scholarly journals 129. Beta-lactam vs Fluoroquinolone Monotherapy for pseudomonas Aeruginosa infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S194-S195
Author(s):  
Eric C Reid ◽  
Ryan Walters ◽  
Christopher Destache

Abstract Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections, including pneumonia, bloodstream infections, and surgical site infections around the world. A variety of antibiotic classes are used in the treatment of PA infections, including beta-lactams (BLs) and fluoroquinolones (FQs), given either together in combination therapy or alone in monotherapy. Here, we report a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of BL agents versus FQ agents as active, definitive monotherapy in PA infections in adults. Methods Comprehensive literature searches of Medline and Scopus electronic databases, alongside hand searches of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, and Google Scholar, were performed in April 2019 without time restriction to identify studies published in English comparing BL and FQ agents given as monotherapy for PA infection in hospitalized adults for which mortality, bacteriological eradication, or clinical response was evaluated. One reviewer screened search results based on pre-defined selection criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed included studies for methodological quality using NIH assessment tools. Two fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed (Figure 1). Results A total of 368 articles were screened, and 6 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Upon evaluation of methodological quality, 2 studies were rated good, 3 fair, and 1 poor (Table 1). A meta-analysis of 3 cohort studies demonstrates FQ monotherapy for PA bacteremia is associated with increased survival compared to BL monotherapy (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.27–10.44; p=.02; Figure 2). A meta-analysis of 3 randomized control studies demonstrates FQ monotherapy for PA pneumonia and skin and soft tissue infection is not significantly associated with increased bacteriological eradication compared to BL monotherapy (RD, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.24; p=.39; Figure 3). Conclusion The data appear to suggest FQ monotherapy is significantly associated with increased survival in PA bacteremia and associated with similar rates of bacteriological eradication in pneumonia and skin and soft tissue infection caused by PA compared to BL monotherapy. However, more research is needed to make meaningful clinical recommendations. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Reid ◽  
Ryan Walters ◽  
Christopher Destache

Abstract Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections. A variety of antibiotic classes are used in the treatment of PA infections, including beta-lactams (BLs) and fluoroquinolones (FQs), given either together in combination therapy or alone in monotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of BL agents versus FQ agents as active, definitive monotherapy in PA infections in adults.Methods: Comprehensive literature searches of Medline and Scopus electronic databases, alongside hand searches of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, and Google Scholar, were performed without time restriction to identify studies published in English comparing BL and FQ agents given as monotherapy for PA infection in hospitalized adults for which mortality, bacteriological eradication, or clinical response was evaluated. One reviewer screened search results based on pre-defined selection criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed included studies for methodological quality using NIH assessment tools. Two fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed.Results: A total of 368 articles were screened, and 6 studies involving 338 total patients were included in the meta-analysis. Upon evaluation of methodological quality, 2 studies were rated good, 3 fair, and 1 poor. A meta-analysis of 3 studies demonstrates FQ monotherapy is associated with significantly improved survival compared to BL monotherapy for patients with PA bacteremia (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.27-10.44; p=.02). A meta-analysis of 3 studies demonstrates FQ monotherapy is associated with equivalent bacteriological eradication compared to BL monotherapy for PA pneumonia or skin and soft tissue infection (RD, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.24; p=.39).Conclusion: The meta-analyses demonstrate FQ monotherapy significantly improves survival in PA bacteremia and is associated with similar rates of bacteriological eradication in pneumonia and skin and soft tissue infection caused by PA compared to BL monotherapy. However, more research is needed to make meaningful clinical recommendations.


Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1483
Author(s):  
Eric Reid ◽  
Ryan W. Walters ◽  
Christopher J. Destache

Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections. A variety of antibiotic classes are used in the treatment of PA infections, including beta-lactams (BLs) and fluoroquinolones (FQs), given either together in combination therapy or alone in monotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of BL agents versus FQ agents as active, definitive monotherapy in PA infections in adults. Methods: Comprehensive literature searches of the Medline and Scopus electronic databases, alongside hand searches of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, and Google Scholar, were performed without a time restriction to identify studies published in English comparing BL and FQ agents given as monotherapy for PA infection in hospitalized adults for which mortality, bacteriological eradication, or clinical response was evaluated. One reviewer screened search results based on pre-defined selection criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed included studies for methodological quality using NIH assessment tools. Two fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed. Results: A total of 368 articles were screened, and six studies involving 338 total patients were included in the meta-analysis. Upon evaluation of methodological quality, two studies were rated good, three fair, and one poor. A meta-analysis of three studies demonstrates FQ monotherapy is associated with significantly improved survival compared to BL monotherapy for patients with PA bacteremia (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.27–10.44; p = 0.02). A meta-analysis of three studies demonstrates FQ monotherapy is associated with equivalent bacteriological eradication compared to BL monotherapy for PA pneumonia or skin and soft tissue infection (RD, 0.07; 95% CI, −0.09 to 0.24; p = 0.39). Conclusion: The meta-analyses demonstrate FQ monotherapy significantly improves survival in PA bacteremia and is associated with similar rates of bacteriological eradication in pneumonia and skin and soft tissue infection caused by PA compared to BL monotherapy. However, more research is needed to make meaningful clinical recommendations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 100-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Castaldo ◽  
Filippo Givone ◽  
Maddalena Peghin ◽  
Elda Righi ◽  
Assunta Sartor ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
G. Kojima ◽  
Y. Taniguchi ◽  
T. Urano

Background: There is limited evidence regarding associations between fruit and vegetable consumption and incident frailty risk among older people. Objectives: The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the association between fruit and vegetable consumption and incident frailty risk among older adults. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed in January 2021 for studies that prospectively examined risk of incident frailty in relation to fruit and vegetable consumption in older adults aged 60 and older. Methodological quality and heterogeneity were assessed. Odds ratios (OR) were pooled using random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analysis, depending on the presence of heterogeneity. Results: Among three studies included in this review, data of four cohorts were provided by two studies and used in meta-analysis. The highest fruit and vegetable consumption was significantly associated with lower risk of incident frailty compared with the lowest consumption (pooled OR=0.38, 95%CI=0.24-0.59, p=<0.001). Conclusions: This study provided the pooled evidence that high fruit and vegetable consumption may be beneficial for preventing the development of frailty in older adults. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption can be a relevant strategy to prevent frailty.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document