scholarly journals ELDER MISTREATMENT FOLLOW-UP: CONNECTING EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS AND COMMUNITIES

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S75-S75
Author(s):  
Alice Bonner ◽  
Kristin Lees-Haggerty ◽  
Debi Lang ◽  
Bree Cunningham ◽  
Jason Burnett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protective Services ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Elder Mistreatment ◽  
Core Element ◽  
Adult Protective Services ◽  
Case Examples ◽  
Ensure Patient Safety ◽  
The Us ◽  
Resource Levels

Abstract To effectively address elder mistreatment (EM) in the emergency department (ED) hospitals must have mechanisms that promote and, to the extent possible, ensure patient safety post-discharge. However, the realities of working within busy hospitals--limited staff time, financial resources, and EM-specific expertise--prevent many EDs from being able to dedicate staff for patient follow up or develop EM multi-disciplinary teams. The fourth core element of the NCAEM’s ED Care Model aims to address this need with a roadmap for leveraging existing community resources. The roadmap provides streamlined tools to help hospitals assess their needs, identify existing teams and resources in their community, and connect with Adult Protective Services and other organizations. In this presentation we will present these tools and share case examples from beginning stages of feasibility testing in hospitals across the US. We will discuss specific strategies for implementing the model in hospitals of differing types, sizes, and resource levels.

scholarly journals REFINING AN ELDER MISTREATMENT SCREENING AND RESPONSE TOOL TO IMPROVE ACCEPTABILITY IN AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S74-S75
Author(s):  
Brian Tanksley ◽  
Theresa Sivers-Teixeira ◽  
Laura Mosqueda ◽  
Bonnie Olsen ◽  
Tim Platts-Mills ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strong Support ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Protective Services ◽  
Online Surveys ◽  
Elder Mistreatment ◽  
Core Element ◽  
Adult Protective Services ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
Cross Training

Abstract Elder mistreatment (EM) is a public health problem that is rarely recognized or addressed in emergency departments (ED) where a lack of evidence-based protocols leave clinicians to rely on intuition and inconsistent action plans. In this presentation we will share findings from focus groups and online surveys with ED clinicians and administrators to evaluate the perceived value and likelihood of adopting the National Collaboratory’s third core element: the EM Screening and Response Protocol (EM-SAR). Results indicated a strong support for the EM-SAR tool in general and highlighted specific considerations for refining the tool. Considerations include resistance to adding to the ED workload, need to clarify roles and responsibilities for administering the tool, hesitancy to rely on clinical judgement to assess EM, concerns over Adult Protective Services’ ability to respond to increased reports, and a desire for cross-training and cooperation. These findings and implications for ongoing feasibility testing will be discussed.

scholarly journals Multidisciplinary Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives on Managing Suspected Elder Abuse in the Healthcare Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 868-869
Author(s):  
Lena Makaroun ◽  
Gloria Klima ◽  
Michele Nichols ◽  
Keri Rodriguez ◽  
Ann O’Hare ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Elder Abuse ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Healthcare Setting ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Protective Services ◽  
Living Situation ◽  
Adult Protective Services

Abstract Elder abuse (EA) is common and has devastating health consequences, yet is rarely detected by healthcare professionals. Veterans are at high risk for EA, and the VA has unique resources (e.g., comprehensive social work services) that can help address EA in the healthcare setting. This qualitative study aimed to assess perceived barriers and facilitators to detecting, reporting, intervening on and monitoring EA for VA providers. Providers from two VA facilities were recruited to participate in a one-on-one semi-structured interview. Transcripts of audio-recorded interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Participants (n=22) were 82% female, age 33-64 years, had 4-25 years practicing in VA, and varied in discipline (e.g., nurse, physician, social worker) and practice setting (e.g., emergency department, geriatrics, primary care). For detecting EA, patient and caregiver cognitive impairment were frequently cited barriers, while an interdisciplinary team approach and ability to do home visits were noted facilitators. Common challenges with reporting EA to adult protective services (APS) were perceived lack of APS follow up and discrepancies in VA provider and APS investigator findings. While removing a patient from an unsafe living situation was a frequently cited successful intervention, providers also expressed feeling conflicted when infringing on patient autonomy. Poor communication with APS, patient loss to follow up, and caregiver interference made monitoring EA cases more difficult; intensive case management and in-home services facilitated monitoring. In conclusion, healthcare professionals see interdisciplinary care, in-home care, and better coordination with APS as key facilitators to managing suspected EA in the healthcare setting.

