scholarly journals Toward Sensitive Practice: Issues for Physical Therapists Working With Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse

1999 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Candice L Schachter ◽  
Carol A Stalker ◽  
Eli Teram
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Childhood Sexual Abuse ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Adult Survivors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Female Survivors ◽  
Semistructured Interviews

Abstract Background and Purpose. The high rates of prevalence of childhood sexual abuse in the United States and Canada suggest that physical therapists work, often unknowingly, with adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. The purposes of this qualitative study were to explore the reactions of adult female survivors of childhood sexual abuse to physical therapy and to listen to their ideas about how practitioners could be more sensitive to their needs. The dynamics and long-term sequelae of childhood sexual abuse, as currently understood by mental health researchers and as described by the participants, are summarized to provide a context for the findings of this study. Subjects and Methods. Twenty-seven female survivors (aged 19–62 years) participated in semistructured interviews in which they described their reactions to physical therapy. Results. Survivors' reactions to physical therapy, termed “long-term sequelae of abuse that detract from feeling safe in physical therapy,” are reported. Participant-identified suggestions that could contribute to the sense of safety are shared. Conclusions and Discussion. Although the physical therapist cannot change the survivor's history, an appreciation of issues associated with child sexual abuse theoretically can increase clinicians' understanding of survivors' reactions during treatment. We believe that attention by the physical therapist to the client's sense of safety throughout treatment can maximize the benefits of the physical therapy experience for the client who is a survivor. [Schachter CL, Stalker CA, Teram E. Toward sensitive practice: issues for physical therapists working with survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

scholarly journals BACK TO THE GRASS ROOT

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-43
Author(s):  
Ali Farhad ◽  
Saad Saleem ◽  
Zainab Abdul Razzak
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Direct Access ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Professional Advancement ◽  
Health Networks ◽  
Grass Root

Profession is, not to squeak like a grateful and apologetic mouse, but to roar like a lion out of pride1. Throughout a professional vocation, professionals change the span of their skill, through becoming more specific, through inspiring into recently emergent areas of professional work, or by taking on administration or enlightening positions. They will also be continually developing the quality of their work in a number of areas, beyond the level of proficiency of one’s ability or skill. Professional advancement inculcates a process of incessant development, long-term knowledge, and augmentation, which allow professionals to get better in their practices so as to better serve patients, clients, associations, the profession, and society2. A physical therapist has an enduring professional accountability for maintaining proficiency through ongoing self-assessment, education, and augmentation of information and skills. Physical Therapy, by 2020, will offer such Physiotherapist who are doctors of Physical Therapy and who may be board–licensed experts3. Clients will have direct access to Physical Therapists in all milieus for patient/client management, expectation, and wellness services. Physiotherapist will be practitioners of choice in clients’/patients’ health networks and will hold all rights of autonomous practice4. Physical Therapists may be assisted by Physical Therapy assistants, who are erudite and qualified to provide Physical Therapist–directed and controlled, components of intervention. Physical Therapy profession in Pakistan is rising with a great pace. Every passing minute brings extraordinary revolution in this field and now it is a high time to have some institution takes the responsibility on its shoulder to curtail the nourishing elements of quackery and bring autonomy and sovereignty to the field.

Referral for Imaging in Physical Therapist Practice: Key Recommendations for Successful Implementation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Paul Keil ◽  
Charles Hazle ◽  
Amma Maurer ◽  
Connie Kittleson ◽  
Daniel Watson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Diagnostic Imaging ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
The United States ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Program Accreditation ◽  
Therapy Program ◽  
Normative Practice ◽  
American Physical

Abstract In recent years, the use of diagnostic imaging in physical therapist practice in the United States (US) has gained considerable interest. In several countries around the world and in the US military, patient direct referral for diagnostic imaging has been considered normative practice for decades. US physical therapy program accreditation standards now stipulate that diagnostic imaging content must be included in physical therapist educational curricula. The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) has made efforts to pursue practice authority for imaging referral. A recent review of state practice acts and other statutory language concluded that many states have no prohibitions against physical therapists referring for imaging studies. Additionally, physical therapists can now pursue certification as musculoskeletal sonographers. In light of these advances, and with a growing number of PTs serving patients who have not yet seen another healthcare provider, it may be helpful for those who have been actively involved in the use of imaging in PT practice to provide their collective recommendations to serve as a guideline to those interested in incorporating this practice privilege. The purpose of this perspective article is to provide an overview of the key elements necessary for effective implementation of referral for imaging in physical therapist practice while emphasizing the cornerstone of effective communication.

