scholarly journals Cancer screening and life expectancy of Canadian patients with kidney failure

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1786-1789 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kajbaf
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Gastens ◽  
C Del Giovane ◽  
D Anker ◽  
L Syrogiannouli ◽  
N Schwab ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Providing high value care and avoiding care overuse is a challenge among older multimorbid adults. There is evidence on benefits and harms of cancer screening and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) preventive treatment up to the age of 75. However, this evidence is not directly applicable to older multimorbid patients. Because each cancer and CVD preventive care has a specific lagtime to benefit, many guidelines recommend tailoring preventive care according to the estimated life expectancy (LE). However, there is no tool to estimate LE among multimorbid patients. Our objectives are therefore to develop new mortality risk prognostic indices and to derive a new LE estimator, what will help clinicians tailoring preventive care in older multimorbid adults. Methods and Results We conduct a prospective cohort study by extending the follow-up of 822 patients in Bern, Switzerland, included in the OPtimising thERapy to prevent Avoidable hospital admissions in Mulitmorbid older people (OPERAM) study over 3 years. Detailed information about cancer screening and CVD preventive treatment will be collected. We will identify variables independently associated with mortality and weight the variables to create 1 year and 3 year mortality prognostic indices. We will transform the 3 year prognostic index into a LE estimator. Preliminary results will be presented at the congress. Conclusions We will develop the first life expectancy estimator specifically for older multimorbid adults. This tool will help clinicians to tailor cardiovascular and cancer preventive care in older multimorbid adults. Key messages Because of the lagtime to benefit, personalizing preventive care by estimated life expectancy is recommended. We will provide the first life expectancy estimator for older multimorbid adults.


2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (11) ◽  
pp. 2539-2544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronen Bareket ◽  
Mara A. Schonberg ◽  
Doron Comaneshter ◽  
Yochai Schonmann ◽  
Michal Shani ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 822-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Bieri ◽  
Kerstin Hübel ◽  
Harald Seeger ◽  
Girish S. Kulkarni ◽  
Tullio Sulser ◽  
...  

Background and objectivesThe general rule that every active malignancy is an absolute contraindication for kidney transplantation is challenged by kidney failure patients diagnosed with active surveillance-eligible prostate cancer during pretransplantation workup. Interdisciplinary treatment teams therefore often face the challenge of balancing the benefits of early kidney transplantation and the risk of metastatic progression. Hence, we compared the quality-adjusted life expectancy of different management strategies in kidney failure patients diagnosed with active surveillance-eligible prostate cancer during pretransplantation workup.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsA discrete event simulation model was developed on the basis of a systematic literature search, clinical guidelines, and expert opinion. After model validation and calibration, we simulated four management strategies in a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 patients: Definitive treatment (surgery or radiation therapy) and listing after a waiting period of 2 years, definitive treatment and immediate listing, active surveillance and listing after a waiting period of 2 years, and active surveillance and immediate listing. Individual patient results (quality-adjusted life years; QALYs) were aggregated into strategy-specific means (± SEs).ResultsActive surveillance and immediate listing yielded the highest amount of quality-adjusted life expectancy (6.97 ± 0.01 QALYs) followed by definitive treatment and immediate listing (6.75 ± 0.01 QALYs). These two strategies involving immediate listing not only outperformed those incorporating a waiting period of 2 years (definitive treatment: 6.32 ± 0.01 QALYs; active surveillance: 6.59 ± 0.01 QALYs) but also yielded a higher proportion of successfully performed transplantations (72% and 74% versus 56% and 59%), with less time on hemodialysis on average (4.02 and 3.81 years versus 4.80 and 4.65 years).ConclusionsAmong kidney failure patients diagnosed with active surveillance-eligible prostate cancer during pretransplantation workup, the active surveillance and immediate listing strategy outperformed the alternative management strategies from a quality of life expectancy perspective, followed by definitive treatment and immediate listing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document