scholarly journals Do young adults see value in advance directives?

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 850-850
Author(s):  
Yuchi Young ◽  
Arianna Stone ◽  
Taylor Perre ◽  
Kuo-Piao Chung ◽  
Ya-Mei Chen

Abstract Many Americans avoid end-of-life care planning; only 26% have completed an advance directive (AD). An AD promotes end-of-life care with dignity allowing individuals to make end-of-life treatment and care decisions before they are unable to do so. Previous studies related to ADs are focused on older adults with serious illness or people with functional/mental disability. The objective of this survey is to better understand young adults' knowledge of and attitude toward ADs and their preferences for ADs related to treatment and care options. Methods. Participants include graduate students (n=25) attending a state university in New York State (NYS). Data were collected using two ADs (Five Wishes; Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST)) and one survey questionnaire. Summary statistics and multivariate models will be used to address the study aims. Results. Preliminary results show the average age was 23 years, 72% were female, 48% White, and 44% Black. The majority of young adults hadn’t completed an AD; however, their attitude toward ADs was positive; the majority believe it is important to have an AD prepared at their current age; and they believe young adults would willing to fill out ADs. Young adults can make difficult treatment and care decisions when the situation requires it. Conclusion. The study findings can be useful to policy makers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders in promoting population-based healthcare decision-making. Limitation. Participants were recruited from one university in NYS; thus, the study results may be generalized to a population sharing similar characteristics.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21518-e21518
Author(s):  
Emily E. Johnston ◽  
Elysia Marie Alvarez ◽  
Olga Saynina ◽  
Lee Sanders ◽  
Smita Bhatia ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e770-e781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily E. Johnston ◽  
Elysia Alvarez ◽  
Olga Saynina ◽  
Lee Sanders ◽  
Smita Bhatia ◽  
...  

Purpose: Cancer is the leading cause of nonaccidental death among adolescents and young adults (AYAs). High-intensity end-of-life care is expensive and may not be consistent with patient goals. However, the intensity of end-of-life care for AYA decedents with cancer—especially the effect of care received at specialty versus nonspecialty centers—remains understudied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based analysis with the California administrative discharge database that is linked to death certificates. The cohort included Californians age 15 to 39 years who died between 2000 and 2011 with cancer. Intense end-of-life interventions included readmission, admission to an intensive care unit, intubation in the last month of life, and in-hospital death. Specialty centers were defined as Children’s Oncology Group centers and National Cancer Institute–designated comprehensive cancer centers. Results: Of the 12,938 AYA cancer decedents, 59% received at least one intense end-of-life care intervention, and 30% received two or more. Patients treated at nonspecialty centers were more likely than those at specialty-care centers to receive two or more intense interventions (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.62). Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with two or more intense interventions included minority race/ethnicity (Black [OR, 1.35, 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.56]; Hispanic [OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.36]; non-Hispanic white: reference), younger age (15 to 21 years [OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.56; 22 to 29 years [OR,1.26; 95% CI,1.14 to 1.39]; ≥ 30 years: reference), and hematologic malignancies (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.41 to 1.66; solid tumors: reference). Conclusion: Thirty percent of AYA cancer decedents received two or more high-intensity end-of-life interventions. In addition to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, hospitalization in a nonspecialty center was associated with high-intensity end-of-life care. Additional research is needed to determine if these disparities are consistent with patient preference.


Medical Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. 1018-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer W. Mack ◽  
Kun Chen ◽  
Francis P. Boscoe ◽  
Foster C. Gesten ◽  
Patrick J. Roohan ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Sun Kim ◽  
Won-Hee Lee ◽  
JooYoung Cheon ◽  
Jung-Eun Lee ◽  
KiSun Yeo ◽  
...  

Background. The goal of advance directives is to help patients retain their dignity and autonomy by making their own decisions regarding end-stage medical treatment. The purpose of this study was to examine preferences of advance directives among general population in Korea.Method. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was performed from October 2007 to June 2008 in Seoul, Korea. A total of 336 city-dwelling adults self-administered the questionnaire and returned it via mail. Data analyses were conducted using SPSS 17.0.Results. Subjects reported the need for healthcare providers' detailed explanations and recommendations regarding end-of-life care. When there is no hope of recovery and death is imminent, most subjects did not want to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation nor an IV or tube feeding. However, most of the subjects wanted pain management care.Conclusions. The present study showed that many Korean people have an interest in advance directives. The results show that the autonomy and dignity of patient have increased in importance. To provide better end-of-life care, there is a need to educate patients on the definition and intent of an advance directive. Additional proactive communication between patients and their caregivers should be educated to healthcare providers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document