scholarly journals RADI-27. ROLE OF STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY IN THE CARE OF PATIENTS WITH >/= 25 CUMULATIVE BRAIN METASTASES

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i27-i27
Author(s):  
Carolina Benjamin ◽  
Monica Mureb ◽  
Bernadine Donahue ◽  
Erik Sulman ◽  
Joshua Silverman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Median Dose ◽  
Total Tumor Volume ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Brain Radiation

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an accepted treatment for multiple brain metastases. However, the upper limit of the number of brain metastases over the course of care suitable for this approach is controversial. METHODS: From a review of our prospective registry, 48 patients treated with SRS for ≥ 25 brain metastases in either single or multiple sessions between 2013 and 2019 were identified. Patient, tumor, and treatments characteristics were evaluated. Clinical outcomes and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-one females (64.6%) and 17 males (35.4%) with a median age of 56 years (25–91) were included. Primary diagnoses included lung (n=23, 47.9%), breast (n=13, 27.1%), melanoma (n=8, 16.7%), and other (n=4, 8.33%). Initial median GPA index was 2 (0.5–3). Nine patients (18.8%) had received whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) prior to first SRS treatment, with a median dose of 35Gy (30–40.5Gy). Ten patients (20.8%) received WBRT after initial SRS, with a median dose of 30Gy (20-30Gy). Thus, only 19 patients (40%) ever received WBRT. Median number of radiosurgeries per patient was 3 (1–12). Median number of cumulative tumors irradiated was 31 (25–110). Median number of tumors irradiated at first SRS was 10 (1–35). Median marginal dose for the largest tumor per session was 16Gy (10-21Gy). Median SRS total tumor volume was 6.8cc (0.8–23.4). Median follow-up since initial SRS was 16 months (1–71). At present, 21 (43.7%) are alive. Median OS from the diagnosis of brain metastases was 31 months (2–97), and OS from the time of first SRS, 22 months (1–70). Median KPS at first SRS and last follow-up was the same (90). Sixty-three percent did not require a corticosteroid course. CONCLUSION: In selected patients with a large number of cumulative brain metastases (≥ 25), SRS is effective and safe. Therefore, WBRT may not be required in this population.

Radiosurgery alone for solitary and multiple brain metastasis

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1541-1541
Author(s):  
J. L. Fox ◽  
L. Kleinberg ◽  
S. Kharkar ◽  
R. E. Clatterbuck ◽  
P. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Time Commitment ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Brain Radiation

1541 Background: Whole-brain radiation (WBRT) in the management of brain metastases treated with radiosurgery (RS) is controversial. Methods: Ninety-eight patients were treated for brain metastases with RS at Johns Hopkins between 4/03 and 7/05. Twenty-eight patients received RS alone after failing WBRT, 33 received RS alone for initial metastases and 37 received RS along with WBRT. Forty-five patients were women and 53 were men, with a median age of 56 (range, 18–92). Histology was: non-small cell lung cancer - 35, breast -14, melanoma -10, renal cell carcinoma - 9, and other - 30. Ninety-two (94%) pts had a KPS of ≥ 70 (median 80). The median number of metastases was 2 (range, 1–14). Results: Follow-up data from date of RS was available for 96 patients. Among those who received RS along with planned WBRT, median survival (MS) was 6.6 months with 1-yr overall survival (OS) 38%. Among patients treated initially with RS alone, MS was 9.7 months with 1-yr OS 42%. Among patients treated with RS for recurrent metastases after prior WBRT, MS was 6.8 months with 1-yr OS 24%. There were no significant differences in survival amongst these 3 treatment groups (p=0.73, log-rank test). For patients with 1–3 metastases (n=66), 1-yr OS was 38% versus 32% for those with ≥ 4 (n=32). Median survivals were 8.4 and 6.7 months, respectively (p=NS). Of patients treated with RS for recurrence, 7 of 25 (28%) with available follow-up data developed recurrent or new metastases whereas 11/27 (41%) treated with RS and planned WBRT and 15/27 (56%) who had RS alone as initial treatment had documented recurrent or new metastases. Conclusions: RS alone may be an effective treatment that preserves survival for those with single or multiple brain metastases at initial presentation or recurrence, but the tradeoff between the marginal increase in risk of brain recurrence versus toxicity and time commitment for WBRT needs further evaluation. The ongoing US Intergroup randomized trial, N0572/Z300, will address some of these questions. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals RADI-40. STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAINSTEM METASTASES: AN ANALYSIS OF SINGLE FRACTION AND MULTI FRACTION TECHNIQUES

