scholarly journals Immunosuppressive treatment after solid organ transplantation and risk of post-transplant cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 2764-2771 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ingvar ◽  
K. E. Smedby ◽  
B. Lindelof ◽  
P. Fernberg ◽  
R. Bellocco ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuka Hirakawa ◽  
Aika Okuno ◽  
Atsuko Tanabe ◽  
Mutsumi Okada ◽  
Naoyuki Anzai ◽  
...  

Voriconazole is a universal anti-fungal prophylaxis, which is frequently taken to the patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and solid organ transplantation. Voriconazole can cause phototoxicity, multiple erythema in sun-exposed areas may develop actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) while taking voriconazole. In North America and Europe, case reports of phototoxicity and aggressive cSCC in patients on voriconazole have been documented. Also 4 cases of voriconazole-associated cSCC have recently been reported in Japan. We describe a Japanese woman with multiple cSCC associated with recurrence of cSCC after discontinuing voriconazole. 


Oral Oncology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 104-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer Alsidawi ◽  
Katharine A. Price ◽  
Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar ◽  
Gustavo F. Westin ◽  
Joaquin J. Garcia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (S2) ◽  
pp. e2021170S
Author(s):  
Paolo Bossi ◽  
Luigi Lorini

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) may develop in patients with dysregulated immune activation (pre-existing autoimmune diseases or immunosuppression due to hematopoietic/solid organ transplant recipients), patients with a compromised immune function (long-term immunosuppression), and patients carrying chronic viral infections, or those affected by lymphoproliferative diseases. It should be also considered that patients presenting with immunosuppression have a high incidence of cSCC (65–250-times higher than general population), highlighting the central role played by the immune system in the development of cSCC. All these cases must be considered as “special populations” for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as the safety and activity of these drugs have not been studied on these specific cases, since these patients were excluded from clinical trials leading to approval of ICIs. It is therefore important to gain as much information as possible from the analysis of real-life data, to derive an indication to be adopted in everyday clinical setting.  Moreover, therapeutic alternatives other than ICIs are scarce, mainly consisting in chemotherapy and anti-EGFR agents, whose activity is lower than immunotherapy and whose toxicity (particularly with chemotherapy) are not sustainable by this frail population. Here, we describe the current evidence of treatment with ICIs in special populations and conclude that it is necessary to find a balance between treatment risks (toxicities) and benefits (efficacy), as well as engaging a multidisciplinary team of experts to thoroughly manage and treat these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document