Deviation analysis for C1/2 pedicle screw placement using a three-dimensional printed drilling guide

2017 ◽  
Vol 231 (6) ◽  
pp. 547-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinghuo Wu ◽  
Rong Liu ◽  
Jie Yu ◽  
Lin Lu ◽  
Cao Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Entry Points ◽  
Computed Tomography Scans

Cervical transarticular fixation is a technically demanding procedure. This study aimed to develop a safer and more accurate method for C1/2 pedicle screw placement using a three-dimensional printed drilling guide. A total of 20 patients with C1/2 fractures and dislocations were recruited, and their computed tomography scans were evaluated. Under the assistance of the three-dimensional printed drilling guide, bilateral C1/2 pedicle screws were successfully placed in the three-dimensional C1/2 models. Then, sagittal and axial computed tomography scans were obtained, and the accuracy and safety of screw placement were evaluated based on X-Y-Z axis setup. The average depths for C1 and C2 pedicle screws were 30.1 ± 1.12 and 31.81 ± 0.85 mm on the left side and 29.54 ± 1.01 and 31.35 ± 0.27 mm on the right side, respectively. The average dimensional parameters for C1/C2 pedicle screw of both sides were measured and analyzed, which showed no statistically significant differences in the ideal and the actual entry points, inclined angles, and tailed angles. The method of developing a three-dimensional printed drilling guide is an easy and safe technique. This novel technique is applicable for C1/2 pedicle screw fixation; the potential use of the three-dimensional printed guide to place C1/2 pedicle screw is promising.

scholarly journals Confirmation of accuracy/inaccuracy of lumbar pedicle screw placement using postoperative computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 518
Author(s):  
Mohamed M. Arnaout ◽  
Magdy O. ElSheikh ◽  
Mansour A. Makia
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Operative Intervention ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Lumbar Pedicle ◽  
Ct Studies

Background: Transpedicular screws are extensively utilized in lumbar spine surgery. The placement of these screws is typically guided by anatomical landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy. Here, we utilized 2-week postoperative computed tomography (CT) studies to confirm the accuracy/inaccuracy of lumbar pedicle screw placement in 145 patients and correlated these findings with clinical outcomes. Methods: Over 6 months, we prospectively evaluated the location of 612 pedicle screws placed in 145 patients undergoing instrumented lumbar fusions addressing diverse pathology with instability. Routine anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs were obtained 48 h after the surgery, while CT scans were obtained at 2 postoperative weeks (i.e., ideally these should have been performed intraoperatively or within 24–48 h of surgery). Results: Of the 612 screws, minor misplacement of screws (≤2 mm) was seen in 104 patients, moderate misplacement in 34 patients (2–4 mm), and severe misplacement in 7 patients (>4 mm). Notably, all the latter 7 (4.8% of the 145) patients required repeated operative intervention. Conclusion: Transpedicular screw insertion in the lumbar spine carries the risks of pedicle medial/lateral violation that is best confirmed on CT rather than X-rays/fluoroscopy alone. Here, we additional found 7 patients (4.8%) who with severe medial/lateral pedicle breach who warranting repeated operative intervention. In the future, CT studies should be performed intraoperatively or within 24–48 h of surgery to confirm the location of pedicle screws and rule in our out medial or lateral pedicle breaches.

scholarly journals Postoperative 320 multi-slice computed tomography in assessment of pedicle screw insertion in thoraco-lumbar fixation

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alsiagy A. Salama ◽  
Mohamed A. Amin ◽  
Ahmed Y. Soliman ◽  
Ahmed El-Tantaway
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Spinal Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Postoperative Assessment ◽  
Reformatted Ct

Abstract Background Pedicle screw instrumentation is used widely in lumbar spine for stabilization to enhance arthrodesis and has been accepted in the thoracic spine in recent years. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of postoperative 320 multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in assessment of pedicle screw placement in patients with spinal fixation with clinical and surgical correlation. Results A total of 340 pedicular screws were inserted to 70 cases. 286 (84.12%) were in, 54 screws (15.88%) were violated, and revision surgeries were required for 5 displaced screws. On axial, coronal reconstruction and three-dimensional (3D) reformatted CT images 36, 47, and 54 displaced screws were detected, respectively. Both sensitivity and specificity for 3D reformatted images were 100%. For axial image, they were 97.6% and 89.4%, respectively, compared with surgical findings in 5 revised screws. Conclusion Multi-slice CT scan is a valuable and valid postoperative assessment tool of accuracy of spinal pedicle screw placement.

