scholarly journals Immune Responses to a Recombinant Glycoprotein E Herpes Zoster Vaccine in Adults Aged 50 Years or Older

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (11) ◽  
pp. 1750-1760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony L Cunningham ◽  
Thomas C Heineman ◽  
Himal Lal ◽  
Olivier Godeaux ◽  
Roman Chlibek ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Alemnew F Dagnew ◽  
Nicola P Klein ◽  
Caroline Hervé ◽  
George Kalema ◽  
Emmanuel Di Paolo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Efficacy of the live-attenuated herpes zoster (HZ) vaccine (ZVL) wanes substantially over time. We evaluated immunogenicity and safety of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in previous ZVL recipients. Methods Adults aged ≥65 years who were previously vaccinated with ZVL ≥5 years earlier (n = 215) were group-matched with ZVL-naive individuals (n = 215) and vaccinated with RZV. Glycoprotein E (gE)–specific humoral and cell-mediated immune responses and the correlation between them, polyfunctional gE-specific CD4 T-cell responses, safety, and confirmed HZ cases were assessed. Results Through 12 months after dose 2, anti-gE antibody concentrations, gE-specific CD4 T-cell frequencies, and activation marker profiles were similar between groups. Safety outcomes were also similar. No HZ episodes were confirmed. Conclusions RZV induced strong humoral and polyfunctional cell-mediated immune responses that persisted above prevaccination levels through 1 year after dose 2 in adults aged ≥65 years irrespective of previous ZVL vaccination. The RZV safety profile was not affected. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02581410.


Author(s):  
Myron J Levin ◽  
Adriana Weinberg

Abstract The adjuvanted recombinant glycoprotein E herpes zoster (HZ) vaccine is superior to the live attenuated HZ vaccine, with an efficacy >90% against HZ in healthy immunocompetent adults aged ≥50 years after vaccination. In pivotal studies, the efficacy of the new vaccine varied very little with the age of the vaccinee and decreased only by 5–10% in the 3.5 years after immunization. This nonlive vaccine was successfully administered to small cohorts of immunocompromised individuals; initial trials showed efficacy of >60–80% in several such settings. Potential drawbacks include the requirement for 2 vaccine doses separated by 2–6 months, local and systemic reactogenicity that is significantly greater than observed with commonly used vaccines, and the inclusion of a strong adjuvant that has been minimally studied in clinical settings where it might be problematic, such as in people with autoimmune diseases. Postmarketing studies are underway to address some of the drawbacks.


2009 ◽  
Vol 200 (7) ◽  
pp. 1068-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Weinberg ◽  
Jane H. Zhang ◽  
Michael N. Oxman ◽  
Gary R. Johnson ◽  
Anthony R. Hayward ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsuko Hata ◽  
Fukue Inoue ◽  
Midori Yamasaki ◽  
Jun Fujikawa ◽  
Yukiko Kawasaki ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S414-S414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrijn Grupping ◽  
Laura Campora ◽  
Martine Douha ◽  
Thomas C Heineman ◽  
Nicola P Klein ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Herpes zoster (HZ), caused by reactivation of varicella-zoster virus (VZV), typically manifests as a dermatomal rash and can lead to postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). HZ and PHN risk increase with age. Efficacy against HZ induced by a live-attenuated zoster vaccine (ZVL; Merck) declines following vaccination (21% in years 5–12 post-vaccination). To ensure protection, revaccination can be considered. Therefore, we assessed immunogenicity and safety of HZ/su, a non-live candidate vaccine containing VZV glycoprotein E (gE) subunit and AS01B adjuvant system (GSK), in adults previously vaccinated with ZVL ≥5 years before, (HZ-PreVac) compared with adults not vaccinated with ZVL (HZ-NonVac). Methods In this phase III, group-matched, open, multicenter study (NCT02581410), 2 parallel groups of adults ≥65 years of age (YOA) received 2 HZ/su doses 2 months apart. A co-primary objective was to compare humoral immune responses 1 month post-dose 2 (M3) in the 2 groups (non-inferiority criterion: upper limit [UL] of the 95% confidence interval [CI] for HZ-NonVac/HZ-PreVac adjusted anti-gE antibody geometric mean concentration [GMC] ratio <1.5). Humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated at various time points. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 days post each dose, respectively. Serious AEs (SAEs), HZ cases and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) will be recorded until study end. Here, we present data up to M3, as the study is still ongoing. Results 430 participants were vaccinated. M3 humoral immune responses in HZ-PreVac were non-inferior to those in HZ-NonVac and the co-primary objective was met as the UL of the 95% CI of the adjusted GMC ratio was 1.17 (Table 1). In addition, there were no apparent differences in CD4[2+] T-cell frequencies between groups (Figure 1). No clinically meaningful differences between frequencies of solicited AEs, unsolicited AEs or SAEs in the 2 groups were observed (Table 2). No SAEs considered vaccine-related by investigators, no suspected HZ cases and no pIMDs were reported up to M3. Conclusion HZ/su vaccination in adults ≥65 YOA who previously received ZVL stimulates strong immune responses and does not raise safety concerns. Funding GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA Disclosures K. Grupping, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary; L. Campora, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary; M. Douha, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary; T. C. Heineman, GSK group of companies: Consultant and Shareholder, Consulting fee; N. P. Klein, GSK group of companies: Investigator, Grant recipient sanofi pasteur: Investigator, Grant recipient; Merck & Co: Investigator, Grant recipient; MedImmune: Investigator, Grant recipient; Protein Science: Investigator, Grant recipient; Pfizer: Investigator, Grant recipient; H. Lal, Pfizer: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Stock as part of compensation; GSK group of companies: Employee at the time of study and Shareholder, Salary and Stock as part of compensation; J. Peterson, GSK group of companies: Investigator, Principal investigator fees; L. Oostvogels, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Shares


2008 ◽  
Vol 197 (6) ◽  
pp. 825-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Levin ◽  
M. N. Oxman ◽  
J. H. Zhang ◽  
G. R. Johnson ◽  
H. Stanley ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document