scholarly journals 490. A Randomized Crossover Study to Evaluate Interventions to Reduce Contamination during Reuse of N95 Respirators

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S311-S312
Author(s):  
Daniel Li ◽  
Heba Alhmidi ◽  
Basya Pearlmutter ◽  
Jennifer Cadnum ◽  
Brigid Wilson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic, shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) have forced many healthcare facilities to require personnel to reuse N95 respirators. We hypothesized that use of correct technique such as changing gloves after N95 contact or providing rapid decontamination between each use would reduce the risk for contamination. Methods We conducted a randomized crossover study using simulated patient care interactions to compare the effectiveness of interventions to reduce contamination of personnel and the environment with high-level N95 contamination (107 plaque-forming units [PFU] of bacteriophage MS2 applied to front of respirator). Ten healthcare personnel performed 4 randomly-assigned standardized examinations of mannequins including: 1) Control (PPE donning and doffing not including glove change after N95 contact); 2) Glove change after any N95 contact; 3) Control with 1-minute ultraviolet-C light (UV-C) treatment between simulations; 4) Control with 30-second steam treatment between simulations. A second trial was conducted with groups 1–3 using a lower inoculum (105 PFU). The frequencies of participant and environmental contamination were compared. Results As shown in Figure 1.A, use of a highly contaminated N95 respirator resulted in frequent MS2 contamination in the Control, Glove change, and UV-C groups, but was dramatically reduced with steam treatment of the N95. With the lower level of contamination, MS2 contamination occurred less frequently across all groups, and was significantly reduced in the UV group, compared to the Control (Figure 1.B). Figure 1: Bacteriophage MS2 contamination during simulated patient care interactions with contaminated N95 respirators Conclusion Reuse of contaminated N95 respirators resulted in contamination of personnel and the environment even when correct technique was used. Rapid decontamination technologies can reduce the risk for transmission. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Author(s):  
Daniel F. Li ◽  
Heba Alhmidi ◽  
Jacob G. Scott ◽  
Ian C. Charnas ◽  
Basya Pearlmutter ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To assess the potential for contamination of personnel, patients and the environment during use of contaminated N95 respirators and to compare the effectiveness of interventions to reduce contamination. Design: Simulation study of patient care interactions using N95 respirators contaminated with a higher and lower inoculum of the benign virus bacteriophage MS2. Methods: Twelve healthcare personnel performed 3 standardized examinations of mannequins including: 1) Control with suboptimal respirator handling technique; 2) Improved technique with glove change after each N95 contact; and 3) Control with 1-minute ultraviolet-C light (UV-C) treatment prior to donning. The order of the examinations was randomized within subject. The frequencies of contamination were compared among groups. Observations and simulations with fluorescent lotion were used to assess routes of transfer leading to contamination. Results: With suboptimal respirator handling technique, bacteriophage MS2 was frequently transferred to the participants, mannequin, and environmental surfaces and fomites. Improved technique resulted in significantly reduced transfer of MS2 in the higher inoculum simulations (P<0.01), whereas UV-C treatment reduced transfer in both the higher and lower inoculum simulations (P<0.01). Observations and simulations with fluorescent lotion demonstrated multiple potential routes of transfer to participants, mannequin, and surfaces, including both direct contact with the contaminated respirator and indirect contact via contaminated gloves. Conclusion: Reuse of contaminated N95 respirators can result in contamination of personnel and the environment even when correct technique is used. Decontamination technologies such as UV-C could reduce the risk for transmission.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-115
Author(s):  
Jennifer Cadnum ◽  
Basya Pearlmutter ◽  
Daniel Li ◽  
Annette Jencson ◽  
Jacob Scott ◽  
...  

Background:  Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light devices are effective in reducing contamination on N95 filtering facepiece respirators.  However, limited information is available on whether UV-C devices meet the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) microbiological requirements for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for respirator bioburden reduction.  Methods:  We tested the ability of 2 UV-C light boxes to achieve the 3-log10 microorganism reductions required for EUA for reuse by single users.  Whole 3M 1860 or Moldex 1513 respirators were inoculated on the exterior facepiece, interior facepiece, and internal fibers with bacteriophage MS2 and/or 4 strains of bacteria and treated with UV-C cycles of 1 or 20 minutes.  Colorimetric indicators were used to assess penetration of UV-C through the respirators.    Results:  For 1 UV-C box, a 20-minute treatment achieved the required bioburden reduction for Moldex 1513 but not 3M 1860 respirators.  For the second UV-C box, a 1-minute treatment achieved the required bioburden reduction in 4 bacterial strains for the Moldex 1513 respirator.  Colorimetric indicators demonstrated penetration of UV-C through all layers of the Moldex 1513 respirator but not the 3M 1860 respirator.  Conclusions:  Our findings demonstrate that UV-C box technologies can achieve bioburden reductions required by the FDA for EUA for single users but highlight the potential for variable efficacy for different types of respirators. 


Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 755-P
Author(s):  
HANA KAHLEOVA ◽  
ANDREA TURA ◽  
MARTA KLEMENTOVA ◽  
LENKA BELINOVA ◽  
MARTIN HALUZIK ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
E. Willuth ◽  
S. F. Hardon ◽  
F. Lang ◽  
C. M. Haney ◽  
E. A. Felinska ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) potentially reduces workload and shortens the surgical learning curve compared to conventional laparoscopy (CL). The present study aimed to compare robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the initial learning phase for novices. Methods In a randomized crossover study, medical students (n = 40) in their clinical years performed both LC and RAC on a cadaveric porcine model. After standardized instructions and basic skill training, group 1 started with RAC and then performed LC, while group 2 started with LC and then performed RAC. The primary endpoint was surgical performance measured with Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score, secondary endpoints included operating time, complications (liver damage, gallbladder perforations, vessel damage), force applied to tissue, and subjective workload assessment. Results Surgical performance was better for RAC than for LC for total OSATS (RAC = 77.4 ± 7.9 vs. LC = 73.8 ± 9.4; p = 0.025, global OSATS (RAC = 27.2 ± 1.0 vs. LC = 26.5 ± 1.6; p = 0.012, and task specific OSATS score (RAC = 50.5 ± 7.5 vs. LC = 47.1 ± 8.5; p = 0.037). There were less complications with RAC than with LC (10 (25.6%) vs. 26 (65.0%), p = 0.006) but no difference in operating times (RAC = 77.0 ± 15.3 vs. LC = 75.5 ± 15.3 min; p = 0.517). Force applied to tissue was similar. Students found RAC less physical demanding and less frustrating than LC. Conclusions Novices performed their first cholecystectomies with better performance and less complications with RAS than with CL, while operating time showed no differences. Students perceived less subjective workload for RAS than for CL. Unlike our expectations, the lack of haptic feedback on the robotic system did not lead to higher force application during RAC than LC and did not increase tissue damage. These results show potential advantages for RAS over CL for surgical novices while performing their first RAC and LC using an ex vivo cadaveric porcine model. Registration number researchregistry6029 Graphic abstract


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
R. Mateo-Galleqo ◽  
S. Perez-Calahorra ◽  
A.M. Bea ◽  
E. Burillo ◽  
J. Homo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document