scholarly journals RADI-02. SINGLE-SESSION VERSUS MULTISESSION GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR LARGE BRAIN METASTASES FROM NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i22-i22
Author(s):  
Jin Wook Kim ◽  
Kawngwoo Park
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Local Control Rate ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Single Session ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Large Brain ◽  
Radiation Induced

Abstract PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) in patients with large brain metastases by comparing single-session radiosurgery (S-GKS) and multisession radiosurgery (M-GKS), the authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent GKS for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2016, 66 patients with 74 lesions >=10 cm3 from large brain metastases from only NSCLC were included. Fifty-five patients with 60 lesions were treated with S-GKS; 11 patients with 14 lesions were treated with M-GKS. Median doses were 16 Gy (range, 11–18 Gy) for the S-GKS group and 8 Gy (range, 7–10 Gy) in three fractions for the M-GKS group. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up period of 13.1 months (range, 1.3–76.4 months), the median survival duration was 21.1 months for all patients. Median tumor volume was 14.3 cm3 (range, 10.0–58.3). The local control rate was 77.0% and the progression-free survival rate was 73.6% at the last follow-up. There were no significant between-group differences in terms of local control rate (p = 0.10). Compared with S-GKS, M-GKS did not differ significantly in radiation-induced complications (38.1% versus 45.4%, p = 0.83). While eight patients who underwent S-GKS experienced major complications of grade >=3, no toxicity was observed in patients treated with M-GKS. CONCLUSIONS: M-GKS may be an effective alternative for large brain metastases from NSCLC. Specifically, severe radiation-induced toxicity (≥ grade 3) did not occur in M-GKS for large-volume metastases. Although the long-term effects and results from larger samples remain unclear, M-GKS may be a suitable palliative treatment to preserve neurological function.

scholarly journals Prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Synchronous Brain Metastases Treated with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doo-Sik Kong ◽  
Jung-Il Lee ◽  
Do Hyun Nam ◽  
Kwan Park ◽  
Jong Hyun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

scholarly journals Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3668
Author(s):  
Anna Cho ◽  
Helena Untersteiner ◽  
Dorian Hirschmann ◽  
Abdallah Shaltout ◽  
Philipp Göbl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

The combination of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and systemic immunotherapy (IT) or targeted therapy (TT) is a novel treatment method for brain metastases (BMs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To elucidate the safety and efficacy of concomitant IT or TT on the outcome after GKRS, 496 NSCLC patients with BMs, who were treated with GKRS were retrospectively reviewed. The median time between the initial lung cancer diagnosis and the diagnosis of brain metastases was one month. The survival after the initial BM diagnosis was significantly longer than the survival predicted by prognostic BM scores. After the first Gamma Knife radiosurgery treatment (GKRS1), the estimated median survival was 9.9 months (95% CI = 8.3–11.4). Patients with concurrent IT or TT presented with a significantly longer survival after GKRS1 than patients without IT or TT (p < 0.001). These significant differences in the survival were also apparent among the four treatment groups and remained significant after adjustment for Karnofsky performance status scale (KPS), recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, sex, and multiple BMs. About half of all our patients (46%) developed new distant BMs after GKRS1. Of note, no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of radiation reaction, radiation necrosis, or intralesional hemorrhage in association with IT or TT at or after GKRS1 were observed. In NSCLC-BM patients, the concomitant use of GKRS and IT or TT showed an increase in overall survival without increased complications related to GKRS. Therefore, the combined treatment with GKRS and IT or TT seems to be a safe and powerful treatment option and emphasizes the role of radiosurgery in modern BM treatment.

Development of brain metastases in stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with or without erlotinib.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19011-e19011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Liu ◽  
Li Kong ◽  
Xue Meng ◽  
Jinbo Yue ◽  
Xindong Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
And Control

e19011 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a risk of death from brain metastases (BM) that exceeds potential mortality from extracranial disease progression. Erlotinib has been proved to be effective for NSCLC patients. We hold a study to evaluate value of erlotinib in preventing BM in stage III/IV NSCLC patients. Methods: Pathologically confirmed NSCLC stage III/IV patients were included and divided into erlotinib group and control group according to whether erlotinib administration (at least one month) in 1- or 2-line therapy or not. Stage IV patients with BM were excluded. Patients with any EGFR-TKI treatment were excluded from control group. Times of erlotinib administration to BM and to death or last follow-up were recorded for erlotinib group. Times of corresponding 1- or 2-line chemotherapy to BM and to death or last follow-up were recorded for control group correspondingly. Time to BM, 1- and 2-year incidence of BM were end points. Results: 140 patients were included (68 in erlotinib group and 72 in control group) and all clinical characteristics between two groups were balanced. At a median follow-up of 20.0 months, the median time to BM for all patients was 28.0 months (95% CI, 23.795-32.205 months). 1- and 2-year incidence of BM were 17.8% (95% CI, 10.744-24.856%) and 38.8% (95% CI, 27.236-50.364%) respectively. The median time to BM were 42.0 months (95% CI, 15.567-68.433 months) and 19.0 months (95% CI, 11.305-26.695 months) (P=0.028) for erlotinib group and control group. Erilotinib group has a lower BM incidence than control group (1-year: 14.4%, 95% CI: 4.992%-23.808%, vs 21.1%, 95% CI: 10.712%-31.488%, P=0.384; 2-year: 26.2%, 95% CI: 18.712%-33.688%, vs 50.2%, 95% CI: 34.128%-66.272%, P=0.005). Multivariate analysis shows interval to BM were longer for erlotinib group (HR, 2.531; 95% CI, 1.272-5.051; P=0.008) and stage III disease (HR, 2.093; 95% CI, 1.035-4.231; P=0.040). Conclusions: Erlotinib administration improves time to BM and 2-year incidence of BM of stage III/IV NSCLC patients. Erlotinib administration and stage III disease predicts lower incidence of BM in all patients.

