C1-2 Pedicle Screw Fixation for Ponticulus Posticus and Duplication of Vertebral Artery: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Gyo Jung ◽  
Byung-Jou Lee ◽  
Wonhyoung Park ◽  
Jin Hoon Park
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Posterior Arch ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Ponticulus Posticus ◽  
Patient Consent

Abstract We previously introduced C1 pedicle screw placement to treat C1-2 pathology in a patient with normal vertebral artery anatomy.1 However, we should prepare to meet various anatomic variations. Ponticulus posticus is a bony prominence arising from the posterior arch or the superior articulating process of the atlas that completely or partially encircles the vertebral artery.2 We herein report a 79-yr-old female who presented with myelopathy and was diagnosed with compressive myelopathy at the C1 level in magnetic resonance imaging. A computed tomography showed ponticulus posticus (complete type to the right side) with duplication of vertebral artery.  She underwent surgical treatment of C1-2 pedicle screw placement and reduction of C1 vertebra under a microscopic view. After C1 laminectomy, both-side vertebral arteries were dissected with a microscissor. The mobilization of upper divisions of vertebral artery was identified to secure the entry point and pedicle to insert a C1 pedicle screw. After complete protection of the upper and lower divisions of vertebral artery and identification of pedicle, a C1 pedicle screw was inserted by a freehand technique. We inserted autologous bone chips in the distracted C1-2 facet joint for facet joint fusion, and the C1 vertebra was pulled out by a rod reducer.  After surgery, the patient's symptoms disappeared, and no vertebral artery injury was identified in postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography angiography.  Patient consent was obtained prior to performing the procedure.

scholarly journals Rates and Risk Factors of Intrapedicular Accuracy and Cranial Facet Joint Violation Among Robot- Assisted, Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous, and Freehand Techniques in Pedicle Screw Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Comparative Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ren-Jie Zhang ◽  
Lu-Ping Zhou ◽  
Hua-Qing Zhang ◽  
Peng Ge ◽  
Chong-Yu Jia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Thoracolumbar Fractures ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Facet Joint Osteoarthritis ◽  
Facet Joint Violation

Abstract Background Robot-assisted (RA) technique has been increasingly applied in clinical practice, providing promising outcomes of inserting accuracy and cranial facet joint protection. However, studies comparing this novel method with other assisted methods are rare, and the controversy of the superiority between the insertion techniques remains. Thus, we compare the rates and risk factors of intrapedicular accuracy and cranial facet joint violation (FJV) of RA, fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous (FP), and freehand (FH) techniques in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods A total of 90 patients with thoracolumbar fractures requiring pedicle screw instruments were retrospectively included and divided into RA, FP, and FH groups at 1:1:1 ratio from June 2016 to May 2020. The primary outcomes were the intrapedicular accuracy and cranial FJV. The factors that affected the intrapedicular accuracy and cranial FJV were assessed using multivariate analyses.Results The optimal intrapedicular accuracy of pedicle screw placement (Grade A) in the RA, FP, and FH groups was 94.3%, 79.3%, and 88.7%, respectively. This finding indicates no significant differences between RA and FH techniques (P =0.062), but significantly higher accuracies of RA over FP (P＜0.001), and FH over FP (P= 0.013). In addition, the rates of proximal FJV in RA, FP, and FH groups were 13.9%, 29.3%, and 22.7%, respectively. The RA had a significantly greater proportion of intact facet joints than the FP (P= 0.001) and FH (P= 0.035). However, FP and FH showed significantly similar outcomes with respect to the proximal FJV (P= 0.149). The logistic regression analysis showed that FP technique (OR= 2.791), pedicle angle (OR= 0.916), and L3 insertion (OR= 0.081) were independently associated with insertion accuracy. Meanwhile, the age (OR= 0.966), pedicle angle (OR= 0.940), mild facet joint osteoarthritis (OR= 5.906), moderate facet joint osteoarthritis (OR= 5.906), severe facet joint osteoarthritis (OR= 9.991), and distance from skin to insertion point (OR= 0.575) were independently associated with cranial FJV.Conclusion RA technique showed higher rate of intrapedicular accuracy and lower rate of cranial FJV than FH and FP techniques, and it might be a safe method for pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery.

