EVALUATION OF SHORT AND LONG TERM BENEFITS/SIDE EFFECTS OF CEMENT AUGMENTATION IN PATIENTS WITH NON INFECTIVE PATHOLOGICAL OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES

2020 ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Abhay Singh ◽  
Rahul Gupta ◽  
Shachi Shachi
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fracture ◽  
Compression Fracture ◽  
Cement Augmentation ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Hybrid Technique

BACKGROUND: Vertebral compression fracture usually occurs in old age population with osteoporosis. Due to severity of pain, quality of life becomes very poor. During the study period 67 patients fullling the eligibility cri METHODS: teria underwent vertebroplasty/ kyphoplasty/ cement augmented screw xation/ hybrid procedures were included. Short term and long term benets /side effects were evaluated in all patients. Patients were evaluated on visual analogue score and modied ranking scale. RESULTS: Vertebroplasty was performed in 26(38.8%) whereas kyphoplasty, cement augmented screw xation and hybrid procedure were performed in 18(26.8%), 17(25.4%) and 6(9.0%) respectively. Signicant pain relief occurred in all patients which were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale. Quality of life also improved which was evaluated with Modied Rankin Scale. In our study, complications which occurred were local cement leak, hematoma formation, infection in 8 (11.9%), 3(4.5%) and 2(3.0%) patients respectively. Use of biological cement has revolutionized CONCLUSION: the management of vertebral compression fracture. Both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures which are minimal invasive, almost cure the non infective pathological fractures with instant pain relief and very low procedure related morbidity. In cases requiring xation, cement augmentation signicantly improves the purchase of the screw and makes the construct more reliable. Hybrid technique helps to prevent extensive long level xation.

scholarly journals Opioid Analgesia: Perspectives on Right Use and Utility

2007 ◽  
Vol 3;10 (5;3) ◽  
pp. 479-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane C. Ballantyne
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Opioid Analgesia ◽  
Opioid Treatment

The ability of opioids to effectively and safely control acute and cancer pain has been one of several arguments used to support extending opioid treatment to patients with chronic pain, against a backdrop of considerable caution that has been based upon fears of addiction. Of course, opioids may cause addiction, but the “principle of balance” may justify that “…efforts to address abuse should not interfere with legitimate medical practice and patient care.” Yet, situations are increasingly encountered in which opioid-maintained patients are refractory to analgesia during periods of pain, or even during the course of chronic treatment. The real question is whether analgesic efficacy of opioids can be maintained over time. Overall, the evidence supporting long-term analgesic efficacy is weak. The putative mechanisms for failed opioid analgesia may be related to tolerance or opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Advances in basic sciences may help in understanding these phenomena, but the question of whether long-term opioid treatment can improve patients’ function or quality of life remains a broader issue. Opioid side effects are well known, but with chronic use, most (except constipation) subside. Still, side effects can negatively affect the outcomes and continuity of therapy. This paper addresses 1) what evidence supports the long-term utility of opioids for chronic pain; 2) how side effects may alter quality of life; 3) the nature of addiction and why it is different in pain patients, and 4) on what grounds could pain medication be denied? These questions are discussed in light of patients’ rights, and warrant balancing particular responsibilities with risks. These are framed within the Hippocratic tradition of “producing good for the patient and protecting from harm,” so as to enable 1) more informed clinical decision making, and 2) progress towards right use and utility of opioid treatment for chronic pain. Key Words: Opioids, chronic pain, addiction, side effects, utility, ethics

Spinal Cord Stimulation in Treatment of Chronic Benign Pain: Challenges in Treatment Planning and Present Status, a 22-Year Experience

Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Kumar ◽  
Gary Hunter ◽  
Denny Demeria
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Pain Clinic ◽  
Axial Component

