Paradigms

Author(s):  
Alicia O'Cathain

A paradigm is a world view held by members of a research community. It determines what humans can know and how to undertake research to generate knowledge. It shapes how research is undertaken and how quality is judged. In mixed methods evaluations combining qualitative research and RCTs, the implicit paradigm is often post-positivism. There are alternative paradigms such as participatory action research and realist evaluation. The status of qualitative research within a mixed methods evaluation may depend on the paradigm adopted. Researchers undertaking qualitative research may adopt a different philosophical stance from those undertaking the RCT. It is important to have team discussions about paradigms throughout a mixed methods evaluation to understand the variety of stances within the team. This chapter focuses on the range of paradigms researchers adopt and some of the challenges researchers face when combining qualitative research and RCTs within different paradigms.

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Limarys Caraballo ◽  
Jamila Lyiscott

Youth participatory action research is part of a revolutionary effort in educational research to take inquiry-based knowledge production out of the sole purview of academic institutions and include those who most directly experience the educational contexts that scholars endeavor to understand. Seeking to extend the robust legacy of participatory action research in schools and communities, in this article, we focus on the pedagogical contributions of youth participatory action research collaborations for the teaching of critical qualitative research. We discuss strategies developed and implemented in an after-school youth participatory action research seminar in order to highlight how collaborative educational spaces can contribute to teaching and engaging in critical qualitative research. We also reflect, in our role as educators and researchers, on the possibilities and limitations of teaching qualitative research critically and reflexively, particularly at the intersection of qualitative action research, critical literacies, and youth social action. We conclude with a discussion of the broader implications of collaborative inquiry for the teaching of qualitative research in education and beyond.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Nurhayati Nurhayati ◽  
Khairuddin Khairuddin ◽  
Fitri Hayati ◽  
Reni Ria Armayani Hasibuan

<p><em>The victims where the majority are women do not only experience physical trauma but also psychic trauma. Therefore the victim does not only need mental and spiritual strength, but also they have to be empowered economically to be able to overcome their life problem. This research is qualitative research with PAR approach (Participatory Action Research) that involves all active stakeholders to address and overcome the problem in order there is significant change to the life of the victim. This research finds that economic empowerment is one of ways to increase the spirit, creativity and motivation of the survivors to increase their family income so stimulating entrepreneur spirit to be able to compete economically. The economic empowerment strategy of the survivor of human trafficking is done in some phases. First, cognitive delivery by encouraging the survivor think in order they can come up with the solution about the problem at hand. Second, giving the training of flower bouquet, bridal bale, creating wall and door decoration by recycling used bottle and plastic. Through this empowerment is expected the survivors have ability to survive and find new things to live. </em></p><p>Korban yang mayoritas perempuan tidak hanya mengalami trauma fisik tetapi juga psikis. Korban <em>trafficking</em> tidak hanya membutuhkan kekuatan mental dan spiritual tetapi juga harus diberdayakan secara ekonomi untuk mampu menghadapi problema kehidupan. Penelitian ini memakai metode kualitatif melalui pendekatan PAR (<em>Participatory Action Research</em>) menggunakan melibatkan berbagai pihak yang relevan secara aktif untuk menyelesaikan dilema beserta sebagai akibatnya terjadi perubahan yang signifikan dalam kehidupan para korban. Melalui penelitian ini diperoleh hasil bahwa pemberdayaan ekonomi menjadi salah satu metode meningkatkan semangat, kreatifitas dan motivasi para korban untuk memperkuat ekonomi keluarga sehingga memunculkan semangat wirausaha untuk bisa bersaing secara ekonomi. Strategi pemberdayaan ekonomi korban <em>trafficking</em> dilakukan dengan beberapa tahap. Pertama, pemberian kognitif dengan mengajak berpikir agar mereka bisa memberikan solusi terhadap permasalahan yang dihadapi. Kedua, dengan pelatihan merangkai bunga dan bale pernikahan serta pembuatan hiasan dinding dan pintu dengan memanfaatkan plastik dan botol bekas. Dengan pemberdayaan ini diharapkan para korban memiliki kemampuan untuk survive dan menemukan hal-hal baru untuk bertahan hidup. </p><p align="center"> </p>


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-350
Author(s):  
Zoë C. Meleo-Erwin

Participatory Action Research (PAR) may be conceived of as a politic or an epistemology rather than a rigid methodology. If this is the case, how can PAR inform other qualitative methodologies? How can qualitative researchers adopt the spirit of PAR without doing PAR work itself? In this work, I seek to explore these questions by reviewing how PAR can guide my future dissertation work on the productive effects of the obesity epidemic. I examine how I might base my research in the ethics and politics of social justice and yet also remain open to and accountable for the ways in which my choice of methods reflects what can be seen as the colonizing approach of traditional social science.


2013 ◽  
Vol 115 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Bautista ◽  
Melanie Bertrand ◽  
Ernest Morrell ◽  
D'Artagnan Scorza ◽  
Corey Matthews

Background The research community has long documented educational disparities along race lines. Countless studies have shown that urban African American and Latino students are systematically denied educational resources in comparison to their white counterparts, resulting in persistent achievement disparities. Though this research is thorough in many regards, it consistently lacks the voices of the Latino and African American students themselves. This omission not only silences those most affected by educational inequalities, it also denies the research community valuable insights. Purpose This article discusses an analysis of a youth participatory action research (YPAR) program, the Council of Youth Research, in which urban youth of color research educational conditions. We address the following research questions: 1. How do the Council youth appropriate traditional tools of research? How do they adapt and transform these tools to serve their purposes? 2. What methodological insights can adult educational researchers draw from the study of an intervention project that seeks to center the voice and perspectives of youth? 3. How does YPAR as it is practiced by Council youth challenge what is considered as legitimate and transformative research? Research Design To address our research questions, we conducted ethnographic research on the Council during the summer of 2010 and the 2010-2011 school year. Findings We demonstrate how the students in the Council appropriated traditional research methods for critical uses and employed creative approaches to conveying research findings. We focus on the students’ use of participant observation, database analysis, and interviews, and describe the multimodal avenues through which the students conveyed findings. Conclusion Our study points to alternatives to traditional research that take advantage of urban students’ positionality and insights. We argue that the perspective of youth of color, especially in working-class, urban areas, is integral to our understanding of problems in urban schools as well as approaches to transforming inequitable learning conditions and structures. Until we make the power of research accessible to young people and other marginalized communities, educational research will be limited in its scope and impact.


Author(s):  
Odessa Gonzalez Benson ◽  
Ana Paula Pimentel Walker ◽  
James M. Ellis ◽  
Mieko Yoshihama ◽  
Maki Usui ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Patricia Cranton

The purpose of this chapter is to introduce readers to how teachers can be taught about research in ways that are meaningful for them and relevant to their practice. The three main research paradigms are described, paradigms that are defined based on the kind of knowledge being sought. Mixed methods research is also acknowledged as possibly being in a fourth paradigm. It is action research and participatory action research (also called “teacher research”) that most closely illustrates how teachers can meaningfully engage in research relevant to their practice. These methodologies are described, and then a template for a research course for teachers is provided. Finally, practical examples of participatory and action research are provided, followed by suggestions for the future development of teacher research, including narrative inquiry and arts-based research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document