Deviation analysis for C1/2 pedicle screw placement using a three-dimensional printed drilling guide

2017 ◽  
Vol 231 (6) ◽  
pp. 547-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinghuo Wu ◽  
Rong Liu ◽  
Jie Yu ◽  
Lin Lu ◽  
Cao Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Entry Points ◽  
Computed Tomography Scans

Cervical transarticular fixation is a technically demanding procedure. This study aimed to develop a safer and more accurate method for C1/2 pedicle screw placement using a three-dimensional printed drilling guide. A total of 20 patients with C1/2 fractures and dislocations were recruited, and their computed tomography scans were evaluated. Under the assistance of the three-dimensional printed drilling guide, bilateral C1/2 pedicle screws were successfully placed in the three-dimensional C1/2 models. Then, sagittal and axial computed tomography scans were obtained, and the accuracy and safety of screw placement were evaluated based on X-Y-Z axis setup. The average depths for C1 and C2 pedicle screws were 30.1 ± 1.12 and 31.81 ± 0.85 mm on the left side and 29.54 ± 1.01 and 31.35 ± 0.27 mm on the right side, respectively. The average dimensional parameters for C1/C2 pedicle screw of both sides were measured and analyzed, which showed no statistically significant differences in the ideal and the actual entry points, inclined angles, and tailed angles. The method of developing a three-dimensional printed drilling guide is an easy and safe technique. This novel technique is applicable for C1/2 pedicle screw fixation; the potential use of the three-dimensional printed guide to place C1/2 pedicle screw is promising.

Accuracy of Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Using Direct Visualization Versus Computed Tomography–Based Navigation

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Harrison Farber ◽  
Jakub Godzik ◽  
Randall J. Hlubek ◽  
James J. Zhou ◽  
Corey T. Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Direct Visualization ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Cervical Pedicle Screw ◽  
Cervical Pedicle

scholarly journals Confirmation of accuracy/inaccuracy of lumbar pedicle screw placement using postoperative computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 518
Author(s):  
Mohamed M. Arnaout ◽  
Magdy O. ElSheikh ◽  
Mansour A. Makia
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Operative Intervention ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Lumbar Pedicle ◽  
Ct Studies

Background: Transpedicular screws are extensively utilized in lumbar spine surgery. The placement of these screws is typically guided by anatomical landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy. Here, we utilized 2-week postoperative computed tomography (CT) studies to confirm the accuracy/inaccuracy of lumbar pedicle screw placement in 145 patients and correlated these findings with clinical outcomes. Methods: Over 6 months, we prospectively evaluated the location of 612 pedicle screws placed in 145 patients undergoing instrumented lumbar fusions addressing diverse pathology with instability. Routine anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs were obtained 48 h after the surgery, while CT scans were obtained at 2 postoperative weeks (i.e., ideally these should have been performed intraoperatively or within 24–48 h of surgery). Results: Of the 612 screws, minor misplacement of screws (≤2 mm) was seen in 104 patients, moderate misplacement in 34 patients (2–4 mm), and severe misplacement in 7 patients (>4 mm). Notably, all the latter 7 (4.8% of the 145) patients required repeated operative intervention. Conclusion: Transpedicular screw insertion in the lumbar spine carries the risks of pedicle medial/lateral violation that is best confirmed on CT rather than X-rays/fluoroscopy alone. Here, we additional found 7 patients (4.8%) who with severe medial/lateral pedicle breach who warranting repeated operative intervention. In the future, CT studies should be performed intraoperatively or within 24–48 h of surgery to confirm the location of pedicle screws and rule in our out medial or lateral pedicle breaches.