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To present an in-depth analysis of clinical predictors of outcome including age, sex, etiology of pain, type of electrodes used, duration of pain, duration of treatment, development of tolerance, employment status, activities of daily living, psychological status, and quality of life. Suggestions for treatment of low back pain with a predominant axial component are addressed. We analyzed the complications and proposed remedial measures to improve the effectiveness of this modality. METHODS: Study group consists of 410 patients (252 men, 58 women) with a mean age of 54 years and a mean follow-up period of 97.6 months. All patients were gated through a multidisciplinary pain clinic. The study was conducted over 22 years. RESULTS: The early success rate was 80% (328 patients), whereas the long-term success rate of internalized patients was 74.1% (243 patients) after the mean follow-up period of 97.6 months. Hardware-related complications included displaced or fractured electrodes, infection, and hardware malfunction. Etiologies demonstrating efficacy included failed back syndrome, peripheral vascular disease, angina pain, complex regional pain syndrome I and II, peripheral neuropathy, lower limb pain caused by multiple sclerosis. Age, sex, laterality of pain or number of surgeries before implant did not play a role in predicting outcome. The percentage of pain relief was inversely related to the time interval between pain onset and time of implantation. Radicular pain with axial component responded better to dual Pisces electrode or Specify-Lead implantation. CONCLUSION: Spinal cord stimulation can provide significant long-term pain relief with improved quality of life and employment. Results of this study will be effective in better defining prognostic factors and reducing complications leading to higher success rates with spinal cord stimulation.

A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials on the Effectiveness of Opioids for Cancer Pain

2012 ◽  
Vol 3S;15 (3S;7) ◽  
pp. ES39-ES58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lakshmi Koyyalagunta
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Transdermal Fentanyl

Background: In all recommended guidelines put forth for the treatment of cancer pain, opioids continue to be an important part of a physician’s armamentarium. Though opioids are used regularly for cancer pain, there is a paucity of literature proving efficacy for long-term use. Cancer is no longer considered a “terminal disease”; 50% to 65% of patients survive for at least 2 years, and there are about 12 million cancer survivors in the United States. There is a concern about side effects, tolerance, abuse and addiction with long-term opioid use and a need to evaluate the effectiveness of opioids for cancer pain. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to look at the effectiveness of opioids for cancer pain. Study Design: A systematic review of randomized trials of opioids for cancer pain. Methods: A comprehensive review of the current literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of opioids for cancer pain was done. The literature search was done using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, clinical trials, national clearing house, Web of Science, previous narrative systematic reviews, and cross references. The studies were assessed using the modified Cochrane and Jadad criteria. Analysis of evidence was done utilizing the modified quality of evidence developed by United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Outcome Measures: Pain relief was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures are quality of life (QoL) and side effects including tolerance and addiction. Results: The level of evidence for pain relief based on the USPSTF criteria was fair for transdermal fentanyl and poor for morphine, tramadol, oxycodone, methadone, and codeine. Limitations: Randomized trials in a cancer setting are difficult to perform and justify. There is a paucity of long-term trials and this review included a follow-up period of only 4 weeks. Conclusion: This systematic review of RCTs of opioids for cancer pain showed fair evidence for the efficacy of transdermal fentanyl and poor evidence for morphine, tramadol, oxycodone, methadone, and codeine. Key words: Opioids, pain relief, cancer pain, morphine, hydromorphone, methadone, fentanyl, oxymorphone, hydrocodone, oxycodone, buprenorphine.

Young-onset colorectal cancer treatment side effects: Infertility, sexual dysfunction, and quality-of-life outcomes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3587-3587
Author(s):  
Laura Diane Porter ◽  
Ronit Yarden ◽  
Kim Lynn Newcomer ◽  
Negeen Fathi ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Sexual Dysfunction ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Cancer Treatments ◽  
Young Onset

