scholarly journals Clonal and seasonal differences in leaf osmotic potential and organic solutes of five hybrid poplar clones grown under field conditions

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 645-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Gebre ◽  
T. J. Tschaplinski ◽  
G. A. Tuskan ◽  
D. E. Todd
2004 ◽  
Vol 130 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Wei ◽  
J.M. Skelly ◽  
S.P. Pennypacker ◽  
J.A. Ferdinand ◽  
J.E. Savage ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 429-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amber Beseli ◽  
Antonio J. Hall ◽  
Anju Manandhar ◽  
Thomas R. Sinclair

1986 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 659 ◽  
Author(s):  
SP Robinson ◽  
GP Jones

Glycinebetaine was determined in leaves and in isolated chloroplasts of spinach (Spinacia oleracea) by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Some leakage of glycinebetaine from the chloroplasts occurred during the isolation so the concentration in chloroplasts in vivo could be up to 1.5 times higher than that measured in isolated chloroplasts. It was demonstrated that any contamination of the chloroplast preparations by glycinebetaine originating from other cellular compartments or from broken chloroplasts would have amounted to less than 10% of the measured values. Leaf osmotic potential of salt-stressed plants was -2.09 MPa compared to -0.91 MPa in non-stressed controls. This was accompanied by a sixfold increase in glycinebetaine content in the leaf but the levels of choline and proline were not increased. In chloroplasts isolated from control leaves the calculated glycinebetaine concentration was 26 mM which was 10-fold higher than the concentration in the leaf as a whole but only contributed 7% of the osmotic potential of the chloroplast. Chloroplasts from salt-stressed plants contained up to 300 mM glycinebetaine which was 20 times the concentration in the leaf as a whole. The glycinebetaine concentration in chloroplasts from salt-stressed leaves was equivalent to an osmotic potential of -0.75 MPa and this contributed 36% of the osmotic potential of the chloroplast and 64% of the decrease in osmotic potential induced by salt stress. At least 30-40% of the total leaf glycinebetaine was localized in the chloroplast. The results demonstrate that glycinebetaine accumulates in chloroplasts to provide osmotic adjustment during salt stress and provide support for the hypothesis that glycinebetaine is a compatible cytoplasmic solute which may be preferentially located in the cytoplasm of cells.


1999 ◽  
Vol 344 (2) ◽  
pp. 503-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annabelle DÉJARDIN ◽  
Lubomir N. SOKOLOV ◽  
Leszek A. KLECZKOWSKI

Sucrose synthase (Sus) is a key enzyme of sucrose metabolism. Two Sus-encoding genes (Sus1 and Sus2) from Arabidopsis thaliana were found to be profoundly and differentially regulated in leaves exposed to environmental stresses (cold stress, drought or O2 deficiency). Transcript levels of Sus1 increased on exposure to cold and drought, whereas Sus2 mRNA was induced specifically by O2 deficiency. Both cold and drought exposures induced the accumulation of soluble sugars and caused a decrease in leaf osmotic potential, whereas O2 deficiency was characterized by a nearly complete depletion in sugars. Feeding abscisic acid (ABA) to detached leaves or subjecting Arabidopsis ABA-deficient mutants to cold stress conditions had no effect on the expression profiles of Sus1 or Sus2, whereas feeding metabolizable sugars (sucrose or glucose) or non-metabolizable osmotica [poly(ethylene glycol), sorbitol or mannitol] mimicked the effects of osmotic stress on Sus1 expression in detached leaves. By using various sucrose/mannitol solutions, we demonstrated that Sus1 was up-regulated by a decrease in leaf osmotic potential rather than an increase in sucrose concentration itself. We suggest that Sus1 expression is regulated via an ABA-independent signal transduction pathway that is related to the perception of a decrease in leaf osmotic potential during stresses. In contrast, the expression of Sus2 was independent of sugar/osmoticum effects, suggesting the involvement of a signal transduction mechanism distinct from that regulating Sus1 expression. The differential stress-responsive regulation of Sus genes in leaves might represent part of a general cellular response to the allocation of carbohydrates during acclimation processes.


GCB Bioenergy ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hortensia Sixto ◽  
Paula Gil ◽  
Pilar Ciria ◽  
Francesc Camps ◽  
Mario Sánchez ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 130 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Wei ◽  
J.M. Skelly ◽  
S.P. Pennypacker ◽  
J.A. Ferdinand ◽  
J.E. Savage ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document