scholarly journals 154. Do I Really Need a Transesophageal Echo? Comparing Echocardiographic Modalities in Native Valve Infective Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S103-S103
Author(s):  
James Livesay ◽  
William Lorson ◽  
R Eric Heidel ◽  
Mahmoud Shorman

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management commonly includes six-weeks of antibiotics and surgical intervention, if the patient has complications. Current guidelines recommend obtaining an echocardiogram. Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is preferred over transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). We wanted to evaluate the role of a TEE in changing management of MRSA IE. Methods A retrospective cohort of patients with MRSA IE was analyzed between January 2013 and July 2017 at a tertiary care facility in East Tennessee. Patients with prosthetic valves or cardiac devices were excluded. Demographic, echocardiographic, antibiotic, blood culture, mortality, and intravenous drug use data were collected (Figure 1). Results Seventy-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. TTE was performed on 73 patients while five patients proceeded directly to TEE. Of the 73 patients that had a TTE, 33 (45.2%) detected the presence of vegetation and 40 (54.8%) did not. Of the 33 patients with a positive TTE, 15 subsequently underwent TEE, confirming IE. Out of the 40 patients with a negative TTE, 34 underwent TEE, of which 22 (64.7%) showed a vegetation. (Figure 2). A total of ten patients (12.8%) from the study underwent surgery. Of these ten, three (30%) had a positive TTE only, with no subsequent TEE. Five (50%) had both a positive TTE and TEE, and two (20%) had a negative TTE but positive TEE. Conclusion Transthoracic echocardiogram was adequate to visualize vegetations in 45.2% of patients. Completing a TEE increased the sensitivity of visualizing a vegetation, but management was most often not altered. Only two patients (5%) with a negative TTE, but positive TEE proceeded to surgery because of the findings. This causes us to question whether a subsequent TEE needs to be pursued when a TTE is negative in the setting of definite or possible IE by the modified Duke criteria. Even if a vegetation is seen on TEE the patient would most likely receive the same treatment, 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics, as if no vegetation was seen. Forgoing a TEE reduces risk to the patient of undergoing a procedure, and reduces costs to the healthcare system. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Daniela Navarrete ◽  
David Hannibal ◽  
Sachin M. Patil ◽  
Tarang Pankaj Patel ◽  
William Roland

Isolated native pulmonic valve infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare occurrence. The most commonly involved valves in injection drug users are the tricuspid valve followed by mitral and then aortic valves. Most reported cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) IE involve multiple valves. Isolated involvement of the pulmonic valve in IE is infrequent, especially in intravenous drug users or patients with indwelling catheters, prosthetic valves, or implantable cardiac devices. Here, we report a young postpartum female patient with isolated native pulmonic valve MRSA IE with MRSA bacteremia and history of active injection drug use. A PubMed literature review revealed a single described prior case report in a postpartum female. The patient’s clinical course was complicated by a large native pulmonic valve vegetation, septic pulmonary emboli, pelvic abscess, polyarticular septic arthritis, and clavicular osteomyelitis. The patient underwent bioprosthetic pulmonic valve replacement and finished six weeks of intravenous vancomycin for complete recovery.


2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (175) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bidya Shrestha ◽  
B M Pokhrel ◽  
T M Mohapatra

Introduction: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the most common cause ofnosocomial infection has been a major cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. They arenormally resistant to most of the antibiotics used in clinical practice. This study has been carried outto fi nd out the resistance pattern among S. aureus.Methods: During November 2007 to June 2008, clinical samples from patients with nosocomialinfection were processed for culture and sensitivity following standard methodology in microbiologylaboratory, Tribhuvan University teaching hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.Results: Among 149 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, highest resistance was observed against Penicillin(91.94%) followed by Fluoroquinolone (61.74%), Erythromycin (52.94%), Gentamicin (46.98%),Cotrimoxazole (42.95%), Tetracycline (40.94%) and others, whereas susceptibility was observedmaximum against Chloramphenicol (94.85%) followed by Rifampicin (92.61%), Tetracycline(59.06%), Cotrimoxazole (57.04%), and others. None of the isolates were resistant to Vancomycinand Teicoplanin. Of these isolates 44.96 % of the isolates were Methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA).Resistance to Penicillin, Fluoroquinolone, Erythromycin, Gentamicin, Co-trimoxazole and Tetracyclinewere associated signifi cantly with MRSA isolates (X2= 8.779, p<0.05, X2= 74.233, p<0.05, X2= 84.2842,p<0.05, X2= 108.2032, p<0.05, X2= 88.1512, p<0.05 and X2= 79.1876, p<0.05 respectively). Althoughmost of the Methicillin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates were susceptible to both Rifampicinand Chloramphenicol, only Rifampicin susceptibility was signifi cantly associated with them (X2=10.1299, p<0.05). Among three Biochemical tests for the detection of β lactamase detection namelychromogenic, iodometric and acidimetric test, chromogenic test method had highest sensitivity andspecifi city.Conclusions: Since MRSA comprised a greater part of S. aureus isolates and were multi-resistant,patients infected by such strains should be identifi ed and kept in isolation for hospital infectioncontrol and treated with second line of drug like vancomycin.Key Words: β lactamase, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus,methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, resistance pattern


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document