scholarly journals O06 Baseline predictors of methotrexate-related adverse events in methotrexate-naïve patients with RA

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad A Sherbini ◽  
James M Gwinnutt ◽  
Kimme L Hyrich ◽  
Suzanne M M Verstappen ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Prevalence Rates ◽  
Clinical Predictors ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Related Data ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background/Aims  Methotrexate (MTX) is the most common treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The prevalence of adverse events (AEs) associated with MTX treatment for RA have been studied extensively, but there are limited data on the predictors of these AEs. This study aims to summarise the prevalence rates of MTX AEs, including gastrointestinal (GI), neurological, mucocutaneous, and elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) enzyme, and to identify baseline demographic and clinical predictors of these AEs. Methods  The Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study (RAMS) is a UK multi-centre prospective cohort study of patients with RA starting MTX for the first time. Relevant demographic, medication, clinical and disease related data were collected at baseline. AEs were reported at six and twelve months follow-ups. The prevalence rates of AEs were calculated based on the proportions of patients who reported having had an AE within one year of follow-up. The associations between candidate baseline predictors and AEs were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results  A total of 2,089 patients were included with a mean age of 58.4 (standard deviation: 13.5) years, 1390 (66.5%) were women. 1,814 and 1,579 patients completed the 6 and 12 months follow-up visits, respectively. The prevalence rates of the AEs within one year of follow-up were: GI = 777 (40.6%), mucocutaneous = 441 (23.1%), neurological = 487 (25.5%), elevated ALT (> upper limit of normal [ULN]) = 286 (15.5%). Younger age and being a woman were associated with increased risk of GI AEs, (age: OR 0.97 per year increase in age, 95% CI 0.98, 1.00; male sex: OR 0.58 vs female, 95% CI 0.46, 0.74) (Table 1). Higher baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score was an independent predictor of GI, mucocutaneous, and neurological AEs. Furthermore, having ALT >1xULN at baseline or history of diabetes was associated with increased risk of subsequent ALT elevation during the study follow-up. Conclusion  In patients with RA starting MTX, GI AEs were the most commonly reported AEs during the first year of follow-up. The identified predictors of AEs may facilitate discussions between clinicians and patients prior to commencing MTX, and may lead to increased adherence and consequently improved effectiveness. Disclosure  A.A. Sherbini: None. J.M. Gwinnutt: Grants/research support; BMS. K.L. Hyrich: Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbvie. Grants/research support; Pfizer, UCB, BMS. S.M.M. Verstappen: Consultancies; Celltrion. Member of speakers’ bureau; Pfizer. Grants/research support; BMS.

scholarly journals OP0098 POLYPHARMACY IS ASSOCIATED WITH A POORER TREATMENT RESPONSE AND INCREASED RISK OF ADVERSE EVENTS IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 54.1-54
Author(s):  
S. Benamar ◽  
C. Lukas ◽  
C. Daien ◽  
C. Gaujoux-Viala ◽  
L. Gossec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Biological Database ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Early Ra ◽  
Increased Risk

