Commentary: Selective Intensive Care Unit Admission After Adult Supratentorial Tumor Craniotomy: Complications, Length of Stay, and Costs

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Behling
Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. E572-E573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis-Rafael Moscote-Salazar ◽  
Ezequiel Garcia-Ballestas ◽  
Rafael Martinez-Perez ◽  
Amit Agrawal

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. E54-E59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark ter Laan ◽  
Suzanne Roelofs ◽  
Ineke Van Huet ◽  
Eddy M M Adang ◽  
Ronald H M A Bartels

Abstract BACKGROUND Admitting patients to an intensive care or medium care unit (ICU/MCU) after adult supratentorial tumor craniotomy remains common practice even though some studies have suggested lower level care is sufficient for selected patients. We have introduced a “no ICU, unless” policy for tumor craniotomy patients. OBJECTIVE To provide a quieter postoperative environment for patients, reduce the burden on the ICU department, and to evaluate whether costs can be reduced. METHODS A cohort study was performed comparing patients that underwent tumor craniotomy for supratentorial tumors during 1 yr after introduction (n = 109) of the new policy with the year before (n = 107). Rate of complications was evaluated, as was the length of stay and patient satisfaction using qualitative evaluation. Finally, costs were evaluated comparing the situation before and after implementation of the new protocol. RESULTS A reduction in ICU/MCU admittance from 64% to 24% of patients was found resulting in 13.3% cost reduction (€1950 per case), without increasing the length of stay at the ward. The length of stay in the hospital was similar. Complications were significantly reduced after implementing the new policy (0.98 vs 0.53 per patient, P = .003). Patients that were interviewed after the new policy reported feeling safe and at ease at the ward. CONCLUSION Changing our policy from “ICU, unless” to “no ICU, unless” reduced complication rates and length of stay in the hospital while keeping patients satisfied. Hospital costs related to the admission have been significantly reduced by the new policy.


2020 ◽  
pp. 204887262092160
Author(s):  
Alexander E Sullivan ◽  
Tara Holder ◽  
Tracy Truong ◽  
Cynthia L Green ◽  
Olamiji Sofela ◽  
...  

Background Risk stratification and management of hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism remains challenging. Professional societies have published stratification schemes, but little is known about the management of patients with intermediate risk pulmonary embolism. We describe the care of these patients at an academic health system. Methods Patient encounters from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2017 were retrospectively identified utilizing a multihospital, electronic health record-based data warehouse. Using the 2019 European Society of Cardiology criteria, differences in hospital resource utilization, defined as intensive care unit admission, use of invasive therapies, and length of stay, were examined in patients with intermediate risk characteristics. Results A cohort of 322 intermediate risk patients, including 165 intermediate–low and 157 intermediate–high risk patients, was identified. Intermediate–high risk patients more often underwent catheter-directed therapy (14.0% vs. 1.8%; P<0.001) compared to intermediate–low risk patients and had a 50% higher rate of intensive care unit admission (relative risk 1.50; 95% confidence interval 1.06, 2.12; P=0.023). There was no difference in median intensive care unit length of stay (2.7 vs. 2.0 days; P=0.761) or hospital length of stay (5.0 vs. 5.0 days; P=0.775) between intermediate–high risk and intermediate–low risk patients. Patients that underwent invasive therapies had a 3.8-day shorter hospital length of stay (beta –3.75; 95% confidence interval –6.17, –1.32; P=0.002). Conclusion This study presents insights into the hospital resource utilization of patients with intermediate risk pulmonary embolism. The 2019 European Society of Cardiology risk stratification criteria are a clinically relevant scheme that identifies patients more often treated with intensive care unit admission and advanced therapies.


2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 859-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain-S. Eichenberger ◽  
Guy Haller ◽  
Nicole Cheseaux ◽  
Vincent Lechappe ◽  
Philippe Garnerin ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 218 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikki G Nolan ◽  
Sandra R Arnold ◽  
Anna M Bramley ◽  
Krow Ampofo ◽  
Derek J Williams ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recognition that coinfections are common in children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is increasing, but gaps remain in our understanding of their frequency and importance. Methods We analyzed data from 2219 children hospitalized with CAP and compared demographic and clinical characteristics and outcomes between groups with viruses alone, bacteria alone, or coinfections. We also assessed the frequency of selected pairings of codetected pathogens and their clinical characteristics. Results A total of 576 children (26%) had a coinfection. Children with only virus detected were younger, more likely to be black, and more likely to have comorbidities such as asthma, compared with children infected with typical bacteria alone. Children with virus-bacterium coinfections had a higher frequency of leukocytosis, consolidation on chest radiography, parapneumonic effusions, intensive care unit admission, and need for mechanical ventilation and an increased length of stay, compared with children infected with viruses alone. Virus-virus coinfections were generally comparable to single-virus infections, with the exception of the need for oxygen supplementation, which was higher during the first 24 hours of hospitalization in some virus-virus pairings. Conclusions Coinfections occurred in 26% of children hospitalized for CAP. Children with typical bacterial infections, alone or complicated by a viral infection, have worse outcomes than children infected with a virus alone.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Eun Kim ◽  
Seul Lee ◽  
Jinwoo Jeong ◽  
Dong Hyun Lee ◽  
Jin-Heon Jeong

Background: Delayed transfer of patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Critically ill patients with delayed admission to the intensive care unit had higher in-hospital mortality and increased hospital length of stay. Objectives: We investigated the effects of an intensive care unit admission protocol controlled by intensivists on the emergency department length of stay among critically ill patients. Methods: We designed the intensive care unit admission protocol to reduce the emergency department length of stay in critically ill patients. Full-time intensivists determined intensive care unit admission priorities based on the severity of illness. Data were gathered from patients who were admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit between 1 April 2016 and 30 November 2016. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and compared the emergency department length of stay between patients admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit before and after intervention. Results: We included 292 patients, 120 and 172 were admitted before and after application of the intensive care unit admission protocol, respectively. The demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. After intervention, the overall emergency department length of stay decreased significantly from 1045.5 (425.3–1665.3) min to 392.0 (279.3–686.8) min (p < 0.001). Intensive care unit length of stay also significantly decreased from 6.0 (4.0–11.8) days to 5.0 (3.0–10.0) days (p = 0.015). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that introduction of the intensive care unit admission protocol controlled by intensivists successfully decreased the emergency department length of stay and intensive care unit length of stay among critically ill patients at our institution.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 403-406
Author(s):  
Vineeta Mittal ◽  
Matt Hall ◽  
James Antoon ◽  
Jessica Gold ◽  
Chen Kenyon ◽  
...  

Intravenous (IV) magnesium is used as an adjunct therapy in management of status asthmaticus with a goal of reducing intubation rate. A recent review suggests that IV magnesium use in status asthmaticus reduces admission rates. This is contrary to the observation of practicing emergency room physicians. The goal of this study was to assess trends in IV magnesium use for status asthmaticus in US children’s hospitals over 8 years through a retrospective analysis of children younger than 18 years using the Pediatric Health Information System database. Outcomes were IV magnesium use, inpatient and intensive care unit admission rate, geometric mean length of stay, and 7-day all-cause readmission rate. IV magnesium use for asthma hospitalization more than doubled over 8 years (17% vs. 36%; P < .001). Yearly trends were not significantly associated with hospital or intensive care unit admission rate or 7-day all-cause readmissions, although length of stay was reduced (P < .001).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document