We Don’t Know our Own Strength: A Survey of Strength Training Attitudes, Behaviors and Knowledge in Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Students

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reed Handlery ◽  
Emma Shover ◽  
Thavi Chhoun ◽  
Lauren Durant ◽  
Kaci Handlery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Strength Training ◽  
Professional Education ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
The United States ◽  
Physical Therapy Students ◽  
Physical Therapy Education ◽  
Education Participation ◽  
Therapy Education

Abstract Objective Strength training is frequently utilized by physical therapists; however, there has been discussion about whether physical therapists utilize strength training adequately. The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the strength training attitudes, behaviors, and knowledge of physical therapists and physical therapy students and to determine how participant characteristics influenced knowledge scores. Methods An anonymous survey was created in 3 rounds. For round 1, researchers used textbooks to create items assessing demographics, attitudes, behaviors, and knowledge regarding strength training. Rounds 2 and 3 consisted of feedback from 7 content experts until 80% consensus was reached; items were added, removed, or edited based on feedback. The final survey was distributed through social media, list servs, and email, targeting physical therapists and students based in the United States. Response frequencies for all items were reported. Overall knowledge scores were calculated by summing correct responses for each item, with a maximum score of 13; scores <70% were considered low. Binomial logistic regression determined which characteristics (demographics, attitudes, or behaviors) influenced whether participants adequately utilized strength training principles (scored ≥70% on knowledge items). Results There were 777 physical therapist and 648 student participants. Nearly 90% of therapists and students reported frequently prescribing strength training. Over 48% of therapists felt their professional education did not prepare them to apply strength training (compared with 24% of students), and 68% believed that strength training is inadequately applied in physical therapy (compared with 40% of students). Sixty-two percent of therapists and 55% of students scored ≥70% for knowledge items. Additional strength training education and regular participation in strength training increased the odds of scoring ≥70% on knowledge items. Conclusions Physical therapists and physical therapy students frequently prescribe strength training, despite similarly low knowledge scores. To increase knowledge, greater emphasis on strength training in professional education, continuing education, participation in strength training, or all 3 is warranted. Impact Strength training is an important intervention used in physical therapy and must be used appropriately to improve the health of patients. According to these findings, strength training education may not currently be optimal, as demonstrated by low knowledge scores by both therapists and students. Further work is needed to determine how knowledge of strength training relates to patient outcomes and also how best to implement strength training in physical therapy education and practice.

scholarly journals Physical Therapy Clinical Instructor Self-Reported Evidence-Based Practice Use

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra Bierwas ◽  
Joan Leafman ◽  
Lisa Wallace ◽  
Donald Shaw ◽  
Steven Fehrer
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
The United States ◽  
Clinical Instructor ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Instructors ◽  
Professional Characteristics

Introduction: Evidence-based practice is a required component of student physical therapist education. Practice applying the five steps of evidence-based practice to patient care (formulate question, retrieve evidence, appraise evidence, integrate evidence, evaluate outcomes), most effectively performed during clinical education, must occur for students to become proficient. Clinical instructor use of evidence-based practice is essential to assure that student physical therapist practice occurs during clinical education. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess self-reported evidence-based practice use by physical therapy clinical instructors and examine whether an association exists between professional characteristics and evidence-based practice use. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional, descriptive study using an electronic survey to collect data on clinical instructor professional characteristics and evidence-based practice use. Results: Respondents included 376 physical therapists who were clinical instructors in the United States. Participant responses for frequency evidence-based practice steps use ranged from never to frequently. Specifically, respondents reported integrating evidence into clinical instruction: never 2.1% (n = 8); rarely 6.4% (n = 24); occasionally 13.3% (n = 50); sometimes 28.7% (n = 108); and frequently 49.5% (n = 186). There was no difference in evidence-based practice use as the result of age or highest degree. Respondents who were American Physical Therapy Association members or held an American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties certification reported using some of the evidence-based practice steps more frequently than those who were not. Discussion and Conclusion: Although the majority of respondents in this study reported using evidence-based practice to some extent, there was great variability. Student physical therapists may be exposed to evidence-based practice during clinical education since the majority of respondents, considering their role as clinical instructors, reported evidence-based practice use. However, exposure cannot be guaranteed for every student because some respondents reported never using evidence-based practice. Educational program use of supplemental learning activities during clinical experiences may facilitate student practice of all five steps of evidence-based practice during clinical education.