Background:Polypharmacy is steadily increasing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They may interfere with treatment response and the occurrence of serious adverse events. Medications taken by a patient may reflect active comorbidities, whereas comorbidity indices usually used include past or current diseases.Objectives:To evaluate whether polypharmarcy is associated with treatment response and adverse events in an early RA cohort and to establish whether polypharmacy could represent a substitute of comorbidities.Methods:We used data from the French cohort ESPOIR, including 813 patients with early onset arthritis. Patients included the current study had to start their first disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) within 24 months of inclusion in the cohort. Disease activity data were collected at one, five and ten years from the initiation of the first DMARD. For each patient, treatments were collected at baseline and at five years. Medications count included all specialties other than background RA therapy, analgesics/NSAIDs and topicals. Polypharmacy was defined as a categorical variable based on the median and tertiles of distribution in the cohort. Treatment response was assessed by achieving DAS28 ESR remission (REM) at 1 year, 5 years and 10 years from the initiation of the first DMARD. The occurrence of severe adverse events (SAE) was measured by the occurrence of severe infection, hospitalization, or death during the 10-year follow-up. The association between patient’s characteristics and achievement of REM and occurrence of SAE were tested in univariate analysis. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate associations between polypharmacy and REM at 1 year, 5 years and 10 years (we used baseline polypharmacy for the 1-year analysis and five years polypharmacy for the 5- and 10-years analyses). Multivariate adjustment was made for age, sex, BMI, duration of disease, initial DAS28 ESR, initial HAQ, smoking status, rheumatic disease comorbidity index (RDCI).Results:The proportion of patients who achieved REM one year after the initiation of the first DMARD was 32.1% in the polypharmacy according to the median group (patients taken ≥2 medication) versus 67.9% in the non-polypharmacy group (p=0.07). At 5 years after the first DMARD, the proportion of patients with REM was 45.0% in the polypharmacy group versus 56.3% in the non-polypharmacy group (p=0.03). At 10 years the proportion of patients with REM was 32.5% in the polypharmacy group versus 67.5% (p=0.06). Patients who take greater or equal to 2 medications had a 40% lower probability of achieving REM (OR = 0.60 [0.38-0.94] p = 0.03) at 5 years from the first DMARD (if RDCI index was not included in the model). At 10 years, patients receiving multiple medications had a 43% lower probability of achieving REM (OR = 0.57 [0.34-0.94] p = 0.02). SAE incidence was 61 per 1000 patient-years. For patients who developed SAE all causes 71.4% where in the polypharmacy group versus 57.8% were in the non-polypharmacy group (p = 0.03; univariate analysis). These results are no longer significant after adjustment for comorbidities indices.Conclusion:In this early RA cohort, polypharmacy is associated with a poorer treatment response and increased risk of adverse events. Polypharmacy may represent a good substitute of comorbidities for epidemiological studies.Acknowledgements:We are grateful to Nathalie Rincheval (Montpellier) who did expert monitoring and data management and all theinvestigators who recruited and followed the patients (F. Berenbaum, Paris-Saint Antoine; MC. Boissier, Paris-Bobigny; A. Cantagrel, Toulouse; B. Combe, Montpellier; M. Dougados, Paris-Cochin; P. Fardellone and P. Boumier, Amiens; B. Fautrel, Paris-La Pitié; RM. Flipo, Lille; Ph. Goupille, Tours; F. Liote, Paris- Lariboisière; O. Vittecoq, Rouen; X. Mariette, Paris-Bicêtre; P. Dieude, Paris Bichat; A. Saraux, Brest; T. Schaeverbeke, Bordeaux; and J. Sibilia, Strasbourg).The work reported on in the manuscript did not benefit from any financial support. The ESPOIR cohort is sponsored by the French Society for Rheumatology. An unrestricted grant from Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) was allocated for the first 5 years. Two additional grants from INSERM were obtained to support part of the biological database. Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly and more recently Fresenius and Biogen also supported the ESPOIR cohort.Disclosure of Interests:Soraya Benamar: None declared, Cédric Lukas Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, UCB, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis and Roche-Chugai, Claire Daien Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Abivax, BMS, MSD, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Lilly, Consultant of: AbbVie, Abivax, BMS, MSD, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Lilly, Cécile Gaujoux-Viala Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Medac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Roche-Chugai, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Medac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Roche-Chugai, UCB, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Laure Gossec Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis et UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis et UCB, Anne-Christine Rat Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Lilly, Consultant of: Pfizer, Lilly, Bernard Combe Speakers bureau: AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen; Lilly; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; and Sanofi;, Consultant of: AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Janssen; Lilly; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; and Sanofi;, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai., Jacques Morel Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, Médac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, Médac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: BMS, Pfizer

scholarly journals AB0330 HIGH REMISSION RATES IN RA – REAL LIFE DATA FROM BARITICINIB

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1463.2-1464
Author(s):  
S. Bayat ◽  
K. Tascilar ◽  
V. Kaufmann ◽  
A. Kleyer ◽  
D. Simon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Das 28 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
One Year

