Models of Service Development and Delivery for People with Intellectual Disability

Author(s):  
Sujeet Jaydeokar ◽  
John Devapriam ◽  
Jane McCarthy ◽  
Chaya Kapugama ◽  
Sabyasachi Bhaumik

It is important to ensure that people with intellectual disability (ID) have access to high quality healthcare services. There is a wide variation in the availability of services and service delivery models globally for people with ID. Reasons for these variations are examined including availability of workforce resources and the development and availability of specialist resources. Tracing the development of services across the world, the chapter goes on to review the ongoing debate on access to generalized healthcare services versus the role of specialist services. We review advantages and disadvantages of different service delivery models. While these models have evolved in response to the political, cultural, and economic environment, it is important that any development of service delivery model signs up to basic underlying principles of person-centred, right-based, and outcome-focused approach. This should be undertaken in partnership with service users and carers in the spirit of co-production and with the underlying principles of choice, inclusion, rights, and independence. Any service development should also ensure that it would meet the complex health needs of people with ID as described in the tiered model of services with an efficient use of available resources. It should be sustainable through development of skills, competencies, and capabilities of the workforce and agencies that work with people with ID. There are number of examples across countries of innovative service provisions by public, private, and voluntary sectors as described in the chapter and it is important that we learn from those models. Advocating should be an integral aspect of any service delivery; we should be constantly advocating globally for high quality healthcare based on the best available evidence for people with ID.

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Carol Dudding

Whether in our professional or private lives, we are all aware of the system wide efforts to provide quality healthcare services while containing the costs. Telemedicine as a method of service delivery has expanded as a result of changes in reimbursement and service delivery models. The growth and sustainability of telehealth within speech-language pathology and audiology, like any other service, depends on the ability to be reimbursed for services provided. Currently, reimbursement for services delivered via telehealth is variable and depends on numerous factors. An understanding of these factors and a willingness to advocate for increased reimbursement can bolster the success of practitioners interested in the telehealth as a service delivery method.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-75
Author(s):  
Karen Whittaker ◽  
Jane V Appleton ◽  
Sue Peckover ◽  
Cheryll Adams

The organisation of health visitor work is an important part of service design, which can have an impact on when and where services are provided and who gains access. This article reports a 2018 survey of UK health visitors conducted to provide an overview of the range of ways in which health visitor cases and workloads are organised. The 584 respondents confirmed the operation of three broad types of health visitor service delivery models; namely, the individual case, the corporate case and the combination model. Themes that emerged from practitioners' experiences of working with the different models reflected concerns about continuity and staffing, accommodating different needs and different services in different places. Overall, the data indicated a lack of consistency in health visitor service across the UK. The advantages and disadvantages of each workload model are detailed and considered with respect to markers of a quality service, including achieving relationships with clients and sufficient communication within and across teams.


2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
CATHERINE J. EVANS ◽  
LUCY ISON ◽  
CLARE ELLIS‐SMITH ◽  
CAROLINE NICHOLSON ◽  
ALESSIA COSTA ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e004484
Author(s):  
Helen Burn ◽  
Lisa Hamm ◽  
Joanna Black ◽  
Anthea Burnett ◽  
Matire Harwood ◽  
...  

PurposeGlobally, there are ~370 million Indigenous peoples. Indigenous peoples typically experience worse health compared with non-Indigenous people, including higher rates of avoidable vision impairment. Much of this gap in eye health can be attributed to barriers that impede access to eye care services. We conducted a scoping review to identify and summarise service delivery models designed to improve access to eye care for Indigenous peoples in high-income countries.MethodsSearches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health in January 2019 and updated in July 2020. All study designs were eligible if they described a model of eye care service delivery aimed at populations with over 50% Indigenous peoples. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles and completed data charting. We extracted data on publication details, study context, service delivery interventions, outcomes and evaluations, engagement with Indigenous peoples and access dimensions targeted. We summarised findings descriptively following thematic analysis.ResultsWe screened 2604 abstracts and 67 studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Studies were focused on Indigenous peoples in Australia (n=45), USA (n=11), Canada (n=7), New Zealand (n=2), Taiwan (n=1) and Greenland (n=1). The main disease focus was diabetic retinopathy (n=30, 45%), followed by ‘all eye care’ (n=16, 24%). Most studies focused on targeted interventions to increase availability of services. Fewer than one-third of studies reported involving Indigenous communities when designing the service. 41 studies reflected on whether the model improved access, but none undertook rigorous evaluation or quantitative assessment.ConclusionsThe geographical and clinical scope of service delivery models to improve access to eye care for Indigenous peoples in high-income countries is narrow, with most studies focused on Australia and services for diabetic retinopathy. More and better engagement with Indigenous communities is required to design and implement accessible eye care services.


The Lancet ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 388 (10042) ◽  
pp. 401-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevan Wylie ◽  
Gail Knudson ◽  
Sharful Islam Khan ◽  
Mireille Bonierbale ◽  
Suporn Watanyusakul ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin N. Cole ◽  
Susan R. Harris ◽  
Sheila F. Eland ◽  
Paulette E. Mills

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (S6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cuc H. Tran ◽  
Brittany K. Moore ◽  
Ishani Pathmanathan ◽  
Patrick Lungu ◽  
N. Sarita Shah ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document