Discussion of Issues Related to Assessing Signed or Spoken Language in Children with Developmental Language Disorder

2021 ◽  
pp. 185-192
Author(s):  
Carol-Anne Murphy ◽  
Pauline Frizelle ◽  
Cristina McKean ◽  
David Quintos-Pozos
Keyword(s):  
Hard Of Hearing ◽  
Language Disorder ◽  
Dynamic Assessment ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
Developmental Language Disorder ◽  
Semantic Fluency ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Issues regarding assessment of the deaf and hard-of-hearing (D/HH) child with developmental language disorder (DLD) have implications for the assessment of the child with DLD who is not D/HH. Of note are suggestions regarding literacy, the potential for semantic fluency assessment to contribute to the identification of DLD, the use of standardized protocols to support assessment at the conversational level, and the necessary skills of those completing assessments. Similarly, issues in assessment and identification of children with DLD who are not D/HH have implications for practice with children who are D/HH. These include the shift from exclusionary approaches to identification and recognition of co-occurring conditions, addressing the impact of development over time and considering the contribution of dynamic assessment. This chapter is a joint discussion of key items related to the assessment of deaf and hearing children with a developmental language disorder that were presented in Chapters 5.1 and 5.2.

Discussion of Issues Related to Assessing the Signed and Spoken Language Skills of Bi/Multilingual Children

2021 ◽  
pp. 221-230
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Bedore ◽  
Kathryn Crowe ◽  
Elizabeth D. Peña ◽  
Kathleen Durant ◽  
Stephanie McMillen
Keyword(s):  
Hard Of Hearing ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Language Disorder ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
Bilingual Children ◽  
Developmental Language Disorder ◽  
Signed Languages ◽  
Growing Body ◽  
Spoken Language Skills

This chapter is a joint discussion of key items related to the assessment of bi-/multilingual deaf and hearing learners with and without a developmental language disorder that were presented in Chapters 6.1 and 6.2. While there is a growing body of evidence describing best practice in the assessment of bilingual children who use spoken languages, there is scant evidence or recommendations available regarding the assessment of bilingual children who use signed languages. This discussion outlines how knowledge from the assessment of spoken languages can be used to inform practice in assessing signed languages for bilingual deaf and hard-of-hearing (D/HH) children.

Vocabulary Learning in Children with Cochlear Implants in Signed and Spoken Modalities

2020 ◽  
pp. 109-125
Author(s):  
Daan Hermans ◽  
Lian van Berkel-van Hoof ◽  
Harry Knoors
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Hard Of Hearing ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
Lexical Knowledge ◽  
Lexical Representations ◽  
Signed Language ◽  
Lexical Quality ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
The Impact

The lexical quality hypothesis emphasizes the importance of the quantity and the quality of lexical knowledge for reading comprehension: children need to quickly and accurately access the meanings of the written words they encounter. This chapter discusses research on the quality and quantity of lexical representations in spoken language and in signed language in children with cochlear implants (CIs). It also describes the impact of three multimodal approaches that have been used to enhance the quantity and quality of lexical representations in deaf and hard-of-hearing children, including those with CIs: Cued Speech, orthographic information, and augmentative signs. The chapter argues that these three multimodal approaches are promising tools for enhancing the quality of lexical representations in spoken language in children with CIs.

Do Children With Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) Have Difficulties With Interference Control, Visuospatial Working Memory, and Selective Attention? Developmental Patterns and the Role of Severity and Persistence of DLD

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 3036-3050
Author(s):  
Elma Blom ◽  
Tessel Boerma
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Selective Attention ◽  
Language Disorder ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Developmental Language Disorder ◽  
Visuospatial Working Memory ◽  
Interference Control ◽  
Developmental Patterns ◽  
Search Tasks ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Many children with developmental language disorder (DLD) have weaknesses in executive functioning (EF), specifically in tasks testing interference control and working memory. It is unknown how EF develops in children with DLD, if EF abilities are related to DLD severity and persistence, and if EF weaknesses expand to selective attention. This study aimed to address these gaps. Method Data from 78 children with DLD and 39 typically developing (TD) children were collected at three times with 1-year intervals. At Time 1, the children were 5 or 6 years old. Flanker, Dot Matrix, and Sky Search tasks tested interference control, visuospatial working memory, and selective attention, respectively. DLD severity was based on children's language ability. DLD persistence was based on stability of the DLD diagnosis. Results Performance on all tasks improved in both groups. TD children outperformed children with DLD on interference control. No differences were found for visuospatial working memory and selective attention. An interference control gap between the DLD and TD groups emerged between Time 1 and Time 2. Severity and persistence of DLD were related to interference control and working memory; the impact on working memory was stronger. Selective attention was unrelated to DLD severity and persistence. Conclusions Age and DLD severity and persistence determine whether or not children with DLD show EF weaknesses. Interference control is most clearly impaired in children with DLD who are 6 years and older. Visuospatial working memory is impaired in children with severe and persistent DLD. Selective attention is spared.

