0753 Cataplexy-Free Days in a Phase 3, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Withdrawal Study of JZP-258 in Adults With Narcolepsy With Cataplexy

Abstract Introduction Sodium oxybate (SXB) is a standard of care for the treatment of cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy. JZP-258 is an oxybate product candidate with 92% less sodium. This analysis evaluated cataplexy-free days/week, as a measure of treatment impact, in a placebo-controlled randomized withdrawal study of JZP-258 treatment in patients with narcolepsy. Methods Treatment for cataplexy at study entry included 1) SXB (SXB-only); 2) SXB plus other anticataplectics (SXB+other); 3) anticataplectics other than SXB (other anticataplectics); or 4) cataplexy treatment-naive (anticataplectic-naive). Participants (aged 18-70 years with narcolepsy with cataplexy) began JZP-258 treatment during a 12-week, open-label, optimized treatment and titration period (OLOTTP), followed by a 2-week stable-dose period (SDP). Participants were randomized to receive placebo or continue JZP-258 treatment during a 2-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period (DBRWP). Results Of 201 enrolled participants, 134 comprised the efficacy population (placebo, n=65; JZP-258, n=69). Median (Q1, Q3) cataplexy-free days/week at first week of OLOTTP (while initiating JZP-258) by prior treatment were SXB-only, 5.8 (2.0, 7.0); SXB+other, 6.4 (5.0, 7.0); other anticataplectics, 4.0 (1.8, 6.0); anticataplectic-naive, 3.5 (0, 5.8). At end of SDP (on stable dose of JZP-258), median (Q1, Q3) cataplexy-free days/week were 6.0 (3.5, 7.0), 6.1 (1.4, 7.0), 6.0 (2.6, 7.0), and 6.2 (4.0, 7.0), respectively. Prior to randomization, there was no difference in median cataplexy-free days/week between participants to be randomized to placebo (6.0 [3.5, 7.0]) or JZP-258 treatment (6.0 [3.0, 7.0]); during DBRWP, median cataplexy-free days/week decreased in participants randomized to placebo (3.5 [0, 5.83]) but remained similar in participants randomized to continue JZP-258 treatment (5.6 [2.8, 7.0]). The overall safety profile of JZP-258 was similar to SXB. Conclusion Number of cataplexy-free days/week increased with JZP-258 treatment in participants previously naive to oxybate. Number of cataplexy-free days/week decreased during placebo exposure in participants randomized to placebo. Support Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Download Full-text

0752 JZP-258 Dose Titration and Transition from Sodium Oxybate in a Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Withdrawal Study in Adult Participants With Narcolepsy With Cataplexy

SLEEP ◽

10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.748 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. A286-A286

Author(s):

N Foldvary-Schaefer ◽

R K Bogan ◽

M J Thorpy ◽

L Huang ◽

R Skowronski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Standard Of Care ◽

Optimal Dose ◽

Sodium Oxybate ◽

Study Entry ◽

Dose Titration ◽

Open Label ◽

Double Blind ◽

Stable Dose ◽

Dose Period ◽

Treatment Naïve

Abstract Introduction Sodium oxybate (SXB) is a standard of care for the treatment of cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy. JZP-258 is an oxybate product candidate (at same concentration as SXB) with 92% less sodium. JZP-258 dose adjustment during titration was evaluated. Methods At study entry, participants were taking SXB only, SXB+other anticataplectics, anticataplectics other than SXB, or were cataplexy treatment-naive. JZP-258 treatment began during a 12-week, open-label optimized treatment and titration period. Participants taking SXB only or SXB+other anticataplectics transitioned to JZP-258 at the same gram-for-gram dose as SXB and titrated to an efficacious and tolerable (optimal) dose from weeks 3-12. Participants taking other anticataplectics or who were anticataplectic-naive initiated JZP-258 at 4.5 g/night and were titrated to an optimal dose at 1-1.5 g/night/week (maximum total dose, 9 g/night). A 2-week stable-dose period and 2-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period followed. Results During the stable-dose period, total nightly JZP-258 dose (median [range]) was higher in participants taking SXB at study entry (SXB-only, 7.5 g [4.5-9.0], n=45; SXB+other anticataplectics, 9.0 g [6.0-9.0], n=14) compared with those not taking SXB (other anticataplectics, 7.5 g [4.5-9.0], n=23; anticataplectic-naive, 7.0 g [3.0-9.0], n=67), and dose adjustments were fewer. In most (69%) participants taking SXB at study entry who entered the stable-dose period, no change in dose was required (median [range] number of adjustments was 0 ([0-8]); for those with a change in dose, most changes were within one titration step (1.5 g/night). In participants not taking SXB at study entry, the median (range) number of adjustments was 3.0 (0-7). Conclusion Most participants taking SXB at study entry transitioned to JZP-258 treatment at the same dose with retained effectiveness. Participants not previously taking SXB achieved a tolerable and efficacious dose of JZP-258 after a median of 3 adjustments. Support Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium oxybates (lower-sodium oxybate [LXB]; JZP-258) in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized withdrawal study in adults with narcolepsy with cataplexy

