Developing the use of convolutional neural networking in benthic habitat classification and species distribution modelling

Author(s):  
Jennifer I Fincham ◽  
Christian Wilson ◽  
Jon Barry ◽  
Stefan Bolam ◽  
Geoffrey French

Abstract Management of the marine environment is increasingly being conducted in accordance with an ecosystem-based approach, which requires an integrated approach to monitoring. Simultaneous acquisition of the different data types needed is often difficult, largely due to specific gear requirements (grabs, trawls, and video and acoustic approaches) and mismatches in their spatial and temporal scales. We present an example to resolve this using a convolutional neural network (CNN), using ad hoc multibeam data collected during multi-disciplinary surveys to predict the distribution of seabed habitats across the western English Channel. We adopted a habitat classification system, based on seabed morphology and sediment dynamics, and trained a CNN to label images generated from the multibeam data. The probability of the correct classification by the CNN varied per habitat, with accuracy above 60% for 85% of habitats in a training dataset. Statistical testing revealed that the spatial distribution of 57 of the 100 demersal fish and shellfish species sampled across the region during the surveys possessed a non-random relationship with the multibeam-derived habitats using CNN. CNNs, therefore, offer the potential to aid habitat mapping and facilitate species distribution modelling at the large spatial scales required under an ecosystem-based management framework.

2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1586) ◽  
pp. 247-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin M. Beale ◽  
Jack J. Lennon

Motivated by the need to solve ecological problems (climate change, habitat fragmentation and biological invasions), there has been increasing interest in species distribution models (SDMs). Predictions from these models inform conservation policy, invasive species management and disease-control measures. However, predictions are subject to uncertainty, the degree and source of which is often unrecognized. Here, we review the SDM literature in the context of uncertainty, focusing on three main classes of SDM: niche-based models, demographic models and process-based models. We identify sources of uncertainty for each class and discuss how uncertainty can be minimized or included in the modelling process to give realistic measures of confidence around predictions. Because this has typically not been performed, we conclude that uncertainty in SDMs has often been underestimated and a false precision assigned to predictions of geographical distribution. We identify areas where development of new statistical tools will improve predictions from distribution models, notably the development of hierarchical models that link different types of distribution model and their attendant uncertainties across spatial scales. Finally, we discuss the need to develop more defensible methods for assessing predictive performance, quantifying model goodness-of-fit and for assessing the significance of model covariates.


2018 ◽  
Vol 373 (1761) ◽  
pp. 20170446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Jarvie ◽  
Jens-Christian Svenning

Trophic rewilding, the (re)introduction of species to promote self-regulating biodiverse ecosystems, is a future-oriented approach to ecological restoration. In the twenty-first century and beyond, human-mediated climate change looms as a major threat to global biodiversity and ecosystem function. A critical aspect in planning trophic rewilding projects is the selection of suitable sites that match the needs of the focal species under both current and future climates. Species distribution models (SDMs) are currently the main tools to derive spatially explicit predictions of environmental suitability for species, but the extent of their adoption for trophic rewilding projects has been limited. Here, we provide an overview of applications of SDMs to trophic rewilding projects, outline methodological choices and issues, and provide a synthesis and outlook. We then predict the potential distribution of 17 large-bodied taxa proposed as trophic rewilding candidates and which represent different continents and habitats. We identified widespread climatic suitability for these species in the discussed (re)introduction regions under current climates. Climatic conditions generally remain suitable in the future, although some species will experience reduced suitability in parts of these regions. We conclude that climate change is not a major barrier to trophic rewilding as currently discussed in the literature.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Trophic rewilding: consequences for ecosystems under global change’.


2019 ◽  
Vol 392 ◽  
pp. 179-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sacha Gobeyn ◽  
Ans M. Mouton ◽  
Anna F. Cord ◽  
Andrea Kaim ◽  
Martin Volk ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document