Free Will and Quantum Mechanics

The Monist ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-426
Author(s):  
Mario De Caro ◽  
Hilary Putnam

Abstract In the last few decades, the relevance of quantum mechanics to the free-will debate has been discussed at length, especially in relation to the prospects of libertarianism (the view according to which humans enjoy an indeterministic kind of free will). Basing his interpretation on Anscombe’s seminal work, Putnam argued in 1979 that, given that quantum mechanical indeterminacy is holistic at the macrolevel—i.e., it is not traceable to atomistic events such as quantum jumps of single atoms—it can provide libertarians with the kind of freedom they seek. As shown in this article, however, Putnam ultimately reached the conclusion—together with the other author of this article—that his argument was wrong due to problems with the way it appealed to the Uncertainty Principle.**

2021 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano ◽  
Luciano Petruzziello

AbstractWe study the implications of the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) with a minimal measurable length on some quantum mechanical interferometry phenomena, such as the Aharonov–Bohm, Aharonov–Casher, COW and Sagnac effects. By resorting to a modified Schrödinger equation, we evaluate the lowest-order correction to the phase shift of the interference pattern within two different GUP frameworks: the first one is characterized by the redefinition of the physical momentum only, and the other is a Lorentz covariant GUP which also predicts non-commutativity of spacetime. The obtained results allow us to fix upper bounds on the GUP deformation parameters which may be tested through future high-precision interferometry experiments.


Author(s):  
Anurag Chapagain

Abstract: It is a well-known fact in physics that classical mechanics describes the macro-world, and quantum mechanics describes the atomic and sub-atomic world. However, principles of quantum mechanics, such as Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, can create visible real-life effects. One of the most commonly known of those effects is the stability problem, whereby a one-dimensional point base object in a gravity environment cannot remain stable beyond a time frame. This paper expands the stability question from 1- dimensional rod to 2-dimensional highly symmetrical structures, such as an even-sided polygon. Using principles of classical mechanics, and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, a stability equation is derived. The stability problem is discussed both quantitatively as well as qualitatively. Using the graphical analysis of the result, the relation between stability time and the number of sides of polygon is determined. In an environment with gravity forces only existing, it is determined that stability increases with the number of sides of a polygon. Using the equation to find results for circles, it was found that a circle has the highest degree of stability. These results and the numerical calculation can be utilized for architectural purposes and high-precision experiments. The result is also helpful for minimizing the perception that quantum mechanical effects have no visible effects other than in the atomic, and subatomic world. Keywords: Quantum mechanics, Heisenberg Uncertainty principle, degree of stability, polygon, the highest degree of stability


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (08) ◽  
pp. 1241012 ◽  
Author(s):  
HANS-THOMAS ELZE

