scholarly journals First Report of Bacterial Spot of Tomato Caused by Xanthomonas perforans in Mississippi

Plant Disease ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-147
Author(s):  
P. Abrahamian ◽  
J. M. Klein ◽  
J. B. Jones ◽  
G. E. Vallad ◽  
R. A. Melanson
2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 1097-1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujan Timilsina ◽  
Peter Abrahamian ◽  
Neha Potnis ◽  
Gerald V. Minsavage ◽  
Frank F. White ◽  
...  

Bacterial disease management is a challenge for modern agriculture due to rapid changes in pathogen populations. Genome sequences for hosts and pathogens provide detailed information that facilitates effector-based breeding strategies. Tomato genotypes have gene-for-gene resistance to the bacterial spot pathogen Xanthomonas perforans. The bacterial spot populations in Florida shifted from tomato race 3 to 4, such that the corresponding tomato resistance gene no longer recognizes the effector protein AvrXv3. Genome sequencing showed variation in effector profiles among race 4 strains collected in 2006 and 2012 and compared with a race 3 strain collected in 1991. We examined variation in putative targets of resistance among Florida strains of X. perforans collected from 1991 to 2006. Consistent with race change, avrXv3 was present in race 3 strains but nonfunctional in race 4 strains due to multiple independent mutations. Effectors xopJ4 and avrBs2 were unchanged in all strains. The effector avrBsT was absent in race 3 strains collected in the 1990s but present in race 3 strains collected in 2006 and nearly all race 4 strains. These changes in effector profiles suggest that xopJ4 and avrBsT are currently the best targets for resistance breeding against bacterial spot in tomato.


2009 ◽  
Vol 99 (9) ◽  
pp. 1037-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Robbins ◽  
Audrey Darrigues ◽  
Sung-Chur Sim ◽  
Mohammed Abu Taher Masud ◽  
David M. Francis

Bacterial spot of tomato is caused by four species of Xanthomonas. The accession PI 128216 (Solanum pimpinellifolium) displays a hypersensitive reaction (HR) to race T3 strains (predominately Xanthomonas perforans). We developed an inbred backcross (IBC) population (BC2S5, 178 families) derived from PI 128216 and OH88119 (S. lycopersicum) as the susceptible recurrent parent for simultaneous introgression and genetic analysis of the HR response. These IBC families were evaluated in the greenhouse for HR to race T3 strain Xcv761. The IBC population was genotyped with molecular markers distributed throughout the genome in order to identify candidate loci conferring resistance. We treated the IBC population as a hypothesis forming generation to guide validation in subsequent crosses. Nonparametric analysis identified an association between HR and markers clustered on chromosome 11 (P < 0.05 to 0.0001) and chromosome 6 (0.04 > P > 0.002). Further analysis of the IBC population suggested that markers on chromosome 6 and 11 failed to assort independently, a phenomenon known as gametic phase disequilibrium. Therefore, to validate marker-trait linkages, resistant IBC plants were crossed with OH88119 and BC3F2 progeny were evaluated for HR in the greenhouse. In these subsequent populations, the HR response was associated with the chromosome 11 markers (P < 0.0002) but not with the markers on chromosome 6 (P > 0.25). Independent F2 families were developed by crossing resistant IBC lines to OH8245, OH88119, and OH7530. These populations were genotyped, organized into classes based on chromosome 11 markers, and evaluated for resistance in the field. The PI 128216 locus on chromosome 11 provided resistance that was dependent on gene dosage and genetic background. These results define a single locus, Rx-4, from PI 128216, which provides resistance to bacterial spot race T3, has additive gene action, and is located on chromosome 11.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 4070
Author(s):  
Rui Shi ◽  
Dilip R. Panthee

