Risk-Stratification of Children Presenting to Ambulatory Paediatrics with First-Onset Seizures: Should We Order an Urgent CT Brain?

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-314
Author(s):  
Jaanri Brugman ◽  
Regan Shane Solomons ◽  
Carl Lombard ◽  
Andrew Redfern ◽  
Anne-Marie Du Plessis

Abstract Introduction A computed tomography (CT) brain scan is an often-utilised emergency department imaging modality to detect emergent intra-cranial pathology in a child with a first seizure. Identifying children at low risk of having a clinically significant intra-cranial abnormality could prevent unnecessary radiation exposure and contrast/sedation-related risks. Objectives To identify clinical variables which could predict clinically significant CT brain abnormalities and use recursive partitioning analysis to define a low-risk group of children in whom emergent CT brain can be deferred. Methods Retrospective cross-sectional review of 468 children who underwent emergent CT brain after presenting to a low- and middle-income paediatric emergency department following first seizure. Results In total 133/468 (28.4%) of CT brain scans had clinically significant abnormalities. Failure to return to neurological baseline and focal neurological deficit persisting >36 h had statistical significance in a multiple regression analysis. Recursive partitioning analysis, applied to a subgroup without suspected tuberculous meningitis (n = 414), classified 153 children aged between 6 months and 5 years, who had a normal neurological baseline, had returned to baseline post-seizure, and were not in status epilepticus, as non-clinically significant scans and 98% were correctly classified. Conclusion Our study re-inforces the American Academy of Neurology recommendation that children with persistent post-ictal abnormal neurological status and/or post-ictal focal deficit be prioritised for emergent CT brain. Having excluded children with suspected tuberculous meningitis, the remaining subgroup aged 6 months to 5 years presenting with a non-status first seizure, normal neurological baseline and return to baseline post-seizure, are at very low risk of having a clinically significant CT brain abnormality.

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e242370
Author(s):  
Jiodany Perez ◽  
Stefani Sorensen ◽  
Michael Rosselli

Prompt recognition and treatment of septic arthritis are crucial to prevent significant morbidity and mortality in affected patients. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, anchoring bias may make an already challenging diagnosis like septic arthritis more difficult to diagnose quickly and efficiently. Musculoskeletal (MSK) point of care ultrasonography (POCUS) is an imaging modality that can be used to quickly and efficiently obtain objective findings that may help a clinician establish the diagnosis of septic arthritis. We report a case where MSK POCUS was a key element in establishing the diagnosis of glenohumeral joint septic arthritis and subdeltoid septic bursitis for a patient that presented to the emergency department with a fever during the era of the COVID-19 pandemic.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e037341
Author(s):  
Timothy E Dribin ◽  
Kenneth A Michelson ◽  
David Vyles ◽  
Mark I Neuman ◽  
David C Brousseau ◽  
...  

IntroductionThere remain significant knowledge gaps about the management and outcomes of children with anaphylaxis. These gaps have led to practice variation regarding decisions to hospitalise children and length of observation periods following treatment with epinephrine. The objectives of this multicentre study are to (1) determine the prevalence of and risk factors for severe, persistent, refractory and biphasic anaphylaxis, as well as persistent and biphasic non-anaphylactic reactions; (2) derive and validate prediction models for emergency department (ED) discharge; and (3) determine data-driven lengths of ED and inpatient observation prior to discharge to home based on initial reaction severity.Methods and analysisThe study is being conducted through the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee (PEMCRC). Children 6 months to less than 18 years of age presenting to 30 participating EDs for anaphylaxis from October 2015 to December 2019 will be eligible. The primary outcomes for each objective are (1) severe, persistent, refractory or biphasic anaphylaxis, as well as persistent or biphasic non-anaphylactic reactions; (2) safe ED discharge, defined as no receipt of acute anaphylaxis medications or hypotension beyond 4 hours from first administered dose of epinephrine; and (3) time from first to last administered dose of epinephrine and vasopressor cessation. Analyses for each objective include (1) descriptive statistics to estimate prevalence and generalised estimating equations that will be used to investigate risk factors for anaphylaxis outcomes, (2) least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and binary recursive partitioning to derive and validate prediction models of children who may be candidates for safe ED discharge, and (3) Kaplan-Meier analyses to assess timing from first to last epinephrine doses and vasopressor cessation based on initial reaction severity.Ethics and disseminationAll sites will obtain institutional review board approval; results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated via traditional and social media, blogs and online education platforms.


2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-136.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Chen ◽  
Richelle J. Cooper ◽  
Ana Lopez-O'Sullivan ◽  
David L. Schriger

Author(s):  
Paul I. Musey ◽  
Fernanda Bellolio ◽  
Suneel Upadhye ◽  
Anna Marie Chang ◽  
Deborah B. Diercks ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document