scholarly journals REFINING AN ELDER MISTREATMENT SCREENING AND RESPONSE TOOL TO IMPROVE ACCEPTABILITY IN AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S74-S75
Author(s):  
Brian Tanksley ◽  
Theresa Sivers-Teixeira ◽  
Laura Mosqueda ◽  
Bonnie Olsen ◽  
Tim Platts-Mills ◽  
...  

Abstract Elder mistreatment (EM) is a public health problem that is rarely recognized or addressed in emergency departments (ED) where a lack of evidence-based protocols leave clinicians to rely on intuition and inconsistent action plans. In this presentation we will share findings from focus groups and online surveys with ED clinicians and administrators to evaluate the perceived value and likelihood of adopting the National Collaboratory’s third core element: the EM Screening and Response Protocol (EM-SAR). Results indicated a strong support for the EM-SAR tool in general and highlighted specific considerations for refining the tool. Considerations include resistance to adding to the ED workload, need to clarify roles and responsibilities for administering the tool, hesitancy to rely on clinical judgement to assess EM, concerns over Adult Protective Services’ ability to respond to increased reports, and a desire for cross-training and cooperation. These findings and implications for ongoing feasibility testing will be discussed.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S75-S75
Author(s):  
Alice Bonner ◽  
Kristin Lees-Haggerty ◽  
Debi Lang ◽  
Bree Cunningham ◽  
Jason Burnett ◽  
...  

Abstract To effectively address elder mistreatment (EM) in the emergency department (ED) hospitals must have mechanisms that promote and, to the extent possible, ensure patient safety post-discharge. However, the realities of working within busy hospitals--limited staff time, financial resources, and EM-specific expertise--prevent many EDs from being able to dedicate staff for patient follow up or develop EM multi-disciplinary teams. The fourth core element of the NCAEM’s ED Care Model aims to address this need with a roadmap for leveraging existing community resources. The roadmap provides streamlined tools to help hospitals assess their needs, identify existing teams and resources in their community, and connect with Adult Protective Services and other organizations. In this presentation we will present these tools and share case examples from beginning stages of feasibility testing in hospitals across the US. We will discuss specific strategies for implementing the model in hospitals of differing types, sizes, and resource levels.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 458-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy Swanson Ernst ◽  
Holly Ramsey-Klawsnik ◽  
Jason E. Schillerstrom ◽  
Carol Dayton ◽  
Paula Mixson ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 815-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth K. Anthony ◽  
Amanda J. Lehning ◽  
Michael J. Austin ◽  
Michael D. Peck

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S501-S501
Author(s):  
Theresa Sivers-Teixeira ◽  
Gregory Stevens ◽  
Kelly Sadamitsu ◽  
Christina Penate ◽  
Bonnie Olsen

Abstract Adult Protective Services (APS) workers assess clients for abuse and neglect and are asked to determine the client’s understanding of risks they face. Yet, APS workers have little structured training in how to make such judgements. The Interview for Decisional Abilities (IDA 3.0-CA) is a tool designed for use by APS workers to assess the ability of suspected victims of elder mistreatment to make decisions about the risks they face. This study evaluates the impact of training and use of this tool on the knowledge, experiences and ability of APS workers to determine decisional ability. APS workers and supervisors were recruited from central and northern California APS programs and randomized into either control (n=94) or IDA 3.0-CA training groups (n= 95). Baseline surveys measure knowledge of, and experiences with, assessing decisional ability and determining next steps for case management. Additionally, respondents determine the decisional ability of three case scenarios. Three months post-training, controls and trained subjects complete the same survey with a new set of cases. Preliminary results at baseline indicate there were no statistically-significant differences between trained subjects (n=42) and controls (n=50) in their knowledge scores (78.6% correct vs. 81.0%, p=0.6641) or performance assessing decisional ability in the case scenarios (60.1% correct vs. 63.3%, p=0.3497). Reported experiences assessing decisional ability and determining next steps in case management were also similar for trained subjects and controls. Complete results will be presented regarding change in knowledge scores, experiences, and assessing decisional ability in case scenarios compared across trained subjects and controls.


2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 601-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kylie Meyer ◽  
Jeanine Yonashiro-Cho ◽  
Zachary D Gassoumis ◽  
Laura Mosqueda ◽  
S Duke Han ◽  
...  