Following a review of quantum-classical hybrid dynamics, we discuss the ensuing proliferation of observables and relate it to measurements of (would-be) quantum mechanical degrees of freedom performed by (would-be) classical ones (if they were separable). Hybrids consist in coupled classical (CL) and quantum mechanical (QM) objects. Numerous consistency requirements for their description have been discussed and are fulfilled here. We summarize a representation of quantum mechanics in terms of classical analytical mechanics which is naturally extended to QM–CL hybrids. This framework allows for superposition, separable, and entangled states originating in the QM sector, admits experimenter's "Free Will", and is local and nonsignaling. Presently, we study the set of hybrid observables, which is larger than the Cartesian product of QM and CL observables of its components; yet it is smaller than a corresponding product of all-classical observables. Thus, quantumness and classicality infect each other.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Scale transcends multiple levels of biological and physical organization, and is the critical factor that determines success of any scientific investigation. Specifically, the scale at which a question is posed plays a crucial role in influencing the type of experiments and apparatuses needed. Single cell and single molecule experiments came to the fore of experiment science due to its capability at addressing a fundamental problem in biology and physical science: does the same behavior in cells and molecules transcend different length and population scales? Thus far, single cell experiments could be achieved with trapping of single cell using optical tweezer traps and microfluidic channels. The same, however, is not true for single molecule studies, which remains in the realm of theoretical and simulation studies. Specifically, single molecule experiment remains at the hundreds to thousands of molecules level, where possible skew in the population of molecules sampled could provide a false depiction of molecular reality of a larger population. But, what do scientists learn from single cell and single molecule studies? Is it the uncovering of mysteries of the probabilistic behavior at the single entity level, guided by perhaps quantum mechanics? The answer is no for single cell studies, given that cellular decision making require the input of tens to hundreds of molecular sensors and effectors within a cell. Hence, single cell behavior is not random, but directed at a nutrient or concentration gradient or signaling source. On the other hand, enzymatic catalysis of a single molecule substrate with the active site involves a quantum mechanical crosstalk. Thus, reaction between the substrate molecule and the active site proceeds if suitable energy levels (i.e., quantum mechanical states) are found for both parties. Given that distribution of quantum mechanical states is probabilistic, stochasticity rules single molecule interaction such as a covalent bond formation reaction between reactant A and B. Thus, single cell and single molecule studies do hold relevance in biological and physical sciences research if the correct experiment tool is used for a pertinent question at an appropriate length and population scale. For example, while tremendous amount of basic understanding could be derived from single cell experiments, single cell perspective is not relevant to questions examining the interactions between two large subpopulations of cells. Single molecule experiments, on the other hand, remains in the theoretical and simulation realm for highlighting the effect of quantum mechanics in guiding the behavior of molecules at the nanoscale.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (19) ◽  
pp. 1250102 ◽  
Author(s):  
TOSHIAKI TANAKA

We formulate [Formula: see text]-fold supersymmetry in quantum mechanical systems with reflection operators. As in the cases of other systems, they possess the two significant characters of [Formula: see text]-fold supersymmetry, namely, almost isospectrality and weak quasi-solvability. We construct explicitly the most general one- and two-fold supersymmetric quantum mechanical systems with reflections. In the case of [Formula: see text], we find that there are seven inequivalent such systems, three of which are characterized by three arbitrary functions having definite parity while the other four characterized by two arbitrary functions. In addition, four of the seven inequivalent systems do not reduce to ordinary quantum systems without reflections. Furthermore, in certain particular cases, they are essentially equivalent to the most general two-by-two Hermitian matrix two-fold supersymmetric quantum systems obtained previously by us.


2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-204
Author(s):  
Romy Jaster

Hawthorne (2001) toys with the view that ascriptions of free will are context-sensitive. But the way he formulates the view makes freedom contextualism look like a non-starter. I step into the breach for freedom contextualism. My aim is twofold. On the one hand, I argue that freedom contextualism can be motivated on the basis of our ordinary practice of freedom attribution is not ad hoc. The view explains data which cannot be accounted for by an ambiguity hypothesis. On the other hand, I suggest a more plausible freedom contextualist analysis, which emerges naturally once we pair the assumption that freedom requires that the agent could have acted otherwise with a plausible semantics of "can" statements. I'll dub the resulting view Alternate Possibilities Contextualism, or APC, for short. In contrast to Hawthorne's view, APC is well-motivated in its own right, does not beg the question against the incompatibilist and delivers a context parameter which allows for a wide range of context shifts. I conclude that, far from being a non-starter, freedom contextualism sets an agenda worth pursuing.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Scale transcends multiple levels of biological and physical organization, and is the critical factor that determines success of any scientific investigation. Specifically, the scale at which a question is posed plays a crucial role in influencing the type of experiments and apparatuses needed. Single cell and single molecule experiments came to the fore of experiment science due to its capability at addressing a fundamental problem in biology and physical science: does the same behavior in cells and molecules transcend different length and population scales? Thus far, single cell experiments could be achieved with trapping of single cell using optical tweezer traps and microfluidic channels. The same, however, is not true for single molecule studies, which remains in the realm of theoretical and simulation studies. Specifically, single molecule experiment remains at the hundreds to thousands of molecules level, where possible skew in the population of molecules sampled could provide a false depiction of molecular reality of a larger population. But, what do scientists learn from single cell and single molecule studies? Is it the uncovering of mysteries of the probabilistic behavior at the single entity level, guided by perhaps quantum mechanics? The answer is no for single cell studies, given that cellular decision making require the input of tens to hundreds of molecular sensors and effectors within a cell. Hence, single cell behavior is not random, but directed at a nutrient or concentration gradient or signaling source. On the other hand, enzymatic catalysis of a single molecule substrate with the active site involves a quantum mechanical crosstalk. Thus, reaction between the substrate molecule and the active site proceeds if suitable energy levels (i.e., quantum mechanical states) are found for both parties. Given that distribution of quantum mechanical states is probabilistic, stochasticity rules single molecule interaction such as a covalent bond formation reaction between reactant A and B. Thus, single cell and single molecule studies do hold relevance in biological and physical sciences research if the correct experiment tool is used for a pertinent question at an appropriate length and population scale. For example, while tremendous amount of basic understanding could be derived from single cell experiments, single cell perspective is not relevant to questions examining the interactions between two large subpopulations of cells. Single molecule experiments, on the other hand, remains in the theoretical and simulation realm for highlighting the effect of quantum mechanics in guiding the behavior of molecules at the nanoscale.


