scholarly journals Development and implementation of a mobile device-based pediatric electronic decision support tool as part of a national practice standardization project

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1175-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell J McCulloh ◽  
Sarah D Fouquet ◽  
Joshua Herigon ◽  
Eric A Biondi ◽  
Brandan Kennedy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Usage Patterns ◽  
National Practice

Abstract Objective Implementing evidence-based practices requires a multi-faceted approach. Electronic clinical decision support (ECDS) tools may encourage evidence-based practice adoption. However, data regarding the role of mobile ECDS tools in pediatrics is scant. Our objective is to describe the development, distribution, and usage patterns of a smartphone-based ECDS tool within a national practice standardization project. Materials and Methods We developed a smartphone-based ECDS tool for use in the American Academy of Pediatrics, Value in Inpatient Pediatrics Network project entitled “Reducing Excessive Variation in the Infant Sepsis Evaluation (REVISE).” The mobile application (app), PedsGuide, was developed using evidence-based recommendations created by an interdisciplinary panel. App workflow and content were aligned with clinical benchmarks; app interface was adjusted after usability heuristic review. Usage patterns were measured using Google Analytics. Results Overall, 3805 users across the United States downloaded PedsGuide from December 1, 2016, to July 31, 2017, leading to 14 256 use sessions (average 3.75 sessions per user). Users engaged in 60 442 screen views, including 37 424 (61.8%) screen views that displayed content related to the REVISE clinical practice benchmarks, including hospital admission appropriateness (26.8%), length of hospitalization (14.6%), and diagnostic testing recommendations (17.0%). Median user touch depth was 5 [IQR 5]. Discussion We observed rapid dissemination and in-depth engagement with PedsGuide, demonstrating feasibility for using smartphone-based ECDS tools within national practice improvement projects. Conclusions ECDS tools may prove valuable in future national practice standardization initiatives. Work should next focus on developing robust analytics to determine ECDS tools’ impact on medical decision making, clinical practice, and health outcomes.

Rationale and design of an evidence-based tool to guide preoperative evaluation and management

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 24-30
Author(s):  
Alex R Campbell ◽  
David P Ingham ◽  
Michele F Shepherd ◽  
Joshua J Mueller ◽  
Timothy D Henry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Preoperative Evaluation ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Preoperative Testing ◽  
Support Tool

Background In the United States, over-testing and over-treatment are recognised causes of excess cost and patient harm. Healthcare value, defined as health outcomes achieved relative to the costs of care, has become a focus to improve the quality and affordability of healthcare. Aim To describe the rationale for, and development of a standardised clinical preoperative decision-support tool. Program description: An evidence-based, preoperative clinical decision tool was developed to guide preoperative testing and management of high-risk medications. Program evaluation: Patient data before and after implementation of the tool will be analysed to determine its effectiveness in reducing preoperative testing. Discussion Preoperative testing is an area that presents an opportunity to increase healthcare value and decrease healthcare spending. Guidelines are available to standardise preoperative assessment but their adoption and acceptance into practice has been slow. To systematise preoperative assessment within our healthcare system, we reviewed current published literature and guidelines and synthesised them into an electronic, evidence-based, decision-support tool. After distribution of the tool to clinicians in our healthcare system, we will assess its impact on healthcare value, costs and outcomes. We believe that an evidence-based preoperative tool, seamlessly and efficiently integrated into clinician workflow, can improve preoperative patient care.

41 Enhancing Burn Medical Care During a Disaster Using a Novel Augmented-Reality Application

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S31-S31
Author(s):  
Sena Veazey ◽  
Maria SerioMelvin ◽  
David E Luellen ◽  
Angela Samosorn ◽  
Alexandria Helms ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Tool

