Evaluation of Fingertip Injuries and Modalities of Flap Coverage in the Emergency Settings: A Retrospective Study

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Salah Nasser Mohamed ◽  
AbdelRahman AbdeIAal ◽  
Mina Agaiby Estawrow ◽  
Andrew Adel Wassef Attia
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Joint Stiffness ◽  
Skin Grafting ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Tissue Loss ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Maximum Function ◽  
Reconstruction Methods

Abstract Background Fingertip comprises the nail complex and glabrous pulp, which is richly vascularized and innervated, built around the distal phalanx. The fingertip is commonly affected because it is the most distal part of the hand so it's easily to be injured during athletic participation, occupational activities or in accidents. Various fingertip reconstruction methods are reported as healing by secondary intention, shortening and primary closure, skin grafts and flaps. Flaps are considered when there's a big soft tissue loss or an exposed bone. Complications of fingertip reconstructions are common such as flexion deformity and neuroma. Objective In this study, we assessed and compared the outcomes of different modalities of soft tissue covemge using different flap techniques in cases of fingertip injuries as regalding the incidence of neuroma, necrosis, donor site morbidity, joint stiffness and sensory impairment, together with the patient satisfaction. Patients and Methods We analyzed a retrospective cohort study of 90 patients with 96 fingertip injuries who underwent coverage by various flap techniques at Ain Shams University Hospitals in the period between July 2017 and July 2019. Results The V-Y Advancement flap and the Cross-finger flap were the commonest flaps done in 26 cases (27.1%) and 25 cases (26.0%) respectively. There's a highly statistically significance in the incidence of necrosis in abdominal flap (100%) followed by Moberg flap (46.2%). In addition, there is a statistically significance in the incidence of neuroma in Moberg flap (53.8%). Most of patients who underwent coverage by flap technique were very satisfied by the results (60.4%). Conclusion Many techniques have been described for reconstruction of fingertip trauma including revision amputation, skin grafting, local flaps, distant flaps and free flaps. The treatment choice depends on many factors such as patient preference, culture, resources available and surgeon skills. The goals of reconstruction in fingertip amputations are to cover the defect with a satisfactory cosmetic appearance, establish maximum function and preservation of sensation.

Preliminary Experience with Perforator Flaps in Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Defects of the Foot and Ankle

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick J. Duffy ◽  
James W. Brodsky ◽  
Christian T. Royer
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Tissue Loss ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Soft Tissue Defects ◽  
Perforator Flaps ◽  
Microsurgical Reconstruction ◽  
Tissue Defects

Background: Microsurgical reconstruction has improved limb salvage in patients who because of many etiologies have soft-tissue loss from the lower extremities. Free-tissue transfer to the foot and ankle often interferes with postoperative function and footwear because of the bulk of a muscle flap. The foot and ankle often are best treated using thin flaps that will not contract and fibrose, particularly if secondary procedures are required. We hypothesized that perforator flaps, which are thin free-tissue transfers consisting of skin and subcutaneous tissue, both diminish donor site morbidity and are ideally suited for soft-tissue reconstruction of the foot and ankle. Methods: Ten patients had free- tissue transfers to the foot and ankle using perforator flaps during a 2-year period. Four had acute posttraumatic wounds, three had soft tissue defects with exposed hardware or bone graft after reconstructive surgery, and three had large soft-tissue defects after foot infection secondary to diabetes. Nine had reconstruction with anterolateral thigh perforator flaps and one had reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEP) perforator flap. Results: All flaps survived. There were no deep infections. Three flaps had minor tissue loss requiring subsequent small skin grafts, all of which healed. There were no donor site complications and no interference of muscle function at the donor sites. Custom shoewear was not required to accommodate the flaps. Conclusion: This series highlights the success and utility of perforator flaps in microsurgical reconstruction of the foot and ankle. The greatest advantage of perforator flaps is the diminished donor site morbidity, which was achieved while maintaining high microsurgical success rates. These skin and fat flaps remained pliable and contracted less than muscle flaps, allowing for smooth tendon gliding and easy flap elevation for secondary orthopaedic procedures.

A Homodigital Reverse Pedicle Island Flap in Soft Tissue Reconstruction of the Finger and the Thumb

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. NIRANJAN ◽  
J. R. ARMSTRONG
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Island Flap ◽  
Tissue Loss ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction

A single stage homodigital reverse pedicle island flap is described for the repair of volar or dorsal tissue loss on the finger or thumb. Donor site morbidity is minimal, and the length of the digit is preserved. Satisfactory function results in 25 patients are presented.

