Competing Canons
Rashi’s critics joined a battle that unfolded across the late medieval Mediterranean at the center of which stood divergent ideas not only as to the correct meaning of the Torah but how to realize the divine charge that the Torah communicated. Many in the eastern Mediterranean, including Rashi’s resisting readers, took inspirtation from teachings of the Spanish luminaries, Abraham ibn Ezra and Maimonides. The late medieval battle over Judaism’s future is apparent from a peculiar specimen of Jewish rationalism bearing the title ‘Alilot devarim (Book of Accusations). Its author put his satirical genius in the service of exposure of the obscurantism that, in his view, had come to degrade Jewish life in post-talmudic times. The corruption infiltrated every sphere, and this writer thought Rashi’s Commentary a major cause and symptom of it. In the end, amid competing canons, Rashi’s Commentary, standing in varying degrees of opposition to the exegetical and theological rationalism of Ibn Ezra and Maimonides, proved triumphant, as is betokened by the composition and popularity of the greatest of the Rashi supercommentaries by Elijah Mizrahi.