scholarly journals SP510SODIUM RESTRICTED DIET DURING CONSERVATIVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL DISEASES (ESRD) MAY RESCUE RESIDUAL RENAL FUNCTION (RRF) FOR THE FIRST YEAR AFTER STARTING PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (PD)

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i520-i520
Author(s):  
Tetsuaki Hiramatsu ◽  
Masashi Mizuno ◽  
Sumiyo Nomori ◽  
Fumiko Sakata ◽  
Yasuhiro Suzuki ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii539-iii539
Author(s):  
Hyung Jik Kim ◽  
Sung Gyun Kim ◽  
Jwa-Kyung Kim ◽  
Chan Ho Kim ◽  
Seung Jun Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 368-376
Author(s):  
Qian Shen ◽  
XiaoYan Fang ◽  
YiHui Zhai ◽  
Jia Rao ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
...  

Background: This study analysed children with end-stage renal disease treated with automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) in our centre to explore the risk factors associated with residual renal function (RRF) loss. Methods: Children treated with APD as the initial renal replacement therapy regimen from January 2008 to December 2016 were included. All the children had a daily urine volume of ≥100 ml/m2 when APD was initiated and a dialysis follow-up time of ≥12 months. A daily urine volume of <100 ml/m2 after 12 months of APD treatment was defined as loss of RRF. Possible risk factors that may be associated with RRF loss were analysed. Results: A total of 66 children were included in the study. After 12 months of APD treatment, the daily urine volume decreased by 377.45 ± 348.80 ml/m2, the residual glomerular filtration rate decreased by 6.39 ± 3.69 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 29 of the patients (43.9%) developed RRF loss. The higher risk of RRF loss after 1 year of APD treatment was most pronounced in patients with daily urine volume of ≤400 ml/m2 before treatment, higher glucose exposure and higher ultrafiltration volume, while the lower risk of RRF loss was in patients with administration of diuretics. Each increase of 1 g/m2/day glucose exposure was associated with a 5% increase in RRF loss (odds ratio (OR) 1.05, p = 0.023) and each increase of 1 ml/m2/day ultrafiltration volume was associated with a 1% increase in RRF loss (OR 1.01, p = 0.013). Conclusion: In children undergoing APD, the risk for loss of RRF is associated with low urine volume at the start of APD, high glucose loading and high peritoneal ultrafiltration volume, while preservation of RRF is associated with the usage of diuretics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Merita Rroji (Molla) ◽  
Saimir Seferi ◽  
Larisa Shehaj ◽  
Myftar Barbullushi

Abstract Background and Aims Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is generally associated with a good survival rate and with great preservation of residual renal function (RRF). The various causes of technique failure are responsible for the relative short time staying in PD. Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the outcome and factors correlated with maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD) to guide for improving prognosis. Method In a retrospective way we examined our PD-cohort concerning mortality, technique survival, peritonitis rate, and other complications. Results From 2005 to 2019 the number of PD patients who have been treated in PD program for more than 3 months was around 199 patient, 29.1% diabetics, mean age 53.3±15.03 years old and meantime in therapy 32.39± 27.34 months. The PD was seen as an alternative for younger patients in the transplant list and elderly patients with comorbidity. Around 7.5% of the PD patients were transplanted and 8.5 % of patients were transferred from HD due to vascular access failure. Around 88.9% of patients were on PD for more than 1 year, 37.7% from 3 up to 5 years and 19.8% percent of the patients have stayed on PD for more than 5 years. Cardiovascular mortality was the main cause of mortality with 53% of the cases. Higher comorbidity index, lower albumin levels, and lower residual renal function were the main risk factors for lower survival. The technical survival of patients was 92.3% during the first year, 79.5% and 69.6% in the second and the fifth year, respectively. There was not found a difference in technical survival between diabetics and nondiabetics patients. Ultrafiltration failure followed by peritonitis was the main reason for transfer patients with more than 24 months in therapy in hemodialysis probably linked with the no availability of icodextrin. Peritonitis rate was 1:41 patient months. Conclusion PD program in our center is organized based in the concept of integrated care in RRT. The outcome of our patients was at least comparable to those reported by larger registries Although we have done good progress in the prevention of infection the nonavailability of icodextrin is an important factor for a technical failure. RRF is an important factor and we need to be more focused to maintain it longer in the future.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-dong Xu ◽  
Xue Han ◽  
Yi Yang ◽  
Xu Li

Objective: Diabetic nephropathy is a serious threat to human health, and its incidence is on the rise. End-stage diabetic nephropathy (ESDN) requires extra investigation due to its complexity and severity, as well as serious concurrent diseases. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the treatment of ESDN. Methods: Clinical data of 84 patients with ESDN admitted to our hospital from June 2016 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into an HD group that received hemodialysis and a PD group that received peritoneal dialysis. Their general conditions, biochemical indicators, residual renal function and incidence of complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: (1) No significant difference in diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, body weight, or urine output was detected between the two groups at the beginning of dialysis (P>0.05). (2) Compared to the PD group, the HD group had significantly lower total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) (P<0.05), and significantly higher total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) after treatment (P<0.05). (3) The two groups also showed significant difference in residual renal function after treatment (P<0.05). (4) The HD group had significantly higher systolic pressure than the PD group after treatment (P<0.05). And more cases of infection were observed in the PD group than the HD group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Both HD and PD are used for treatment of ESDN, and can achieve similar calcium and phosphorus control. Compared to HD, PD has less adverse effect on hemodynamics and better preserves residual renal function, but is more likely to cause malnutrition and disorders of lipid metabolism. Therefore, choice of dialysis method should be based on specific conditions of each patient. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.2901 How to cite this:Xu XD, Han X, Yang Y, Li X. Comparative study on the efficacy of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(7):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.2901 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document