scholarly journals Patient Self-Referral to Infectious Diseases Clinic: You Don’t Always Get What You Want, But Hopefully What You Need

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S330-S331
Author(s):  
Katherine Holman ◽  
Eric Wolske ◽  
Demeatrice Nance ◽  
Jeff Olender ◽  
Kristin Englund ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients call into the departments at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) to request appointments directly for all specialties. The Infectious Diseases (ID) department chose to evaluate these self-referred patients being seen in our clinic due to (1) limited outpatient clinic appointment availability and (2) patients’ perception of need may not align with the subspecialty care provided. Methods In spring 2016, all self-referred patients requesting an outpatient ID evaluation were screened by the ID Access Plus program. Patients were called by administrative staff with a request for records from a licensed practitioner, and when received, were reviewed within 72 hours of receipt by a staff ID physician. Requests were either (1) accepted for appointment, (2) declined, or (3) referred to a more appropriate department within the CCF system. Patients who were declined appointments were informed by an administrator via telephone call. All patients were also informed of the ability for urgent referrals to be accepted with an MD to MD discussion. Results During a 12-month period a total of 1000 referrals were processed through the ID Access Plus program: 25% were declined for appointments; 45% were tabled as requested records were not received; and 30% had appointments scheduled. The most common patient reported reasons for self-referral to ID clinic were “Lyme disease” (10%) and “parasites” (4%). The “no-show” rate for scheduled self-referred patients was <5%. The median wait period for a new patient ID appointment in the department declined from over 40 days to < 10 days. Conclusion A system of prescreening patients self-referred to ID, requiring a review of medical records by ID clinicians, resulted in improved access for patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Radiology ◽  
1944 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 600-600

AI Magazine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Lenat ◽  
Michael Witbrock ◽  
David Baxter ◽  
Eugene Blackstone ◽  
Chris Deaton ◽  
...  

By extending Cyc’s ontology and KB approximately 2%, Cycorp and Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) have built a system to answer clinical researchers’ ad hoc queries. The query may be long and complex, hence only partially understood at first, parsed into a set of CycL (higher-order logic) fragments with open variables. But, surprisingly often, after applying various constraints (medical domain knowledge, common sense, discourse pragmatics, syntax), there is only one single way to fit those fragments together, one semantically meaningful formal query P. The system, SRA (for Semantic Research Assistant), dispatches a series of database calls and then combines, logically and arithmetically, their results into answers to P. Seeing the first few answers stream back, the user may realize that they need to abort, modify, and re-ask their query. Even before they push ASK, just knowing approximately how many answers would be returned can spark such editing. Besides real-time ad hoc query-answering, queries can be bundled and persist over time. One bundle of 275 queries is rerun quarterly by CCF to produce the procedures and outcomes data it needs to report to STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons, an external hospital accreditation and ranking body); another bundle covers ACC (American College of Cardiology) reporting. Until full articulation/answering of precise, analytical queries becomes as straight-forward and ubiquitous as text search, even partial understanding of a query empowers semantic search over semi-structured data (ontology-tagged text), avoiding many of the false positives and false negatives that standard text searching suffers from.


1981 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 492-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin G. Wood ◽  
Melinda G. Rusnov ◽  
Harvey M. Tucker ◽  
Howard L. Levine

Thirty-two tracheoesophageal punctures (TEP) were performed on 30 patients by The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Department of Otolaryngology and Communicative Disorders. In all cases, the Blom-Singer duckbill prosthesis was utilized for alaryngeal voice restoration. Ninety-three percent of patients were able to produce significantly better voice following TEP when compared to their preoperative mode of communication. The preoperative orientation/evaluation format, surgical technique, success-failure ratios, and possible factors affecting successful TEP voice restoration are examined.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-193
Author(s):  
Christine Zayouna ◽  
Jessica El-Asmar ◽  
Ahmad Abu-Haniyeh ◽  
Shailee Shah ◽  
Karam Al-Issa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document