Background:Recent developments of targeted treatments such as targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) increase the chances of a sustained low disease activity (LDA) or remission state for patients suffering rheumatoid arthritis (RA). tsDMARDs such as baricitinib, an oral inhibitor of the Janus Kinases (JAK1/JAK2) was recently approved for the treatment of RA with an inadequate response to conventional (cDMARD) and biological (bDMARD) therapy. (1, 2).Objectives:Aim of this study is to analyze the effect of baricitinb on disease activity (DAS28, LDA) in patients with RA in real life, to analyze drug persistance and associate these effects with various baseline characteristics.Methods:All RA patients were seen in our outpatient clinic. If a patient was switched to a baricitinib due to medical reasons, these patients were included in our prospective, observational study which started in April 2017. Clinical scores (SJC/TJC 76/78), composite scores (DAS28), PROs (HAQ-DI; RAID; FACIT), safety parameters (not reported in this abstract) as well as laboratory biomarkers were collected at each visit every three months. Linear mixed effects models for repeated measurements were used to analyze the time course of disease activity, patient reported outcomes and laboratory results. We estimated the probabilities of continued baricitinib treatment and the probabilities of LDA and remission by DAS-28 as well as Boolean remission up to one year using survival analysis and explored their association with disease characteristics using multivariable Cox regression. All patients gave informed consent. The study is approved by the local ethics.Results:95 patients were included and 85 analyzed with available follow-up data until November 2019. Demographics are shown in table 1. Mean follow-up duration after starting baricitinib was 49.3 (28.9) weeks. 51 patients (60%) were on monotherapy. Baricitinib survival (95%CI) was 82% (73% to 91%) at one year. Cumulative number (%probability, 95%CI) of patients that attained DAS-28 LDA at least once up to one year was 67 (92%, 80% to 97%) and the number of patients attaining DAS-28 and Boolean remission were 31 (50%, 34% to 61%) and 12(20%, 9% to 30%) respectively. Median time to DAS-28 LDA was 16 weeks (Figure 1). Cox regression analyses did not show any sufficiently precise association of remission or LDA with age, gender, seropositivity, disease duration, concomitant DMARD use and number of previous bDMARDs. Increasing number of previous bDMARDs was associated with poor baricitinib survival (HR=1.5, 95%CI 1.1 to 2.2) while this association was not robust to adjustment for baseline disease activity. Favorable changes were observed in tender and swollen joint counts, pain-VAS, patient and physician disease assessment scores, RAID, FACIT and the acute phase response.Conclusion:In this prospective observational study, we observed high rates of LDA and DAS-28 remission and significant improvements in disease activity and patient reported outcome measurements over time.References:[1]Keystone EC, Taylor PC, Drescher E, Schlichting DE, Beattie SD, Berclaz PY, et al. Safety and efficacy of baricitinib at 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2015 Feb;74(2):333-40.[2]Genovese MC, Kremer J, Zamani O, Ludivico C, Krogulec M, Xie L, et al. Baricitinib in Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis. The New England journal of medicine. 2016 Mar 31;374(13):1243-52.Figure 1.Cumulative probability of low disease activity or remission under treatment with baricitinib.Disclosure of Interests:Sara Bayat Speakers bureau: Novartis, Koray Tascilar: None declared, Veronica Kaufmann: None declared, Arnd Kleyer Consultant of: Lilly, Gilead, Novartis,Abbvie, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Lilly, David Simon Grant/research support from: Else Kröner-Memorial Scholarship, Novartis, Consultant of: Novartis, Lilly, Johannes Knitza Grant/research support from: Research Grant: Novartis, Fabian Hartmann: None declared, Susanne Adam: None declared, Axel Hueber Grant/research support from: Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, EIT Health, EU-IMI, DFG, Universität Erlangen (EFI), Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Speakers bureau: GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Georg Schett Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche and UCB

scholarly journals Risk factors for adverse events within one year after atrial septal closure in children: a retrospective follow-up study

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustaf Tanghöj ◽  
Petru Liuba ◽  
Gunnar Sjöberg ◽  
Estelle Naumburg
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Atrial Septal Defect ◽  
Septal Defect ◽  
Conditional Logistic Regression ◽  
Septal Defects ◽  
Atrial Septal Defects ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
One Year

AbstractIntroduction:Secundum atrial septal defect is one of the most common congenital heart defects. Previous paediatric studies have mainly addressed echocardiographic and few clinical factors among children associated with adverse events. The aim of this study was to identify neonatal and other clinical risk factors associated with adverse events up to one year after closure of atrial septal defect.Methods:This retrospective case–control study includes children born in Sweden between 2000 and 2014 that were treated surgically or percutaneously for an atrial septal defect. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between major and minor adverse events and potential risk factors, adjusting for confounding factors including prematurity, neonatal sepsis, neonatal general ventilatory support, symptomatic atrial septal defects, and pulmonary hypertension.Results:Overall, 396 children with 400 atrial septal defect closures were included. The median body weight at closure was 14.5 (3.5–110) kg, and the median age was 3.0 (0.1–17.8) years. Overall, 110 minor adverse events and 68 major events were recorded in 87 and 49 children, respectively. Only symptomatic atrial septal defects were associated with both minor (odds ratio (OR) = 2.18, confidence interval (CI) 95% 1.05–8.06) and major (OR = 2.80 CI 95% 1.23–6.37) adverse events.Conclusion:There was no association between the investigated neonatal comorbidities and major or minor events after atrial septal defect closure. Patients with symptomatic atrial septal defects had a two to four times increased risk of having a major event, suggesting careful management and follow-up of these children prior to and after closure.

