scholarly journals P202 Administering live vaccines to infants exposed to biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs in-utero for maternal treatment of rheumatic disease: a systematic review of the literature

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethan Goulden ◽  
Nicole Chua ◽  
Elaine Parker ◽  
Ian Giles

Abstract Background/Aims  Increasing utilisation of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs in women of reproductive age has potential for informed or accidental use in pregnancy and impact on fetal immunity. Transplacental passage of certain biologic DMARDs result in detectable drug levels in the neonate. Current British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guidelines recommend all live vaccines be delayed in infants until 7 months of age after in-utero exposure in later pregnancy to the tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) etanercept, adalimumab or infliximab. This advice affects administration of rotavirus, BCG and potentially MMR vaccination. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to evaluate vaccine safety in infants exposed to bDMARDs or tsDMARDs in pregnancy. Methods  A systematic review of Embase, Medline and Cochrane identified live vaccine outcomes in the infants of mothers who took bDMARDs or tsDMARDs during pregnancy, focussing on drugs used in standard rheumatology practice. Studies were reviewed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Results  A total of 226 titles and abstracts were screened and 8 papers selected for final analysis. Studies included in-utero exposures to adalimumab (n = 326), certolizumab pegol (n = 18), etanercept (n = 1), infliximab (n = 408), golimumab (n = 1), rituximab (n = 1), tocilizumab (n = 3) and ustekinumab (n = 1). No relevant articles on tsDMARDs were identified. Maternal disease included inflammatory bowel disease (n = 849), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 3) and Burkitt’s lymphoma (n = 1). For infants exposed to biologic medications in utero, we identified infant vaccination to: BCG (n = 111) and/or rotavirus (n = 48) in the first year of life, many < 6 months; and MMR (n = 605) at 12 months (n = 590), 6-9 months (n = 12) and at 1, 2 or 4 months (n = 3). Adverse events with BCG vaccination included 1 death, 2 large local skin reactions, and 1 infant with axillary lymphadenopathy. A freedom of information request to the MHRA revealed 4 further suspected fatal BCG infections in infants exposed to TNFi in-utero (2 infliximab, 1 adalimumab, 1 unspecified TNFi). Side-effects noted in infants given rotavirus vaccination were mild and at similar frequency to those in non-biologic exposed infants. No complications were reported with MMR vaccination. Conclusion  Overall, we found most evidence of clinically harmful effects after administration of BCG to infants < 3 months of age and after in-utero exposure to infliximab. In contrast, outcomes following rotavirus (mostly < 6 months) and MMR (mostly at a year) vaccinations were reassuring. These findings are limited to live vaccine usage at standard time points in Europe/USA following maternal use of TNFis with significant placental transfer. Therefore, further understanding of live vaccine safety after exposure to any bDMARD or tsDMARD is required, including confirmation of the presumed safety of live vaccine use following maternal usage of bDMARDs with negligible rates of placental transfer. Disclosure  B. Goulden: None. N. Chua: None. E. Parker: None. I. Giles: Consultancies; Educational grant from UCB; speakers fees from UCB; travel fees from UCB. Other; Chair of guideline group on prescribing anti-rheumatic drugs in pregnancy for British Society of rheumatology.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1511.2-1511
Author(s):  
M. G. Lazzaroni ◽  
F. Crisafulli ◽  
I. Debeni ◽  
C. Nalli ◽  
L. Andreoli ◽  
...  

