scholarly journals 198. Evaluation of Oral Step-down versus Continued Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy in Immunocompromised Patients Hospitalized with Gram-Negative Bacteremia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S207-S207
Author(s):  
Heather Savage ◽  
Catherine H Vu ◽  
DeMaurian Mitchner ◽  
Amir Zaki
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Immunocompromised Patients ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Step Down

Abstract Background Bloodstream infections are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in the United States. Most patients initially receive parenteral antibiotics for gram-negative bacteremia, and more data is emerging supporting de-escalation to oral (PO) antibiotics to complete treatment. Previous studies evaluating PO antibiotics for gram-negative bacteremia often exclude or have underrepresented immunocompromised patients. This study evaluated clinical failure in immunocompromised patients receiving intravenous (IV) antibiotics compared to patients transitioned to PO antibiotics for gram-negative bacteremia. Methods A single center, retrospective cohort study was conducted at 446-bed academic medical center. Patients were included if they were immunocompromised and admitted with a positive blood culture for E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter spp., Serratia spp., Enterobacter spp., Proteus spp., P. aeruginosa. between November 4, 2017 to November 4, 2020. Patients were excluded from this study if they had polymicrobial bacteremia, no source control within the first 5 days, or an indication for prolonged duration of treatment. The primary endpoint of this study was clinical failure defined as an escalation from PO to IV antibiotics, worsening clinical status, or readmission for the same infection within 30 days of discharge. The secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and time to microbiologic clearance. Results A total of 31 immunocompromised patients were included in the study with 26 patients receiving PO step-down therapy and 5 patients being continued on IV treatment for gram-negative bacteremia. There was no difference in the primary outcome of clinical failure between the PO step-down group versus the IV therapy group (15.4% vs 20%; p = 0.613). The most common immunocompromised state in both groups was being HIV positive. Patients in the PO step-down group had a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (7.4 days vs. 13.6 days; p = 0.016). Conclusion Oral step-down therapy for gram-negative bacteremia showed similar clinical failure rates to continuous IV therapy in the immunocompromised patient population and may be an option to shorten hospital length of stay. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 1043. Evaluation of Early Clinical Failure Criteria for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S311-S312
Author(s):  
Hana Rac ◽  
Alyssa Gould ◽  
P Brandon Bookstaver ◽  
Julie Ann Justo ◽  
Joseph Kohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Failure Criteria ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Additional Criterion ◽  
Prolonged Hospitalization

Abstract Background Early identification of patients at high risk of morbidity and mortality following Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSI) based on initial clinical course may prompt adjustments to optimize diagnostic and treatment plans. This retrospective cohort study aims to develop early clinical failure criteria (ECFC) to predict unfavorable outcomes in patients with GN-BSI. Methods Adults with community-onset GN-BSI who survived hospitalization for at least 96 hours at Palmetto Health hospitals in Columbia, SC, USA from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2015 were identified. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine association between clinical variables within 72–96 hours of BSI and unfavorable outcomes (28-day mortality or hospital length of stay >14 days). Results Among 766 patients with GN-BSI, 225 (29%) had unfavorable outcomes. After adjustments for Charlson Comorbidity Index and appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy in multivariate model, predictors of unfavorable outcomes included systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg or vasopressor use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–2.5), heart rate >100/minute (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.5), respiratory rate ≥22/minute or mechanical ventilation (aOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4–3.3), altered mental status (aOR 4.5, 95% CI 2.8–7.1), and peripheral WBC count >12 × 103/mm3 (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8–4.1) at 72–96 hours from index BSI. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve of ECFC model in predicting unfavorable outcomes was 0.77 (0.84 and 0.71 in predicting 28-day mortality and prolonged hospitalization separately, respectively). Predicted 28-day mortality increased from 1% in patients with no ECFC to 3%, 7%, 16%, 32%, and 54% in presence of each additional criterion (P < 0.001). Predicted hospital length of stay was 7.5 days in patients without any ECFC and increased by 4.0 days (95% CI 3.1–4.9, P < 0.001) in presence of each additional criterion. Conclusion Risk of 28-day mortality or prolonged hospitalization can be estimated within 72–96 hours of GN-BSI using ECFC. These criteria may have utility in future clinical research in assessing response to antimicrobial therapy based on a standard evidence-based definition of early clinical failure. Disclosures P. B. Bookstaver, CutisPharma: Scientific Advisor, <$1,000. Melinta Therapeutics: Speaker’s Bureau, <$1,000.