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i29-i29
Author(s):  
Elana Nack ◽  
Varun Iyengar ◽  
Esther Yu ◽  
Thomas DiPetrillo ◽  
Timothy Kinsella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Single Fraction ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Brain Radiation

Abstract PURPOSE: Utilization of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brainstem metastases (BSM) is increasing. Multi-fraction SRS (MF-SRS) is a potential means of obtaining therapeutic gain while limiting toxicity. However, most available data assesses only single-fraction SRS (SF-SRS). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SF-SRS and MF-SRS for BSM. METHODS: Data was retrospectively collected for patients with BSM treated with SRS between 2003–2018 at a single institution. Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and local control (LC). Independent t-test was used for correlations between groups. RESULTS: 29 patients (31 lesions) were identified; 13 patients (15 lesions) underwent SF-SRS and 16 patients (16 lesions) underwent MF-SRS. Median follow-up was 6.8 months (1–80.8 months). Post-SRS MRI was available for 78% of patients. Median dose was 16Gy (12–18 Gy) for SF-SRS and 24 Gy (18–30 Gy) for MF-SRS. MF-SRS was delivered in a median of 3 fractions (3–5). There was a trend toward larger mean tumor volume with MF-SRS (1.297 vs 0.302mL, p=0.055). OS was 64.8% at 6 months and 49.3% at 12 months. LC was 90.9% at 6 months and 69.9% at 12 months. LC was similar between SF-SRS and MF-SRS at 6 months (100% vs 79.5%, p=0.143) and 12 months (50.0% vs 79.5%, p=0.812). Among the 4 patients who experienced local recurrence, 3 received salvage whole brain radiation and median OS was 8.1 months after LF. Distant CNS failures occurred in 40.3% of patients at 6 months and 72.4% at 12 months. Tumor volume >0.5 mL was associated with worse LC at 6 months (64.3% vs 100%, p=0.022). One patient developed symptomatic radiation necrosis (1/29 lesions, 3.4%) after MF-SRS. CONCLUSION: SRS is a safe and effective treatment for small BSM. Outcomes were not different between SF-SRS and MF-SRS but analysis is limited by small sample size.

The Role of Radiosurgery to the Tumor Bed After Resection of Brain Metastases

Neurosurgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared H. Gans ◽  
Daniel M.S. Raper ◽  
Ashish H. Shah ◽  
Amade Bregy ◽  
Deborah Heros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Brain Radiation

Abstract BACKGROUND: Optimal postoperative management paradigm for brain metastases remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to understand the role of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery after resection of brain metastases. METHODS: We performed a MEDLINE search of the literature to identify series of patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery after surgical resection. Outcomes including overall survival, local control, distant intracranial failure, and salvage therapy use were recorded. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were correlated with outcomes through the use of the Pearson correlation and 2-way Student t test as appropriate. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 629 patients were included. Median survival for all studies was 14 months. Local control was correlated with the median volume treated with radiosurgery (r = −0.766, P < .05) and with the rate of gross total resection (r = .728, P < .03). Mean crude local control was 83%; 1-year local control was 85%. Distant intracranial failure occurred in 49% of cases, and salvage whole-brain radiation therapy was required in 29% of cases. Use of a radiosurgical margin did not lead to increased local control or overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review supports the use of radiosurgery as a safe and effective strategy for adjuvant treatment of brain metastases, particularly when gross total resection has been achieved. With all limitations of comparisons between studies, no increase in local recurrence or decrease in overall survival compared with rates with adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy was found.

scholarly journals Clinical dose profile of Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for extensive brain metastases

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Gregory Neil Bowden ◽  
Jong Oh Kim ◽  
Andrew Faramand ◽  
Kevin Fallon ◽  
John Flickinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
The Brain