SLEEP ◽

10.1093/sleep/zsaa206 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Richard K Bogan ◽

Michael J Thorpy ◽

Yves Dauvilliers ◽

Markku Partinen ◽

Rafael Del Rio Villegas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Placebo Group ◽

Group Versus ◽

Sodium Oxybate ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Open Label ◽

Double Blind ◽

Clinical Trial Registration ◽

Titration Period ◽

Secondary Efficacy Endpoint ◽

Optimized Treatment

Abstract Study Objectives Evaluate efficacy and safety of lower-sodium oxybate (LXB), a novel oxybate medication with 92% less sodium than sodium oxybate (SXB). Methods Adults aged 18–70 years with narcolepsy with cataplexy were eligible. The study included a ≤30-day screening period; a 12-week, open-label, optimized treatment and titration period to transition to LXB from previous medications for the treatment of cataplexy; a 2-week stable-dose period (SDP); a 2-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period (DBRWP); and a 2-week safety follow-up. During DBRWP, participants were randomized 1:1 to placebo or to continue LXB treatment. Results Efficacy was assessed in 134 participants who received randomized treatment, and safety was assessed in all enrolled participants (N = 201). Statistically significant worsening of symptoms was observed in participants randomized to placebo, with median (first quartile [Q1], third quartile [Q3]) change in weekly number of cataplexy attacks from SDP to DBRWP (primary efficacy endpoint) in the placebo group of 2.35 (0.00, 11.61) versus 0.00 (−0.49, 1.75) in the LXB group (p < 0.0001; mean [standard deviation, SD] change: 11.46 [24.751] vs 0.12 [5.772]), and median (Q1, Q3) change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (key secondary efficacy endpoint) of 2.0 (0.0, 5.0) in the placebo group versus 0.0 (−1.0, 1.0) in the LXB group (p < 0.0001; mean [SD] change: 3.0 [4.68] vs 0.0 [2.90]). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events with LXB were headache (20.4%), nausea (12.9%), and dizziness (10.4%). Conclusions Efficacy of LXB for the treatment of cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness was demonstrated. The safety profile of LXB was consistent with SXB. Clinical trial registration NCT03030599.

Download Full-text

486 Timing and Duration of Adverse Events in a Clinical Trial of Lower-Sodium Oxybate in Participants With Narcolepsy With Cataplexy

SLEEP ◽

10.1093/sleep/zsab072.485 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. A192-A192

Author(s):