Bacterial spot (BS) is one of the most devastating foliar bacterial diseases of tomato and is caused by multiple species of Xanthomonas. We performed the RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis of three tomato lines with different levels of resistance to Xanthomonas perforans race T4 to study the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and transcript-based sequence variations. Analysis between inoculated and control samples revealed that resistant genotype Solanum pimpinellifolium accession PI 270443 had more DEGs (834), followed by susceptible genotype tomato (S. lycopersicum L) breeding line NC 714 (373), and intermediate genotype tomato breeding line NC 1CELBR (154). Gene ontology (GO) terms revealed that more GO terms (51) were enriched for upregulated DEGs in the resistant genotype PI 270443, and more downregulated DEGs (67) were enriched in the susceptible genotype NC 714. DEGs in the biotic stress pathway showed more upregulated biotic stress pathway DEGs (67) for PI 270443 compared to more downregulated DEGs (125) for the susceptible NC 714 genotype. Resistant genotype PI 270443 has three upregulated DEGs for pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, and susceptible genotype NC 714 has one downregulated R gene. Sequence variations called from RNA-Seq reads against the reference genome of susceptible Heinz 1706 showed that chr11, which has multiple reported resistance quantitative trait loci (QTLs) to BS race T4, is identical between two resistant lines, PI 270443 and NC 1CELBR, suggesting that these two lines share the same resistance QTLs on this chromosome. Several loci for PR resistance proteins with sequence variation between the resistant and susceptible tomato lines were near the known Rx4 resistance gene on chr11, and additional biotic stress associated DEGs near to the known Rx4 resistance gene were also identified from the susceptible NC 714 line.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Shi ◽  
Dilip R. Panthee

AbstractBacterial spot (BS) is one of the most devastating foliar bacterial diseases of tomato caused by multiple species of Xanthomonas. We performed the RNA-Seq analysis of three tomato lines with different level of resistance to Xanthomonas perforans race T4 to study the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and transcript-based sequence variations.Analysis between inoculated and control samples revealed that resistant line PI 270443 had more DEGs (834), followed by susceptible line NC 714 (373), and intermediate line NC 1CELBR (154). Gene functional analysis based on Gene Ontology (GO) terms revealed that more GO terms (51) were enriched for up-regulated DEGs in the resistant line PI 270443, and more down-regulated DEGs (67) were enriched in the susceptible line NC 714. The specific analysis for DEGs in biotic stress pathway using MapMan software showed more up-regulated biotic stress pathway DEGs (67) for PI 270443 compared to more down-regulated DEGs (125) for susceptible NC 714 line. One interesting feature was that resistant PI 270443 has three up-regulated DEGs for PR-protein, and susceptible line NC 714 has one down-regulated R gene, which is disease-related.Analysis of sequence variations called from RNA-Seq reads against the reference genome of susceptible Heinz 1706 showed that chr11 which has multiple reported resistance QTLs to BS race T4 is identical between two resistant lines, PI 270443 and NC 1CELBR, suggesting that these two lines share the same resistance QTLs on this chromosome. Several loci for PR-resistance proteins with sequence variation between the resistant and susceptible tomato lines were identified near the known Rx4 resistance gene on chr11. These findings may be useful for further molecular breeding of tomato.


Plant Disease ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 96 (11) ◽  
pp. 1690-1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Ibrahim ◽  
M. Al-Saleh

In the summer of 2009 and 2010, 18 sweet pepper fruit with blister-like, raised, rough lesions were collected from four greenhouses (total of 0.1 ha) in the Al-Kharj region of Saudi Arabia. All samples were collected from commercial crops of the sweet pepper cv. California Wonder. Disease incidence was ≤5%. Isolations were made from all diseased fruits. A small piece (3 mm2) of symptomatic tissue from pepper fruit was placed in a sterile mortar and macerated in sterile distilled water with a pestle. A loopful of bacterial suspension from each sample was streaked onto Tween B agar medium (3). Plates were incubated at 28°C for 48 h. Single yellow, circular, butyrous, shiny colonies were picked from the plates and transferred to nutrient agar plates containing 5% D+ glucose agar (NGA). Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria were consistently isolated from the fruit and 10 of the isolates were identified as Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria on the basis of morphological, physiological, and biochemical tests (1,2). The isolates were oxidase positive and levan negative, arginine-dihydrolase positive, and did not macerate potato discs. The isolates were also non-fluorescent, grew at 37 and 4°C but not at 40°C, did not liquefy gelatine or starch, but did produce H2S. The identity of the 10 bacterial strains was confirmed by PCR assay using primers RST65 and RST69 (4). Four-week old pepper plants (cv. California Wonder) were inoculated by spraying five potted plants with each isolate using a bacterial suspension (108 CFU/ml). Sterile distilled water was sprayed on an additional five plants as a negative control treatment. The bacterial isolates caused necrotic lesions, each with a yellow halo, on leaves of inoculated plants. Bacteria reisolated from the necrotic lesions using the technique previously described were identical to the original strains according to the morphological, cultural, and biochemical tests described above. Negative control plants inoculated with sterile distilled water did not show symptoms and no bacterial colonies were recovered from them. To our knowledge, this is the first report of bacterial spot on pepper fruits in Saudi Arabia. References: (2) R. F. Bradbury. Genus II Xanthomonas Dowson 1939. In: Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol. 1, Krieg, R., Holt, J. G. (Eds.), Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, MD, 1987. (3) R. A. Lelliott and D. E. Stead. Methods for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Diseases of Plants. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK. (1) R. G. McGuire et al. Plant Dis 70:887, 1986. (4) A. Obradovic et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 110:285, 2004.