scholarly journals Survival, efficacy and safety of Golimumab in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis: data from an Argentine cohort

2021 ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
Carolina A. Isnardi ◽  
Emma Civit ◽  
Agustín García Ciccarelli ◽  
Jimena Sánchez Alcover ◽  
Rodrigo García Salinas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Start Date ◽  
Lower Treatment ◽  
One Year

Objectives: golimumab is approved for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis. However, data from our region are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cumulative survival of golimumab in real-life patients with RA, PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpa) from different rheumatology centers in Argentina. Material and methods: we performed a longitudinal study of consecutive adults with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria), PsA (CASPAR criteria) and axSpa (ASAS 2009 criteria), who have started treatment with golimumab according to medical indication. Data was obtained by review of medical records. Sociodemographic and clinical data, musculoskeletal manifestations, comorbidities and previous treatments were recorded. In reference to golimumab treatment, start date, route of administration and concomitant treatments were identified. Disease activity was assessed using DAS28 for RA patients, DAPSA and MDA for PsA and BASDAI for axSpa. The presence of adverse events was recorded. If golimumab was stopped, date and cause was documented. Patients were followed up until golimumab discontinuation, loss of follow-up, death, or study completion (November 30, 2020). Results: in total 182 patients were included, 116 with a diagnosis of RA, 30 with PsA and 36 with axSpa. Most of them (70.9%) were female with a median (m) age of 55 years (IQR 43.8- 64) and m disease duration of 7 years (IQR 4-12.7) at treatment initiation. Al least one prior biological (-b) and/or targeted synthetic (-ts) disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) was received by 63 patients (34.6%). Total follow-up was 318.1 patients/year. Golimumab treatment showed clinical improvement in all three groups of patients. The incidence of AE was 6.6 per 100 patients/year, being infections the most frequents ones. During follow-up, 50 patients (27.5%) discontinued golimumab, the most frequent cause was treatment failure (68%), followed by lack of health insurance (16%) and adverse events (10%). Golimumab persistence was 76% and 68% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Treatment survival was 50.2 months (95% CI 44.4-55.9). Patients who had received prior treatment with b- or ts-DMARDs showed lower survival (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.3-4.4). Conclusions: golimumab treatment in real life patients in Argentina has shown good efficacy and safety. Drug survival was over 4 years and almost 80% were still using golimumab after one year. Prior treatment with other b- or ts-DMARDs was associated with lower treatment survival.

scholarly journals AB0206 DESCRIPTION AND FOLLOW-UP OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS WHO STOPPED B/TSDMARD THERAPY, STRATIFIED BY CESSATION REASON

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1128.1-1128
Author(s):  
T. Burkard ◽  
E. Vallejo-Yagüe ◽  
T. Hügle ◽  
A. Finckh ◽  
A. M. Burden
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Family History ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Cohort Entry ◽  
Research Support ◽  
History Of