Soft Tissue Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
pp. 63-74
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Open Fractures ◽  
Soft Tissue Coverage ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Wound Excision

Soft tissue coverage of open fractures with well-vascularised tissues should be performed within 72 hours of injury or at the same time as internal fixation. It may be in the form of local or free flaps, and may comprise muscle, fasciocutaneous tissues, or both. Flap selection depends on multiple factors, including the size and location of the defect following wound excision, availability of flaps, and donor site morbidity. Local flaps are usually used to cover defects with a limited zone of injury. Anastomoses for free flaps should be performed outside the zone of injury. Experimental data suggest that coverage with muscle leads to improved healing of fractures. However, there is currently little clinical evidence to support the use of one form of soft tissue cover over another for open fractures of the lower limb. The plastic surgeon must always consider the donor site morbidity of the flap(s) chosen.

scholarly journals Experiência de um hospital de referência com o retalho livre anterolateral da coxa na reconstrução de extremidades

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolas Higa Benites ◽  
Guilherme Leipner Margatho ◽  
Fernanda Ruiz de Andrade ◽  
Luis Guilherme Rosifini Alves Rezende ◽  
Amanda Favaro Cagnolati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Free Flap ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh Flap ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh Flaps ◽  
The Impact

Introdução: Com a evolução da microcirurgia ao longo dos anos o Retalho Anterolateral da Coxa vem se tornando uma das principais opções para reconstruções na cabeça, pescoço, tronco e extremidades devido sua versatilidade e confiabilidade. Objetivo: Descrever dados de um hospital terciário referência em trauma na reconstrução de extremidades com o Retalho Anterolateral da Coxa. Método: Este é um estudo retrospectivo de 18 retalhos Anterolateral da Coxa microcirúrgicos realizados entre Março de 2016 e Outubro de 2019 em pacientes de todas as idades, na reconstrução de membros, onde se observou dados referentes ao paciente: idade, sexo, membro acometido, tempo entre a lesão e a confecção do retalho; ao intraoperatório: anatomia dos vasos perfurantes, tempo cirúrgico total, vasos receptores utilizados; e informações do pós-operatório: número de cirurgias relacionadas ao retalho, necessidade de reabordagem e número de perdas. Foram excluídos pacientes que perderam seguimento ou que apresentaram dados do prontuário incompletos. Realizou-se estatística descritiva e cruzamento de algumas variáveis utilizando o teste t-Student. Resultados: Nas reconstruções houve predomínio de pacientes do sexo masculino (72%), em idade produtiva, de etiologia traumática e nos membros inferiores. O tempo médio até a reconstrução foi de 21 dias e o tempo cirúrgico foi de 384 minutos. O paciente permaneceu, em média, 39 dias internado. Dos 18 retalhos, 3 evoluíram com necrose, 2 por trombose arterial e 1 por infecção. 6 retalhos necessitaram de reaborgadem de emergência, 3 por sangramento, 2 por congestão e 1 por infecção. Foram realizadas uma média de 3 cirurgias até a alta. Foram identificadas 15 perfurantes miocutâneas (83%) e 3 septocutâneas (17%). A análise do sucesso do retalho em relação ao tempo cirúrgico e dos dias até a cirurgia não mostrou significância estatística, assim como a necessidade de reabordagem em relação ao tempo cirúrgico. Conclusão: O retalho Anterolateral da Coxa mostrou-se confiável, além de apresentar diversas vantagens como: por ser retirado com uma grande ilha de pele, apresentar pedículo longo, vasos de bom calibre, não necessitar de mudança de decúbito e apresentar baixa morbidade da área doadora.Descritores: Retalho Miocutâneo; Microcirurgia; Hospitais Especializados.ReferênciasDaniel RK, Taylor GI. Distant transfer of an island flap by microvascular anastomoses. A clinical technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;52(2):111-17.Ninkovic M, Voigt S, Dornseifer U, Lorenz S, Ninkovic M. Microsurgical advances in extremity salvage. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39(4):491-505.Tamimy MS, Rashid M, Ehtesham-ul-Haq, Aman S, Aslam A, Ahmed RS. Has the anterolateral thigh flap replaced the latissimus dorsi flap as the workhorse for lower limb reconstructions? J Pak Med Assoc. 2010; 60(2):76-81.Spyropoulou A, Jeng SF. Microsurgical coverage reconstruction in upper and lower extremities. Semin Plast Surg. 2010;24(1):34-42.Xiong L, Gazyakan E, Kremer T, Hernekamp FJ, Harhaus L, Saint-Cyr M et al. Free flaps for reconstruction of soft tissue defects in lower extremity: a meta-analysis on microsurgical outcome and safety. Microsurgery. 2016; 36(6):511-24.Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concepted based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg. 1984; 37(2):149-59.Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2219-26Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Nakatsuka T, Harii K. Anatomic variation and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: A report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102(5):1517-23Spindler N, Al-Benna S, Ring A, Homann H, Steinsträsser L, Steinau HU et al. Free anterolateral thigh flaps for upper extremity soft tissue reconstruction. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2015;4:Doc05.Kimura N, Satoh K, Hasumi T, Ostuka T. Clinical application of the free thin anterolateral thigh flap in 31 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(5):1197-210.Collins J, Ayeni O, Thoma A. A systematic review of anterolateral thigh flap donor site morbidity. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(1):17-23.Kuo YR, Jeng SF, Kuo MH, Huang MN, Liu YT, Chiang YC et al. Free anterolateral thigh flap for extremity reconstruction: Clinical experience and functional assessment of donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(7):1766-71Novak CB, Lipa JE, Noria S, Allison K, Neligan PC, Gilbert RW. Comparison of anterolateral thigh and radial forearm free flap donor site morbidity. Microsurgery. 2007;27(8):651-54.Pagano M, Gauvreau K. Princípios de Bioestatística. São Paulo: Pioneira Thomson Learning; 2004.SAS Institute Inc., SAS/STAT® User’s Guide. Version 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Arruda LRP, Silva MAC, Malerba FG, Turíbio FM, Fernandes MC, Matsumoto MH. Fraturas expostas: estudo epidemiológico e prospectivo. Acta ortop bras. 2009;17(6):326-30.Cunha FM, Braga GF, Drumond Jr SN, Figueiredo CTO. Epidemiologia de 1.212 fraturas expostas. Rev Bras Ortop. 1998;33(6):451-56.Court-Brown CM, Rimmer S, Prakash U, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of open long bone fractures. Injury. 1998;29(7):529-34.Shabtai M, Rosin D, Zmora O, Munz Y, Scarlat A, Shabtai EL et al. The impact of a resident’s seniority on operative time and length of hospital stay for laparoscopic appendectomy: outcomes used to measure the resident’s laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(9):1328-30.Godina M. Early microsurgical reconstruction of complex trauma of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg.1986;78:285-292Smit JM, Acosta R, Zeebregts CJ, Liss AG, Anniko M, Hartman EH. Early reintervention of compromised free flaps improves success rate. Microsurgery. 2007;27(7):612-16.