scholarly journals 191. Oral Antibiotic Step-Down Therapy for Non-Staphylococcal Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S203-S203
Author(s):  
Kelvin Gandhi ◽  
Magdalena Wrzesinski ◽  
Kristen Bunnell ◽  
Ashley Long ◽  
Vanessa Hutzley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Oral Antibiotic ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Oral Group ◽  
Step Down ◽  
Primary Composite Outcome

Abstract Background Bloodstream infections are traditionally treated with intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy, which may increase length of stay and healthcare costs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if oral antibiotic step-down therapy for non-staphylococcal gram-positive bloodstream infections (GP-BSIs) is non-inferior to IV antibiotics. Methods This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with a non-Staphylococcus aureus, non-Staphylococcus lugdunensis GP-BSI from January 2017 to December 2019. Patients were excluded if they fit any of the following criteria: organism identified as contaminant, polymicrobial BSI, recurrent BSI within the past 90 days, or receipt of an effective antibiotic for a duration longer than what is indicated for BSI treatment. Patients were categorized into those who received an IV antibiotic for the total duration of therapy and those who received an oral step-down antibiotic for at least one-third of the treatment course. The primary composite outcome was the incidence of 90-day clinical failure consisting of 90-day all-cause mortality, change in therapy due to inadequate clinical response, and 90-day BSI recurrence. The secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary composite outcome, line-related complications, and hospital length of stay. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess for predictors of 90-day clinical failure. Results A total of 308 patients were included (oral group, n=94; IV group, n=214). Pitt Bacteremia Scores were low overall, but higher in the IV group (0 vs 1, p=0.045). The oral group had a higher proportion of GP-BSI caused by streptococcal species (76% vs 61%, p< 0.001). The oral group had a lower incidence of 90-day clinical failure and was found to be noninferior to the IV group (9% vs 14%; mean difference -5%, 90% CI -12.7 to 2.6). The IV group had a longer hospital length of stay (4 vs 6 days, p< 0.001), however there were no other significant differences in secondary outcomes. Bivariate analysis found no significant predictors of 90-day clinical failure. Conclusion Oral antibiotic step-down therapy was found to be non-inferior to IV antibiotic therapy, and thus may be an alternative option for the treatment of non-staphylococcal GP-BSIs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Impact of Accelerate Pheno and BacT/ALERT VIRTUO on Clinical Processes and Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis and Concurrent Gram-Negative Bacteremia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faith Babowicz ◽  
Reid LaPlante ◽  
Colby Mitchell ◽  
J. Nicholas O’Donnell ◽  
Ellis Tobin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Gram Stain ◽  
Inpatient Mortality ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Narrow Spectrum ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
The Impact

Background: Accelerate Pheno system and BacT/ALERT VIRTUO may improve bacteremia management. This study evaluated the impact of both devices on outcomes in patients with sepsis and concurrent gram-negative bacteremia. Methods: This quasi-experimental study included a retrospective pre-implementation and a prospective post-implementation group. Patients ≥18 years old with gram-negative bacteremia were included. Patients with neutropenia, pregnancy, were transferred from an outside hospital with active bloodstream infection, or polymicrobial bacteremia were excluded. Blood culture incubation in the BacT/ALERT 3D and microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing from culture plate growth was used prior to implementation of BacT/ALERT VIRTUO and Accelerate Pheno. MALDI-TOF identification directly from blood culture was used pre- and post-implementation. Time to gram-stain, identification, susceptibility reporting, initiation of narrow spectrum gram-negative therapy at 72 hours, 30-day inpatient mortality, sepsis resolution, and hospital length of stay were evaluated. Results: 116 patients were included (63 pre-implementation, 53 post-implementation). Median time to gram-stain and susceptibility results were significantly shorter post-implementation (P < 0.001). The post-implementation group had an improved hazard for narrow spectrum gram-negative therapy at 72 hours (HR [95% CI] = 2.685 [1.348 – 5.349]), reduced hazard for 30-day inpatient mortality (aHR: 0.150 [0.026 – 0.846]) and improved sepsis resolution (77.8% vs. 92.5%, P = 0.030). Hospital length of stay was unchanged between groups. Conclusion: The implementation of BacT/Alert VIRTUO and the Accelerate Pheno system improved microbiology laboratory processes, antibiotic utilization processes and clinical outcomes. These data support the use of rapid diagnostics in sepsis with concurrent gram-negative bacteremia.

