scholarly journals COVD-17. TUMOR TREATING FIELDS FOR GLIOBLASTOMA THERAPY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: EXPERT CONSENSUS ON USE AND EXPERIENCE

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii24-ii24
Author(s):  
Na Tosha Gatson ◽  
Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan ◽  
Jan Drappatz ◽  
Roger Henriksson ◽  
Andreas Hottinger ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has placed excessive strain on health care systems and this is especially evident in treatment decision-making for cancer patients. Glioblastoma (GBM) patients are among the most vulnerable due to increased incidence in the elderly (median age 64 years, peak between 75–84 years) and the short survival time. A virtual meeting was convened on May 9, 2020 with a panel of international neuro-oncology experts with hands-on experience using Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). The objective was to assess the risk-to-benefit and to provide guidance for using TTFields in GBM during the COVID-19 pandemic. PANEL DISCUSSION Topics discussed included support and delivery of TTFields during the COVID-19 pandemic, concomitant use of TTFields with chemotherapy, and any potential impact of TTFields on the immune system in an intrinsically immunosuppressed GBM population. Special consideration was given to TTFields’ use in elderly patients and in combination with radiotherapy regimens (standard versus hypo-fractionated). Finally, we discussed the need to better capture COVID-19 positive brain tumor patients to analyze longitudinal outcomes and subtle changes in treatment decision-making during the pandemic. EXPERT CONSENSUS TTFields is a portable home-use device which can be managed via telemedicine and safely used in GBM patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. TTFields has no known immunosuppressive effects and is a reliable treatment modality with a relatively favorable side-effect profile. This is important during a crisis where other treatment methods might be limited, especially for elderly patients and patients with multiple co-morbidities. It is too early to estimate the full impact of COVID-19 on the global healthcare system and on patient outcomes and strongly recommended the need to collaborate with existing cancer COVID-19 registries (i.e. CCC19, ESMO-CoCARE, etc.) to follow CNS tumor patients. These efforts would have implications in assessing lessons-learned from this crisis and future guideline development.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Tosha N. Gatson ◽  
Jill Barnholtz-Sloan ◽  
Jan Drappatz ◽  
Roger Henriksson ◽  
Andreas F. Hottinger ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has placed excessive strain on health care systems and is especially evident in treatment decision-making for cancer patients. Glioblastoma (GBM) patients are among the most vulnerable due to increased incidence in the elderly and the short survival time. A virtual meeting was convened on May 9, 2020 with a panel of neuro-oncology experts with experience using Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). The objective was to assess the risk-to-benefit ratio and provide guidance for using TTFields in GBM during the COVID-19 pandemic.Panel DiscussionTopics discussed included support and delivery of TTFields during the COVID-19 pandemic, concomitant use of TTFields with chemotherapy, and any potential impact of TTFields on the immune system in an intrinsically immunosuppressed GBM population. Special consideration was given to TTFields' use in elderly patients and in combination with radiotherapy regimens. Finally, the panel discussed the need to better capture data on COVID-19–positive brain tumor patients to analyze longitudinal outcomes and changes in treatment decision-making during the pandemic.Expert OpinionTTFields is a portable home-use device which can be managed via telemedicine and safely used in GBM patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. TTFields has no known immunosuppressive effects which is important during a crisis where other treatment methods might be limited, especially for elderly patients with multiple co-morbidities. It is too early to estimate the full impact of COVID-19 on the global healthcare system and on patient outcomes and the panel strongly recommended collaboration with existing cancer COVID-19 registries to follow CNS tumor patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 477-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihane Fattoum ◽  
Giovanna Cannas ◽  
Mohamed Elhamri ◽  
Isabelle Tigaud ◽  
Adriana Plesa ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuya Kushida ◽  
Takeshi Hiramoto ◽  
Yuriko Yamakawa

In spite of increasing advocacy for patients’ participation in psychiatric decision-making, there has been little research on how patients actually participate in decision-making in psychiatric consultations. This study explores how patients take the initiative in decision-making over treatment in outpatient psychiatric consultations in Japan. Using the methodology of conversation analysis, we analyze 85 video-recorded ongoing consultations and find that patients select between two practices for taking the initiative in decision-making: making explicit requests for a treatment and displaying interest in a treatment without explicitly requesting it. A close inspection of transcribed interaction reveals that patients make explicit requests under the circumstances where they believe the candidate treatment is appropriate for their condition, whereas they merely display interest in a treatment when they are not certain about its appropriateness. By fitting practices to take the initiative in decision-making with the way they describe their current condition, patients are optimally managing their desire for particular treatments and the validity of their initiative actions. In conclusion, we argue that the orderly use of the two practices is one important resource for patients’ participation in treatment decision-making.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. O'Brien ◽  
Timothy Whelan ◽  
Amiram Gafni ◽  
Cathy Charles ◽  
Peter Ellis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document