3587 Background: Colorectal cancer is the third-most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second-leading cause of cancer death in men and women combined in the United States. Young-onset colorectal cancer refers to individuals diagnosed under the age of 50. In recent years, the incidence has increased by 2.2% annually in individuals younger than 50 years and 1% in individuals 50-64, in contrast to a 3.3% decrease in adults 65 years and older. Young-onset (YO) CRC patients and survivors face unique clinical challenges with fertility and sexual dysfunctions, but this risk is not well quantified. There is limited data and public discussion on the long-term effects of colorectal cancer treatments on fertility and sexual dysfunction and the long-term impact on the quality of life. Methods: To explore the unique challenges and unmet needs of the young-adult patient population, a cross-sectional study was conducted. Colorectal cancer patients and survivors (N = 884) diagnosed between the ages of 20 to 50 years old (median age 42 ± 7.0) completed an online questionnaire based on established instruments EORTC-QOL-30, EORTC-CR-29, and EORTC-SHC-22. Results: Thirty-one percent of respondents stated that a medical professional spoke to them about fertility preservation at the time of diagnosis and during treatment. Only 31% were referred to a reproductive endocrinologist, even though 37% of women and 16% of men reported that treatment left them infertile or sterile. Among survey respondents, 12% of women had an egg retrieval procedure, and 36% of men had their sperm preserved prior to the start of treatment. Fifty-three percent of women reported treatment led to premature menopause. Sixty-five percent of respondents suffer from some level of sexual dysfunction due to treatment. In patients who received radiation therapy, women were 12% less likely than men to have discussed sexual side effects with the provider before treatment. Patients who have an ostomy reported more severe sexual dysfunction (17.8%). Rectal cancer patients were 2.5 times more likely than those with colon cancer to report severe dysfunction after their treatment. More than 25% of the respondents said they would have considered alternative treatment if they would have known the risks of sexual dysfunction. Conclusions: Our survey demonstrates inadequate communications between patients and providers about the irreversible fertility and sexual effects of colorectal cancer treatments. Younger patients and survivors face unique long-term challenges and require further information about fertility preservation options and emotional support regarding their sexuality post-treatment. Other studies are needed to assess the physical and psychological side effects endured by young-onset CRC patients and survivors.

Neurosurgical Choice for Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Benefit–Harm Assessment of Long-Term Quality of Life

Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Du ◽  
Bing Ni ◽  
Wei Shu ◽  
Yongsheng Hu ◽  
Hongwei Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Brief Pain Inventory ◽  
Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Database ◽  
Global Impression Of Change ◽  
Satisfaction Rates

Abstract BACKGROUND Microvascular decompression (MVD) and vagoglossopharyngeal rhizotomy (VGR) are effective treatment for glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GN). However, surgical choice is controversial due to the need to maximize pain relief and reduce complications. OBJECTIVE To retrospectively compare safety, efficacy, long-term quality of life (QOL), and global impression of change following MVD and VGR for treatment of GN. METHODS Patient database reviews and telephone surveys were conducted to assess baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes. The effects of pain and complications on QOL were assessed using Brief Pain Inventory-Facial (BPI-Facial) questionnaire. Complication tolerance and surgery satisfaction were sorted using the global impression of change survey. RESULTS Of 87 patients with GN, 63 underwent MVD alone, 20 underwent VGR alone, and 4 underwent VGR following a failed MVD. The long-term rate of pain relief was slightly, but not significantly, lower following MVD than VGR (83.6% vs 91.7%, P = .528). However, long-term complications occurred much more frequently following VGR (3.0% vs 50.0%, P < .001). The BPI-Facial, which evaluates pain and complications, showed that MVD had better postoperative QOL than VGR (P < .001). However, 91.7% of patients who underwent VGR experienced no or mild complications. There was no significant difference in the overall satisfaction rates between the groups (83.3% vs 83.6%, P > .99). CONCLUSION Although VGR resulted in lower postoperative QOL due to a high complication rate, most of these complications were mild. The overall satisfaction rates for the 2 surgeries were similar.