scholarly journals Iowa Dependent Adult Abuse Prosecutions From 2006 Through 2015: Health Care Providers’ Concern

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette M. Daly ◽  
Yinghui Xu ◽  
Gerald J. Jogerst
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Protective Services ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Adult Protective Services ◽  
The Us ◽  
State Association ◽  
Government Data ◽  
Design And Methods

Background: In most states, health care providers are required to report abuse. Some states provide investigation feedback/findings to the reporter. The reporters rarely know if the perpetrator is convicted. The purposes of this study are to determine the incidence of Iowa dependent adult abuse prosecutions from 2006 through 2015, the incidence of convictions, and the association between dependent adult abuse prosecutions with county census and government characteristics. Design and Methods: Through the Iowa Court Information Systems, dependent adult abuse prosecution data were purchased for a 10-year time period. County demographics were obtained through the US Census and government data were Iowa State Association of Counties and the US Department of Agriculture. Results: During 2006-2015, there were 368 dependent adult abuse prosecution cases accounting for 482 original charges. Exploitation greater than $100 was the dependent adult abuse charge most frequently cited. Within the 10 years, it accounted for 60% of the original charges. Of the 482 disposed charges, 251 (52%) of the charges were dismissed. A total of 122 (14%) counts resulted in probation, 73 resulted in prison, and 37 in jail. Conclusions: For the first time, information about dependent adult abuse prosecutions in Iowa is available. The latter 5 years, 2011 to 2015, of dependent adult abuse prosecutions are significantly higher than the first 5 years, 2006 to 2010. This project encourages health care providers to report dependent adult abuse to law enforcement if appropriate as well as adult protective services.

Assessing Elder Mistreatment: Instrument Development and Implications for Adult Protective Services

2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 815-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth K. Anthony ◽  
Amanda J. Lehning ◽  
Michael J. Austin ◽  
Michael D. Peck
Keyword(s):  
Instrument Development ◽  
Protective Services ◽  
Elder Mistreatment ◽  
Adult Protective Services

scholarly journals THE INTERVIEW FOR DECISIONAL ABILITIES: DEVELOPING THE EVIDENCE BASE FOR ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S501-S501
Author(s):  
Theresa Sivers-Teixeira ◽  
Gregory Stevens ◽  
Kelly Sadamitsu ◽  
Christina Penate ◽  
Bonnie Olsen
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Protective Services ◽  
Elder Mistreatment ◽  
Adult Protective Services ◽  
Trained Subjects ◽  
Training Groups ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Abuse And Neglect ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Adult Protective Services (APS) workers assess clients for abuse and neglect and are asked to determine the client’s understanding of risks they face. Yet, APS workers have little structured training in how to make such judgements. The Interview for Decisional Abilities (IDA 3.0-CA) is a tool designed for use by APS workers to assess the ability of suspected victims of elder mistreatment to make decisions about the risks they face. This study evaluates the impact of training and use of this tool on the knowledge, experiences and ability of APS workers to determine decisional ability. APS workers and supervisors were recruited from central and northern California APS programs and randomized into either control (n=94) or IDA 3.0-CA training groups (n= 95). Baseline surveys measure knowledge of, and experiences with, assessing decisional ability and determining next steps for case management. Additionally, respondents determine the decisional ability of three case scenarios. Three months post-training, controls and trained subjects complete the same survey with a new set of cases. Preliminary results at baseline indicate there were no statistically-significant differences between trained subjects (n=42) and controls (n=50) in their knowledge scores (78.6% correct vs. 81.0%, p=0.6641) or performance assessing decisional ability in the case scenarios (60.1% correct vs. 63.3%, p=0.3497). Reported experiences assessing decisional ability and determining next steps in case management were also similar for trained subjects and controls. Complete results will be presented regarding change in knowledge scores, experiences, and assessing decisional ability in case scenarios compared across trained subjects and controls.

