Health Can Be Measured

Author(s):  
Joshua A. Salomon

This chapter defends the view that it is possible to measure the quantity of health and not simply the value of health and that the 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) shows how this might be done. The author begins by offering a brief introduction to the GBD, focusing in particular on the evolution of measurement constructs and approaches pertaining to disability weights over the first several iterations of the GBD. The author then describes the new approach to disability weights measurement taken in the GBD 2010 study. Based on this, the chapter presents a conceptual framework and empirical evidence to support the claim that it is possible to measure quantities of health.

The Lancet ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 381 (9860) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh R Taylor ◽  
Jost B Jonas ◽  
Jill Keeffe ◽  
Janet Leasher ◽  
Kovin Naidoo ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 380 (9859) ◽  
pp. 2129-2143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua A Salomon ◽  
Theo Vos ◽  
Daniel R Hogan ◽  
Michael Gagnon ◽  
Mohsen Naghavi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Daniel M. Hausman

This essay is concerned with conceptualizing the measurement of overall health. Its conclusion—that the measurement of health consists in assigning a value to health rather than in measuring some quantity or magnitude of health—challenges some of the claims made in the 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study (Salomon et al. 2012). The arguments here are drawn from the author’s book, Valuing Health: Well-Being, Freedom, and Suffering (Hausman 2015) and in several cases are developed further there. After saying a few words about why health needs to be measured or valued, what health is, and what measurement requires, the chapter argues that health is not measurable, because the relation “is at least as healthy as” is massively incomplete. The author also argues that even though the value of health is measurable, health itself cannot be measured indirectly by its value.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document