Author(s):  
Jens V. Fischer

In previous studies we found that generalized functions can be smooth, discrete, periodic or discrete periodic and they can either be local or global and they are regular or generalized functions. We also saw that these properties were related to Poisson’s summation formula on one hand and to Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle on the other. In this paper, we interlink these studies and show that scalars (real or complex numbers) considered as trivial functions are discrete and periodic, local and global as well as regular and generalized, simultaneously. However, this is also a paradox because it means that Dirac’s δ and 1 (its Fourier transform) coincide. They both are unity. We show that δ and 1 coincide in the sense of scalars (real or complex numbers) but they differ in the sense of (generalized) functions. This result can moreover be related to Max Born’s principle of reciprocity. It also answers an open question in present-day quantum mechanics because it means that the Dirac delta squared is simply delta.


Author(s):  
Demetris Nicolaides

Parmenides’s insinuation of an unchanging universe is assertively supported by Zeno with various logical paradoxes that question the very nature of plurality, space, time, and the reality of apparent motion. The dichotomy is his most famous paradox. To begin a trip, say, from here to the door, a traveler must travel the first half of it, but before she does that she must travel half of the first half, and in fact half of that, ad infinitum. Since there will always exist a smaller first half to be traveled first, Zeno questions whether a traveler can ever even start a trip. Zeno’s analysis is logical; on the other hand, things everywhere appear to be moving. Hence, either Zeno’s reasoning is wrong or appearances are deceptive. Empowered by the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics, it will be argued that, at best, the phenomenon of motion is experimentally unverifiable!


2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Youpa Andrew

This book offers a reading of Spinoza’s moral philosophy. Specifically, it is a philosophical exposition of his masterpiece, the Ethics, that focuses on his moral philosophy. Central to the reading I defend is the view that there is a way of life that is best for human beings, and what makes it best is that it is the way of life that is in agreement with human nature. I begin this study with Spinoza’s theory of emotions, and I do so because it is one of two doctrines that fundamentally shape the structure and content of his vision of the way of life that is best. The other is his view that striving to persevere in being is the actual essence of a finite thing (3p7). Together these make up the foundation of Spinoza’s moral philosophy, and it is from these two doctrines that his moral philosophy emerges. In saying this I am not denying that his substance monism, the doctrines of mind-body parallelism and identity, the tripartite theory of knowledge, and his denial of libertarian free will, among others, also belong to the foundation of his moral philosophy. Each of these contributes in its way to the portrait of the best way of life, and they play important roles in the chapters that follow. But it is his theory of emotions and the theory of human nature on which it rests that are chiefly responsible for the structure and content of his moral philosophy....


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document