scholarly journals Minimising the donor area morbidity of radial forearm phalloplasty using prefabricated thigh flap: A new technique

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (01) ◽  
pp. 091-095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Aggarwal ◽  
Hardeep Singh ◽  
Sanjay Mahendru ◽  
Vimalendu Brajesh ◽  
Sukhdeep Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Donor Site ◽  
Tissue Expander ◽  
Tissue Expansion ◽  
Skin Grafting ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Standing Position ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
New Technique ◽  
Donor Area ◽  
Radial Forearm

ABSTRACTPhalloplasty is indicated in various conditions of penile loss or absence. There are numerous techniques for phalloplasty including the pedicle and free flaps with the ultimate goal of micturition in standing position, attaining adequate size, aesthesis and sensations for sexual intercourse. Radial forearm phalloplasty is the gold standard flap to achieve above results but gives a very bad scar on the forearm. We present a technique of using prefabricated thigh flap to reduce the morbidity of donor area. The descending branch of lateral circumflex femoral pedicle was placed in a subcutaneous plane over tissue expander. After attaining an adequate size of flap with tissue expansion, it was delayed 3 weeks before phalloplasty. Prefabricated flap was thin and of large size replicating the radial forearm flap used for phalloplasty. Whole forearm defect was covered with the thigh flap, and the thigh could be closed primarily. This new technique of using prefabricated thigh flap has significantly reduced the donor site morbidity both aesthetically and functionally without the use of skin grafting in the whole procedure.

scholarly journals First dorsal metacarpal artery islanded flap: A useful flap for reconstruction of thumb pulp defects

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (01) ◽  
pp. 032-035
Author(s):  
Chetan Satish ◽  
Sunit Nema
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Tissue Loss ◽  
Flap Necrosis ◽  
Secondary Procedure ◽  
Dorsal Metacarpal Artery ◽  
Soft Tissue Loss ◽  
First Dorsal Metacarpal Artery

ABSTRACTThumb pulp defects are commonly due to avulsion injuries. It is very important to reconstruct these defects using sensate flaps as the thumb pulp needs to be sensate for implementing the various functions of the thumb. A very good option for coverage of these defects is the islanded first dorsal metacarpal artery flap. Our study was done over a period of 2 years and involved 9 consecutive cases of thumb pulp defects treated at our institution. The patients included 8 males and 1 female, ranging in age from 16 to 51 years old. The flap size ranged from 2 × 1.5 cm to 5 × 3 cm. We had only one complication in the form of partial flap necrosis, which fortunately healed following debridement without the need for a secondary procedure. All our cases were done under local anesthesia with tourniquet control. All the patients had good fine touch and average two-point discrimination of 6 mm, which was satisfactory. Our good results further reinforce the islanded first dorsal metacarpal artery flap as one the best flaps for sensate reconstruction of thumb pulp defects. It replaces the soft tissue loss at the thumb pulp with minimal donor site morbidity and with good return of thumb pulp sensation.