Background:Biologic or targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARD) may be stopped for several reasons such as non-response, adverse events, remission, or other reasons (e.g. major surgery). Understanding the reasons and consequences of b/tsDMARD therapy cessation may contribute towards therapy decision guidance. Moreover, identifying patient characteristics leading to the re-start of b/tsDMARD therapy may guide decision-making as to which patients should remain on continuous b/tsDMARD therapy versus who may potentially stop b/tsDMARD therapy.Objectives:To describe and follow rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who stopped b/tsDMARD therapy, stratified by cessation reason.Methods:We conducted a descriptive cohort study among adult RA patients in the longitudinal Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases (SCQM) between 1997 and 2019. RA patients who stopped their first b/tsDMARD therapy were eligible, with therapy stop date defining cohort entry. We followed all eligible patients from cohort entry until b/tsDMARD re-start (the outcome) or censoring due to end of patient record. All analyses were carried out stratified by cessation reason (non-response, adverse events, remission, other reasons, unknown reasons). We described patient characteristics (demographics, lifestyle factors, clinical information, other medication use, relevant comorbidities) at cohort entry. Furthermore, we estimated Kaplan Meier curves to describe differences in cumulative incidences of b/tsDMARD re-start. Finally, we assessed patient characteristics at b/tsDMARD re-start and compared them with those at cohort entry.Results:Among 2559 eligible RA patients, the majority stopped their b/tsDMARD due to non-response (982, 38%), followed by adverse events (475, 19%), other reasons (445, 17%), unknown reasons (444, 17%), and remission (213, 8%). Mean age at b/tsDMARD stop was around 56.2 years except in patients who stopped due to remission (mean age of 58.1 years). The majority of patients were women (78%), stopping due to an adverse event had the highest proportion of women (84%), stopping due to remission had the lowest proportion of women (70%). Compared to patients who stopped b/tsDMARD therapy due to non-response or adverse events, patients who stopped due to remission were generally more physically active, better educated, less likely to have a family history of rheumatic diseases, and had shorter median disease duration. A total of 2086 patients (82%) re-started b/tsDMARD therapy during follow-up. Of these, the majority did so after stopping due to non-response (94%), followed by adverse events (82%), unknown reasons (79%), other reasons (74%), and remission (47%). The median cumulative incidence of re-starting b/tsDMARD therapy was shortest after non-response (30 days), followed by unknown reasons (31 days), adverse events (94 days), other reasons (212 days), and remission (1597 days). The population who stopped b/tsDMARD therapy due to remission or other reasons yielded increased RA disease activity and an increase in proportions of women, cardiac diseases, degenerative joint disease, other auto-immune diseases, and of patients with family history of rheumatic diseases at the date of b/tsDMARD re-start. However, among patients who stopped b/tsDMARD therapy due to non-response or adverse events, patient characteristics at b/tsDMARD re-start were unchanged compared to those at b/tsDMARD stop.Conclusion:Observed differences in patient characteristics at b/tsDMARD stop may yield insight into why the patient was not responding, had an adverse event, or achieved remission. Observed changes in patient characteristics from the date of b/tsDMARD stop to re-start identified which ones may lead to a worsening of RA activity in the absence of b/tsDMARD therapy.Acknowledgements:We would like to thank Dr. Almut Scherer, Monika Hebeisen, and Eleftherios Papagiannoulis from SCQM for providing the data and answering questions thereto. A list of rheumatology offices and hospitals that are contributing to the SCQM registries can be found on www.scqm.ch/institutions. The SCQM is financially supported by pharmaceutical industries and donors. A list of financial supporters can be found on www.scqm.ch/sponsors.Disclosure of Interests:Theresa Burkard: None declared, Enriqueta Vallejo-Yagüe: None declared, Thomas Hügle Consultant of: Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Grant/research support from: GSK, Jansen, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Roche, MSD, Sanofi, BMS, Eli Lilly, UCB, Axel Finckh Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Eli-Lilly, Paid instructor for: Pfizer, Eli-Lilly, Consultant of: Pfizer, BMS, Novartis, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AB2Bio, BMS, Gilead, Pfizer, Viatris, Andrea Michelle Burden: None declared

scholarly journals SAT0137 METHOTREXATE ASSOCIATED ADVERSE EVENTS AND THEIR PREDICTORS IN METHOTREXATE-NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1005.2-1006
Author(s):  
A. Sherbini ◽  
S. Sharma ◽  
J. Gwinnutt ◽  
K. Hyrich ◽  
S. Verstappen
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Liver Enzymes ◽  
Forest Plot ◽  
Research Support ◽  
High Baseline ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Elevated Liver Enzymes ◽  
Increased Risk