Listening to the Therapeutic Needs of Male Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 2033-2054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlene Rapsey ◽  
Anna Campbell ◽  
Ken Clearwater ◽  
Tess Patterson
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Childhood Sexual Abuse ◽  
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis ◽  
Adult Survivors ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Treatment Providers ◽  
Male Survivors ◽  
Semistructured Interviews ◽  
Therapeutic Needs

Childhood sexual abuse of males is not uncommon with estimated prevalence rates across countries and different studies indicating that 8% of boys experience sexual abuse before age 18. A number of adverse outcomes are recognized in terms of mental health, behavioral, and relational difficulties. However, research also indicates that there is potential for healing. The present study explores the barriers, benefits, and processes involved in engagement in formal therapy for adult survivors of CSA from the male survivor’s point of view. Nine men spoke of their treatment experiences in response to semistructured interviews. Participants were all members of a group for male survivors of sexual abuse. Seven participants reported benefiting from treatment. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) of the interviews identified three superordinate themes: “motivation to engage in treatment,” “developing a connection with treatment providers,” and “changing thinking about the abuse.” These themes reveal a number of obstacles that are encountered in seeking treatment including stigma, process barriers, and engagement of a skilled and empathic therapist. For the men who were able to take part in therapy despite these barriers, improved quality of life were noted through the two primary mechanisms of relationship and changed thinking. Key changes in thinking included developing an awareness that they were not responsible for the abuse, understanding the effects of abuse, and developing an identity distinct from the experience of abuse. These changes in thinking occurred within the context of a robust therapeutic relationship.

Effects of long-term childhood sexual abuse on adult survivors: Comparing results based on methods of obtaining information

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Percosky ◽  
Amy L. Wevodau ◽  
Carol L. Woods ◽  
Alexandra Tellez ◽  
Brian J. Allen
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Childhood Sexual Abuse ◽  
Adult Survivors

scholarly journals Do As I Do: Exercise Habits of Physical Therapists, Physical Therapist Assistants, and Student Physical Therapists

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 726-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Chevan ◽  
Esther M. Haskvitz
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Leisure Time ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Physical Therapist Assistants

BackgroundPhysical therapy practitioners are among the many health care professionals who can counsel their patients to address the public health care concern of physical inactivity. Health care providers who are physically active themselves are more likely to counsel patients on the benefits of activity.ObjectiveThe purposes of this study were: (1) to examine the leisure-time physical activity habits of physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, and student physical therapists in the United States using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and American College of Sports Medicine (CDC-ACSM) recommendations and (2) to compare these habits with those of the general population and other health care professionals.DesignA cross-sectional survey design was used.MethodsThere were 2 data sources. A random sample of American Physical Therapy Association members completed an online survey that included questions about physical activity habits worded in same manner as the leisure-time activities section of the 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The final study sample comprised 1,238 participants: 923 physical therapists, 210 student physical therapists, and 105 physical therapist assistants. The 2005 NHIS public use data files were the source for the same information about the general US population and for a subset of health care professionals. Rates of participation in vigorous and moderate physical activity were analyzed.ResultsPhysical therapists, physical therapist assistants, and student physical therapists exercised at higher rates than adults and health-diagnosing professionals in the 2005 NHIS.LimitationsThe study may be limited by sampling and response bias.ConclusionsThis study identified that physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, and student physical therapists are meeting CDC-ACSM physical activity guidelines at higher rates than the US adult population and health-diagnosing professionals. These rates exceed the physical activity targets set for adults in Healthy People 2010.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document