Species limits and taxonomy in birds

The Auk ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Winker ◽  
Pamela C Rasmussen
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Species Delimitation ◽  
Population Genomics ◽  
Species Concept ◽  
Biological Species ◽  
Integrative Approach ◽  
Population Divergence ◽  
Biological Species Concept ◽  
Species Limits ◽  
American Kestrel

Abstract Despite the acknowledged importance of defining avian species limits to scientific research, conservation, and management, in practice, they often remain contentious. This is true even among practitioners of a single species concept and is inevitable owing to the continuous nature of the speciation process, our incomplete and changing understanding of individual cases, and differing interpretations of available data. This issue of Ornithology brings together several papers on species limits, some more theoretical and general, and others case studies of specific taxa. These are viewed primarily through the lens of the biological species concept (BSC), by far the most widely adopted species concept in influential ornithological works. The more conceptual contributions focus on the importance of the integrative approach in species delimitation; the importance of considering selection with the increasing use of genomic data; examinations of the effectiveness of the Tobias et al. character-scoring species limits criteria; a review of thorny issues in species delimitation using examples from Australo-Papuan birds; and a review of the process of speciation that addresses how population divergence poses challenges. Case studies include population genomics of the American Kestrel (Falco sparverius); an integrative taxonomic analysis of Graceful Prinia (Prinia gracilis) that suggests two species are involved; and a reevaluation of species limits in Caribbean Sharp-shinned Hawk (Accipiter striatus) taxa.

Species limits in Antbirds (Aves: Passeriformes: Thamnophilidae): an evaluation of Plumbeous Antvireo (Dysithamnus plumbeus) based on vocalizations

Zootaxa ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 1726 (1) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
MORTON L. ISLER ◽  
PHYLLIS R. ISLER ◽  
BRET M. WHITNEY
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
Species Concept ◽  
Biological Species ◽  
Southeastern Brazil ◽  
Biological Species Concept ◽  
Species Status ◽  
Species Limits ◽  
The Andes ◽  
Northern Peru ◽  
Contrary Evidence

Through most of the 20th Century, Dysithamnus plumbeus was considered to comprise three geographically remote subspecies based on plumage: D. p. plumbeus of the lowlands of southeastern Brazil; D. p. leucostictus of the east slope of the Andes from central Colombia to extreme northern Peru; and D .p tucuyensis endemic to the mountains of northern Venezuela. Some recent authors have elevated these taxa to species status without providing additional evidence. We analyzed vocal differences among these taxa and compared the extent of diagnostic differences to a benchmark for species status under the Biological Species Concept (BSC). Vocalizations of D. plumbeus differed sufficiently from the others for D. plumbeus to be considered specifically distinct. Although both calls and loudsongs of the two remaining taxa differed from each other in some aspects, the differences did not meet our benchmark for species separation. We therefore recommend that they be designated as D. leucostictus leucostictus and D. leucostictus tucuyensis pending the acquisition of additional vocal recordings or other contrary evidence.

scholarly journals Taxonomy and Species Delimitation in Cyanobacteria

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessio Papini ◽  
Sara Falsini ◽  
Tiruha Habte Karssa
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Species Delimitation ◽  
Species Concept ◽  
Cell Structure ◽  
Ultrastructural Level ◽  
Biological Species ◽  
Botanical Nomenclature ◽  
Biological Species Concept ◽  
Theoretical Point ◽  
Main Concept

Cyanobacteria are prokaryotes whose taxonomy follows the same rules of a code (the International Botanical Nomenclature Code, IBNC) built for eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms. Hence, names of cyanobacteria follow the same rules and are assigned to biological entities (species) that should correspond to eukaryotic species. The main difficulty in the current situation is that the species concept in eukaryotes is based theoretically mainly on the biological species concept, that is centered on genetic exchange through sexual reproduction or lack of them. However, as shown, this difference is important from a theoretical point of view, but also in eukaryotes, the boundaries between different species are very rarely checked experimentally by direct observation of sexual barriers and hybridization events. The main concept for species delimitation is hence that related to morphology and, more recently and always in relation to morphology, DNA sequences. The introduction of distances obtained from matrixes of aligned sequences in the framework of a barcoding project provides a quantitative interpretation of species delimitation in relation to genetic distance that can be used both in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. However, the introduction of quantitative criteria needs the definition of distance thresholds to identify the boundaries between different species and, for doing that, it is necessary to test the distance thresholds in models of traditionally defined and recognized species. An alternative approach may be the comparison of the molecular distance (quantitative approach) to data about the capability of strains/species to exchange genetic information. Unfortunately data about this last question is still scarce. The adoption of molecular criteria to check species boundaries based on morphological characters has proved particularly challenging in cyanobacteria: a known example is provided. In conclusion, the only possible approach appears to be the association of molecular data to the increase of available data about the cell structure and the variation thereof in different physiological situations, particularly at the ultrastructural level. A further necessity is the check of the typus for a large number of cyanobacteria species, often based on old basionyms. In many of these cases the typus is often a drawing and more rarely a herbarium specimen or a microscope slide. In many cases an epitypification or a neotypification appears to be necessary.

