Justifying Judgement on Things Past
Part 3 Justifying Judgement on Things Past Part 3 moves from describing features of works of history to underwriting a range of judgements that are currently outlawed not just by advocates of neutralism and moral contextualism, but, finally, by the doctrine of moral relativism. This Part of the book legitimates some of the apparently presentist value judgements that many historians already make and establishes criteria according to which other judgements can be formed or criticized. It is the longest section of the work because it has to dig so deep through layers of occidental thought to trace the growth and flaws of an influential though never uncontested cluster of moral theories. The point of the opening three historical sections is to use historical investigation to undermine some of the prevailing standards of the disciple of History, showing that far from being self-evident for a properly scholarly undertaking, those standards emerge from particular, contestable standpoints in theology, strands of philosophy, and even theories of nationalism and raison d’état. Three concluding sections summarize the major issues at stake and address them from a more purely philosophical perspective.