Background:The adverse events (AEs) associated with methotrexate (MTX) treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been studied extensively, but precise estimates of the incidence and prevalence of AEs are lacking. There is also limited published data on the predictors of AEs.Objectives:To summarise and pool incidence and prevalence rates of AEs in patients treated with MTX for RA, and to identify treatment, clinical and disease related predictors of AEs.Methods:A systematic literature search was carried out using Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL databases to identify relevant studies published between 1/1/2005 and 12/2/2019. The eligibility criteria included RCTs, non-randomized trials, and observational studies of first-time users of MTX in adults (≥ 18 years old) with RA and reported incidence, prevalence or predictors of the most common MTX related AEs, including: any AE, serious AEs, discontinuation due to AEs, elevated liver enzymes, gastrointestinal (GI), mucocutaneous (MC), central nervous system (CNS), and pulmonary AEs. Pooled proportions of GI AEs and elevated liver enzymes of patients treated with MTX monotherapy were estimated using random effects meta-analysis.Results:Of 3142 records screened, we included 46 articles (35 clinical trials and 11 cohort studies) with a total of 9646 patients, and a mean follow-up duration of 70±35 weeks (range: 13 - 104 weeks for RCTs, 40 - 156 weeks for observational cohorts).Six studies reported incidence rate (IR) of any AE (range: 196 - 595 per 100 person-years), and eight studies reported IR of serious AEs (range: 3.7 - 15.9 per 100 person-years). The percentage of patients with any AE, reported in 32 studies, varied between 37% and 100% in RCTs, and between 13% and 34% in observational studies. Discontinuation of MTX due to AEs ranged between 1% and 29% in RCTs, and between 8% and 38% in observational studies. The reported prevalence of MC events (4% - 54%), CNS events (12% - 59%) and pulmonary events (10% - 67%) varied between studies.The estimated pooled prevalence from studies with a MTX monotherapy arm was 14% (95% CI: 9%, 19%; N=7 studies) for liver enzymes elevation (Figure 1), and 29% (95% CI: 13%, 44%; N=7 studies) for GI AEs (Figure 2).Figure 1.Forest plot of pooled prevalence of elevated liver enzymesFigure 2.Forest plot of pooled prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse eventsNo statistically significant predictors of “any AE” were identified. For discontinuation of MTX due to AEs, RF positivity was associated with lower risk of MTX discontinuation due to MTX (HR 0.37, 95%CI: 0.21, 0.64), while other studies found that baseline HAQ score (OR 1.87, 95%CI: 1.11, 3.15) and BMI (OR 1.21, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.44) were associated with increased risk of MTX discontinuation due to AEs. ACPA positivity (OR 1.8, 95%CI: 1.1, 3.1), and high baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (OR 3.1, 95%CI: 1.6, 6.2) were both independent predictors of two-fold elevation of ALT in one paper, and baseline creatinine (OR 1.03, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.07) and high baseline ALT (OR 1.03, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.06) were associated with increased risk of elevated ALT above the upper limit of normal in a different study.Conclusion:These findings affirm the high prevalence of GI AEs and elevated liver enzymes among patients treated with MTX for RA. The identified predictors of MTX withdrawal and elevated ALTs may be useful for identifying future patients likely to experience these AEs early in the course of treatment. However, the results of the predictors should be interpreted with caution, and further work is needed to replicate the results in studies with larger sample sizes and to assess the prognostic value of established predictors.Disclosure of Interests:Ahmad Sherbini: None declared, Seema Sharma: None declared, James Gwinnutt Grant/research support from: BMS, Kimme Hyrich Grant/research support from: Pfizer, UCB, BMS, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Suzanne Verstappen Grant/research support from: BMS, Consultant of: Celltrion, Speakers bureau: Pfizer

scholarly journals SAT0135 COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TWO BRIDGING SCHEDULES OF PREDNISOLONE IN EARLY ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (CORRA): A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMISED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1004.2-1005
Author(s):  
D. Krause ◽  
A. Mai ◽  
N. Timmesfeld ◽  
U. Trampisch ◽  
R. Klaassen-Mielke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
The Mean

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease potentially leading to disability, impaired functioning, and premature death. Most treatment strategies include the early use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate (MTX) which is considered as an established ‘anchor’ therapy. Since it takes some weeks until MTX shows clinical efficacy, glucocorticoids (GC) are widely used for bridging.Objectives:The aim of the study “Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two starting dosages of prednisolone in early active RA” (CORRA) is to compare the efficacy and safety of two standard GC bridging schedules vs. placebo in addition to MTX, following a treat-to-target regimen, in early RA.Methods:CORRA is an investigator-initiated, randomised, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adult RA patients who were eligible for inclusion in the trial if they had a disease duration of less than 3 years and moderate or high disease activity were recruited in one hospital and 18 rheumatology practices in Germany. Patients were randomised (1:1:1) to receive 60 mg or 10 mg prednisolone (Pred) orally once daily (tapered down to 5 mg Pred within 8 weeks) or placebo. The duration of the intervention was 12 weeks, followed by an open observational phase for another 40 weeks. All patients were also treated with MTX (usually starting with 15mg/week followed by a treat-to target scheme). The primary efficacy endpoint was the progression of the radiographic joint damage after one year compared to baseline as determined by the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp score (SHS). Patients, physicians and readers of radiographs were unaware of the treatment assignments. For the comparison of the two GC groups, a non-inferiority margin of 1.3 points of the SHS was set. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT02000336.Results:Between February 2014 and February 2017, 395 patients were included in the trial, 381 of which had sufficient data also of follow-up visits. A total of 129 patients were assigned to the 60 mg Pred group, 124 to 10 mg Pred and 128 to the placebo group. At baseline, mean age was 58 years, 58% were female, 55% were rheumatoid factor and 52% ACPA positive. The mean number of swollen joints was 12.8 out of 28, mean ESR was 33.6 mm/h, mean CRP 2.2 mg/dL, mean DAS 28 6.0. Radiographic damage was 4.9 as measured by the SHS. In the 60 mg, 10 mg Pred group and in the placebo group, the DAS 28 was 2.6, 3.1, 4.5 at week 4 (p<0.001), 3.1, 2.8, 3.6 at week 12 (p<0.001), and 2.7, 2.6, 2.8 at week 52 (p=0.411), respectively. After 12 months the radiographic progression could be determined in 375 patients. In the 60 mg, 10 mg Pred group, and in the placebo group, the mean progression after 1 year was 1.0, 1.0, 1.1 for the total SHS and 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 for the erosion score of the SHS, respectively. Statistical analysis showed non-inferiority of the 10 mg Pred and of the placebo group in comparison to the 60 mg Pred group. Regarding safety issues, there were 10, 5, 6 serious adverse events and 31, 16, 20 adverse events in the MedDRA system organ class “infections and infestations” for the 60 mg Pred, 10 mg Pred, and the placebo group, respectively.Conclusion:The bridging schedule starting with 60 mg Pred reduced disease activity better than the 10 mg schedule or placebo only for a short time. The primary outcome structural damage was non-inferior in the 10 mg Pred and the placebo group in comparison to the 60 mg Pred group. Initial advantages of the higher dose may have been compromised by the long follow-up with the possible escalation of therapy due to the treat-to-target regimen.Disclosure of Interests:Dietmar Krause Grant/research support from: Pfizer and AbbVie (Abbott), Anna Mai: None declared, Nina Timmesfeld: None declared, Ulrike Trampisch: None declared, Renate Klaassen-Mielke: None declared, Henrik Rudolf: None declared, Xenofon Baraliakos Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Elmar Schmitz: None declared, Claas Fendler: None declared, Claudia Klink: None declared, Stephanie Boeddeker: None declared, Ertan Saracbasi: None declared, Jochen Christoph: None declared, Manfred Igelmann: None declared, Hans Juergen Menne: None declared, Albert Schmid: None declared, Hans J Trampisch: None declared, Juergen Braun Grant/research support from: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, Eli Lilly and Company, Medac, MSD (Schering Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi- Aventis, and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, EBEWE Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, EBEWE Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB Pharma