scholarly journals Freehand thoracic pedicle screw technique using a uniform entry point and sagittal trajectory for all levels: preliminary clinical experience

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 778-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vernard S. Fennell ◽  
Sheri Palejwala ◽  
Jesse Skoch ◽  
David A. Stidd ◽  
Ali A. Baaj
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Transverse Process ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Entry Point ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Thoracic Pedicle Screw ◽  
Thoracic Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Diameter

Object Experience with freehand thoracic pedicle screw placement is well described in the literature. Published techniques rely on various starting points and trajectories for each level or segment of the thoracic spine. Furthermore, few studies provide specific guidance on sagittal and axial trajectories. The goal of this study was to propose a uniform entry point and sagittal trajectory for all thoracic levels during freehand pedicle screw placement and determine the accuracy of this technique. Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed postoperative CT scans of 33 consecutive patients who underwent open, freehand thoracic pedicle-screw fixation using a uniform entry point and sagittal trajectory for all levels. The same entry point for each level was defined as a point 3 mm caudal to the junction of the transverse process and the lateral margin of the superior articulating process, and the sagittal trajectory was always orthogonal to the dorsal curvature of the spine at that level. The medial angulation (axial trajectory) was approximately 30° at T-1 and T-2, and 20° from T-3 to T-12. Breach was defined as greater than 25% of the screw diameter residing outside of the pedicle or vertebral body. Results A total of 219 thoracic pedicle screws were placed with a 96% accuracy rate. There were no medial breaches and 9 minor lateral breaches (4.1%). None of the screws had to be repositioned postoperatively, and there were no neurovascular complications associated with the breaches. Conclusions It is feasible to place freehand thoracic pedicle screws using a uniform entry point and sagittal trajectory for all levels. The entry point does not have to be adjusted for each level as reported in existing studies, although this technique was not tested in severe scoliotic spines. While other techniques are effective and widely used, this particular method provides more specific parameters and may be easier to learn, teach, and adopt.

C1-2 Pedicle Screw Fixation for Ponticulus Posticus and Duplication of Vertebral Artery: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Gyo Jung ◽  
Byung-Jou Lee ◽  
Wonhyoung Park ◽  
Jin Hoon Park
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Posterior Arch ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Ponticulus Posticus ◽  
Patient Consent

Abstract We previously introduced C1 pedicle screw placement to treat C1-2 pathology in a patient with normal vertebral artery anatomy.1 However, we should prepare to meet various anatomic variations. Ponticulus posticus is a bony prominence arising from the posterior arch or the superior articulating process of the atlas that completely or partially encircles the vertebral artery.2 We herein report a 79-yr-old female who presented with myelopathy and was diagnosed with compressive myelopathy at the C1 level in magnetic resonance imaging. A computed tomography showed ponticulus posticus (complete type to the right side) with duplication of vertebral artery.  She underwent surgical treatment of C1-2 pedicle screw placement and reduction of C1 vertebra under a microscopic view. After C1 laminectomy, both-side vertebral arteries were dissected with a microscissor. The mobilization of upper divisions of vertebral artery was identified to secure the entry point and pedicle to insert a C1 pedicle screw. After complete protection of the upper and lower divisions of vertebral artery and identification of pedicle, a C1 pedicle screw was inserted by a freehand technique. We inserted autologous bone chips in the distracted C1-2 facet joint for facet joint fusion, and the C1 vertebra was pulled out by a rod reducer.  After surgery, the patient's symptoms disappeared, and no vertebral artery injury was identified in postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography angiography.  Patient consent was obtained prior to performing the procedure.

Feasibility of mixed reality–based intraoperative three-dimensional image-guided navigation for atlanto-axial pedicle screw placement

2019 ◽  
Vol 233 (12) ◽  
pp. 1310-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinghuo Wu ◽  
Rong Liu ◽  
Song Xu ◽  
Cao Yang ◽  
Shuhua Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Mixed Reality ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Upper Cervical Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Upper Cervical