Impact of Extracorporeal Photochemotherapy on the Clinical and Economical Management of Patients Affected with GVHD.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5293-5293
Author(s):  
Cesare Perotti ◽  
Paola Isernia ◽  
Claudia Del Fante ◽  
Gianluca Viarengo ◽  
Daniela Bressan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Extracorporeal Photochemotherapy ◽  
Short Period ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Economical Advantage

Abstract Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is an effective, relatively new technique, FDA approved for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, employed as second-third line treatment in patients affected with GVHD not or poorely responsive to standard immunosuppressive drugs. Both aGVHD and cGVHD are the major complications after stem cell transplantation (till to 50% and 80% of the patients, respectively). Corticosteroids, cyclosporine, micofenolate, tacrolimus and various experimental monoclonal antibodies (anti CD40 ligand, anti TNFα etc) are the drugs employed to control GVHD and are burdened with important short and long term side effects. Recently we revised our data about 102 pts (children and adults) treated by ECP in our Institution. The overall response was 75%, permitting to taper or suspend the immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in 67.6% of the pts. The economical and social impact (cost analysis and quality of life) of ECP vs standard IST was calculated basing on the National Price List and on Short Form Quality of Life (QoL) Scoring System. The cost of ECP comprehensive of the leukapheresis procedure, waste matherials and dedicated personnel was estimated as 684.51 Euro/procedure. On the other side, when the solely costs of the most common IST drugs (corticosteroids, cyclosporine) were considered for 5 months of treatment, an evident and obvious economical advantage emerged (120,3 E). On the contrary, when the costs of hospitalisation and day hospital regimen derived from the most common side effects related to the solely use of IST were included in our cost analysis studies, an economical advantage for long term ECP treatment (calculated on 16 procedures) was demonstrated (14952.16 E vs 17553 E). Moreover, when the “real life implication” calculated on the QoL parameters were considered, the advantages were more evident. In conclusion, the tie of respecting strictly an imposed program of budget calculated on the short period may exert an inhibitory effect in introducing new diagnostic or therapeutic procedures ignoring that the improvement or the cure of the patient has always a positive economical counterpart, expecially when the impact of a new technology is considered in a long term view.

scholarly journals “Chronic fatigue, quality of life and long-term side-effects of chemotherapy in patients treated for non-epithelial ovarian cancer: national case-control protocol study of the GINECO-Vivrovaire rare tumors INCa French network for rare malignant ovarian tumors”

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
François Gernier ◽  
Djihane Ahmed-Lecheheb ◽  
Patricia Pautier ◽  
Anne Floquet ◽  
Cédric Nadeau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Chronic Fatigue ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Sex Cord Stromal Tumors

Abstract Background Germ cell tumors and sex cord stromal tumors are rare cancers of the ovary. They mainly affect young women and are associated with a high survival rate. The standard treatment mainly involves conservative surgery combined with chemotherapy [bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP)] depending on the stage and the prognostic factors, as for testicular cancers. As reported in testicular cancer survivors, chemotherapy may induce sequelae impacting quality of life, which has not yet been evaluated in survivors of germ cell tumors and sex cord stromal tumors. The GINECO-VIVROVAIRE-Rare tumor study is a two-step investigation aiming to assess i) chronic fatigue and quality of life and ii) long-term side-effects of chemotherapy with a focus on cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders. Methods Using self-reported questionnaires, chronic fatigue and quality of life are compared between 134 ovarian cancer survivors (cancer-free ≥2 years after treatment) treated with surgery and chemotherapy and 2 control groups (67 ovarian cancer survivors treated with surgery alone and 67 age-matched healthy women). Medical data are collected from patient records. In the second step evaluating the long-term side-effects of chemotherapy, a subgroup of 90 patients treated with chemotherapy and 45 controls undergo the following work-up: cardiovascular evaluation (clinical examination, non-invasive cardiovascular tests to explore heart disease, blood tests), pulmonary function testing, audiogram, metabolic and hormonal blood tests. Costs of sequelae will be also assessed. Patients are selected from the registry of the INCa French Network for Rare Malignant Ovarian Tumors, and healthy women by the ‘Seintinelles’ connected network (collaborative research platform). Discussion This study will provide important data on the potential long-term physical side-effects of chemotherapy in survivors of Germ Cell Tumors (GCT) and Sex Cord Stromal Tumors (SCST), especially cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders, and neurotoxicity. The identification of long-term side-effects can contribute to adjusting the treatment of ovarian GCT or SCST patients and to managing follow-up with adapted recommendations regarding practices and chemotherapy regimens, in order to reduce toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Based on the results, intervention strategies could be proposed to improve the management of these patients during their treatment and in the long term. Trial registration This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: 03418844, on 1 February 2018. This trial was registered on 25 October 2017 under the unique European identification number (ID-RCB): 2017-A03028–45. Recruitment Status: Recruiting. Protocol version Version n° 4.2 dated from Feb 19, 2021. Trial sponsor Centre François Baclesse, 3 avenue du Général Harris, F-14076 Caen cedex 05, France.