scholarly journals AB1335-HPR HEALTH PROFESSIONALS’ PERSPECTIVE ON THE BENEFITS AND RISKS OF LOW-DOSE GLUCOCORTICOIDS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS – AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF 444 HEALTH PROFESSIONALS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1955.1-1956
Author(s):  
T. Santiago ◽  
M. Voshaar ◽  
M. De Wit ◽  
P. Carvalho ◽  
M. Boers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Patient Perspective ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Low Doses ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Patient Organizations

Background:The Glucocorticoid Low-dose Outcome in Rheumatoid Arthritis Study (GLORIA) is an international investigator-initiated pragmatic randomized trial designed to study the effects of low-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) in elderly patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).The research team is also committed to promote a better understanding of the risks and benefits of these drugs among health professionals and patients. In order to achieve these goals, it is important to assess the current ideas and concerns of patients regarding GCs.Objectives:To evaluate the current patient perspective on the efficacy and risks of GCs in RA patients who are or have been treated with GCs.Methods:Patients with RA completed an online survey (with 5 closed questions regarding efficacy and safety) presented in their native language. RA patients were recruited through a variety of patient organizations representing three continents. Patients were invited to participate through national patient organizations. In the USA, patients were also invited to participate through MediGuard.org. Participants were asked for their level of agreement on a 5-point Likert scale.Results:1344 RA patients with exposure to GCs, from Brazil, USA, UK, Portugal, Netherlands, Germany and 24 other countries** participated: 89% female, mean age (SD) 52 (14) years and mean disease duration 13 (11) years. The majority of participants (84%) had ≥10 years of education. The duration of GCs exposure was 1.6 (4.2) years. The majority of participants had read articles or pamphlets on the benefits or harms of GC therapy.Regarding GCs efficacy (table 1), high levels of endorsement were found: about 2/3 of patients considered that GCs as very useful in their case, more than half considered that GCs were effective even at low doses, and agreed that GC improved RA symptoms within days.Regarding safety (table 1), 1/3 of the participants reported having suffered some form of serious adverse events (AEs) due to GCs, and 9% perceived this as “life-threatening. Adverse events had a serious impact on quality of life, according to about 1/3 of the respondents.Conclusion:Patients with RA exposed to GC report a strong conviction that GCs are very useful and effective for the treatment of their RA, even at low doses. This is accompanied by an important prevalence of serious AEs. Understanding the patient perspective can improve shared decision-making between patient and rheumatologist.Funding statement:This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 634886.Disclosure of Interests:Tânia Santiago: None declared, Marieke Voshaar Grant/research support from: part of phd research, Speakers bureau: conducting a workshop (Pfizer), Maarten de Wit Grant/research support from: Dr. de Wit reports personal fees from Ely Lilly, 2019, personal fees from Celgene, 2019, personal fees from Pfizer, 2019, personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, 2017, outside the submitted work., Consultant of: Dr. de Wit reports personal fees from Ely Lilly, 2019, personal fees from Celgene, 2019, personal fees from Pfizer, 2019, personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, 2017, outside the submitted work., Speakers bureau: Dr. de Wit reports personal fees from Ely Lilly, 2019, personal fees from Celgene, 2019, personal fees from Pfizer, 2019, personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, 2017, outside the submitted work., Pedro Carvalho: None declared, Maarten Boers: None declared, Maurizio Cutolo Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Actelion, Celgene, Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Sigma-Alpha, Frank Buttgereit Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Generic Assays, GSK, Hexal, Horizon, Lilly, medac, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi., José Antonio P. da Silva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, Roche, Lilly, Novartis