Biogeography and taxonomy of racket-tail hummingbirds (Aves: Trochilidae: Ocreatus): evidence for species delimitation from morphology and display behavior

Zootaxa ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4200 (1) ◽  
pp. 83 ◽  
Author(s):  
KARL-L. SCHUCHMANN ◽  
ANDRÉ-A. WELLER ◽  
DIETMAR JÜRGENS
Keyword(s):  
Geographic Variation ◽  
Endemic Species ◽  
Species Delimitation ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Species Concept ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Biological Species ◽  
Biological Species Concept ◽  
Taxonomic History ◽  
History Of

We analyzed geographic variation, biogeography, and intrageneric relationships of racket-tail hummingbirds Ocreatus (Aves, Trochilidae). Presently, the genus is usually considered monospecific, with O. underwoodii including eight subspecies (polystictus, discifer, underwoodii, incommodus, melanantherus, peruanus, annae, addae), although up to three species have been recognized by some authors. In order to evaluate the current taxonomy we studied geographic variation in coloration, mensural characters, and behavioral data of all Ocreatus taxa. We briefly review the taxonomic history of the genus. Applying the Biological Species Concept, species delimitation was based on a qualitative-quantitative criteria analysis including an evaluation of character states. Our results indicate that the genus should be considered a superspecies with four species, the monotypic Ocreatus addae, O. annae, and O. peruanus, and the polytypic O. underwoodii (including the subspecies underwoodii, discifer, incommodus, melanantherus, polystictus). In this taxonomic treatment, O. annae becomes an endemic species to Peru and O. addae is endemic to Bolivia. We recommend additional sampling of distributional, ethological, and molecular data for an improved resolution of the evolutionary history of Ocreatus. 

Discriminating arboviral species

2021 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiyuan Li ◽  
Angela C. O’Donnell ◽  
Howard Ochman
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Viral Vectors ◽  
Species Concept ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Biological Species ◽  
Biological Species Concept ◽  
Substantial Variation ◽  
Artificial Boundaries ◽  
Human Infections

Mosquito-borne arboviruses, including a diverse array of alphaviruses and flaviviruses, lead to hundreds of millions of human infections each year. Current methods for species-level classification of arboviruses adhere to guidelines prescribed by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), and generally apply a polyphasic approach that might include information about viral vectors, hosts, geographical distribution, antigenicity, levels of DNA similarity, disease association and/or ecological characteristics. However, there is substantial variation in the criteria used to define viral species, which can lead to the establishment of artificial boundaries between species and inconsistencies when inferring their relatedness, variation and evolutionary history. In this study, we apply a single, uniform principle – that underlying the Biological Species Concept (BSC) – to define biological species of arboviruses based on recombination between genomes. Given that few recombination events have been documented in arboviruses, we investigate the incidence of recombination within and among major arboviral groups using an approach based on the ratio of homoplastic sites (recombinant alleles) to non-homoplastic sites (vertically transmitted alleles). This approach supports many ICTV-designations but also recognizes several cases in which a named species comprises multiple biological species. These findings demonstrate that this metric may be applied to all lifeforms, including viruses, and lead to more consistent and accurate delineation of viral species.

scholarly journals Putting the Biological Species Concept to the Test: Using Mating Networks to Delimit Species

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. e68267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lélia Lagache ◽  
Jean-Benoist Leger ◽  
Jean-Jacques Daudin ◽  
Rémy J. Petit ◽  
Corinne Vacher
Keyword(s):  
Species Concept ◽  
Biological Species ◽  
Biological Species Concept

Fern nothogenera and ×Lepinema, a new hybrid genus between Ellipinema and Lepisorus (Polypodiaceae)

Phytotaxa ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 455 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-266
Author(s):  
LIANG ZHANG ◽  
LI-BING ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
Species Concept ◽  
Intergeneric Hybrid ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Biological Species ◽  
Biological Species Concept

The biological species concept is not exclusively applicable in many groups of organisms including ferns. Interspecific fern hybrids are not rare: there are 16 intergeneric hybrid genera in ferns confirmed with molecular data. Here we add one more hybrid genus in the tribe Lepisoreae of Polypodiaceae, ×Lepinema, formed via hybridization between parents in two genera: Ellipinema and Lepisorus.