Impact of the radiosurgery prescription dose on the local control of small (2 cm or smaller) brain metastases

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza M. Mohammadi ◽  
Jason L. Schroeder ◽  
Lilyana Angelov ◽  
Samuel T. Chao ◽  
Erin S. Murphy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Radiation Necrosis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Local Progression ◽  
Prescription Dose

OBJECTIVE The impact of the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) prescription dose (PD) on local progression and radiation necrosis for small (≤ 2 cm) brain metastases was evaluated. METHODS An institutional review board–approved retrospective review was performed on 896 patients with brain metastases ≤ 2 cm (3034 tumors) who were treated with 1229 SRS procedures between 2000 and 2012. Local progression and/or radiation necrosis were the primary end points. Each tumor was followed from the date of radiosurgery until one of the end points was reached or the last MRI follow-up. Various criteria were used to differentiate tumor progression and radiation necrosis, including the evaluation of serial MRIs, cerebral blood volume on perfusion MR, FDG-PET scans, and, in some cases, surgical pathology. The median radiographic follow-up per lesion was 6.2 months. RESULTS The median patient age was 56 years, and 56% of the patients were female. The most common primary pathology was non–small cell lung cancer (44%), followed by breast cancer (19%), renal cell carcinoma (14%), melanoma (11%), and small cell lung cancer (5%). The median tumor volume and median largest diameter were 0.16 cm3 and 0.8 cm, respectively. In total, 1018 lesions (34%) were larger than 1 cm in maximum diameter. The PD for 2410 tumors (80%) was 24 Gy, for 408 tumors (13%) it was 19 to 23 Gy, and for 216 tumors (7%) it was 15 to 18 Gy. In total, 87 patients (10%) had local progression of 104 tumors (3%), and 148 patients (17%) had at least radiographic evidence of radiation necrosis involving 199 tumors (7%; 4% were symptomatic). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for local progression and radiation necrosis. For local progression, tumors less than 1 cm (subhazard ratio [SHR] 2.32; p < 0.001), PD of 24 Gy (SHR 1.84; p = 0.01), and additional whole-brain radiation therapy (SHR 2.53; p = 0.001) were independently associated with better outcome. For the development of radiographic radiation necrosis, independent prognostic factors included size greater than 1 cm (SHR 2.13; p < 0.001), location in the corpus callosum (SHR 5.72; p < 0.001), and uncommon pathologies (SHR 1.65; p = 0.05). Size (SHR 4.78; p < 0.001) and location (SHR 7.62; p < 0.001)—but not uncommon pathologies—were independent prognostic factors for the subgroup with symptomatic radiation necrosis. CONCLUSIONS A PD of 24 Gy results in significantly better local control of metastases measuring < 2 cm than lower doses. In addition, tumor size is an independent prognostic factor for both local progression and radiation necrosis. Some tumor pathologies and locations may also contribute to an increased risk of radiation necrosis.

scholarly journals Long-Term Survival in a Patient with Multiple Brain Metastases from Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery on Four Occasions: A Case Report

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Ameer L. Elaimy ◽  
Sudheer R. Thumma ◽  
Andrew F. Lamm ◽  
Alexander R. Mackay ◽  
Wayne T. Lamoreaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Primary Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Brain Radiation

Brain metastases are the most common cancerous neoplasm in the brain. The treatment of these lesions is challenging and often includes a multimodality management approach with whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and neurosurgery options. Although advances in biomedical imaging technologies and the treatment of extracranial cancer have led to the overall increase in the survival of brain metastases patients, the finding that select patients survive several years remains puzzling. For this reason, we present the case of a 70-year-old patient who was diagnosed with multiple brain metastases from small-cell lung cancer five years ago and is currently alive following treatment with chemotherapy for the primary cancer and whole-brain radiation therapy and Gamma Knife radiosurgery on four separate occasions for the neurological cancer. Since the diagnosis of brain metastases five years ago, the patient’s primary cancer has remained controlled. Furthermore, multiple repeat GKRS procedures provided this patient with high levels of local tumor control, which in combination with a stable primary cancer led to an extended period of survival and a highly functional life. Further analysis and clinical research will be valuable in assessing the durability of multiple GKRS for brain metastases patients who experience long-term survival.

scholarly journals P.140 Radiological characteristics of brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer relative to EGFR mutation status

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (s3) ◽  
pp. S60-S60
Author(s):  
O Hashmi ◽  
H Younus ◽  
L Bolton
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Tki Treatment ◽  
Egfr Mutated

Background: Approximately 20-40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will develop brain metastases (BM). The aim of this study was to investigate if Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) status of NSCLC alters the radiological appearances of BM. Also to compare differences in imaging features of BM occurring from EGFR-mutated NSCLC during treatment with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) versus prior to treatment. Methods: A retrospective study was performed over a 5 year period of all patients with histologically proven NSCLC with BM and known EGFR status. 72 patients met the inclusion criteria. Radiological features were reviewed as well as number, size and location of BM. Results: 18/72 patients had EGFR-mutated NSCLC and of these 9 presented with BM while on TKI treatment. Patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC had statistically significant higher occurrence of multiple BM (p=0.029) and BM in a central location (p=0.027). BM that occurred during TKI treatment appeared smaller and with minimal surrounding oedema. Conclusions: Given the propensity for multiple BM in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, vigilant imaging follow up would need to be considered. BM presenting while on TKI were more subtle, especially on Computed Tomography (CT), therefore careful follow up with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document