Conclusion
The conclusion compares eccentric film form to the spaces of a haunted house, considering how the disruption to structures of knowledge offered by both is tamed and diminished by the imposition of a centring character, a ghost in the machine. The subversive potential of art cinema, like that of the haunted house, is constrained by the centring critical manoeuvre of discovering (or constructing) a comprehensible protagonist with backstory and motivation. If, instead, the protagonist is read as just another symptom of a film’s complicated articulation, the effect of the text’s ability to disrupt and disturb habitual patterns of knowledge-making is reinstated. Drawing on Deleuze and Guattari’s theory of the rhizome, the conclusion argues for a criticism that does not seek to settle, but rather to unsettle, meaning.