scholarly journals Systematics and bird conservation policies: the importance of species limits

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
OCTAVIO R. ROJAS-SOTO ◽  
ADOLFO G. NAVARRO-SIGÜENZA ◽  
ALEJANDRO ESPINOSA DE LOS MONTEROS
Keyword(s):  
Endangered Species ◽  
Species Concept ◽  
Valid Species ◽  
Biological Species Concept ◽  
Bird Conservation ◽  
Phylogenetic Species ◽  
Species Limits ◽  
Species List ◽  
Phylogenetic Species Concept ◽  
Species Lists

SummaryThe taxonomic criteria used as bases for endangered species lists can affect conservation policy decisions. We emphasize that the use of different taxonomic units affects the baselines of such lists. Recent taxonomic reviews for the Mexican avifauna provided the tools for assessing this effect on a highly diverse avifauna which is currently in need of serious conservation actions. Most ornithologists have used a taxonomy based on the biological species concept (BSC) to make decisions on species limits and therefore to set them into endangered species lists. However, the application of the phylogenetic species concept (PSC) as an alternative for delimiting species, results in a different panorama of what should be protected. Our analysis shows that the current official Mexican endangered species list, BSC based, encompasses 371 birds, ranked as 277 species and 94 subspecies. The same list of protected forms changes under the phylogenetic species concept because 47 of them are not recognized as valid species, while another 28 forms merit higher levels of protection. Additionally, under this concept another 11 forms should be candidates for inclusion based on their restricted distribution. We call attention to the fact that the use of one or another species concept affects endangered species lists.

The increasing multiplicity of the species concepts

2005 ◽  
Vol 176 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-225
Author(s):  
Jean Génermont
Keyword(s):  
Species Concept ◽  
Cladistic Analysis ◽  
Biological Species ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Biological Species Concept ◽  
Phylogenetic Species ◽  
Phylogenetic Species Concept ◽  
Ecological Criteria ◽  
Stem Species ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract In 1980, Henri Tintant advocated the usefulness of the biological species concept in paleontology. At this time, this concept was still accepted by many neontologists, but it was already rather severely criticized by some others. In fact, a lot of new concepts appeared in the course of the following two decades. While a few ones are mere adjustments of the biological concept, for instance taking in account ecological criteria, in such a way that it could be applied to clonal organisms, some others, which were developed in connexion with the cladistic theory of taxonomy, are truly new from a conceptual point of view. The diagnosable version of the phylogenetic species concept is somewhat reminiscent of Simpson’s evolutionary species concept, since it accepts phyletic speciation as well as survival of the stem species after a cladogenetic event. One of its more criticizable features, from a cladistic point of view, is that the species are not necessarilly monophyletic. On another hand, according to the monophyly version of the phylogenetic species concept, species are recognized rather subjectively as monophyletic taxa revealed by some previous cladistic analysis dealing with operational taxonomic units. A consensus on the definition of species cannot be expected, since all concepts related to the biological one are founded on population grouping on the basis of potentially identical evolutionary fates, while those which are related to cladistic taxonomy are exclusively concerned with historical features.

scholarly journals Group selection and the development of the biological species concept

2010 ◽  
Vol 365 (1547) ◽  
pp. 1853-1863 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Mallet
Keyword(s):  
Species Concept ◽  
Biological Species ◽  
Second World War ◽  
Species Level ◽  
Biological Species Concept ◽  
Ernst Mayr ◽  
World War ◽  
Mutualistic Interaction ◽  
Theodosius Dobzhansky ◽  
Second World

The development of what became known as the biological species concept began with a paper by Theodosius Dobzhansky in 1935, and was amplified by a mutualistic interaction between Dobzhansky, Alfred Emerson and Ernst Mayr after the second world war. By the 1950s and early 1960s, these authors had developed an influential concept of species as coadapted genetic complexes at equilibrium. At this time many features of species were seen as group advantages maintained by selection to avoid breakdown of beneficial coadaptation and the ‘gene pool’. Speciation thus seemed difficult. It seemed to require, more so than today, an external deus ex machina , such as allopatry or the founder effect, rather than ordinary within-species processes of natural selection, sexual selection, drift and gene flow. In the mid-1960s, the distinctions between group and individual selection were clarified. Dobzhansky and Mayr both understood the implications, but their views on species changed little. These group selectionist ideas now seem peculiar, and are becoming distinctly less popular today. Few vestiges of group selectionism and species-level adaptationism remain in recent reviews of speciation. One wonders how many of our own cherished views on evolution will seem as odd to future biologists.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document