Stepwise Methodology for Plain Radiographic Assessment of Pedicle Screw Placement: A Comparison With Computed Tomography

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 547-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore J. Choma ◽  
Francis Denis ◽  
John E. Lonstein ◽  
Joseph H. Perra ◽  
James D. Schwender ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Radiographic Assessment ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement

Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 615-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoguang Han ◽  
Wei Tian ◽  
Yajun Liu ◽  
Bo Liu ◽  
Da He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
The Mean

OBJECTIVEThe object of this study was to compare the safety and accuracy of pedicle screw placement using the TiRobot system versus conventional fluoroscopy in thoracolumbar spinal surgery.METHODSPatients with degenerative or traumatic thoracolumbar spinal disorders requiring spinal instrumentation were randomly assigned to either the TiRobot-assisted group (RG) or the freehand fluoroscopy-assisted group (FG) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of screw placement according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale; grades A and B (pedicle breach < 2 mm) were considered clinically acceptable. In the RG, discrepancies between the planned and actual screw placements were measured by merging postoperative CT images with the trajectory planning images. Secondary outcome parameters included proximal facet joint violation, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to freehand approach in the RG, postoperative hospital stay, and radiation exposure.RESULTSA total of 1116 pedicle screws were implanted in 234 patients (119 in the FG, and 115 in the RG). In the RG, 95.3% of the screws were perfectly positioned (grade A); the remaining screws were graded B (3.4%), C (0.9%), and D (0.4%). In the FG, 86.1% screws were perfectly positioned (grade A); the remaining screws were graded B (7.4%), C (4.6%), D (1.4%), and E (0.5%). The proportion of clinically acceptable screws was significantly greater in the RG than in the FG (p < 0.01). In the RG, the mean deviation was 1.5 ± 0.8 mm for each screw. The most common direction of screw deviation was lateral in the RG and medial in the FG. Two misplaced screws in the FG required revision surgery, whereas no revision was required in the RG. None of the screws in the RG violated the proximal facet joint, whereas 12 screws (2.1%) in the FG violated the proximal facet joint (p < 0.01). The RG had significantly less blood loss (186.0 ± 255.3 ml) than the FG (217.0 ± 174.3 ml; p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of surgical time and postoperative hospital stay. The mean cumulative radiation time was 81.5 ± 38.6 seconds in the RG and 71.5 ± 44.2 seconds in the FG (p = 0.07). Surgeon radiation exposure was significantly less in the RG (21.7 ± 11.5 μSv) than in the FG (70.5 ± 42.0 μSv; p < 0.01).CONCLUSIONSTiRobot-guided pedicle screw placement is safe and useful in thoracolumbar spinal surgery.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02890043 (clinicaltrials.gov)

Accuracy of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using the oblique or “owl's-eye” view and novel guidance technology

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cary Idler ◽  
Kevin W. Rolfe ◽  
Josef E. Gorek
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Guidance System ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
Clinical Series ◽  
Lumbar Pedicle

Object This study was conducted to assess the in vivo safety and accuracy of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using the owl's-eye view of the pedicle axis and a new guidance technology system that facilitates orientation of the C-arm into the appropriate fluoroscopic view and the pedicle cannulation tool in the corresponding trajectory. Methods A total of 326 percutaneous pedicle screws were placed from L-3 to S-1 in 85 consecutive adult patients. Placement was performed using simple coaxial imaging of the pedicle with the owl's-eye fluoroscopic view. NeuroVision, a new guidance system using accelerometer technology, helped align the C-arm trajectory into the owl's-eye view and the cannulation tool in the same trajectory. Postoperative fine-cut CT scans were acquired to assess screw position. Medical records were reviewed for complications. Results Five of 326 screws breached a pedicle cortex—all breaches were less than 2 mm—for an accuracy rate of 98.47%. Five screws violated an adjacent facet joint. All were at the S-1 superior facet and included in a fusion. No screw violated an adjacent mobile facet or disc space. There were no cases of new or worsening neurological symptoms or deficits for an overall clinical accuracy of 100%. Conclusions The owl's-eye technique of coaxial pedicle imaging with the C-arm fluoroscopy, facilitated by NeuroVision, is a safe and accurate means by which to place percutaneous pedicle screws for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. This is the largest series reported to use the oblique or owl's-eye projection for percutaneous pedicle screw insertion. The accuracy of percutaneous screw insertion with this technique meets or exceeds that of other reported clinical series or techniques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document