OBJECTIVEThe use of Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) for the treatment of extensive intracranial metastases has been expanding due to its superior dosimetry and efficacy. However, there remains a dearth of data regarding the dose parameters in actual clinical scenarios. The authors endeavored to calculate the radiation dose to the brain when treating ≥ 15 brain metastases with GKSRS.METHODSThis retrospective analysis reviewed dosage characteristics for patients requiring single-session GKSRS for the treatment of ≥ 15 brain metastases. Forty-two patients met the inclusion criteria between 2008 and 2017. The median number of tumors at the initial GKSRS procedure was 20 (range 15–39 tumors), accounting for 865 tumors in this study. The median aggregate tumor volume was 3.1 cm3 (range 0.13–13.26 cm3), and the median marginal dose was 16 Gy (range 14–19 Gy).RESULTSThe median of the mean brain dose was 2.58 Gy (range 0.95–3.67 Gy), and 79% of patients had a dose < 3 Gy. The 12-Gy dose volume was a median of 12.45 cm3, which was equivalent to 0.9% of the brain volume. The median percentages of brain receiving 5 Gy and 3 Gy were 6.7% and 20.4%, respectively. There was no correlation between the number of metastases and the mean dose to the brain (p = 0.8). A greater tumor volume was significantly associated with an increased mean brain dose (p < 0.001). The median of the mean dose to the bilateral hippocampi was 2.3 Gy. Sixteen patients had supplementary GKSRS, resulting in an additional mean dose of 1.4 Gy (range 0.2–3.8 Gy) to the brain.CONCLUSIONSGKSRS is a viable means of managing extensive brain metastases. This procedure provides a relatively low dose of radiation to the brain, especially when compared with traditional whole-brain radiation protocols.

The Volumetric Response of Brain Metastases After Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Its Post-treatment Implications

Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne R. Sharpton ◽  
Eric K. Oermann ◽  
Dominic T. Moore ◽  
Eric Schreiber ◽  
Riane Hoffman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Neurological Symptoms ◽  
Volume Reduction ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Local Progression ◽  
Tumor Volume Reduction

Abstract BACKGROUND: Changes in tumor volume are seen on magnetic resonance imaging within weeks after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but it remains unclear what clinical outcomes early radiological changes portend. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that rapid, early reduction in tumor volume post-SRS is associated with prolonged local control and favorable clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated with CyberKnife SRS for brain metastases at the University of North Carolina from 2007 to 2009 was performed. Patients with at least 1 radiological follow-up, minimal initial tumor volume of 0.1 cm3, no previous focal radiation, and no recent whole-brain radiation therapy were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with 100 metastatic brain lesions were analyzed and had a median follow-up of 15.6 months (range, 2-33 months) and a median of 2 (range, 1–8) metastatic lesions. In treated metastases in which there was a significant tumor volume reduction by 6 or 12 weeks post-SRS, there was no local progression for the duration of the study. Furthermore, patients with metastases that did not reduce in volume by 6 or 12 weeks post-SRS were more likely to require corticosteroids (P = .01) and to experience progression of neurological symptoms (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Significant volume reductions of brain metastases measured at either 6 or 12 weeks post-SRS were strongly associated with prolonged local control. Furthermore, early volume reduction was associated with less corticosteroid use and stable neurological symptoms.

Incidence, timing, and treatment of new brain metastases after Gamma Knife surgery for limited brain disease: the case for reducing the use of whole-brain radiation therapy

2011 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Rush ◽  
Robert E. Elliott ◽  
Amr Morsi ◽  
Nisha Mehta ◽  
Jeri Spriet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Gamma Knife Surgery ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation Therapy ◽  
Leptomeningeal Disease ◽  
Whole Brain ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Brain Radiation

Object In this paper, the authors' goal was to analyze the incidence, timing, and treatment of new metastases following initial treatment with 20-Gy Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) alone in patients with limited brain metastases without whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Methods A retrospective analysis of 114 consecutive adults (75 women and 34 men; median age 61 years) with KPS scores of 60 or higher who received GKS for 1–3 brain metastases ≤ 2 cm was performed (median lesion volume 0.35 cm3). Five patients lacking follow-up data were excluded from analysis. After treatment, patients underwent MR imaging at 6 weeks and every 3 months thereafter. New metastases were preferentially treated with additional GKS. Indications for WBRT included development of numerous metastases, leptomeningeal disease, or diffuse surgical-site recurrence. Results The median overall survival from GKS was 13.8 months. Excluding the 3 patients who died before follow-up imaging, 12 patients (11.3%) experienced local failure at a median of 7.4 months. Fifty-three patients (50%) developed new metastases at a median of 5 months. Six (7%) of 86 instances of new lesions were symptomatic. Most patients (67%) with distant failures were successfully treated using salvage GKS alone. Whole-brain radiotherapy was indicated in 20 patients (18.3%). Thirteen patients (11.9%) died of neurological disease. Conclusions For patients with limited brain metastases and functional independence, 20-Gy GKS provides excellent disease control and high-functioning survival with minimal morbidity. New metastases developed in almost 50% of patients, but additional GKS was extremely effective in controlling disease. Using our algorithm, fewer than 20% of patients required WBRT, and only 12% died of progressive intracranial disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document