Richard Bogan ◽

Nancy Foldvary-Schaefer ◽

Roman Skowronski ◽

Abby Chen ◽

Michael Thorpy

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Study Drug ◽

Drug Dose ◽

Sodium Oxybate ◽

Open Label ◽

Double Blind ◽

Peak Incidence ◽

Safety Population ◽

Titration Period ◽

Treatment Naïve

Abstract Introduction This analysis evaluated treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial (NCT03030599) of lower-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav™), an FDA-approved treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness or cataplexy in narcolepsy. Methods At study entry, participants were taking sodium oxybate (SXB) alone, SXB with other anticataplectics, other anticataplectics alone, or were anticataplectic treatment-naive. Participants taking SXB transitioned to the same LXB dose (gram-for-gram); oxybate-naive participants initiated LXB (4.5 g/night). TEAEs were analyzed in the safety population (N=201, received ≥1 study drug dose) during a 12-week open-label optimized treatment/titration period (while other anticataplectics were tapered/discontinued) and subsequent 2-week stable-dose period (SDP). TEAE duration was defined as time from TEAE start to end date (or end of SDP, if TEAE end date was unrecorded). Results LXB-emergent TEAEs varied by treatment at entry. Anticataplectic treatment-naive participants reported TEAEs including headache (n=36/90, 40%; median duration [range]=1 [1–76] day), nausea (n=19/90, 21%; duration=9 [1–37] days), and dizziness (n=15/90, 17%; duration=10 [1–117] days); peak incidence was week 2 (n=8/89, 9%) for headache, week 3 (n=3/88, 3%) for dizziness, and week 1 (n=6/90, 7%) for nausea. Anticataplectic treatment-naive participants (n=13/90, 14%) also reported decreased appetite, with relatively long duration (58 [2–358] days). Participants taking SXB alone reported TEAEs including headache (n=17/52, 33%; duration=1 [1–122] day) and diarrhea (n=4/52, 8%; duration=41 [2–101] days); peak headache incidence was week 4 (n=4/52, 8%); diarrhea had no peak. Participants taking other anticataplectics alone reported TEAEs including headache (n=14/36, 39%; duration=1 [1–94] day), nausea (n=9/36, 25%; duration=3 [1–16] days), and dizziness (n=9/36, 25%; duration=4 [1–29] days); peak incidence was week 1 (n=3/36, 8%) for headache, week 6 (n=2/32, 6%) for nausea, and week 4 (n=3/33, 9%) for dizziness. One participant taking SXB with other anticataplectics (n=1/23, 4%) reported headache in weeks 1–2 and 4; one reported nausea (4%) persisting from week 1 to 8. Overall, study discontinuations attributed to TEAEs were 20/57 (35%). Conclusion Most TEAEs with LXB treatment occurred early, were consistent with the known SXB safety profile, and were relatively short-lived (except decreased appetite). Participants previously taking SXB reported fewer TEAEs than oxybate-naive participants. Support (if any) Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Download Full-text

Casirivimab and imdevimab in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial

10.1101/2021.06.15.21258542 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Peter W Horby ◽

Marion Mafham ◽

Leon Peto ◽

Mark Campbell ◽

Guilherme Pessoa-Amorim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Usual Care ◽

Rate Ratio ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Care Group ◽

P Value ◽

Open Label ◽

Proportional Effect ◽

Randomised Controlled ◽

To Receive ◽

Efficacy Population

Background: REGEN-COV is a combination of 2 monoclonal antibodies (casirivimab and imdevimab) that bind to two different sites on the receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of REGEN-COV in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Methods: In this randomised, controlled, open-label platform trial, several possible treatments were compared with usual care in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either usual standard of care alone (usual care group) or usual care plus a single dose of REGEN-COV 8g (casirivimab 4g and imdevimab 4g) by intravenous infusion (REGEN-COV group). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality assessed first among patients without detectable antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 at randomisation (seronegative) and then in the overall population. Findings: Between 18 September 2020 and 22 May 2021, 9785 patients were randomly allocated to receive usual care plus REGEN-COV or usual care alone, including 3153 (32%) seronegative patients, 5272 (54%) seropositive patients and 1360 (14%) patients with unknown baseline antibody status. In the primary efficacy population of seronegative patients, 396 (24%) of 1633 patients allocated to REGEN-COV and 451 (30%) of 1520 patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.91; p=0.0010). In an analysis involving all randomised patients (regardless of baseline antibody status), 944 (20%) of 4839 patients allocated to REGEN-COV and 1026 (21%) of 4946 patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio 0.94; 95% CI 0.86-1.03; p=0.17). The proportional effect of REGEN-COV on mortality differed significantly between seropositive and seronegative patients (p value for heterogeneity = 0.001). Interpretation: In patients hospitalised with COVID-19, the monoclonal antibody combination of casirivimab and imdevimab (REGEN-COV) reduced 28-day mortality among patients who were seronegative at baseline.

