P044 HIGH STRESS REACTIVITY AND SYMPTOM FLARES IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS PATIENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S63-S64
Author(s):  
Jenny Sauk ◽  
Hyo Jin Ryu ◽  
Jennifer Labus ◽  
Cathy Liu ◽  
Jean Stains ◽  
...  

Abstract Psychological stress has long been implicated as a cause of symptom relapse in IBD. Whether psychological stress is associated with alterations in the brain-gut-microbiome (BGM) axis and intestinal inflammation requires further investigation. Aims: We hypothesize that stress-induced changes in BGM interactions play a role in the development of symptomatic flares in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to test this hypothesis in a prospective study of 100 UC patients in clinical remission to identify gut microbiome, brain network connectivity, and stress-associated biomarkers of UC patients at baseline that can predict the risk of future symptomatic flares. Methods: Ninety-four subjects in clinical remission (Mayo score ≤ 1 AND Simple Colitis Clinical Activity Index (SCCAI) score < 5) underwent comprehensive phenotyping, including clinical and behavioral assessments, brain imaging, and autonomic testing for heart rate variability (HRV) and electrodermal activity (EDA) before, during, and after a 3 minute arithmetic stress test at baseline, with longitudinal follow-up every 3 months and at time of flare. Clinical flares (SCCAI >5) and subjective flares (“Do you think you are in a flare?”) were assessed. Fecal calprotectin has been collected at baseline and every 3 months and at time of flare. Results: To date, there have been 18 clinical flares (19%) and 8 symptomatic flares (8.5%) in 94 patients over a mean follow-up time of 8.1 months. Baseline measurements have identified two clusters of patients (low stress reactivity in cluster 1, high stress reactivity in cluster 2), based on trait anxiety (International Personality Item Pool [IPIP]-Neuroticism), and perceived stress (Cohen’s Perceived Stress Scale) measured at baseline. These groups differed in the frequency of clinical flares (9.3% vs. 27.4%, p=0.03) and subjective flares (3.6% vs. 11.8%, p=0.28), respectively. There were no cluster differences in heart rate variability, but there was overall greater EDA noted in the high stress reactivity group (EDA: 3.99 (SE: 0.27) vs. 5.02 (SE: 0.25); p=0.007). Conclusions: Based on our current results, the frequency of symptomatic flares in UC patients in clinical remission is predicted by measures of perceived stress and trait anxiety and by heightened sympathetic arousal as measured by electrodermal activity. We expect that gut microbiome profiles and brain imaging networks will further delineate the stress-responsive subset of UC patients with heightened flare risk and that fecal calprotectin levels collected will confirm whether the stress-responsive subset of UC patients experiences biochemical flare with increase in symptoms.

2021 ◽  
pp. 144-151
Author(s):  
O. V. Knyazev ◽  
A. V. Kagramanova ◽  
A. A. Lishchinskaya

Introduction. Ulcerative colitis (UC) is one of the severe therapeutic diseases. High doses of oral granular mesalazine are required to maintain clinical and endoscopic remission of UC, which may be sufficient and supposedly more acceptable for patients, as some studies showed that adherence to topical therapy is significantly lower than to oral 5-ASA drugs.Objective of the study. To evaluate the efficacy of therapy of patients with moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis (UC) and pancolitis receiving prolonged-release ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine.Materials and methods. The evaluation of the outcomes of treatment of UC patients who received prolonged-release mesalazine was carried out. We examined 87 patients with UC who received granular ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine, of those 38 (43.7%) men and 49 (56.3%) women. The average age of the enrolled patients was 38.3 ± 12.6 years.Results and discussion. After 2 weeks from the beginning of therapy with prolonged-release mesalazine, the majority of patients – 71 (81.6%) responded to the therapy. After 12 weeks, 71 (81.6%) of 87 UC patients, who responded to therapy with prolongedrelease mesalazine, remained in clinical remission. On average, the Mayo score in the group decreased from 7.6 ± 0.99 to 2.6 ± 0.25 points. There was a significant decrease in CRP, ESR, leukocytosis, and fecal calprotectin. After 26 weeks, Mayo score in the group of patients remained on average at the level of 2.2–2.3 points. The number of UC patients with colon mucosal healing was 32 (36.8%) patients. A year after the start of therapy with prolonged-release mesalazine, 69 (79.3%) UC patients who responded to therapy had a clinical remission, of those 32 (36.8%) patients had a clinical and endoscopic remission. During the year of observation, no case of surgical intervention or re-hospitalization due to exacerbation of the disease was recorded in patients with UC who achieved remission.Conclusions. Treatment of moderate active UC should begin with oral mesalazine ≥ 3 g per day in combination with topical mesalazine. The prolonged-release mesalazines are the most preferred


