Comparison of Hot-Water Spray and Immersion Treatments for Control of Postharvest Decay of Papaya

Plant Disease ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 436 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Couey
Author(s):  
Kourtney A. Daniels ◽  
Katherine Modrow ◽  
Wesley N. Osburn ◽  
Thomas Matt Taylor

Water use for antimicrobial intervention application for beef harvest has come under increased scrutiny in recent years in an effort to enhance water conservation during beef harvest and fabrication. This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of beef safety interventions for reducing surrogates of the Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on beef cuts while lowering intervention-purposed water use for a Small or Very Small beef establishment. Beef briskets, shoulder/clods, and rounds were inoculated with a gelatin-based slurry containing 6.8±0.3 log CFU/g non-pathogenic E. coli . After 30 min of attachment, inoculated cuts were treated by: conventional lactic acid spray (LA; 2.5%, 55°C), lactic acid spray delivered by an electrostatic spray handheld wand (ESS; 2.5%, 55°C), hot water spray (HW; 82°C), recycled hot water spray (RW; 82°C) wherein previously applied hot water was collected, thermally pasteurized to 82°C, or left untreated (CON). 100 mL of each treatment was sprayed onto marked surfaces of inoculated cuts, after which surviving surrogate E. coli were enumerated. LA and ESS treatments produced greater reductions (1.0-1.1 log CFU/300 cm 2 ) versus hot water interventions (0.3-0.5 log CFU/300 cm 2 ) ( p =<0.0001). Recycling of water reduced water losses by no less than 45% on RW-treated beef cuts. Low water beef safety interventions offer Small and Very Small inspected beef establishments opportunities to incrementally reduce water use during intervention application, but not necessarily without loss of pathogen reduction efficacy.


Plant Disease ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 1405-1409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis A. Margosan ◽  
Joseph L. Smilanick ◽  
Gilbert F. Simmons ◽  
Delmer J. Henson

Spores of Monilinia fructicola or Rhizopus stolonifer were immersed in water or 10% ethanol (EtOH) for 1, 2, 4, or 8 min at temperatures of 46 or 50°C to determine exposure times that would produce 95% lethality (LT95). EtOH reduced the LT95 by about 90%. Peaches and nectarines infected with M. fructicola were immersed in hot water alone or with EtOH to control decay. EtOH significantly increased the control of brown rot compared to water alone. Immersion of fruit in water at 46 or 50°C for 2.5 min reduced the incidence of decayed fruit from 82.8% to 59.3 and 38.8%, respectively. Immersion of fruit in 10% ethanol at 46 or 50°C for 2.5 min further reduced decay to 33.8 and 24.5%, respectively. Decay after triforine (1,000 μg ml-1) treatment was 32.8%. Two treatments, 10% EtOH at 50°C for 2.5 min and 20% EtOH at 46°C for 1.25 min, were selected for extensive evaluation. The flesh of EtOH-treated fruit was significantly firmer, approximately 4.4 N force, than that of control fruit among seven of nine cultivars evaluated. No other factor evaluated was significantly influenced by heated EtOH treatments. The EtOH content of fruit treated with 10 or 20% EtOH was approximately 520 and 100 μg g-1 1 day and 14 days after treatment, respectively.


Author(s):  
Sean Comeau ◽  
Richard Ianniello ◽  
Wai Wong ◽  
Shawn Gerstenberger

2011 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 1684-1691 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. E. MARTÍNEZ-GONZÁLES ◽  
L. MARTÍNEZ-CHÁVEZ ◽  
C. MARTÍNEZ-CÁRDENAS ◽  
A. CASTILLO

The objectives of this study were to compare the effectiveness of various washing treatments for reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella sp., and Listeria monocytogenes populations on orange surfaces and to measure the effect of some of these treatments in preventing the transfer of pathogens during juice extraction. Orange surfaces inoculated with L. monocytogenes or a mixture of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium were washed by water spray and then sprayed with or dipped in water at 80°C for 1 min, 70% ethanol for 15, 30, or 45 s or 1, 2, or 4 min, 2 or 4% lactic acid solution at 55°C for 15, 30, or 45 s or 1, 2, or 4 min, or 200 mg/liter hypochlorite at pH 6.5 or 10 for 15 s. The surviving populations of these pathogens on the oranges were enumerated after each treatment. In a further stage, the ability of these pathogens to be transferred to the juice during extraction was tested. Juice was obtained from inoculated oranges that were subjected to selected treatments using chlorine, lactic acid, ethanol, and hot water as described above, and then bacterial counts in orange juice were determined. The application of these treatments reduced the populations of pathogens on orange surfaces by 1.9 to >4.9 log, 1.9 to >4.6 log, and 1.4 to 3.1 log cycles for E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, and L. monocytogenes, respectively. The treatments using hot water or lactic acid showed greater reductions than other treatments. The time, antimicrobial concentration, and form of application affected the bacterial reduction. All treatments resulted in undetectable counts in the juice. Nevertheless, pathogens were recovered by the enrichment-plating method. Treatment of oranges before juice extraction may reduce the risk associated with consuming orange juice.


2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomislav Jemric ◽  
Dario Ivic ◽  
Goran Fruk ◽  
Helena Skutin Matijas ◽  
Bogdan Cvjetkovic ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document