Abstract Introduction In disaster or mass casualty situations, access to remote burn care experts, communication, or resources may be limited. Furthermore, burn injuries are complex and require substantial training and knowledge beyond basic clinical care. Development and use of decision support (DS) technologies may provide a solution for addressing this need. Devices capable of delivering burn management recommendations can enhance the provider’s ability to make decisions and perform interventions in complex care settings. When coupled with merging augmented reality (AR) technologies these tools may provide additional capabilities to enhance medical decision-making, visualization, and workflow when managing burns. For this project, we developed a novel AR-based application with enhanced integrated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to manage large burn injuries for use in different environments, such as disasters. Methods We identified an AR system that met our requirements to include portability, infrared camera, gesture and voice control, hands-free control, head-mounted display, and customized application development abilities. Our goal was to adapt burn CPGs to make use of AR concepts as part of an AR-enabled burn clinical decision support system supporting four sub-applications to assist users with specific interventional tasks relevant to burn care. We integrated relevant CPGs and a media library with photos and videos as additional references. Results We successfully developed a clinical decision support tool that integrates burn CPGs with enhanced capabilities utilizing AR technology. The main interface allows input of patient demographics and injuries with step-by-step guidelines that follow typical burn management care and workflow. There are four sub-applications to assist with these tasks, which include: 1) semi-automated burn wound mapping to calculate total body surface area; 2) hourly burn fluid titration and recommendations for resuscitation; 3) medication calculator for accurate dosing in preparation for procedures and 4) escharotomy instructor with holographic overlays. Conclusions We developed a novel AR-based clinical decision support tool for management of burn injuries. Development included adaptation of CPGs into a format to guide the user through burn management using AR concepts. The application will be tested in a prospective research study to determine the effectiveness, timeliness, and performance of subjects using this AR-software compared to standard of care. We fully expect that the tool will reduce cognitive workload and errors, ensuring safety and proper adherence to guidelines.

scholarly journals Estimating the impact of deploying an electronic clinical decision support tool as part of a national practice improvement project

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 630-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen K Kerns ◽  
Vincent S Staggs ◽  
Sarah D Fouquet ◽  
Russell J McCulloh
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Market Area ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Febrile Infant ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Electronic Clinical Decision Support

Abstract Objective Estimate the impact on clinical practice of using a mobile device–based electronic clinical decision support (mECDS) tool within a national standardization project. Materials and Methods An mECDS tool (app) was released as part of a change package to provide febrile infant management guidance to clinicians. App usage was analyzed using 2 measures: metric hits per case (metric-related screen view count divided by site-reported febrile infant cases in each designated market area [DMA] monthly) and cumulative prior metric hits per site (DMA metric hits summed from study month 1 until the month preceding the index, divided by sites in the DMA). For each metric, a mixed logistic regression model was fit to model site performance as a function of app usage. Results An increase of 200 cumulative prior metric hits per site was associated with increased odds of adherence to 3 metrics: appropriate admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.18), appropriate length of stay (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.12-1.28), and inappropriate chest x-ray (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.91). Ten additional metric hits per case were also associated: OR were 1.18 (95% CI, 1.02-1.36), 1.36 (95% CI, 1.14-1.62), and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.62-0.89). Discussion mECDS tools are increasingly being implemented, but their impact on clinical practice is poorly described. To our knowledge, although ecologic in nature, this report is the first to link clinical practice to mECDS use on a national scale and outside of an electronic health record. Conclusions mECDS use was associated with changes in adherence to targeted metrics. Future studies should seek to link mECDS usage more directly to clinical practice and assess other site-level factors.

scholarly journals Desenvolvimento e Avaliação de uma Plataforma Colaborativa Digital para Educação e Tomada de Decisão Médica Baseada em Evidências

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1 suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 513-524
Author(s):  
Álisson Oliveira dos Santos ◽  
Alexandre Sztajnberg ◽  
Tales Mota Machado ◽  
Daniel Magalhães Nobre ◽  
Adriano Neves de Paula e Souza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Alternative Form ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Life Problems

ABSTRACT The medical education for clinical decision-making has undergone changes in recent years. Previously supported by printed material, problem solving in clinical practice has recently been aided by digital tools known as summaries platforms. Doctors and medical students have been using such tools from questions found in practice scenarios. These platforms have the advantage of high-quality, evidence-based and always up-to-date content. Its popularization was mainly due to the rise of the internet use and, more recently, of mobile devices such as tablets and smartphones, facilitating their use in clinical practice. Despite this platform is widely available, the most of them actually present several access barriers as costs, foreign language and not be able to Brazilian epidemiology. A free national platform of evidence-based medical summaries was proposed, using the crowdsourcing concept to resolve those barriers. Furthermore, concepts of gamification and content evaluation were implemented. Also, there is the possibility of evaluation by the users, who assigns note for each content created. The platform was built with modern technological tools and made available for web and mobile application. After development, an evaluation process was conducted by researchers to attest to the valid of content, usability, and user satisfying. Consolidated questionnaires and evaluation tools by the literature were applied. The process of developing the digital platform fostered interdisciplinarity, from the involvement of medical and information technology professionals. The work also allowed the reflection on the innovative educational processes, in which the learning from real life problems and the construction of knowledge in a collaborative way are integrated. The assessment results suggest that platform can be real alternative form the evidence-based medical decision-making.

