Part I Commercial Arbitration in the Energy Sector, 3 Gas Supply Transactions and Disputes

Author(s):  
Finizio Steven ◽  
Howe Michael

This chapter first describes the main transactions that occur in relation to the supply of natural gas after its exploration. In particular, it studies contracts relating to: the production of gas (including drilling contracts), the processing of gas, the transportation of gas (including in pipelines and as liquefied natural gas (LNG) by ship), the storage of gas, the sale of gas from producers to wholesalers, and the sale of gas from wholesalers to end users. The chapter then discusses disputes that typically arise in relation to those transactions, including transportation infrastructure disputes and storage disputes. It pays particular attention to disputes relating to long-term gas sale and purchase agreements (GSPAs), an important number of which have led to high-profile arbitration proceedings in recent years. The chapter, therefore, analyzes in detail the clauses typically contained in those agreements, and the issues that typically arise in arbitration — in particular, gas price reviews.

Significance Sonatrach is preparing to renegotiate most of its long-term contracts to supply natural gas by pipeline and as liquefied natural gas (LNG), as their expiry dates approach in 2019 and 2020. Ould Kaddour, who was appointed Sonatrach’s chief executive one year ago after a period of turbulence within Sonatrach, has made clear that he appreciates the need for a flexible approach in an intensely competitive market. Impacts Algeria’s hydrocarbons production is declining, but global demand for LNG in particular is rising fast. Securing new natural gas supply contracts will be vital for Algeria’s revenue prospects. Ould Kaddour’s efforts to foster better relations with international companies could be rewarded by increased investment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 31-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marte Fodstad ◽  
Kristin Tolstad Uggen ◽  
Frode Rømo ◽  
Arnt-Gunnar Lium ◽  
Geert Stremersch

2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Kuwahara ◽  
S.V Bajay ◽  
L.N Castro

Energy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 70-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suwon Seo ◽  
Sangheon Han ◽  
Sangick Lee ◽  
Daejun Chang

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 412
Author(s):  
Sindre Knutsson

Increasing spreads between spot liquefied natural gas (LNG) and oil-indexed contracts have resulted in the world’s top three LNG buyers paying a cost premium of $33 billion in 2019 and 23 billion in 2020. The top three buyers are Japan, China and South Korea, which had a combined 151Mt of long-term LNG contracts indexed to oil in 2020. This cost premium shows what top Asian buyers are currently paying for the security of LNG supply through long-term oil-indexed contracts. However, it also shows the potential reward Asian buyers have if they manage to develop a liquid LNG pricing hub in Asia to which they can index their contracts. Japanese buyers’ efforts of increasing flexibility in contracts, both through take-or-pay agreements and destination flexibility and aims of growing the spot market, will increasingly support the liquidity of the LNG market. However, there will be resistance from the other side of the table, for where someone is paying a premium, or making a loss, someone is making money. 2020 was another year of plenty for LNG producers selling oil-indexed volumes to Asian markets. Australia is the largest seller of LNG to Japan, China and South Korea with over 60Mt of long-term LNG contracts indexed to oil in 2020. Australia has benefited from having their contracts indexed to oil, but what’s next? In this paper, Rystad Energy will discuss the future market for Australian LNG exports including development in LNG demand, contract trends and price spreads.


1981 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
B. P. McCaul

Natural gas price structures in Australia vary widely from state to state. Long-term low-base-price contracts with inadequate, but freely entered into, price escalation clauses are the main cause of this discrepancy.Natural gas pricing structures in Australia evolved from the cost of alternate energy forms or market conditions prior to 1970, when the first contracts were negotiated. Major changes in the pricing environment have since occurred. New factors include substantial Government control or influence and the development of a monopsonistic market in place of the previous situation where there were alternative sales outlets.The influence of gas utilities on the overall gas price structure has changed dramatically in the last 10 years.Explorers are looking to new marketing and gas use concepts to obtain a more equitable return for their risk than the present monopsonistic market promises to allow. They do not accept that the reward for success should reside with the gas utilities as it currently does, rather than with them as the original risk takers.The industry should itself make changes in current gas pricing structures to correct inequitable and anomalous situations. This would preempt probable Government interference.A free market system is the best long-term policy to ensure efficient exploration and economic use of natural gas.


2019 ◽  
Vol 222 ◽  
pp. 414-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Strantzali ◽  
Konstantinos Aravossis ◽  
Georgios A. Livanos ◽  
Christos Nikoloudis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document