2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (8) ◽  
pp. 41-46
Author(s):  
O V Knyazev ◽  
T V Shkurko ◽  
A V Kagramanova ◽  
A A Lishchinskaya ◽  
M Yu Zvyaglova ◽  
...  

Real - life data on the effectiveness and safety of biosimilar and biologic drugs licensed for treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is lacking. Aim. To investigate efficacy of original Infliximab (IFX) and its biosimilar in treating patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and determine the frequency of adverse events during 1 year follow - up period. Materials and methods. Our cohort consisted of 98 ulcerative colitis patients, treated with original IFX and its biosimilar since December 2017 till December 2018 years. Original Infliximab was prescribed in 56 UC patients (57.1%) during 5 years and longer; 16 patients (16.3%) were switched to IFX biosimilar; 13 UC bio - naïve patients (13.3%) received original IFX, 29 (29.6%) patients - biosimilar IFX. In 14 patients (14.3%) original infliximab was rotated with biosimilar. We picked out 42 patients to assess efficacy of original IFX and biosimilar. Results and discussion. Twelve patients, received original IFX and 28 patients, treated with its biosimilar, showed significant clinical improvement by decreasing Mayo index from 9.7±0.4 and 10.2±0.2 points to 1.9±0.09 and 2.1±0.1 points, accordingly. Also we noticed positive change in laboratory markers - CRP decrease from 89.6±8.7 mg/l and 77.5±8.0 mg/l to 6.5±0.8 mg/l and 6.9±0.8 mg/l (p>0.05), albumin increase from 30.1±4.7 g/l and 29.6±3.6 g/l to 34.1±6.3 g/l and 32.8±5.9 g/l (p>0.05), increase of serum iron levels from 6.4±0.5 mcg/l and 7.1±0.65 mcg/l to 14.6±4.4 mcg/l and 15.9±5.1 mcg/l (p>0.05), hemoglobin increase from 104.7±9.8 g/l and 102.2±8.8 g/l till 124±11.3 g/l and 121±10.9 g/l (p>0.05), and fecal calprotectin decrease from 1680±134 mcg/g and 1720±126 mcg/g till 245.5±33.4 mcg/g and 230.5±29.8 mcg/g (p>0.05). During 1 year follow - up 12 UC patients, treated with original IFX and its biosimilar, developed adverse events. The majority of adverse events (n=8) were registered in patients, rotating administration of original IFX and its biosimilar. Conclusion. IFX biosimilar is effective as well as original IFX. Frequency of adverse events, occurred in patients, treated with original IFX, was comparable with adverse events frequency in patients, received biosimilar IFX. Frequency of adverse events was significantly higher in UC patients, rotating original IFX and its biosimilar.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S383-S384
Author(s):  
E Dubois ◽  
A Moens ◽  
J Sabino ◽  
M Ferrante ◽  
S Vermeire

