The Influence of the Phonetic Elements of a Name on Risk Assessment

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-145
Author(s):  
Keith A Botner ◽  
Arul Mishra ◽  
Himanshu Mishra

Abstract The authors propose that the phonetic elements of a name affect risk perception. Specifically, they find that people prefer a name that evokes volatility when faced with a risky prospect, but prefer a name that evokes calmness when faced with a safe prospect. The authors posit that a volatile (vs. calm) prospect name results in more perceived fluctuations, and thus greater movement from, the given risk level. Therefore, a volatile prospect name results in a wider range of probabilities compared to a calm prospect name. The authors test the proposed effect and the role of the phonetic elements of a name using real-world data and controlled studies within diverse consumer domains (e.g., product evaluations, wagering, and branding). Findings contribute to the larger theoretical area of phonetic symbolism and provide guidance for practitioners trying to maximize preference for a given product, service, or policy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 100043
Author(s):  
Eleni Gavriilaki ◽  
Eudoxia-Evaggelia Koravou ◽  
Thomas Chatziconstantinou ◽  
Christina Kalpadaki ◽  
Nikoleta Printza ◽  
...  

Contraception ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Reed ◽  
Thai Do Minh ◽  
Jens A. Lange ◽  
Carol Koro ◽  
Michelle Fox ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Klonoff

Real-world evidence (RWE) is the clinical evidence about benefits or risks of medical products derived from analyzing real world data (RWD), which are data collected through routine clinical practice. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of RWE studies, how these studies differ from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), how to overcome barriers to current skepticism about RWE, how FDA is using RWE, how to improve the quality of RWE, and finally the future of RWE trials.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-70
Author(s):  
Martina Zeleňáková ◽  
Ibrahim Gargar ◽  
Pavol Purcz

Abstract Environmental hazards (natural and man-made) have always constituted problem in many developing and developed countries. Many applications proved that these problems could be solved through planning studies and detailed information about these prone areas. Determining time and location and size of the problem are important for decision makers for planning and management activities. It is important to know the risk represented by those hazards and take actions to protect against them. Multicriteria analysis methods - Analytic hierarchy process, Pairwise comparison, Ranking method are used to analyse which is the most dangerous hazard facing Libya country. The multicriteria analysis ends with a more or less stable ranking of the given alternatives and hence a recommendation as to which alternative(s) problems should be preferred. Regarding our problem of environmental risk assessment, the result will be a ranking or categorisation of hazards with regard to their risk level.


2017 ◽  
Vol 187 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inbal Goldshtein ◽  
Yariv Gerber ◽  
Sophia Ish-Shalom ◽  
Moshe Leshno

2018 ◽  
Vol 378 (23) ◽  
pp. 2155-2157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann W. McMahon ◽  
Gerald Dal Pan

The Breast ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S22
Author(s):  
George W. Sledge

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document