Download Full-text

0950 Effects of Sodium Oxybate (SXB) on Body Mass Index (BMI) in Pediatric Patients With Narcolepsy

SLEEP ◽

10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.946 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. A361-A361

Author(s):

Y Dauvilliers ◽

G J Lammers ◽

M Lecendreux ◽

G Plazzi ◽

K Maski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pediatric Patients ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Normal Weight ◽

Study Entry ◽

Withdrawal Period ◽

Open Label ◽

Double Blind ◽

Stable Dose ◽

Dose Period ◽

Safety Period

Abstract Introduction Obesity is a common comorbidity of pediatric narcolepsy. SXB is a standard of care for cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy. BMI decreases have been observed with SXB treatment. We examined BMI changes by BMI percentile category at study entry in pediatric participants. Methods Participants were aged 7-17 years with narcolepsy with cataplexy. SXB-naive participants were titrated to an optimal SXB dose, then entered a 2-week stable-dose period; participants taking SXB at study entry entered a 3-week stable-dose period. After a 2-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized-withdrawal period, all participants entered an open-label safety period (total study duration: ≤1 year). Weight categories were defined using BMI percentiles at study entry based on growth charts from the Centers for Disease Control. BMI percentile was categorized as: underweight (<5%ile), normal (≥5%ile to <85%ile), overweight (≥85%ile to<95%ile), obese (≥95%ile). Results Among SXB-naive participants, median (Q1, Q3) BMI percentile decreased with SXB treatment in participants who were categorized as normal-weight and overweight/obese at baseline (normal-weight, n=16: 76.5 [57.8, 82.4] at baseline, 35.0 [20.5, 62.6] at week 52; overweight/obese, n=35: 97.6 [93.6, 99.1] at baseline, 86.7 [72.5, 97.9] at week 52). Of participants who were normal-weight at baseline, 15/16 remained normal-weight at week 52. Of participants who were overweight at baseline, 9/10 were normal-weight at week 52. Of participants who were obese at baseline, 7/25 were normal-weight, 3/25 were overweight, and 15/25 remained obese at week 52. Among participants taking SXB at study entry, BMI percentile decreased, but to a lesser degree. Decreased weight or weight loss was reported as an adverse event in 13 participants (11 SXB-naive; 1 participant withdrew). Four participants became underweight during the study but returned to normal-weight by study end. Conclusion Decreases in BMI percentile and category were observed with SXB treatment in pediatric participants with narcolepsy. Support Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Download Full-text

Aspirin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial

10.1101/2021.06.08.21258132 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Peter W Horby ◽

Guilherme Pessoa-Amorim ◽

Natalie Staplin ◽

Jonathan R Emberson ◽

Enti Spata ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Usual Care ◽

Rate Ratio ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Open Label ◽

Absolute Increase ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Randomised Controlled ◽

To Receive

Background: Aspirin has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 on the basis of its antithrombotic properties. Methods: In this randomised, controlled, open-label trial, several possible treatments were compared with usual care in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. Eligible and consenting adults were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus 150mg aspirin once daily until discharge using web-based simple (unstratified) randomisation with allocation concealment. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The trial is registered with ISRCTN (50189673) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04381936). Findings: Between 01 November 2020 and 21 March 2021, 7351 patients were randomly allocated to receive aspirin and 7541 patients to receive usual care alone. Overall, 1222 (17%) patients allocated to aspirin and 1299 (17%) patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.04; p=0.35). Consistent results were seen in all pre-specified subgroups of patients. Patients allocated to aspirin had a slightly shorter duration of hospitalisation (median 8 days vs. 9 days) and a higher proportion were discharged from hospital alive within 28 days (75% vs. 74%; rate ratio 1.06; 95% CI 1.02-1.10; p=0.0062). Among those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, there was no significant difference in the proportion meeting the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (21% vs. 22%; risk ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.90-1.03; p=0.23). Aspirin use was associated with an absolute reduction in thrombotic events of 0.6% (SE 0.4%) and an absolute increase in clinically significant bleeding of 0.6% (SE 0.2%). Interpretation: In patients hospitalised with COVID-19, aspirin was not associated with reductions in 28-day mortality or in the risk of progressing to invasive mechanical ventilation or death but was associated with a small increase in the rate of being discharged alive.