Abstract Background Data about long-term prognostic and therapeutic outcome of patients with ulcerative proctitis (UP) are scarce. Real-world data are very important as these patients are usually excluded from participation in randomised controlled clinical trials. Methods All patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis limited to the rectum (further defined as UP) and followed at our referral centre between 1998 and 2018, were identified via an automated search of electronic medical records and were reviewed for long-term therapeutic outcome. Treatment success was defined as clinical remission (complete disappearance of UP-related symptoms as judged by the treating physician) and endoscopic inactive disease (Mayo endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1 on sigmoidoscopy) if available at last follow-up. Results From a total of 1561 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), 168 patients with UP were identified (54% female, mean age at diagnosis 36 years). While the majority (118 patients or 70%) had proctitis since diagnosis, another 50/168 (30%) were diagnosed with left-sided colitis or extensive colitis but had a predominant disease course of proctitis afterwards. Nearly, all patients received treatment with 5-ASA but 71 patients (42%) were refractory to rectal ± oral therapy with 5-ASA and corticosteroids necessitating azathioprine in 41 patients (24%) and/or biological therapies in 59 patients (35%). Azathioprine was started as monotherapy in 34 patients. Anti-TNF was the first-line biological in 45 and vedolizumab in 14 patients. After a median follow-up of 76.5 months (IQR 34.3–143.8), clinical remission was observed in 143 patients (85%) and in 52/71 patients with 5-ASA refractory proctitis (73%). In this last group, clinical remission rates were significantly higher for patients treated with biologicals (44/59 or 75%) as compared with patients treated with azathioprine (8/34 or 24%; p < 0.0001). Conclusion Ten per cent of patients with ulcerative colitis from our referral centre cohort had disease confined to the rectum. With a median follow-up of more than 6 years, good clinical outcomes were recorded with 85% of patients achieving clinical remission. Nevertheless, more than one third needed escalation to biologicals to control the proctitis. Long-term outcome in patients on biologicals was superior to azathioprine. Our data do not suggest inferior outcomes for patients with proctitis compared with left-sided or extensive colitis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-120
Author(s):  
Mahsa Mahdipour ◽  
Afshin Shafaghi ◽  
Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei ◽  
Amineh Hojati ◽  
Farahnaz Joukar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S474-S474
Author(s):  
C Arieira ◽  
F Dias de Castro ◽  
T Cúrdia Gonçalves ◽  
M J Moreira ◽  
J Cotter

Abstract Background Biologic therapy has demonstrated efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it remains unclear whether oral aminosalicylates (5-ASA) should be continued or stopped after treatment escalation to biologics. The aim of the study was to evaluate differences in inflammatory biomarkers or the occurrence of complications in UC patients being treated with a combination of 5-ASA and biologics vs. biologics alone. Methods Retrospective study, including patients with UC and on biologic therapy with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Collected inflammatory biomarkers were faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The occurrence of complications was defined as the need of hospitalisation, need of corticosteroids or other top-up therapy, surgery and the occurrence of dysplasia or colorectal cancer. Results We included 65 patients with UC, 56.9% female with a mean age of 32.8 (±12.8) years. The median follow-up was 30 (6–132) months. Regarding extension, 61.5% were E3, 35.4% E2 and 3.1% E1. While 44 patients (67.7%) were on 5-ASA and biologics (infliximab = 32, adalimumab = 6, vedolizumab = 6), 21 (32.3%) were on biologics alone (infliximab = 13, adalimumab = 3, vedolizumab = 5). The median duration of biologic therapy was 30 (6–126) months. Regarding baseline characteristics, including age, gender, duration of the disease or biologic therapy and age at UC diagnosis, there were no differences between groups. No differences regarding inflammatory biomarkers were observed – fecal calprotectin (p = 0.39), CRP (p = 0.9) and ESR (p = 0.61). No differences were found regarding complications, namely the need of hospitalisation (p = 0.06) or need of corticosteroids (p = 0.89). Only one patient developed dysplasia (under infliximab and 5-ASA). Any of the included patients needed surgery or developed colorectal cancer. Conclusion About two-thirds of the UC patients under biologics are co-treated with 5-ASA. No differences between UC patients under combination biologics+5-ASA vs. biologics alone were found regarding inflammatory biomarkers or the occurrence of complications. These results raise the question if continuing 5-ASA in UC patients under biologics is really necessary.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (3) ◽  
pp. S103-S104
Author(s):  
Jenny Sauk ◽  
Hyo Jin Ryu ◽  
Jennifer Labus ◽  
Cathy Liu ◽  
Jean Stains ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document