Author(s):  
Peter Abrahamian ◽  
Jeannie M. Klein-Gordon ◽  
Jeffrey B. Jones ◽  
Gary E. Vallad

Plant Disease ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 95 (12) ◽  
pp. 1584-1584 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Ma ◽  
M. L. Lewis Ivey ◽  
S. A. Miller

In 2009 and 2010, outbreaks of bacterial spot characterized by significant fruit spotting occurred in at least 2,000 ha of commercial processing tomatoes in northwest Ohio and southeast Michigan. Losses were estimated at $7.8 million. Diseased fruit and foliage were collected from 32 Ohio and Michigan fields in 2010. Excised lesions from fruit and leaves were dipped briefly in 70% ethanol, air dried, and chopped into pieces in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (KPB), pH 7.4. Ten-fold serial dilutions in KPB were plated on yeast dextrose carbonate agar medium and 83 yellow mucoid colonies were purified. All isolates were gram negative and induced a hypersensitive response in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants 24 h after inoculation with a 108 CFU/ml bacterial suspension in water. All 83 isolates were identified as Xanthomonas spp. using genus-specific primers RST65/69 (2). Of these, 11 were identified as X. euvesicatoria and 8 as X. perforans using the species-specific primers RST27/28 (1) and JJ19/22 (5′-AACCCAACTAATTTCCCTC-3′ and 5′-AACGAGATTTGTTACGAACC-3′; J. B. Jones, personal communication), respectively. DNA fingerprint profiles of 62 of the 64 remaining strains generated using BOX-PCR assays (4) were identical to the profile of X. gardneri type strain XCGA2. The DNA profiles of 2 of the 64 Xanthomonas strains did not resemble those of any reference strains. The 16S rDNA and ITS1 genes from two representative strains (SM174-10 and SM230-10) were PCR amplified, direct sequenced, and aligned using nBLAST with the same gene region from XCGA2 (GenBank Accession No. AF123093). Strains SM174-10 and SM230-10 differed from XCGA2 by 2 bp (99% nucleotide similarity). Pathogenicity tests were performed twice on 6-week-old tomato seedlings (cv. Peto 696). Three tomato seedlings were sprayed until runoff with strain SM174-10 (~108 CFU/ml), three seedlings were sprayed similarly with water (control treatment), and all six plants were grown under high relative humidity (24 s of mist per 12 min) at day/night temperatures of 29/23°C for 15 days. Seedlings inoculated with SM174-10 exhibited water-soaked lesions and chlorosis on the foliage, similar to field symptoms, within 14 days. Seedlings sprayed with water did not develop symptoms. Isolates cultured as described above from all three pathogen-inoculated seedlings were similar in morphology to strain SM174-10; no cultures were recovered from water-inoculated plants. The BOX-PCR fingerprint profile of a representative reisolated colony was identical to that of SM174-10. Although bacterial spot of tomato is a common disease in Ohio and Michigan, to our knowledge this is the first report of X. gardneri infecting tomatoes in these states and provides evidence that there may have been a shift in the primary causal agent of bacterial spot from X. euvesicatoria (3) to X. gardneri. References: (1) H. Bouzar et al. Phytopathology 84:39, 1994. (2) A. Obradovic et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 11:285, 2004. (3) F. Sahin. Ph.D. Diss. The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1997. (4) D. J. Versalovic et al. Methods Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:25, 1994.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document