scholarly journals 581 The Effects of the COVID Pandemic on Burn Clinic

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S142-S142
Author(s):  
Theresa L Chin ◽  
Rita Frerk ◽  
Victor C Joe ◽  
Sara Sabeti ◽  
Kimberly Burton ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The COVID19 pandemic has led to anxiety and fears for the general public. People were concerned about coming to a medical facility where the virus might be transmitted. Furthermore, stay-at-home orders that were implemented during the pandemic did not apply to clinic visits but contributed to people staying at home even for medical care. We hypothesized that there were delays in burn care due to the pandemic. Methods We queried our clinic data for number of clinic visits and new burn evaluations by month. Patients referred to our clinic from March 15, 2020 to Sept 15, 2020 were reviewed for time of presentation after injury. Days from injury date to clinic referral date and days from clinic referral date to appointment date were calculated. Patients who were referred but did not show and were not seen in our ED were not included because injury date could not be determined. Univariate analysis was performed. Results As seen in Figure 1, our in-person clinic volume decreased in April and May 2020 but rebounded in June 2020 as compared to the number of clinic visits for the same months last year. Similarly, in Figure 2, our new burn evaluations decreased in April and May 2020 compared to our new burn volume from 2019. However, our video telehealth visits increased in March and April then decreased in June-August. Conclusions Our burn clinic remained open to see patients with burn injury throughout the pandemic, however, clinic visits were delayed early in the pandemic. While we had an increase in video telehealth, it does not account for the decrease in clinic visits. This may be due to low enrollment in the electronic medical record encrypted communication platform and/or limited knowledge/access to the technology. Additional care may have been informally given via telephone but not well captured. Furthermore, burn care was delivered in the following months. Additional investigation is necessary to see if the incidence of burn injury decreased.

Author(s):  
Karina Tolentino-Bazán ◽  
Tatiana Chavez-Heres ◽  
Mariana Morales-García ◽  
Salvador Israel Macías-Hernández ◽  
Alma Citlallic Ramírez-Ramírez ◽  
...  

Abstract The goal of this study was to identify predictive factors that influence return to work in burn patients treated at the National Center for Burn Care and Research at the National Institute of Rehabilitation (CENIAQ) in México City. This is a retrospective case–control study that included all burn patients of working age (16–91 years old), treated between January 2011 and December 2013. Patients were divided into two groups: unemployed (no work group) and those who returned to work (RTW). The statistical analysis was performed by a logistic regression univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 210 subjects were included in the study. The mean age was 38 ± 15 years and 66.7% of them were male. One hundred sixty-five patients (79.6%) were able to return to work after treatment. Through univariate analysis it was found that the predictive factors for not returning to work after injury were: education lower than elementary school (OR: 3.59; CI 95%: 1.79–7.32); history of epilepsy prior to burn injury (OR: 10.18; CI 95%: 1.9–54.43); total burned surface area (TBSA) ≥20% (OR: 2.87; CI 95%: 1.46–5.64); third-degree burns (OR: 2.64; CI 95%: 1.32–5.29); hospital stay ≥20 days (OR: 2.8; CI 95%: 1.47–5.68); length of stay in the burn intensive care unit (OR: 2.5; CI 95%: 1.25–4.97); secondary infection (OR: 2.24; CI 95%: 1.15–4.38); amputations (one or more regardless of amputation level; OR: 8; CI 95%: 2.52–25.30); burn of the upper extremity (shoulder; OR: 2.21; CI 95%: 0.97–5.03); thigh (OR: 2.41; CI 95%: 1.32–5.14); and knee (OR: 2.81; CI 95%: 1.21–6.55). Some of these factors have never been reported by other authors.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Sanders
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 476
Author(s):  
Ioana Tichil ◽  
Samara Rosenblum ◽  
Eldho Paul ◽  
Heather Cleland

Objective: To determine blood transfusion practices, risk factors, and outcomes associated with the use of blood products in the setting of the acute management of burn patients at the Victorian Adult Burn Service. Background: Patients with burn injuries have variable transfusion requirements, based on a multitude of factors. We reviewed all acute admissions to the Victorian Adult Burns Service (VABS) between 2011 and 2017: 1636 patients in total, of whom 948 had surgery and were the focus of our analysis. Method and results: Patient demographics, surgical management, transfusion details, and outcome parameters were collected and analyzed. A total of 175 patients out of the 948 who had surgery also had a blood transfusion, while 52% of transfusions occurred in the perioperative period. The median trigger haemoglobin in perioperative was 80mg/dL (IQR = 76–84.9 mg/dL), and in the non-perioperative setting was 77 mg/dL (IQR = 71.61–80.84 mg/dL). Age, gender, % total body surface area (TBSA) burn, number of surgeries, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were associated with transfusion. Conclusions: The use of blood transfusions is an essential component of the surgical management of major burns. As observed in our study, half of these transfusions are related to surgical procedures and may be influenced by the employment of blood conserving strategies. Furthermore, transfusion trigger levels in stable patients may be amenable to review and reduction. Risk adjusted analysis can support the implementation of blood transfusion as a useful quality indicator in burn care.


Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Leonard ◽  
Stefano Miceli Sopo ◽  
Mary Grace Baker ◽  
Alessandro Fiocchi ◽  
Robert A. Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S67-S68
Author(s):  
Erika Tay ◽  
Ché R Ochtli ◽  
Katharine A Kirby ◽  
Melissa Carmean ◽  
Nicole O Bernal ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Access to quality health care services is important for acute burn care, but comprehensive burn care goes beyond acute hospitalization. Follow up is an essential part of recovery, where providers can assess late effects of burn and help the patients with community re-integration, injury rehabilitation, and mental health. However, not all patients return for follow up after burn injury due to barriers in care and patient characteristics. We hypothesized that patients with neuropsychiatric comorbidities and 0–10% of total body surface (TBSA%) are more likely to be lost at follow up compared to patients with no neuropsychiatric comorbidities and higher TBSA. Methods A retrospective analysis was completed on patients that were admitted to a verified Burn Center from January 2016 to June 2019. Patients that were under 18 years of age and patients that died prior to discharge were excluded. Patient characteristics included were age, gender, TBSA, discharge location, payer, and comorbidities. Univariate analysis was completed using Tableau and multiple logistic regression analysis using Stata. Neuropsychiatric comorbidities were defined as dementia, alcoholism, major psychiatric disease, and drug dependence. Lost to follow up was defined as no follow up in clinic after inpatient discharge date within 1 month. Results Of 562 patients, 35.94% (n=202) were female and 65.12% (n=366) were Caucasian followed by Asian 13.7% (n=77) and Other Race 13.7% (n=77). Of the 562 patients, 157 (27.95%) were lost to follow up. After adjusting for insurance type, race, and medical comorbidities, patients with neuropsychiatric comorbidities had double the risk (OR 2.052; 1.377 - 3.057 p< 0.001) to be lost at follow up compared with those that did not have neuropsychiatric disorders. Homelessness was collinear with neuropsychiatric comorbidities suggesting an association. Patients with a TBSA >20% (n=37) were 3 times more likely to be lost at follow up in comparison with patients with 0–10% TBSA. (OR 2.921; 1.455–5.861 p< 0.003). Race, medical comorbidities, and insurance status had no significant impact on follow up. Conclusions Patients with dementia, alcoholism, major psychiatric disease, and drug dependence were more likely to be lost at follow up. Contrary to intuition, patients with burns >20% TBSA were also less likely to follow-up. Additional research is needed to better identify how psychosocial factors affect follow up in our burn patients and how to address those barriers. By focusing on our population and their needs, we can adjust our practices to make sure that we are providing holistic burn care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
Ade Suherman ◽  
Tetep Tetep ◽  
Asep Supriyatna ◽  
Eldi Mulyana ◽  
Triani Widyanti ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain public perceptions of the implementation of social distancing during the pandemic as the implementation of social capital. This study was motivated by the phenomenon of the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic in a number of countries, including Indonesia. This condition not only affects the economic condition of a country, hinders social interaction among the community, and also has an impact on the health condition of every human being. To avoid the wider spread of Covid-19, the government was forced to adopt social distancing and physical distancing policies in the form of staying at home, working from home, studying, and worshiping at home. This research approach is descriptive qualitative. The data of this research is the impact of social distancing for the community in Tarogong Kidul District, Garut Regency. Sources of data come from several communities with a total of 50 respondents. Collecting data in this study using interview techniques, record, and continue to take notes. The results of the research can be concluded that with the implementation of social distancing in the pandemic period, at least the community can implement social capital which includes informal values ​​or norms that are shared among members of an interrelated community group, which is based on the values ​​of beliefs, norms and networks social and they respect each other, the development of social capital is the creation of increasingly independent groups of people who are able to participate more meaningfully. Social capital can solve citizens' problems, especially with regard to strengthening friendship, repairing and maintaining public service facilities because it has advantages and is the most appropriate, even though there are other social capital in the community.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document