Regime Complexity and Main Argument

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Randall Henning
Keyword(s):  
International Finance ◽  
Global Governance ◽  
Research Program ◽  
Control Agency ◽  
International Organization ◽  
Euro Crisis ◽  
Main Argument ◽  
International Regime ◽  
Institutional Interaction ◽  
Regime Complex

International regime complexity provides a framework that is useful for analyzing the questions that are addressed in this study. This chapter discusses the origins and development of the regime complexity approach and locates the arguments of the book relative to it and other approaches to the study of international organization and global governance. It defines the concept of a regime complex, reviews some of the shortcomings of the approach, and shows how the analysis of the complex for international finance contributes to the research program on regime complexity. This study is a comparison of institutional interaction in seven structured cases of lending programs, woven through a narrative of the euro crisis. The chapter then previews the main arguments of the book, including that regime complexity stems from states’ efforts to control agency drift and that key states mediate interinstitutional conflict informally.

The Rise of International Regime Complexity

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 329-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen J. Alter ◽  
Kal Raustiala
Keyword(s):  
International Cooperation ◽  
Global Governance ◽  
World Order ◽  
First Century ◽  
International Agreement ◽  
Political Systems ◽  
International Regime ◽  
Regime Complex ◽  
Political Effects ◽  
Twenty First Century

The signature feature of twenty-first-century international cooperation is arguably not the regime but the regime complex. A regime complex is an array of partially overlapping and nonhierarchical institutions that includes more than one international agreement or authority. The institutions and agreements may be functional or territorial in nature. International regime complexity refers to international political systems of global governance that emerge because of the coexistence of rule density and regime complexes. This article highlights insights and questions that emerge from the last 15 years of scholarship on the politics of international regime complexity, explaining why regime complexes arise, what factors sustain them, and the range of political effects regime complexity creates. Our conclusion explains why, in a post-American world order, the trend of greater international regime complexity will likely accelerate.

The legitimacy of transnational NGOs: lessons from the experience of Transparency International in Germany and France

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELLEN GUTTERMAN
Keyword(s):  
Global Governance ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Main Argument ◽  
International Regime ◽  
Non Profit ◽  
Transparency International ◽  
Relational Concept ◽  
Effective Advocacy ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThis article develops theoretical insights concerning the legitimacy of non-profit Transnational Non-Governmental Organisations (TNGOs) in global governance. The research compares the advocacy initiatives of Transparency International (TI), the leading TNGO in the international regime of anti-corruption, in Germany and France during the 1990s. The main argument is that the legitimacy of TNGOs is a relational concept: it is granted or denied in a relationship between at least two parties, in which actor attributes play a role but are not decisive. Only such a relational conception can explain why a given TNGO is granted legitimacy in one context and denied it in another. In addition, legitimacy matters. Although insufficient on its own, legitimacy is a necessary condition for effective advocacy, which TNGOs can generate endogenously. To the extent that the legitimacy of TNGOs depends on their acceptance by dominant groups and powerful decision-makers, therefore, ‘legitimate’ TNGOs may function to sustain rather than challenge the structures of power which condition global outcomes in ways that are often contrary to the goals of equality, fairness, and justice. Thus to assess the impact of TNGOs in global governance, one must examine which TNGOs have been granted (or denied) legitimacy and influence, and why.

Introduction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Randall Henning
Keyword(s):  
Euro Area ◽  
European Central Bank ◽  
International Political Economy ◽  
Euro Crisis ◽  
European Monetary ◽  
Member States ◽  
European Central ◽  
Regime Complex ◽  
The International Monetary Fund ◽  
European Monetary Fund

European governments, against their initial instincts, invited the International Monetary Fund to design financial rescue programs during the euro crisis in cooperation with the European Commission and European Central Bank. These institutions, known as the “troika,” constitute a regime complex in the parlance of international political economy. This book poses four questions about the regime complex for crisis finance in the euro area: Why did European governments choose this particular mix of institutions? What was the strategy of key member states in directing several institutions to collaborate on lending programs? Why did this arrangement endure despite severe conflicts among the institutions? Should the member states of the euro area “go it alone” by creating a European Monetary Fund? This chapter elaborates on these questions and provides an overview of the book.

scholarly journals The Trade Regime Complex and Megaregionals – An Exploration from the Perspective of International Domination

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Brandi
Keyword(s):  
Global Governance ◽  
Global Justice ◽  
Democratic Deficit ◽  
Global Order ◽  
Transatlantic Trade ◽  
Regime Complex ◽  
Heated Debate ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Trade And Investment ◽  
Institutional Fragmentation

Megaregional trade negotiations have become the subject of heated debate, above all in the context of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). In this article, I argue that the justice of the global order suffers from its institutional fragmentation into regime complexes. From a republican perspective, which aspires to non-domination as a guiding principles and idea of global justice, regime complexes raise specific and important challenges in that they open the door to specific forms of domination. I thereby challenge a more optimistic outlook in regime complexes, which paints a positive normative picture of regime complexes, arguing that they enable the enhancement of democracy beyond the state and, consequently, have the potential to reduce the democratic deficit in global governance. By drawing attention to how regime complexes reinforce domination-related injustice, this article contributes an original perspective on megaregionals and to exploring the implications of global justice as non-domination.

Creating Space for Public Administration in International Organization Studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Moloney ◽  
David H. Rosenbloom
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Global Governance ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Due Process ◽  
International Organization ◽  
Representative Bureaucracy ◽  
Modern State ◽  
Organization Studies ◽  
Regional Organizations ◽  
Administrative Theory

The emergent global administrative order includes more than 800 international and regional organizations. Just as the rise of the modern state placed greater importance on the study of public administration, the growth of multistate organizations, their agendas, and personnel require research that draws upon contemporary and classical public administrative thought. This article employs multiple lenses to explore the utility of public administrative theory and empirically based knowledge in analyzing the behavior of international and regional organizations. Specifically, while remaining cognizant of differences between international organizations and sovereign states, we consider the utility of the politics–administration dichotomy, representative bureaucracy, individual and employee due process and other rights, and broader questions of accountability in understanding the administrative life and influence of international organizations in global governance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document