P–286 Uterine vascularity in women with previous caesarean section and its potential role in implantation failure: a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Moliner ◽  
J Llacer ◽  
J C Castillo ◽  
P Cirillo ◽  
A Fuentes ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Does a previous Caesarean section affect uterine vascularisation the day of embryo transfer? Summary answer 3D vascularisation parameters show less uterine irrigation in patients with previous Caesarean section What is known already A recent retrospective cohort study demonstrates that previous Caesarean section impairs live birth rates after assisted reproductive treatment (ART) compared to a previous vaginal delivery. Furthermore, it has been hypothesized about the mechanisms by which post-cesarean section niche may diminish clinical pregnancy rates. One of the hypothetical process mentioned has been a distorted contractility of the uterus caused by fibrosis, which can influence in the vascularisation of the endometrium. Study design, size, duration We retrospectively studied the uterine contractility and 3D vascularisation parameters in women who had an embryo transfer at the Instituto Bernabeu of Alicante, between 2018 and 2020 with one recurrent implantation failure (at least two good quality blastocysts transferred from egg donation treatment). Participants/materials, setting, methods Patients with large myomas (more than 4 cm), adenomyosis or polyp were excluded. In total, 196 patients were assessed on the day of embryo transfer which 12 patients had a previous caesarean section. Uterine contractility was analyzed using 4D ultrasound after 6 minutes of video recording. Vascularisation index and vascularisation flow index were assessed after the endometrial volume definition. Main results and the role of chance Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. 3D vascularization parameters were significantly lower in women with a previous caesarean section. Vascularization Index (VI) reached 0,8% in caesarean section group (CS group) versus 2,3% (p = 0,038) and vascularization flow index (VFI) was 0,2 in CS group versus 0,8 (p = 0,038) Despite uterine peristalsis showed less contractility in those patients with previous caesarean section (0,8 contractions per minute versus 1,1 contractions per minute), non-statistical differences were demonstrated (p = 0,154) Limitations, reasons for caution This study is limited by its retrospective design and the low number of cases. Wider implications of the findings: The lower 3D vascularisation indexes support a post-Caesarean section vascular-related impaired perfusion as a hypothetical mechanism. Its correlation with a possible impairment in the embryo implantation after fertility treatments warrants further studies. Trial registration number Not applicable

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205951312110233 ◽  
Author(s):  
İhsan Bağlı ◽  
Rei Ogawa ◽  
Sait Bakır ◽  
Cuma Taşın ◽  
Ayhan Yıldırım ◽  
...  

Background: Caesarean skin scars (CSS; hypertrophic scars and keloids) are very stressful for women and treatment strategies vary. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the outcome of surgical excision of CSS during caesarean section (CS). The study aims to determine the rate of recurrence and risk factors of recurrence for surgically removed CSS. Method: This is a retrospective cohort study that used STROBE guidelines. Pfannenstiel incisions of 145 patients were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: recurred (group 1, n = 19) and non-recurred group (group 2, n = 126). The groups were compared. Results: The rate of recurrence of CSS was 13% in the total cohort (19/145), one of the main outcomes of the study. While emergency CS was performed for 12 patients in group 1 (63%), CS was carried out in 25 patients in group 2 (20%); this difference was significant ( P = 0.001). Before surgery, white blood cell and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in group 1 ( P = 0.014 and P = 0.023, respectively). There were 11 dark-skinned women (26%; Fitzpatrick type 4) in group 1 and 31 (74%) in group 2. This difference was statistically significant ( P = 0.031). As the other main outcome, emergency CS could be accepted as a risk factor for recurrence in the multivariate regression analysis ( P = 0.060; odds ratio = 5.07; 95% confidence interval = 0.93–17.51). Conclusion: The rate of recurrence of surgically removed previous CSS at CS is promising without adjunct therapy. Emergency CS was found to be a risk factor for recurrence. Lay Summary Background Caesarean skin scars (CSS; hypertrophic scars and keloids) are very stressful and are generally itchy and painful for women. Treatment strategies vary. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the outcome of only surgical excision of CSS scars during caesarean section (CS). The issue being explored There are few data in the literature for CSS in the lower abdomen. These scars can be removed during the second or third CS, but the results are not known exactly. How was the work conducted? In our clinic, 145 patients with CSS were given a CS and their scars were removed at the same time. While most of these scars were reported as hypertrophic by pathological examination, some were reported as keloid. At the earliest, one year after surgery, the rate of recurrence was found to be 13%. What we learned from the study Asymptomatic patients who are planning another pregnancy and do not want to receive any other radiotherapy or steroid injection therapy can wait to remove their CSS at the next CS, especially elective CS with or without adjunct therapy. Emergency CS was found to be a risk factor for the recurrence of these scars.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document