scholarly journals 182. Missed Opportunities to Discontinue Unnecessary Vancomycin During Pharmacist Therapeutic Monitoring

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S98-S98
Author(s):  
Corey J Medler ◽  
Mary Whitney ◽  
Juan Galvan-Cruz ◽  
Ron Kendall ◽  
Rachel Kenney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Therapeutic Monitoring ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Missed Opportunities

Abstract Background Unnecessary and prolonged IV vancomycin exposure increases risk of adverse drug events, notably nephrotoxicity, which may result in prolonged hospital length of stay. The purpose of this study is to identify areas of improvement in antimicrobial stewardship for vancomycin appropriateness by clinical pharmacists at the time of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods Retrospective, observational cohort study at an academic medical center and a community hospital. Inclusion: patient over 18 years, received at least three days of IV vancomycin where the clinical pharmacy TDM service assessed for appropriate continuation for hospital admission between June 19, 2019 and June 30, 2019. Exclusion: vancomycin prophylaxis or administered by routes other than IV. Primary outcome was to determine the frequency and clinical components of inappropriate vancomycin continuation at the time of TDM. Inappropriate vancomycin continuation was defined as cultures positive for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant bacteria, and non-purulent skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) in the absence of vasopressors. Data was reported using descriptive statistics and measures of central tendency. Results 167 patients met inclusion criteria with 38.3% from the ICU. SSTIs were most common indication 39 (23.4%) cases, followed by pneumonia and blood with 34 (20.4%) cases each. At time of vancomycin TDM assessment, vancomycin continuation was appropriate 59.3% of the time. Mean of 4.22 ± 2.69 days of appropriate vancomycin use, 2.18 ± 2.47 days of inappropriate use, and total duration 5.42 ± 2.94. 16.4% patients developed an AKI. Majority of missed opportunities were attributed to non-purulent SSTI (28.2%) and missed MRSA nares swabs in 21% pneumonia cases (table 1). Conclusion Vancomycin is used extensively for empiric treatment of presumed infections. Appropriate de-escalation of vancomycin therapy is important to decrease the incidence of adverse effects, decreasing hospital length of stay, and reduce development of resistance. According to the mean duration of inappropriate therapy, there are opportunities for pharmacy and antibiotic stewardship involvement at the time of TDM to optimize patient care (table 1). Missed opportunities for vancomycin de-escalation Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Intravenous versus Oral Step-Down for the Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in a Pediatric Population

Pharmacy ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Sarah Grace Gunter ◽  
Mary Joyce B. Wingler ◽  
David A. Cretella ◽  
Jamie L. Wagner ◽  
Katie E. Barber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Step Down

Limited data are available regarding optimal antimicrobial therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with intravenous (IV) versus oral step-down treatment of pediatric SAB. This study evaluated patients aged 3 months to 18 years that received at least 72 h of inpatient treatment for SAB. The primary endpoint was 30-day readmission. Secondary endpoints included hospital length of stay and inpatient mortality. One hundred and one patients were included in this study. The median age was 7.9 years. Patients who underwent oral step-down were less likely to be immunocompromised and more likely to have community-acquired SAB from osteomyelitis or skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI). More patients in the IV therapy group had a 30-day readmission (10 (25.6%) vs. 3 (5.3%), p = 0.006). Mortality was low (5 (5%)) and not statistically different between groups. Length of stay was greater in patients receiving IV therapy only (11 vs. 7 days, p = 0.001). In this study, over half of the patients received oral step-down therapy and 30-day readmission was low for this group. Oral therapy appears to be safe and effective for patients with SAB from osteomyelitis or SSTIs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document