and 12 days from dose 2. Among CTMs reporting symptoms, 104 did so after a median of 7 days (mean 6.3, range −23 to +22) from vaccination to symptom onset, with 8 reporting symptoms before vaccination, 9 on the day of vaccination, and 3 CTMs at 1 day after vaccination, 6 CTMs at 2 days after vaccination, and 11 CTMs at 3 days after vaccination. Overall, 86 (78%) of 111 were female and 95 (86%) of 111 were white. The median age was 44 years (range, 22–71). Clinical job roles were most frequently nurses (n = 31, 28%), physicians or physician extenders (n = 19, 17%), and CTMs with no patient contact (n = 21, 19%). Assessment by the contact-tracing team assigned sources as household clusters (n = 22, 23%), local transmission (n = 21, 22%), occupational acquisition from coworkers (n = 11, 12%), travel related (n = 9, 10%), and unknown (n = 32, 34%). Only 32 (32%) CTMs were compliant with physical distancing. Among 104 CTMs reporting symptoms, cough (75%), headache (71%), rhinorrhea (63%), myalgia (60%), sore throat (48%), anosmia (44%), and subjective fever (40%) were the most commonly reported symptoms. Among 54 symptomatic CTMs with available viral-load data, the median and mean cycle numbers (Cn) were 19.98 and 21.91, respectively, for samples tested a median 3 days from symptom onset. Asymptomatic and symptomatic CTMs had a median Cn of 30.1 vs 20.9, respectively (p <0.001) and overall 50% of vaccinated CTMs had Cn >20, with no significant effect seen by vaccine dose (Figure 1). Conclusions: Most COVID-19 cases following vaccination occurred in CTMs with infection incubating prior to vaccination. No significant attenuation of viral load is apparent among vaccinated CTMs with COVID-19, but asymptomatic CTMs diagnosed with COVID-19 following vaccination appear to have resolved infections. Our data reinforce the need to adhere to public health measures by people who have been vaccinated.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

“They’re very passionate about making sure that women stay healthy”: Women’s experiences participating in a community paramedicine program

Community paramedicine programs (i.e., physician-directed preventive care by emergency medical services personnel embedded in communities) offer a novel approach to community-based health care. Project Swaddle, a community paramedicine program for mothers and their infants, seeks to address (directly or through warm referrals) the physical, mental, social, and economic needs of its participants. The objective of this process evaluation was to describe women’s experiences in Project Swaddle. By understanding their experiences, our work begins to build the foundation for similar programs and future examinations of the efficacy and effectiveness of these approaches. We completed 21 interviews with women living in Indiana (July 2019 - February 2020) who were currently participating in or had graduated from Project Swaddle. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a six-phase approach to thematic analysis. Four emerging themes resulted: 1) Program enrollment was influenced by the community paramedics’ experience and connections; 2) Participating women view the community paramedics as a trusted provider who supplied necessary health information and support; 3) In their role as physician extenders, the community paramedics enhanced patient care through communication with other providers; 4) The program and its community paramedics connected participants to outside resources, which aimed to support their holistic health and wellbeing. The results of our process evaluation suggest Project Swaddle is a promising approach to improving the health and wellbeing of women and infants. Future outcome and impact evaluations are necessary to quantify the effect of Project Swaddle on its participants.

Performance of Integrated Emergency Surgical Officers at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction. Surgical physician extenders are used in Ethiopia and sub-Saharan Africa where there is a lack of surgical providers. Methods. We tested characteristics associated with and outcomes of births attended by an integrated emergency surgical officers (IESOs) as compared to midwives and physician providers. Results. Of 1,000 women in our convenience sample, data on birth attendant was missing on 5 women (0.5%). Of the remaining women, almost three-fourths (73.6%, n = 732) of women were attended by a midwife, almost a quarter were attended by an IESO (24.4%, n = 243), 10 women were attended by a physician with a General Practitioner level of training (1.0%), 5 women were delivered by an Ob/Gyn resident (0.5%), and 5 women were attended by an Ob/Gyn (0.5%). Women had a higher likelihood of being attended by an IESO than a midwife if they underwent forceps-assisted (RR 88.4, p < 0.05 ), vacuum-assisted (RR 45.2, p < 0.05 ), or cesarean birth (RR 161.8, p < 0.05 ) as compared to an unassisted vaginal birth. IESOs are performing more operative vaginal and cesarean births than other delivery providers. Outcomes of their deliveries are worse than those of midwives, but this is likely due to the acuity level of the patients and not the provider type.

Upper Airway Stimulation Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Upper Airway Stimulation Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea provides the current state of knowledge regarding this novel therapy. It reviews the pathophysiologic basis of sleep apnea and the specific mechanism by which upper airway stimulation provides airway support in this disorder. It also provides practical insights into this therapy related to patient selection, clinical outcomes, surgical technique, long-term follow-up, and adverse events and offers recommendations for those aspiring to develop an upper airway stimulation program. It provides an overview of unique populations and circumstances that may extend the utility of the procedure, and that may provide challenges in management, as well as thoughts on the future of this technology. This textbook is intended for all practitioners who have interest or care for sleep disordered breathing, including sleep medicine physicians, pulmonologists, otolaryngologists, primary care practitioners, as well as physician extenders.

LONG-TERM CARE FACILITY VARIATION IN THE INCIDENCE OF PNEUMONIA AND INFLUENZA HOSPITALIZATIONS

Pneumonia and influenza (P&I) increase morbidity and mortality among older adults, especially those residing in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Facility-level characteristics may affect P&I risk beyond resident-level determinants. However, the relationship between facility characteristics and P&I is poorly understood. We therefore identified potentially modifiable facility-level characteristics that might influence the incidence of P&I across LTCFs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 100% of 2013-2015 Medicare claims linked to Minimum Data Set 3.0 and LTCF-level data. Short-stay (&lt;100 days) and long-stay (≥100 days) LTCF residents aged ≥65 were followed for the first occurrence of hospitalization, LTCF discharge, Medicare disenrollment, or death. We calculated LTCF risk-standardized incidence rates (RSIRs) per 100 person-years for P&I hospitalizations by adjusting for over 30 resident-level demographic and clinical covariates using hierarchical logistic regression. The final study cohorts included 1,767,241 short-stay (13,683 LTCFs) and 922,863 long-stay residents (14,495 LTCFs). LTCFs with lower RSIRs had more Physician Extenders (Nurse Practitioners or Physician’s Assistants) among short-stay (44.9% vs. 41.6%, p&lt;0.001) and long-stay residents (47.4% vs. 37.9%, p&lt;0.001), higher Registered Nurse hours/resident/day among short-stay and long-stay residents (Mean (SD): 0.5 (0.7) vs. 0.4 (0.4), p&lt;0.001), and fewer residents prescribed antipsychotics among short-stay (21.4% (11.6) vs. 23.6% (13.2), p&lt;0.001) and long-stay residents (22.2% (14.3) vs. 25.5% (15.0), p&lt;0.001). LTCF characteristics may play an important role in preventing P&I hospitalizations. Hiring more Registered Nurses and Physician Extenders, increasing staffing hours, and reducing antipsychotic use may be modifiable means of reducing P&I in LTCFs. Funding provided by Sanofi Pasteur.