scholarly journals Cost of acute hospitalization and post-discharge follow-up care for meningococcal disease in the US

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith L. Davis ◽  
Derek Misurski ◽  
Jacqueline M. Miller ◽  
Timothy J. Bell ◽  
Bela Bapat
Keyword(s):  
Meningococcal Disease ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Acute Hospitalization ◽  
The Us ◽  
Follow Up Care

scholarly journals Elder Mistreatment Victims during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Administrative Data from San Francisco Adult Protective Services

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pi-Ju Liu ◽  
Aining Wang ◽  
Laura M. Schwab-Reese ◽  
Sara K. Stratton
Keyword(s):  
San Francisco ◽  
Emotional Abuse ◽  
Unmet Needs ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Protective Services ◽  
Elder Mistreatment ◽  
Adult Protective Services ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Medical Needs

AbstractThis study examined elder mistreatment victims’ experiences at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on their COVID-19 awareness and unmet needs. San Francisco Adult Protective Services (APS) caseworkers conducted phone interviews with clients or collaterals (client’s family, trusted other, or service provider) to inquire about clients’ awareness of COVID-19 and unmet needs. Nine-hundred-and-thirty-four (71%) of 1,313 APS’ past clients or their collaterals were interviewed, with 741 (79%) responding positively to COVID-19-awareness questions, and 697 (75%) having no unmet needs. Binary logistic regression with Firth adjusted maximum likelihood estimation method revealed that older persons (p < .05), self-neglectors (p < .05), and victims of neglect (p < .05) were less aware of COVID-19. Unmet needs varied by mistreatment type. Victims of isolation were more likely to have medical needs (p < .05), while victims of emotional abuse were more likely to report loneliness (p < .001). Case notes reflected clients who were well-prepared for the pandemic, versus those who required additional assistance to follow preventative measures of the COVID-19 pandemic to stay home. Although the majority of San Francisco APS’ past clients experienced no unmet needs at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the prolonged length and intensity of the pandemic could have exacerbated this vulnerable group’s situation. Collaboration between service providers is key in assisting victims experiencing unmet needs to live safely in a public health crisis, especially underserved victims of specific ethnic backgrounds.

scholarly journals Recognizing and Intervening on Elder Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in the Age of COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 73-73
Author(s):  
Pi-Ju Liu ◽  
Pamela Teaster
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Elder Abuse ◽  
Protective Services ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Future Health ◽  
Elder Mistreatment ◽  
Adult Protective Services ◽  
Age Related

Abstract The rapid outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to a global pandemic. Public health measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19, such as social distancing and self-quarantine, have drastically altered people’s lives and led to social isolation, financial instability, and disrupted access to healthcare and social services. Older adults have not only borne the brunt of the highest COVID-19 mortality rates, but recent studies also describe growing reports of elder mistreatment. It is necessary to attend to these age-related disparities during the remainder of the COVID-19 pandemic and future health crises. This symposium includes four presentations on researchers’ findings in elder mistreatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. E-Shien Chang will compare prevalence of elder mistreatment before and since the pandemic, and highlight associated risk and protective factors during the pandemic. Dr. Lena Makaroun will examine changes in elder mistreatment risk factors among caregivers during the pandemic. Dr. Pamela Teaster will present Adult Protective Services’ (APS) policy and practice changes in response to the pandemic to demonstrate the pandemic’s impact on service providers. Lastly, Dr. Pi-Ju (Marian) Liu will appraise elder mistreatment victims’ awareness of COVID-19 and their unmet needs during the pandemic. Following the four presentations, Dr. Pamela Teaster will moderate a discussion on how elder mistreatment is a growing concern, especially during the pandemic, and what service providers are doing to protect older adults.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document