scholarly journals P1_27 Characteristics of patients with giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis in a nationwide, retrospective cohort study in Japan

Rheumatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii52-iii60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiko Sugihara ◽  
Hitoshi Hasegawa ◽  
Haruhito Uchida ◽  
Hajime Yoshifuji ◽  
Yoshikazu Nakaoka ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 655.1-655
Author(s):  
J. Rakholiya ◽  
M. Koster ◽  
H. Langenfeld ◽  
C. S. Crowson ◽  
A. Abril ◽  
...  

Background:Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an inflammatory condition of medium- and large-sized arteries. Prospective clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) for treatment of patients with GCA (1). However, there is a limited data on the use of TCZ in routine clinical practice.Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCZ in a retrospective cohort study of patients with GCA treated with TCZ.Methods:Patients with GCA treated with TCZ at 4 clinical centers of a single tertiary care institution (2000-2020) were identified. The diagnosis of GCA was confirmed by at least one of the following modalities: 1. Arterial biopsy 2. Large vessel imaging 3. Clinical diagnosis of GCA meeting ACR classification criteria and established by a rheumatologist. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory studies, treatment course and adverse events were abstracted from the medical record; only patients with at least 6 months of follow-up after TCZ initiation were included. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate time to TCZ discontinuation and time to first relapse after TCZ discontinuation. Poisson regression models were used to compare relapse rates before and after TCZ initiation.Results:The study cohort included 119 patients [61% female; mean (SD) age at GCA diagnosis 70.3 (8.2) years]. The majority of patients (89%) had a biopsy-proven and/or imaging-based diagnosis of GCA, while 13 (11%) had a clinical diagnosis of GCA. In addition to glucocorticoids, 40 (34%) patients received other immunosuppressive agents prior to TCZ. The method of initial TCZ administration was subcutaneous (162mg/ml) weekly in 48 (41%), subcutaneous every other week in 20 (17%), monthly 4mg/kg infusions in 34 (29%), monthly 8mg/kg infusions in 14 (12%) and non-standard dosing in 3 remaining patients. The median (IQR) duration from GCA diagnosis to TCZ initiation was 4.8 (1.2-22.0) months and the median (IQR) duration of TCZ treatment was 18 (11-28) months. The mean (SD) dose of prednisone at TCZ initiation was 31 (19) mg/day and was reduced to a mean (SD) dose of 3.9 (6.7) mg/day at TCZ discontinuation/last follow-up visit. The relapse rate per year decreased 43% from 0.77 to 0.44 after the initiation of TCZ (RR=0.57; 95% CI: 0.44-0.75; p<0.001). The mean (SD) ESR and CRP decreased from 22 (20) mm/hour to 6 (9.2) mm/hour and from 19.1 (25) mg/L to 5.4 (16.6) mg/L, respectively from TCZ initiation to TCZ discontinuation/last follow-up visit. At 2 years of follow-up, 67% of patients had discontinued glucocorticoids. At last follow up, 46 patients had discontinued TCZ, only 14 of which were due to adverse events. The median time to TCZ discontinuation was 2.9 years. Only 17% (95%CI: 10-24%) had discontinued by 1 year after TCZ initiation and 38% (95% CI: 26-47%) had discontinued by 2 years. The most common adverse events were infections and cytopenias. While on TCZ, 1 patient developed new onset vision loss related to GCA and 1 patient, without history of diverticulitis, had bowel perforation. Among those discontinuing TCZ, 61% had relapsed at least once by 1 year after TCZ discontinuation.Conclusion:In this large single institution cohort of patients with GCA, TCZ use resulted in a significantly reduced relapse rate and reduction in glucocorticoid dosage. Overall, patients tolerated long-term use with only 12% discontinuing due to adverse events. However, over half of patients stopping TCZ had a subsequent flare; highlighting ongoing use may be required beyond two years in several patients with GCA to maintain remission.References:[1]Stone JH, et al. Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):317-328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613849. PMID: 28745999.[2]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis. Observational, open-label multicenter study of 134 patients in clinical practice. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Aug;49(1):126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 5. PMID: 30655091.Disclosure of Interests:Jigisha Rakholiya: None declared, Matthew Koster: None declared, Hannah Langenfeld: None declared, Cynthia S. Crowson: None declared, Andy Abril: None declared, Pankaj Bansal: None declared, Lester Mertz: None declared, Alicia Rodriguez-Pla: None declared, Rahul Sehgal: None declared, Benjamin Wang: None declared, Kenneth J Warrington Grant/research support from: Research support: Kiniksa, Eli Lilly


2015 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prabhu D. Udayakumar ◽  
Arun K. Chandran ◽  
Cynthia S. Crowson ◽  
Kenneth J. Warrington ◽  
Eric L. Matteson

Rheumatology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristian Labarca ◽  
Matthew J. Koster ◽  
Cynthia S. Crowson ◽  
Ashima Makol ◽  
Steven R. Ytterberg ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e0149579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Lo Gullo ◽  
Matthew J. Koster ◽  
Cynthia S. Crowson ◽  
Ashima Makol ◽  
Steven R. Ytterberg ◽  
...  