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and accuracy of mixed reality–based intraoperative three-dimensional navigated pedicle screws in three-dimensional printed model of fractured upper cervical spine. A total of 27 cervical model from patients of upper cervical spine fractures formed the study group. All the C1 and C2 pedicle screws were inserted under mixed reality–based intraoperative three-dimensional image-guided navigation system. The accuracy and safety of the pedicle screw placement were evaluated on the basis of postoperative computerized tomography scans. A total of 108 pedicle screws were properly inserted into the cervical three-dimensional models under mixed reality–based navigation, including 54 C1 pedicle screws and 54 C2 pedicle screws. Analysis of the dimensional parameters of each pedicle at C1/C2 level showed no statistically significant differences in the ideal and the actual entry points, inclined angles, and tailed angles. No screw was misplaced outside the pedicle of the three-dimensional printed model, and no ionizing X-ray radiation was used during screw placement under navigation. It is easy and safe to place C1/C2 pedicle screws under MR surgical navigation. Mixed reality–based navigation is feasible within upper cervical spinal fractures with improved safety and accuracy of C1/C2 pedicle screw insertion.

scholarly journals P.174 Accuracy of pedicle screw placement with X-ray versus O-arm image-guided navigation

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (s3) ◽  
pp. S69-S70
Author(s):  
L Neuburger ◽  
Y Cheng ◽  
DR Fourney
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Image Guided

Background: Image-guided navigation is routinely used in spine surgery to improve placement of pedicle screws. However, most reports have relied on two-dimensional X-ray evaluation to determine accuracy of screw positioning. In this study, computed tomography (CT) and O-arm imaging enabled a detailed three-dimensional comparison of screw placement. The objective was to compare the accuracy of pedicle screw placement with intraoperative X-ray versus O-arm image-guided navigation. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of image-guided pedicle screw placement in patients who underwent spinal instrumentation. Post-operative CT and O-arm imaging allowed grading of screw accuracy based on pedicle breaches. Clinical outcomes included patient and operative factors. Results: Pedicle screws were placed in 208 patients (1116 screws). Three-dimensional O-arm guidance was utilized for 126 patients, while the remainder underwent two-dimensional X-ray imaging and post-operative CT assessment. O-arm navigation was associated with improved pedicle screw accuracy: pedicle breaches were more likely to be low grade (odds ratio 2.84, p=0.001) and less likely to be medium grade (odds ratio 0.35, p=0.007) or high grade (odds ratio 0.31, p=0.025). Conclusions: This study provided a detailed comparison of surgical accuracy with X-ray versus O-arm guidance. Navigation with O-arm imaging is associated with benefits in spinal instrumentation, without impacting operative risks for patients.

scholarly journals Thoracic, Lumbar, and Sacral Pedicle Screw Placement Using Stryker-Ziehm Virtual Screw Technology and Navigated Stryker Cordless Driver 3: Technical Note

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen Satarasinghe ◽  
D. Kojo Hamilton ◽  
Michael Jace Tarver ◽  
Robert J. Buchanan ◽  
Michael T. Koltz
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Intraoperative Ct ◽  
Spine Stabilization

Object. Utilization of pedicle screws (PS) for spine stabilization is common in spinal surgery. With reliance on visual inspection of anatomical landmarks prior to screw placement, the free-hand technique requires a high level of surgeon skill and precision. Three-dimensional (3D) computer-assisted virtual neuronavigation improves the precision of PS placement and minimize steps. Methods. Twenty-three patients with degenerative, traumatic, or neoplastic pathologies received treatment via a novel three-step PS technique that utilizes a navigated power driver in combination with virtual screw technology. 1) Following visualization of neuroanatomy using intraoperative CT, a navigated 3-mm match stick drill bit was inserted at anatomical entry point with screen projection showing virtual screw. 2) Navigated Stryker Cordless Driver with appropriate tap was used to access vertebral body through pedicle with screen projection again showing virtual screw. 3) Navigated Stryker Cordless Driver with actual screw was used with screen projection showing the same virtual screw. One hundred and forty-four consecutive screws were inserted using this three-step, navigated driver, virtual screw technique. Results. Only 1 screw needed intraoperative revision after insertion using the three-step, navigated driver, virtual PS technique. This amounts to a 0.69% revision rate. One hundred percent of patients had intraoperative CT reconstructed images to confirm hardware placement. Conclusions. Pedicle screw placement utilizing the Stryker-Ziehm neuronavigation virtual screw technology with a three step, navigated power drill technique is safe and effective.

Usefulness of Electromyography Compared to Computed Tomography Scans in Pedicle Screw Placement

Spine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. E43-E48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Duffy ◽  
Jonathan H. Phillips ◽  
Dennis R. Knapp ◽  
Jose Antonio Herrera-Soto
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Computed Tomography Scans
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document