“Spare Part” Forearm Free Flaps Harvested from the Amputated Limb for Coverage of Amputation Stumps

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 615-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. WEINBERG ◽  
M. M. AL-QATTAN ◽  
J. MAHONEY
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Spare Part ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Amputation Stumps ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Different Tissues

The use of “spare part” flaps from a non-replantable limb to cover amputation stumps in the upper extremity preserves limb length, provides durable coverage and sensation and will avoid additional donor site morbidity. We have studied the blood supply of the forearm based on the radial artery. The potential for harvesting different tissues is confirmed. In five clinical cases reliable primary soft tissue reconstruction was achieved, even in the presence of trauma.

scholarly journals Role of large transverse fasciocutaneous cross leg flap (whole leg flap) in lower extremity salvage

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1760
Author(s):  
Manish Zade ◽  
Dhananjay Nakade ◽  
Jitendra Mehta ◽  
Pawan Shahane ◽  
Shitiz Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Donor Site ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Joint Stiffness ◽  
Skin Grafting ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Donor Area ◽  
Microvascular Flap ◽  
Ankle And Foot

Background: Extensive soft tissue defects of leg, ankle and foot are challenge to reconstructive surgeons due to lack of local tissue. Microvascular flap coverage has become a standard line of treatment as large amount of tissue transfer is required. Large transverse fasciocutaneous cross leg flap remains an alternative for reconstruction of such extensive defects. We present our experience with this flap in 14 patients.Methods: A total of 14 patients were operated for large transverse fasciocutaneous cross leg flap cover for defects over leg (9), ankle and foot (3) and sole (2). Age group ranged from 4 years to 50 years with 4 patients below 12 years of age. Male to female ratio was 5:2. Flaps were divided at 3weeks and final inset was done.Results: 11 patients had complete flap survival. Two patients had marginal necrosis and one patient had superficial necrosis of proximal flap margin after flap division. One patient with partial skin graft loss at donor area required secondary skin grafting at the time of flap division. Average hospital stay was 34.5 days (range 10 - 50 days). The donor limb had no joint stiffness related to immobilisation and cosmetic outcome of flap and donor area was satisfactory.Conclusions: large transverse fasciocutaneous cross leg flap is safe, technically easy and is associated with minimal donor site morbidity. It offers the possibility of limb salvage in difficult situations.

scholarly journals Suprafascial Free Flaps: Classification and Comprehensive Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 247275122110205
Author(s):  
Sebastian Rios ◽  
María Isabel Falguera-Uceda ◽  
Alicia Dean ◽  
Susana Heredero
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh Flap ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Comprehensive Review ◽  
Search Terms

Study Design: Suprafascial free flaps have become common place in reconstructive surgery units. Nomenclature related to these flaps has not been uniform throughout the scientific literature, especially in regard to planes of dissection. This study is designed as a comprehensive review of the literature. Objectives: Our study highlights which flaps are used most frequently, their main indications, their survival rate, and how they have evolved in the last few decades as innovations have been introduced. Methods: A review of the literature was performed using keywords and Medical Subject Headings search terms. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched using the appropriate search terms. Data collected from each study included flap type, dissection plane, preoperative planning, area of reconstruction, as well as complications, donor-site morbidity and survival rate. Results: Seven hundred and fifty-five studies were found based on the search criteria. After full-text screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria 34 studies were included. A total of 1332 patients were comprised in these studies. The most common types of flaps used were superficial circumflex iliac perforator flap (SCIP), anterolateral thigh flap (ALT), and radial forearm flap. The most common areas of reconstruction were head & neck and limbs. There was no significant difference in survival rates between flaps that were raised in different planes of dissection. Conclusions: Based on the author’s review of the literature, suprafascial flaps are reliable, they have low donor site morbidity, and there is a wide selection available for harvest. The use of new technologies for preoperative planning, such as CT-Angiography and UHF ultrasound, have contributed to have more predictable results. We propose a standardized classification for these flaps, in order to create a uniform nomenclature for future reference.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document