Download Full-text

A phase 3 randomised study of enzalutamide plus leuprolide and enzalutamide monotherapy in high-risk non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with rising PSA after local therapy: EMBARK study design

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046588 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (8) ◽

pp. e046588

Author(s):

Stephen J Freedland ◽

Ugo De Giorgi ◽

Martin Gleave ◽

Brad Rosbrook ◽

Qi Shen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

High Risk ◽

Specific Antigen ◽

Local Therapy ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Open Label ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Double Blind ◽

Randomised Study ◽

Definitive Therapy

IntroductionLimited data from controlled clinical trials are available for men who experience biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy for prostate cancer. In the absence of overt metastases, patients with non-metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC) often receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). There is no standard-of-care consensus on optimal ADT timing, although most men are treated prior to metastases, especially those with high-risk features (Gleason score 8–10 or prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) <9–12 months). Given data that ADT plus novel hormonal agents improve survival in men with metastatic CSPC, there is a desire to evaluate these agents earlier in the disease course. The main objective of EMBARK is the comparative assessment of enzalutamide plus leuprolide (luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa)) or enzalutamide monotherapy versus monotherapy LHRHa to improve metastasis-free survival (MFS) in patients with high-risk nmCSPC PSA recurrence after definitive therapy.Methods and analysisEMBARK is a randomised, phase 3 study of high-risk patients with nmCSPC, a PSADT of ≤9 months and a screening PSA of ≥2 ng/mL above the nadir after radiotherapy (RT) or ≥1 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without postoperative RT. Men (n=1050) are randomised 1:1:1 to enzalutamide 160 mg/day plus LHRHa or placebo plus LHRHa (double-blind arms) or enzalutamide monotherapy (open-label arm). Treatment is suspended at week 37 if PSA concentrations are <0.2 ng/mL and reinstated if levels rise to ≥2.0 ng/mL with RP or ≥5.0 ng/mL without RP. Patients with PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL at week 37 continue until treatment discontinuation criteria are met. The primary endpoint is MFS comparing enzalutamide plus LHRHa versus placebo plus LHRHa.Ethics and disseminationThe study is conducted under the guiding principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be disseminated at research conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT02319837.

Download Full-text

096 Assessment of the efficacy of erenumab during the open-label treatment (13–24 weeks) of subjects with episodic migraine who failed 2–4 prior preventive treatments: results of the LIBERTY study

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry ◽

10.1136/jnnp-2019-anzan.84 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 90 (e7) ◽

pp. A31.1-A31

Author(s):

Lauren Giles ◽

Uwe Reuter ◽

Peter Goadsby ◽

Michel Lanteri-Minet ◽

Peggy Hours-Zesiger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Treatment Phase ◽

Preventive Treatment ◽

Episodic Migraine ◽

Open Label ◽

Double Blind ◽

Open Label Extension ◽

Specific Medication ◽

Continuous Use ◽

To Receive ◽

Headache Impact

IntroductionTo assess efficacy of erenumab in the first three months of the open-label extension phase (OLEP; 13–24 weeks) of the LIBERTY study.MethodsIn the double-blind treatment phase (DBTP), 246 patients were randomized to placebo and erenumab 140 mg for 12 weeks, following which, patients completing that phase (N=240) were enrolled in OLEP, to receive monthly erenumab 140 mg. Outcomes measured monthly throughout to week 24 were achievement of at least 50%/75%/100% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD), change from DBTP baseline in MMD, monthly acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6TM) total score, everyday activities (EA) and physical impairment (PI) as measured by the Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary (MPFID).ResultsOverall, 228/240(95.0%) patients completed the 24 week visit of the OLEP. In the overall population at Week 24, 39.2%, 15.9% and 7.0% patients achieved ≥50%/≥75%/100% reduction in MMD. The mean (standard deviation) change from DBTP baseline in MMD was −2.7(4.4) and −1.4(3.0) in MSMD; and −7.6(8.0), −2.5(9.2) and −4.0(9.0) in HIT-6TM, MPFID-PI and MPFID-EA scores respectively. Patients with continuous use of erenumab showed sustained efficacy in all outcomes assessed. Patients who switched from placebo to erenumab in the OLEP showed improvement from the first measurement at Week 16 on all outcomes assessed.ConclusionsEfficacy of erenumab was sustained throughout 24 weeks in a hard to treat patient population with multiple prior preventive treatment failures. Overall, efficacy data over 24 weeks (assessed over weeks 13–16,17–20 and 21–24) was generally in line with prior erenumab trials.