scholarly journals 978. Assessing the Impact of a Mobile Device-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool on Guideline Adherence and Mental Workload

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S40-S40
Author(s):  
Katherine Richardson ◽  
Sarah Fouquet ◽  
Ellen Kerns ◽  
Russell Mcculloh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Mental Workload ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
System Usability Scale ◽  
Nasa Tlx ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Fever in infants <90 days old can indicate a serious bacterial infection (SBI) such as urinary tract infection, bacteremia, or meningitis. Clinical management of febrile infants varies widely. Implementing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can help standardize care, and electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) tools are a potential means of distributing CPGs. Little is known regarding the individual-level impact of eCDS tool use on medical decision-making. Children’s Mercy Kansas City developed a mobile eCDS tool (CMPeDS: Pediatric Decision Support) that was used internationally in a practice standardization project focused on the management of febrile infants. Methods We conducted a prospective cross-over simulation study amongst pediatric healthcare providers. Attending and resident physicians performed simulated patient scenarios using either CMPeDS or a standard text reference (the Harriet Lane Handbook). Participants’ responses in the simulation were evaluated based on adherence to evidence-based guidelines. Participants’ mental workload was assessed using the NASA Task Load Index survey (NASA-TLX, in which lower scores are optimal) to assesses mental, physical, and temporal demand, as well as performance, effort, and frustration when completing a series of tasks. Paired t-test and ANOVA were used to determine significance for case performance scores and NASA-TLX scores, respectively. A System Usability Scale (SUS) was used to determine usability of the CMPeDS app. Results A total 28 of 32 planned participants have completed trial procedures to date. Mean performance scores on the cases were significantly higher with CMPeDS vs. standard reference, (87.7% vs. 72.4% [t(27) 3.22, P = 0.003]). Participants reported lower scores on the NASA-TLX when using CMPeDS compared with standard reference tool (Figure 1). Mean score on SUS was 88.2 (scale 0–100) indicating excellent tool usability (Figure 2). Conclusion Using the eCDS tool CMPeDS was associated with significantly increased adherence to evidence-based guidelines for febrile infant management and decreased mental workload in simulation. Our findings highlight the potential value of eCDS deployment as part of CPG implementation projects. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals LO22: Implementation of an electronic clinical decision support tool to improve knowledge translation and imaging appropriateness for patients with mild traumatic brain injury and suspected pulmonary embolism

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S34-S35
Author(s):  
J. Andruchow ◽  
D. Grigat ◽  
A. McRae ◽  
G. Innes ◽  
E. Lang
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Imaging Appropriateness ◽  
Ct Head ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines

Introduction/Innovation Concept: Utilization of CT imaging has increased dramatically over the past two decades, but has not necessarily improved patient outcomes. As healthcare spending grows unsustainably and evidence of harms from unnecessary testing accrues, there is pressure to improve imaging appropriateness. However, prior attempts to reduce unnecessary imaging using evidence-based guidelines have met with limited success, with common barriers cited including a lack of confidence in patient outcomes, medicolegal risk, and patient expectations. This project attempts to address these barriers through the development of an electronic clinical decision support (CDS) tool embedded in clinical practice. Methods: An interactive web-based point-of-care CDS tool was incorporated into computerized physician order entry software to provide real-time evidence-based guidance to emergency physicians for select clinical indications. For patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI), decision support for the Canadian CT Head Rule pops up when a CT head is ordered. For patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), the tool is triggered when a CT pulmonary angiogram is ordered and provides CDS for the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC), Wells Score, age-adjusted D-dimer and CT imaging. To study the impact of the tool, all emergency physicians in the Calgary zone were randomized to receive voluntary decision support for either MTBI or PE. Curriculum, Tool, or Material: The tool uses a multifaceted approach to inform physician decision making, including visualization of risk and quantitative outcomes data and links to primary literature. The CDS tool simultaneously documents guideline compliance in the health record, generates printable patient education materials, and populates a REDCap™ database, enabling the creation of confidential physician report cards on CT utilization, appropriateness and diagnostic yield for both audit and feedback and research purposes. Preliminary data show that physicians are using the MTBI CDS approximately 30% of the time, and the PE CDS approximately 40% of the time. Evaluation of CDS impact on imaging utilization and appropriateness is ongoing. Conclusion: A voluntary web-based point-of-care decision support tool embedded in workflow has the potential to address many of the factors typically cited as barriers to use of evidence-based guidelines in practice. However, high rates of adherence to CDS will likely require physician incentives and appropriateness measures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document