The Impact of Verbal Capacity on Theory of Mind in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children

2012 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clovis Levrez ◽  
Béatrice Bourdin ◽  
Barbara Le Driant ◽  
Baudouin Forgeot D'Arc ◽  
Luc Vandromme
Keyword(s):  
Theory Of Mind ◽  
Hard Of Hearing ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals The Impact of Language Input on Deaf and Hard of Hearing Preschool Children Who Use Listening and Spoken Language

2018 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronda Rufsvold ◽  
Ye Wang ◽  
Maria C. Hartman ◽  
Sonia B. Arora ◽  
Elaine R. Smolen
Keyword(s):  
Preschool Children ◽  
Hard Of Hearing ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
Language Input ◽  
The Impact

Establishing a Bimodal Bilingual Co-Enrollment Program in Germany: Preconditions, Policy, and Preliminary Data

2019 ◽  
pp. 149-164
Author(s):  
Johannes Hennies ◽  
Kristin Hennies
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Hard Of Hearing ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
The Political ◽  
Bilingual Programs ◽  
Regular School ◽  
Schools For The Deaf ◽  
Hearing Children

In 2016, the first German bimodal bilingual co-enrollment program for deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) students, CODAs, and other hearing children was established in Erfurt, Thuringia. There is a tradition of different models of co-enrollment for DHH children in a spoken language setting in Germany, but there has been no permanent program for co-enrollment of DHH children who use sign language so far. This program draws from the experience of an existing model in Austria to enroll a group of DHH children using sign language in a regular school and from two well-documented bimodal bilingual programs in German schools for the deaf. The chapter describes the preconditions for the project, the political circumstances of the establishment of bimodal bilingual co-enrollment, and the factors that seem crucial for successful realization.

scholarly journals Adoption of the sign language with deaf and hard of hearing preschool children

Bastina ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 513-535
Author(s):  
Tamara Kovačević ◽  
Ljubica Isaković
Keyword(s):  
Preschool Children ◽  
Sign Language ◽  
Hard Of Hearing ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
Preschool Age ◽  
Deaf Children ◽  
The Family ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
Hearing Children

This study analyses the process of adopting of the sign language with deaf and hard of hearing preschool children in the context of the result of linguistic and psycholinguistic research. The importance of the sign language is emphasized and its historical development is analyzed. It is pointed to the significance of the critical period for the adoption and the learning of the sign and spoken language with deaf and hard of hearing preschool children. The sign language is natural and primary linguistic expression of deaf children. Deaf and hard of hearing children are exposed to the sign and spoken language, they have better understanding and linguistic production than the children who are only exposed to the spoken language. Bilingualism involves the knowledge and the regular use of the sign language, which is used by the deaf community, and of the spoken language, which is used by the hearing majority. Children at the preschool age should be enabled to continue to adopt the language they started to adopt within the family (the sign language or the spoken language). Children will adopt the best both linguistic modalities through the interaction with other fluent speakers (the adults and children).

scholarly journals The Impact of Dose and Dose Frequency on Word Learning by Kindergarten Children With Developmental Language Disorder During Interactive Book Reading

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 518-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly L. Storkel ◽  
Rouzana Komesidou ◽  
Mollee J. Pezold ◽  
Adrienne R. Pitt ◽  
Kandace K. Fleming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Word Learning ◽  
Language Disorder ◽  
Intensity Variation ◽  
Kindergarten Children ◽  
Book Reading ◽  
Developmental Language Disorder ◽  
Dose Frequency ◽  
Response Variation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Interactive Book

Purpose The goal was to determine whether interactive book reading outcomes for children with developmental language disorder (DLD) were affected by manipulation of dose (i.e., the number of exposures to the target word during a book reading session) and dose frequency (i.e., the number of repeated book reading sessions) and whether pretreatment factors predicted treatment response variation. Method Thirty-four kindergarten children with DLD (aged 5;0–6;2 [years;months]) were taught 1 set of words using the Dose 6 and Dose Frequency 6 format from a prior study ( Storkel, Voelmle, et al., 2017 ) and taught a different set of words using an alternative format, either Dose 4 × Dose Frequency 9 or Dose 9 × Dose Frequency 4, determined through random assignment. Word learning was tracked for each treatment via a definition task prior to, during, and after treatment. Results Results showed that children with DLD learned a significant number of words during treatment regardless of the dose and dose frequency format but that significant forgetting of newly learned words occurred in all formats once treatment was withdrawn. Individual differences in word learning were related to Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Core Language and Understanding Spoken Paragraphs scores. Conclusion When administered at an adequate intensity, variation in the dose and dose frequency of interactive book reading does not appear to influence word learning by children with DLD. Although interactive book reading continues to show promise as an effective word learning intervention for children with DLD, further development is needed to enhance the effectiveness of this treatment approach. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9745181

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document