scholarly journals A Retrospective Analysis in 1347 Patients Undergoing Cement Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral 
Compression Fracture: Is the Sandwich Vertebra at a Higher Risk of Further Fracture?

Neurosurgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S90-S90
Author(s):  
Ping-Yeh Chiu ◽  
Fu-Cheng Kao ◽  
Ming-Kai Hsieh ◽  
Tsung-Ting Tsai ◽  
Wen-Jer Chen ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Abhay Singh ◽  
Rahul Gupta ◽  
Shachi Shachi

BACKGROUND: Vertebral compression fracture usually occurs in old age population with osteoporosis. Due to severity of pain, quality of life becomes very poor. During the study period 67 patients fullling the eligibility cri METHODS: teria underwent vertebroplasty/ kyphoplasty/ cement augmented screw xation/ hybrid procedures were included. Short term and long term benets /side effects were evaluated in all patients. Patients were evaluated on visual analogue score and modied ranking scale. RESULTS: Vertebroplasty was performed in 26(38.8%) whereas kyphoplasty, cement augmented screw xation and hybrid procedure were performed in 18(26.8%), 17(25.4%) and 6(9.0%) respectively. Signicant pain relief occurred in all patients which were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale. Quality of life also improved which was evaluated with Modied Rankin Scale. In our study, complications which occurred were local cement leak, hematoma formation, infection in 8 (11.9%), 3(4.5%) and 2(3.0%) patients respectively. Use of biological cement has revolutionized CONCLUSION: the management of vertebral compression fracture. Both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures which are minimal invasive, almost cure the non infective pathological fractures with instant pain relief and very low procedure related morbidity. In cases requiring xation, cement augmentation signicantly improves the purchase of the screw and makes the construct more reliable. Hybrid technique helps to prevent extensive long level xation.


2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822093990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray Echt ◽  
William Ranson ◽  
Jeremy Steinberger ◽  
Reza Yassari ◽  
Samuel K. Cho

Study Design: Systematic review Objectives: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) are well-known complications after long-segment fusions in the thoracolumbar spine of osteoporotic patients. Recent advances in anti-resorptive and anabolic medications, instrumentation, surgical technique, and cement augmentation have all aided in the avoidance of junctional kyphosis. In this article, current literature on the prevention of PJK and PJF in the osteoporotic spine is reviewed. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases in order to search for the current preventive treatment methods for PJK and PJF published in the literature (1985 to present). Inclusion criteria included (1) published in English, (2) at least 1-year mean and median follow-up, (3) preoperative diagnosis of osteoporosis, (4) at least 3 levels instrumented, and (5) studies of medical treatment or surgical techniques for prevention of junctional kyphosis. Results: The review of the literature yielded 7 studies with low levels of evidence ranging from level II to IV. Treatment strategies reviewed addressed prophylaxis against ligamentous failure, adjacent vertebral compression fracture, and/or bone-implant interface failure. This includes studies on the effect of osteoporosis medication, cement augmentation, multi-rod constructs, and posterior-tension band supplementation. The role of perioperative teriparatide therapy maintains the highest level of evidence. Conclusions: Perioperative teriparatide therapy represents the strongest evidence for preventive treatment, and further clinical trials are warranted. Use of cement augmentation, sublaminar tethers, and multi-rod constructs have low or insufficient evidence for recommendations. Future guidelines for adult spinal deformity correction may consider bone mineral density–adjusted alignment goals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3;23 (6;3) ◽  
pp. 315-323
Author(s):  
David Gimarc

Background: Vertebral cement augmentation is a commonly used procedure in patients with vertebral body compression fractures from primary or secondary osteoporosis, metastatic disease, or trauma. Many of these patients present with radiculopathy as a presenting symptom, and can experience symptomatic relief following the procedure. Objectives: To determine the incidence of preprocedural radiculopathy in patients with vertebral body compression fractures presenting for cement augmentation, and present their postoperative outcomes. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Interventional pain practice in a tertiary care university hospital. Methods: In this cohort study, all patients who underwent kyphoplasty (KP) or vertebroplasty (VP) procedures in a 7-year period within our practice were evaluated through a search of the electronic medical records. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the prevalence of noncompressive preprocedural radiculopathy in our patients. Evaluation of each patient’s relative improvement following the procedure, respective to the initial presence or absence of radicular symptoms (including and above T10, above and below T10, and below T10) was included as a secondary endpoint. Additional subanalysis was performed with respect to patients demographics, fracture location, and primary indication for the procedure (osteoporosis, trauma, etc.). Results: A total of 302 procedures were performed during this time period, encompassing 544 total vertebral body levels. After exclusion criteria were applied to this cohort, 31.6% of patients demonstrated radiculopathy prior to the procedure that could not be explained by nerve impingement. Nearly half of patients demonstrated an optimal clinical outcome (48.5% nearly complete/complete resolution of symptoms, 40.1% partial resolution of symptoms, 11.4% little to no resolution of symptoms). Patients with fractures above T10 were more likely to see complete resolution, whereas patients with fractures above and below T10 were likely to not see any resolution. Men and women without initial radiculopathy symptoms were more likely to see little to no resolution, regardless of fracture location. Limitations: This retrospective study used an electronic chart review of clinicians’ notes to determine the presence of radiculopathy and their relative improvement following the procedure. Conclusions: Preprocedural radiculopathy is a common symptom of patients presenting for the evaluation of VP or KP. The presence of radiculopathy in the absence of nerve impingement may be an important marker for those patients who may experience greater benefit from the procedure. Key words: Radiculopathy, kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, osteoporosis, compression fracture, spine, cement augmentation


2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeun Sung Kim ◽  
Sung Hoon Kim ◽  
Chang Il Ju ◽  
Seok Won Kim ◽  
Sung Myung Lee ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping-Yeh Chiu ◽  
Fu-Cheng Kao ◽  
Ming-Kai Hsieh ◽  
Tsung-Ting Tsai ◽  
Wen-Jer Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Multiple percutaneous vertebral cement augmentation may create sandwich vertebrae. Whether the sandwich vertebra is at higher risk of further fracture remains unknown. OBJECTIVE To compare the incidence of further fractures of sandwich vertebrae and adjacent vertebrae and to identify potential risk factors for sandwich vertebral fractures. METHODS Patients who underwent cement augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in a single medical center between January 2012 and December 2015 were included. A sandwich vertebra was defined as an intact vertebra located between 2 previously cemented vertebrae. Demographic data and imaging findings were recorded. All patients were followed up for at least 24 mo postoperatively. During follow-up period, if the patient reported new-onset back pain with corresponding imaging findings, a diagnosis of sandwich vertebral fracture was made. RESULTS Among the 1347 patients who underwent vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty for OVCFs, 127 patients with 128 fracture levels met the criteria for sandwich vertebrae (females/males 100/27, mean age 77.8 ± 7.7 yr old). The fracture location was most common in the thoraco-lumbar junction (T10-L2), 68.5% (87/127). The incidence of sandwich vertebral fracture was 21.3%, whereas the incidence of adjacent level fracture of those with no sandwich vertebra was 16.4% (196/1194), P = .1879. CONCLUSION The incidence of sandwich vertebral fracture is not higher than that at the adjacent levels. The factor associated with further sandwich vertebral fracture was male gender. Once sandwich vertebral fracture occurred, patients may seek more surgical intervention than those with only adjacent fractures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document