scholarly journals Is Life Better After Motor Cortex Stimulation for Pain Control? Results at Long-Term and their Prediction by Preoperative rTMS

2014 ◽  
Vol 17;1 (1;17) ◽  
pp. 53-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie André-Obadia
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Drug Intake ◽  
Motor Cortex Stimulation ◽  
Pain Scores

Background: A positive effect of motor cortex stimulation (MCS) (defined as subjective estimations of pain relief ≥ 30%) has been reported in 55 – 64% of patients. Repetitive magnetic cortical stimulation (rTMS) is considered a predictor of MCS effect. These figures are, however, mostly based on subjective reports of pain intensity, and have not been confirmed in the long-term. Objectives: This study assessed long-term pain relief (2 – 9 years) after epidural motor cortex stimulation and its pre-operative prediction by rTMS, using both intensity and Quality of Life (QoL) scales. Study Design: Analysis of the long-term evolution of pain patients treated by epidural motor cortex stimulation, and predictive value of preoperative response to rTMS. Setting: University Neurological Hospital Pain Center. Methods: Patients: Twenty patients suffering chronic pharmaco-resistant neuropathic pain. Intervention: All patients received first randomized sham vs. active 20Hz-rTMS, before being submitted to MCS surgery. Measurement: Postoperative pain relief was evaluated at 6 months and then up to 9 years post-MCS (average 6.1 ± 2.6 y) using (i) pain numerical rating scores (NRS); (ii) a combined assessment (CPA) including NRS, drug intake, and subjective quality of life; and (iii) a short questionnaire (HowRu) exploring discomfort, distress, disability, and dependence. Results: Pain scores were significantly reduced by active (but not sham) rTMS and by subsequent MCS. Ten out of 20 patients kept a long-term benefit from MCS, both on raw pain scores and on CPA. The CPA results were strictly comparable when obtained by the surgeon or by a third-party on telephonic survey (r = 0.9). CPA scores following rTMS and long-term MCS were significantly associated (Fisher P = 0.02), with 90% positive predictive value and 67% negative predictive value of preoperative rTMS over long-term MCS results. On the HowRu questionnaire, long-term MCSrelated improvement concerned “discomfort” (physical pain) and “dependence” (autonomy for daily activities), whereas “disability” (work, home, and leisure activities) and “distress” (anxiety, stress, depression) did not significantly improve. Limitations: Limited cohort of patients with inhomogeneous pain etiology. Subjectivity of the reported items by the patient after a variable and long delay after surgery. Predictive evaluation based on a single rTMS session compared to chronic MCS. Conclusions: Half of the patients still retain a significant benefit after 2 – 9 years of continuous MCS, and this can be reasonably predicted by preoperative rTMS. Adding drug intake and QoL estimates to raw pain scores allows a more realistic assessment of long-term benefits and enhance the rTMS predictive value. The aims of this study and its design were approved by the local ethics committee (University Hospitals St Etienne and Lyon, France). Key words: Neuropathic pain, chronic refractory pain, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, rTMS, epidural motor cortex stimulation, MCS, quality of life, predictive value

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document