Background:A possible increase in neurodevelopmental (ND) and learning disorders (LD) in the offspring of mothers affected by SLE have been suggested in some studies, along with the identification of different possible risk factors. Azathioprine (AZA) is commonly used during pregnancy, based on its non-teratogenicity and extended experience in women with different diseases. However, a few small studies suggested an association between in utero exposure to AZA and possible increased frequency of ND/LD in children, indirectly derived from increased request of supportive educational services.Objectives:To evaluate the medium-long term outcome in terms of ND/LD in children of school age (≥6 years) born to SLE women treated with AZA during pregnancy, as compared to that of children born to SLE mothers not treated with AZA during pregnancy.Methods:Data from our Pregnancy Clinic registry were collected for prospectively followed pregnancies of SLE women treated with AZA (cases) and compared to pregnancies of SLE women not treated with AZA (controls), that were matched for age at pregnancy, presence of renal involvement and aPL positivity. SLE patients (cases and controls) were interviewed by phone to collect data about their children, focusing on the presence of ND/LD certified by Neuropsychiatrists.Results:Data were collected for 14 SLE mothers in the AZA group and 31 in the control group, with similar age at pregnancy (30.3±5.21 vs 31.4±4.70 years, p:0.45) and frequency of renal involvement (50.0% vs 44.1%, p:0.77), aPL positivity (33.3% vs 29.4%, p:0.76) and anti-Ro/SSA positivity (27.8% vs. 26.5%, p:0.55). A SLE flare during pregnancy was more frequently recorded in the AZA group (27.8% vs. 2.94%, p:0.02). Other medications included HCQ (55.6% vs. 70.6%, p:0.36) and corticosteroids (100% vs 79.4%, p:0.08).We collected data for 18 children in the AZA group and 34 children in the control group, that had a similar mean age at the time of the interview (12.7±4.80 vs. 12.9±5.61 years, p:0.91). The two groups had also similar gestational age (37.4±2.20 weeks vs. 38.0±1.29 weeks, p:0.23), birth weight (3003±433 g vs 3011±453 g, p:0.95) and rate of male sex (61.1% vs 44.1%, p:0.38).We recorded similar frequency of ND/LD in the two groups. In particular, a ND was present in 2/18 (11.1%) of children exposed to AZA vs. 2/34 (5.88%) in the control group (p:0.60). A LD was present in 1/18 cases (5.56%) and 6/34 controls (17.6%) (p:0.40).Conclusion:The medium-long term outcome of children born to SLE mothers in the whole cohort was characterized by the presence of ND in 4/54 (7.69%) and LD in 7/52 (13.5%). ND/LD do not seem to be related to in utero exposure to AZA.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Radiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 286 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao Prola-Netto ◽  
Mark Woods ◽  
Victoria H. J. Roberts ◽  
Elinor L. Sullivan ◽  
Christina Ann Miller ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Hom ◽  
Intira Sriprasert ◽  
Ugonna Ihenacho ◽  
J Esteban Castelao ◽  
Kimberly Siegmund ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Early exposure to estrogen-like compounds has been implicated in the etiology of testicular cancer, but individual level epidemiologic data addressing this hypothesis are scarce. The synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES) was administered during pregnancy from 1948 to 1971, but sequelae of in utero exposure have been more extensively characterized in females than in males. Methods By systematic review, we sought to identify all epidemiologic research relating testicular cancer to a history of in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol. Identified studies were critically appraised to assemble a set of nonredundant data in which any in utero exposure to DES was compared between men with incident testicular cancer and cancer-free men. These data were synthesized using random effects meta-analysis to estimate the summary association between in utero DES exposure and testicular cancer. Results By meta-analysis of data from the six qualifying studies, the summary odds ratio estimate of the in utero DES-testicular cancer association was 2.98 (95% confidence interval = 1.15 to 7.67). Conclusions Results of this comprehensive meta-analysis accord with a threefold increase in testicular cancer risk among men who were exposed in utero to DES, implicating early hormonal exposures in etiology of testicular cancer. Because use of DES ceased in 1971, this work may provide the most comprehensive estimate of this association that will be made.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. e20200375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Y.P. Foo ◽  
Mohinder Sarna ◽  
Gavin Pereira ◽  
Hannah C. Moore ◽  
Deshayne B. Fell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jianjun Wang ◽  
Fiammetta Cosci

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> A clear picture of neonatal withdrawal signs due to in utero selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) exposure and its consequences is still missing. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to provide an overview of neonatal withdrawal signs following late in utero exposure to SSRIs and to quantify the corresponding risks. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from inception to January 2021. The Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were followed. English-language observational studies reporting on acute postpartum outcomes following late in utero exposure to SSRIs or SSRIs/venlafaxine were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 2,269 citations reviewed, 79 studies were assessed for eligibility; 13 were included in the qualitative analysis of the literature, which allowed us to identify 26 signs. A meta-analysis was run separately for studies on SSRI exposure (<i>n</i> = 3) and those on SSRI/venlafaxine exposure (<i>n</i> = 6). Hypoglycemia was identified as a withdrawal sign based on the SSRI studies. Tremors, hypotonia, tachycardia, rapid breathing, respiratory distress, and hypertonia were identified as withdrawal signs based on the SSRI/venlafaxine studies. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The present work provides a framework for the identification of neonatal SSRI withdrawal syndrome. Tapering and discontinuation of antidepressant drugs before and during the early phase of pregnancy are worth attempting to prevent the occurrence of this syndrome.


CNS Drugs ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 451-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gali Pariente ◽  
Tom Leibson ◽  
Talya Shulman ◽  
Thomasin Adams-Webber ◽  
Eran Barzilay ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document