scholarly journals MP322PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF HEMORRHAGIC COMPLICATIONS AFTER KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT BIOPSY: RESULTS FROM THE JAPANESE NATIONWIDE CLAIM DATABASE

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i446-i446
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Yamamoto ◽  
Hideki Hashimoto ◽  
Hiromasa Horiguchi ◽  
Hideo Yasunaga
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Attias ◽  
Giovanna Melica ◽  
David Boutboul ◽  
Nathalie De Castro ◽  
Vincent Audard ◽  
...  

Epidemiology of opportunistic infections (OI) after kidney allograft transplantation in the modern era of immunosuppression and the use of OI prevention strategies are poorly described. We retrospectively analyzed a single-center cohort on kidney allograft adult recipients transplanted between January 2008 and December 2013. The control group included all kidney recipients transplanted in the same period, but with no OI. We analyzed 538 kidney transplantations (538 patients). The proportion of OI was 15% (80 and 72 patients). OI occurred 12.8 (6.0–31.2) months after transplantation. Viruses were the leading cause (n = 54, (10%)), followed by fungal (n = 15 (3%)), parasitic (n = 6 (1%)), and bacterial (n = 5 (0.9%)) infections. Independent risk factors for OI were extended criteria donor (2.53 (1.48–4.31), p = 0.0007) and BK viremia (6.38 (3.62–11.23), p < 0.0001). High blood lymphocyte count at the time of transplantation was an independent protective factor (0.60 (0.38–0.94), p = 0.026). OI was an independent risk factor for allograft loss (2.53 (1.29–4.95), p = 0.007) but not for patient survival. Post-kidney transplantation OIs were mostly viral and occurred beyond one year after transplantation. Pre-transplantation lymphopenia and extended criteria donor are independent risk factors for OI, unlike induction therapy, hence the need to adjust immunosuppressive regimens to such transplant candidates.


2008 ◽  
Vol 86 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 580
Author(s):  
A Trailin ◽  
T Nikonenko ◽  
A Nikonenko ◽  
T I. Ostapenko ◽  
N N. Polyakov

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Chang ◽  
Xiaojuan Wang ◽  
Yuchen Qiao ◽  
Jie Zhao ◽  
Haiqing Song

Background and objective: Rapid administration of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is the standard treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). While hemorrhage represents as an important and unpredictable complication of thrombolytic treatment, few studies have specifically assessed the prevalence and predictors of bleeding complications among AIS patients in Asia. We assessed characteristics of hemorrhagic complications after intravenous thrombolysis in Chinese AIS patients. Methods: This single-academic-center study retrospectively evaluated 351 acute ischemic stroke patients who received rt-PA intravenously from April 2011 to April 2016. The occurrence and characteristics of any hemorrhagic complications, as well as their associated risk factors were recorded and summarized. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to analyze significant predictors of bleeding. Results: 134 (38.1%) patients experienced one hemorrhagic event in one or more locations The top seven common sites were gingiva (49.3%), skin (18.3%), urinary system (10.4%), digestive tract (7.5%), intra-cranial cavity (7.5%), mouth (4.4%) and nasal cavity (2.2%). All the gingival bleeding occurred during 1 to 24 hours after thrombolysis and was the first sign of bleeding. Intracranial hemorrhage (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) occurred in 16 patients, of whom 4 presented first with gingival bleeding. Multivariate analysis showed that high systolic blood pressure (SBP) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score were independent risk factors for hemorrhage post thrombolysis (P<0.05). Conclusions: One out of three AIS patients in this study had a bleeding complication. The most common site of initial hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis was gingival, which frequently occurred as the initial bleeding site within 24 hours after thrombolysis. Consistent with literature, elevated SBP and higher NIHSS were the two key predictors of bleeding risk.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (02) ◽  
pp. 142-145
Author(s):  
Kenan Keven ◽  
Ebru Uz ◽  
Sule Sengul ◽  
İlhan Kurultak ◽  
Acar Tuzuner ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Roy First ◽  
David A. Gerber ◽  
Sundaram Hariharan ◽  
Dixon B. Kaufman ◽  
Ron Shapiro

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (29) ◽  
pp. 4848-4857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Falanga ◽  
Marina Marchetti

Patients with hematologic malignancies are at high risk of thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications. The incidence of these events is greatly variable and is influenced by many factors, including the type of disease, the type of chemotherapy, and the use of a central venous device. As in solid tumors, a number of clinical risk factors have been identified and contribute to the increasing thrombotic rate in hematologic malignancies. Biologic properties of the tumor cells can influence the hypercoagulable state of patients with these malignancies by several mechanisms. Of interest, oncogenes responsible for neoplastic transformation in leukemia also may be involved in clotting activation. Epidemiologic data allow an estimate of the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acute leukemia, lymphomas, and multiple myeloma (MM). In this review, we focus on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and VTE management in these three hematologic malignancies. No recommendation for routine thromboprophylaxis in these conditions, with the exception of MM, is available. Large, prospective, randomized clinical trials are needed to establish the best practice for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of VTE in these types of cancers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document