scholarly journals AB0144 PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF SUSTAINED CLINICAL REMISSION IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1099.2-1099
Author(s):  
R. Fakhfakh ◽  
N. El Amri ◽  
K. Baccouche ◽  
H. Zeglaoui ◽  
E. Bouajina
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Power Doppler ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Sustained Remission ◽  
Sharp Score ◽  
Remission Criteria ◽  
Ultrasound Parameters

Background:Sustained remission (SR) is an ultimate treatment goal in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (1) and is associated with better RA prognosis, reflected by the quality of life, physical function and radiographic progression (2).Objectives:To investigate the prevalence and predictors of SR in RA patients.Methods:A longitudinal prospective study of patients with RA. At the inclusion, the patients were in remission DAS28 ESR≤ 2.6 for at least 6 months. A B-mode and power doppler (PD) ultrasound of 42 joints and 20 tendons was performed. Synovial hypertrophy (SH) and tenosynovitis in B-mode and PD were defined and scored from 0 to 3 using the OMERACT. The CDAI, SDAI, Boolean remission criteria, the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and the radiological Sharp score were calculated. Then, the DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was evaluated at 6 and 12 months. SR was defined as the persistence of a DAS28 ESR≤2.6 at 6 or 12 months without any change in RA therapy during the follow-up. Unstable remission (UR) was defined either as DAS28 ESR > 2.6 at 6 or 12 months or an increase in RA therapy because of a relapse during the follow-up.Results:At baseline, thirty-seven patients were included. At 6 and 12 months, 28 and 24 patients completed follow-up, respectively. In decreasing order, Boolean remission (92.2%), DAS28ESRremission (85.7%), SDAI remission (85%) and CDAI remission (83.3%) achieved SR at 6 months. At 12 months, SR was found in 100% in Boolean remission, 87.5% in SDAI remission, 86.7% in CDAI remission and in 79.7% in DAS28 ESR remission. At 6 months, only the ESR (17mm/1h in SR versus 32 mm/1h in UR, p=0.04) was associated with SR. The disease duration, remission duration, swollen and tender joints, DAS28ESR, HAQ, rheumatoid factor, radiological Sharp score and ultrasound parameters weren’t associated with SR. At 12 months, the squeeze test (15% in SR vs 80% in UR, P=0.01), the ESR (15 mm/1h in SR versus 30 mm/1h in UR, p=0.03), the Boolean remission (61.1% in SR versus 0% in UR, p=0.04) and the DAS28ESR (mean: 1.8 in SR versus 2.5 in UR, P=0.01) were associated with SR. However, no association was found with radiological Sharp score and ultrasound parameters. On multivariate analysis, the ESR (OR=1.13, CI95%=1.01-1.2, p=0.03) and the Squeeze test (OR=21.3, CI95%=1.7-263, p=0.01) were predictors of SR, at 12 months.Conclusion:At 6 and 12 months, 79.7%-85.7% of patients in DAS28 ESR remission achieved sustained remission, respectively. Boolean and DAS28 ESR remission were associated with SR. Unlike DAS28 ESR, Boolean remission seems to reflect more the SR. The squeeze test and the ESR were predictors’ factor. However, the radiological and the ultrasound parameters didn’t show any association.References:[1]Ajeganova S, Huizinga T. Sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis: latest evidence and clinical considerations. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2017;9(10):249-62.[2]Xie W, Li J, Zhang X, Sun X, Zhang Z. Sustained clinical remission of rheumatoid arthritis and its predictive factors in an unselected adult Chinese population from 2009 to 2018. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019;22(9):1670-8.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document