Rheumatology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. i14-i14
Author(s):  
P. Deepak Udayakumar ◽  
A. K. Chandran ◽  
C. S. Crowson ◽  
K. J. Warrington ◽  
E. L. Matteson

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. K. Brekke ◽  
A. P. Diamantopoulos ◽  
B.-T. Fevang ◽  
J. Aβmus ◽  
E. Esperø ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. K. Brekke ◽  
A. P. Diamantopoulos ◽  
B-T. Fevang ◽  
J. Aβmus ◽  
E. Esperø ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 397.2-398
Author(s):  
L. K. Brekke ◽  
B. T. Svanes Fevang ◽  
J. Assmus

Background:Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common systemic vasculitis in adults, and the number of incident cases worldwide is projected to increase [1]. Evidence as to whether or not GCA confers a mortality risk is conflicting, and many studies have been limited by inadequate or lacking adjustment for confounders.Objectives:To investigate possible predictors of death in a large and well characterized Norwegian cohort of GCA-patients.Methods:This is a hospital-based retrospective cohort study including patients diagnosed with GCA during 1972-2012. Patients were identified through computerized hospital records using the International Classification of Diseases coding system. Clinical information was extracted from patients’ medical journals. Further details about the inclusion process have been published previously [2]. Information on time of death was obtained from the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. We investigated predicting factors using Cox regression. Selected variables were first analyzed in univariate and block regression models (block 1: clinical features including histology, block 2: laboratory and treatment factors, block 3: demographic and traditional risk factors). Variables included in the final multivariate model were selected on the following basis: P-value <0.1 in univariate or block regression or otherwise deemed clinically significant.Results:881 patients were included of which 626 (71.1%) were females. Mean age was 73 years (SD 9). 490 patients (55.6%) died during the study period (1 January 1972 – 31 December 2012). Characteristics and mortality for the GCA-cohort compared to matched controls have been published previously [3]. Within the GCA-cohort we found that presenting with visual disturbance (any) or scalp necrosis was associated with increased risk of death in univariate analysis (Figure 1). However, in multivariate analysis the traditional risk factors (age, smoking, hypertension and previous cardiovascular disease) were more strongly associated with risk of death. Among laboratory parameters only Hemoglobin (Hb) levels were significantly associated with risk of death with increasing Hb-levels indicating decreased risk. Neither temporal artery biopsy result nor initial or maximal (before first tapering) Prednisolone dose were found to be associated with risk of death. Results from univariate and the final multivariate models are presented in Figure 1.Figure 1.Conclusion:In our large cohort of GCA-patients the risk of death was found to be predominantly predicted by age (HR 2.81) and traditional risk factors (smoking (HR 1.61), hypertension (HR 1.48) and previous cardiovascular disease (HR 1.26)). Visual disturbance (HR 1.40), visual loss in particular (HR 2.37), and scalp necrosis (HR 3.42) were found to be the clinical features most associated with risk of death. However, we note that our material lacked information about extra-cranial (large vessel) vasculitis, which may also carry increased risk of death.References:[1]De Smit E, Palmer AJ, Hewitt AW. Projected worldwide disease burden from giant cell arteritis by 2050. J Rheumatol 2015;42:119-25.[2]Brekke LK, Diamantopoulos AP, Fevang BTS, Assmus J, Esperø E, Gjesdal CG. Incidence of giant cell arteritis in Western Norway 1972-2012: a retrospective cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):278.[3]Brekke LK, Fevang BTS, Diamantopoulos AP, Assmus J, Esperø E, Gjesdal CG. Survival and death causes of patients with giant cell arteritis in Western Norway 1972-2012: a retrospective cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):154.Disclosure of Interests:Lene Kristin Brekke Grant/research support from: Unrestricted research grant from MSD, Bjørg Tilde Svanes Fevang Consultant of: Been part of advisory board for Lilly, Jörg Assmus: None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document