Abstract Elder mistreatment (EM) is a public health problem that harms millions of older Americans each year. Despite growing recognition of its occurrence, there are no evidence-based primary prevention programs. Although EM is distinct from other areas of family violence, including child maltreatment and intimate partner violence, common risk factors and theoretical underpinnings point to opportunities for prevention strategies. Drawing on evidence-based best practices found in other fields of family violence, we identify approaches that could be tested to prevent EM at the hands of family caregivers, who are among the most likely to commit mistreatment. Specifically, we examine home visiting approaches primarily used in the child maltreatment field and identify components that have potential to inform EM interventions, including prevention. We conclude that there is enough information to begin testing a prevention intervention for EM that targets caregivers.


Author(s):  
Pi-Ju Liu ◽  
Aining Wang ◽  
Laura M. Schwab-Reese ◽  
Sara K. Stratton

AbstractThis study examined elder mistreatment victims’ experiences at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on their COVID-19 awareness and unmet needs. San Francisco Adult Protective Services (APS) caseworkers conducted phone interviews with clients or collaterals (client’s family, trusted other, or service provider) to inquire about clients’ awareness of COVID-19 and unmet needs. Nine-hundred-and-thirty-four (71%) of 1,313 APS’ past clients or their collaterals were interviewed, with 741 (79%) responding positively to COVID-19-awareness questions, and 697 (75%) having no unmet needs. Binary logistic regression with Firth adjusted maximum likelihood estimation method revealed that older persons (p < .05), self-neglectors (p < .05), and victims of neglect (p < .05) were less aware of COVID-19. Unmet needs varied by mistreatment type. Victims of isolation were more likely to have medical needs (p < .05), while victims of emotional abuse were more likely to report loneliness (p < .001). Case notes reflected clients who were well-prepared for the pandemic, versus those who required additional assistance to follow preventative measures of the COVID-19 pandemic to stay home. Although the majority of San Francisco APS’ past clients experienced no unmet needs at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the prolonged length and intensity of the pandemic could have exacerbated this vulnerable group’s situation. Collaboration between service providers is key in assisting victims experiencing unmet needs to live safely in a public health crisis, especially underserved victims of specific ethnic backgrounds.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 2088-2090 ◽  
Author(s):  
James G. O’Brien ◽  
Colm Cooney ◽  
Mairead Bartley ◽  
Desmond O’Neill

Self-neglect in old age is complex, challenging, and likely to increase in the future. Self-neglect is characterized as the behavior of an elderly person that threatens his or her own safety. Self-neglect is the most common form of abuse and neglect reported to Adult Protective Services in the United States (see Teaster, 2000). Self-neglect is also associated with a significantly increased mortality in victims (Dong et al., 2009). Self-neglect has become a significant public health problem affecting not just the victims but also family members, friends, and frequently the community at large. Characteristics of self-neglect include a failure to provide oneself with adequate food, water, clothing, shelter, or a safe environment and neglect of personal hygiene and medical treatment (O’Brien, 2011).


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 73-73
Author(s):  
Pi-Ju Liu ◽  
Pamela Teaster

Abstract The rapid outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to a global pandemic. Public health measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19, such as social distancing and self-quarantine, have drastically altered people’s lives and led to social isolation, financial instability, and disrupted access to healthcare and social services. Older adults have not only borne the brunt of the highest COVID-19 mortality rates, but recent studies also describe growing reports of elder mistreatment. It is necessary to attend to these age-related disparities during the remainder of the COVID-19 pandemic and future health crises. This symposium includes four presentations on researchers’ findings in elder mistreatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. E-Shien Chang will compare prevalence of elder mistreatment before and since the pandemic, and highlight associated risk and protective factors during the pandemic. Dr. Lena Makaroun will examine changes in elder mistreatment risk factors among caregivers during the pandemic. Dr. Pamela Teaster will present Adult Protective Services’ (APS) policy and practice changes in response to the pandemic to demonstrate the pandemic’s impact on service providers. Lastly, Dr. Pi-Ju (Marian) Liu will appraise elder mistreatment victims’ awareness of COVID-19 and their unmet needs during the pandemic. Following the four presentations, Dr. Pamela Teaster will moderate a discussion on how elder mistreatment is a growing concern, especially during the pandemic, and what service providers are doing to protect older adults.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document