Download Full-text

Rifabutin-Containing Triple Therapy (RHB-105) for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: Randomized ERADICATE Hp Trial

Antibiotics ◽

10.3390/antibiotics9100685 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (10) ◽

pp. 685 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ira N. Kalfus ◽

David Y. Graham ◽

Dennis S. Riff ◽

Raymond M. Panas

Keyword(s):

Helicobacter Pylori ◽

Eradication Rate ◽

Study Drug ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Empiric Therapy ◽

World Health ◽

Double Blind Study ◽

Double Blind ◽

Treatment Naïve ◽

H Pylori

Due to increasing resistance to commonly used antibiotics, the World Health Organization and Food and Drug Administration have advocated the development of new therapeutic regimens for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). This phase three, double-blind study (ERADICATE Hp) randomized (2:1) treatment-naïve adults with H. pylori infection and dyspepsia to RHB-105 (an all-in-one combination of omeprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and rifabutin 50 mg) or an identically-appearing placebo, both administered every 8 h for 14 days. The H. pylori eradication rate with RHB-105, using a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population of subjects who received ≥1 dose of study drug and had test-of-eradication performed 28–35 days post-completion of therapy, was compared (one-sample Z-test) to a literature-derived comparator rate of 70% and success rate with physician-selected standard-of-care given to placebo failures. The mITT H. pylori eradication rate (95% CI) with RHB-105 of 89.4% (82.0–96.8%) was greater than both the literature-derived comparator rate (P < 0.001) and the standard-of-care rate of 63.0% (44.8–81.1%) (P = 0.006). Adverse events with an incidence ≥5% for RHB-105 were diarrhea (12.7%), headache (11.9%), chromaturia (9.3%), abdominal tenderness (6.8%), and dizziness (5.1%). No leukopenia was noted. RHB-105 (Talicia®) proved to be a safe and effective empiric therapy for H. pylori eradication.

Download Full-text

Sustained clinical benefits of glatiramer acetate in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients observed for 6 years

Multiple Sclerosis Journal ◽

10.1177/135245850000600407 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 6 (4) ◽

pp. 255-266 ◽

Cited By ~ 150

Author(s):

K P Johnson ◽

B R Brooks ◽

C C Ford ◽

A Goodman ◽

J Guarnaccia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Sclerosis ◽

Glatiramer Acetate ◽

Relapse Rate ◽

Open Label ◽

Double Blind ◽

Open Label Study ◽

Label Study ◽

Open Label Phase ◽

Multiple Sclerosis Patients ◽

To Receive

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, glatiramer acetate (Copaxone®) reduced the relapse rate and slowed accumulation of disability for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Of the original 251 patients randomized to receive glatiramer acetate or placebo, 208 chose to continue in an open-label study with all patients receiving active drug. The majority of the original double-blind cohort continues to receive glatiramer acetate by daily subcutaneous injection and are evaluated at 6-month intervals and during suspected relapse. The data reported here are from approximately 6 years of organized evaluation, including the double-blind phase of up to 35 months and the open-label phase of over 36 months. Daily subcutaneous injections of 20 mg glatiramer acetate were well tolerated. The mean annual relapse rate of the patients who received glatiramer acetate since randomization and continued into the open-label study was 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI), CI=0.34-0.51). The rate per year has continued to drop and for the sixth year is 0.23. Of the group who have received glatiramer acetate without interruption for 5 or more years, 69.3% were neurologically unchanged or have improved from baseline by at least one step on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Patients who left the open-label phase were surveyed by questionnaire. The majority responded, providing information about their current status and reasons for dropping out. This study demonstrates the sustained efficacy of glatiramer acetate in reducing the relapse rate and in slowing the accumulation of disability in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.

Download Full-text